Citizens for the Constitution;
27 March, 2013
The best DEFENSE is a good OFFENSE!
Instead
of defending your position on the DEFENSE of the Constitution, here are
some ideas on how to go on the OFFENSE against those who would support
and defend ‘the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people’ (© 2012 Clint Eastwood)
FAQs: Frequently Asked Questions
Vs.
FUQs: Frequently Unasked Questions
A. FUQ for any U.S. Citizen:
If
I put your Social Security number through E-Verify, The U.S. Government
program for determining one’s eligibility to even be employed in the
United States, do you think you would pass or qualify?
What
do you think should be done to someone currently occupying a very high
Office in the U.S. Government who self-publishes a stolen SS#
042-68-4425 that fails E-Verify, and therefore would be ineligible for
employment in the United States?
Would you call for their arrest and removal from Office, and, if not, why not?
B. FUQ for anyone who would call someone a ‘Birther’:
I
gather from your willingness to call Article II Constitutionalists -
‘Birthers’ - that you also must have reached the conclusion that using a
forged Certificate of Birth for identity purposes for employment in
high Office would not make one guilty of Mispersonization of Identity – a
felony punishable by up to 15 years in prison.
Knowing this to be true about the person now occupying the Office of President, would you call for their arrest and removal from Office, and, if not, why not?
Knowing this to be true about the person now occupying the Office of President, would you call for their arrest and removal from Office, and, if not, why not?
C. FUQ for anyone who asks why we should be concerned about Obama’s forged Selective Service Registration:
I
am sure you are aware that in 1980, all male U.S. Citizens were
required to register for the draft, and that failure to do so would make
one forever INELIGIBLE for employment with the U.S. Government, to
include the Office of President – but Foreign Exchange Students were
exempt from this requirement, although also making them ineligible for
the Office of President.
Did
you register for the draft, or did you serve and take an oath to uphold
and defend the Constitution, or were you exempt – from the requirement
and therefore ineligible for the Office?
What
do you think should be done to someone in a very high Office in the
U.S. Government who submits a forged Selective Service Registration form
to try to convince a lap-dog media and Congress, and a sheep-like
public that he was not a Foreign Exchange Student?
Knowing
this to be true about the person now occupying the Office of President,
would you call for their arrest and removal from Office, and, if not, why not?
D. FUQ for anyone and everyone you meet – worldwide:
1. If
you were paid on a binding contract with a bad check (a forgery) and
you reported the ‘passer-of-bad-paper’ to the Police/Sheriff, what would
you say or do if the Sheriff said “I’m not accusing the person who
defrauded you by passing the bad paper of any crime, but I’ll be raising
money to pay for my posse to go after the printing press operator who
made the ‘checks’”?
Knowing that the ‘passer-of-bad-papers’ was unlawfully occupying the Office of President of the United States, would you:
Knowing that the ‘passer-of-bad-papers’ was unlawfully occupying the Office of President of the United States, would you:
a. Demand that the Sheriff file formal charges with Congress against the ‘passer-of-forged-documents?, and
b. Refuse to help fund his efforts to search for the printing-press operator until he did so?
… and, if not, why not?
2. ‘Who
(or what) has the power to make the issue of Obama’s INELIGIBILITY and
acts of TREASON not fit for discussion, only derision … and to turn
otherwise intelligent people into blithering idiots?’
When
we start receiving reasonable and intelligent answers to these simple
questions of our elected representatives, the Media and the Becks, the
Hannitys, the Levins, the van Susterens, the Judge Napolitanos, the
Cavutos, the Palins, the Rubios, the Cruzes, and our religious leaders,
then perhaps we can get on with the business of restoring our
Constitutional Republic.
Until
then, keep asking the FUQs instead of the repeatedly asked and
meaningless FAQs of why would the Congress, SCOTUS, and the Media
continue to cover for the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people!
He can be reached at: NBTurner@RoadRunner.com
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.