Monday, August 31, 2009

IF NO ONE IN CONGRESS WILL CHALLENGE THE USURPER...THEN THEY HAVE VIOLATED THEIR OATH ANDF MUST BE REPLACED!!!!!!!

Every member of the Legislature, the Executive, and the Judiciary swears allegiance to the Constitution, and every act they do is under the Authority Granted by the Constitution.

Notwithstanding the fact that the CRS (Congressional Research Services), a government sponsored and taxpayer funded ‘think-tank’ for Congress told everyone in Congress that Mr. Soetoro/Obama met the Article II ‘natural-born’ requirements for President, and;

Given the fact that all 535 members of Congress were informed by the hundreds of thousands of emails, letters, and internet websites that:

1. One of California’s electors for the DNC ‘ticket’ had been dead for 6 years, but they counted her vote anyway;

2. There were demands from the people even before the DNC nominated Mr. Soetoro/Obama to be on the ballot in all 50 states that he (and they) prove that he was eligible per Article II, Section 8 of the Constitution;

3. It is Public and Common Knowledge that to be ‘natural-born’, BOTH parents (if married) must be US. Citizens, and we know that his father, from their divorce papers, was not;

Therefore, given the foregoing, and the fact that removing the Usurper would immediately stop the Obamination of the Socialized Drug Care bill they are trying to ram down our throats, my two questions are:


1. Why didn’t you, or any of the other 535 members of Congress, OBJECT to the counting of electoral votes for Mr. Soetoro/Obama on January 8th, 2009 – until he could PROVE that he was Constitutionally eligible?,

and;

2. Why won’t you take action NOW to demand PROOF, like active members of the Military are now doing, that Mr. Soetoro/Obama is able to issue anything other than unlawful orders, which they are sworn not to obey, lest you, along with all members of Congress be charged with misprision* of Treason?

* Misprision: Neglect in preventing or reporting a felony or treason by one not an accessory, but in a lawful position to act on or prevent it.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.