Sunday, August 9, 2009
Obama's Afraid of American Justice- The Lawyer Who Retreats From Our Courts
I would expect the same intense effort to remove any ineligible POTUS, this isn't about Obama the black man. It's about Obama the non NBC President.
I have seen where the left has mentioned past candidates who ran for the office of POTUS whom they say were non NBC.
Goldwater for one is mentioned, in that he was born in the Territory of Arizona.
As Berg has found out the SCOTUS allows ineligible candidates to run for president as a 1st amendment right. If the Republican Party wanted to waste their efforts on Goldwater in 1964 with the afore knowledge he had blemishes, or alleged blemishes, that could disqualify him, so be it. If those blemishes were true it would not justify his admission to the Oval office solely based upon election results had he won. None of the examples provided by Obamaists were ever elected, so to me that is what is called a moot point. How does comparing Obama's position as a de facto President to the moot point of past non winning Canidates even makes a logical argument?
I suppose when you don't have the truth on your side, a grasping for straws defense is all that's left.
Steve
I have seen where the left has mentioned past candidates who ran for the office of POTUS whom they say were non NBC.
Goldwater for one is mentioned, in that he was born in the Territory of Arizona.
As Berg has found out the SCOTUS allows ineligible candidates to run for president as a 1st amendment right. If the Republican Party wanted to waste their efforts on Goldwater in 1964 with the afore knowledge he had blemishes, or alleged blemishes, that could disqualify him, so be it. If those blemishes were true it would not justify his admission to the Oval office solely based upon election results had he won. None of the examples provided by Obamaists were ever elected, so to me that is what is called a moot point. How does comparing Obama's position as a de facto President to the moot point of past non winning Canidates even makes a logical argument?
I suppose when you don't have the truth on your side, a grasping for straws defense is all that's left.
Steve
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)






An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.