Musings

Here's one I've been meaning to comment on for a few weeks now.

Single Ply Toilet Paper--- Some Obama "green" genius (Cass Sunnstein this sounds just like your work, so for the sake of not researching it, I'll assume it was you, I'm certain there are things we DON'T know about yet, so just consider this a pre payment on a well deserved kick in the ass, if this wasn't your idea, you nutty deweeb.) Wow what I do to set the table.

Okay single ply toilet paper-There is a suggestion in the Obama Regime, to restrict toilet paper to single ply. We are told to think of the trees we would save. Forget comfort, that's just a decadent capitalistic luxury of post Lenin days. OKIE DOKIE.

Me I'm a single ply kind of guy anyway, butt,some of you are not.. A Kenyan wouldn't have an appreciation for this, butt,(yet again) Americans are known for their inherent ingenuity, Those of us non single plyers will simply fold. Once, twice, thrice, nae, dare I say, a fourth or more.

Sunnstein answers directly to butt one person, to Obama, so it follows when Cassidy, heads for the throne room, only one person has the authority, the dooty, to verify Cass is butt a single plyer.

The rest of us, when the TP police show up, then maybe we'll say "ENUF ALREADY !!!!"



On the employment front--- As the all intrusive "Government Knows Best" demi-god who sets the bar on executive salary limits, why hasn't the "World's Smartest Man" thought of this?---

Say you have 2 households with two earners each. They all work for the same local company. The company must cut half of its work force. These 4 workers all do the same work, in an acceptable manner.

The company in an unthinking callus capitalistic moment gives both pink slips to the Jones household. The Smith household keeps both jobs. Should the company be required to take into consideration this inequitable act, when deciding who must go and who gets to stay.

Also consider the single people out there, again one household has 2 workers, the single household has of course 1 worker. Shouldn't that be a consideration. I do think some government regulation is needed by the USA during strong recessionary times but more on the State regulatory level not Federal.


Swine Flu-H1N1

To show the degree of government mistrust 39% in August said they would not take the H1N1 flu shot, in September that number has grown to 50%.

Government Efficiency-Why Rush?

Our normal flu season runs November to March, and each year 35,000 die from getting the flu.

Our government is slowlyyyyy making the question of whether or not to take the H1N1 shot a moot point.

Here we are 15 days away from November, and only a portion of the vaccine is actually in the hands of health workers. I mean, it's not like we haven't been aware of Swine Flu since, at the minimum, last April. Yet only 40 million doses are "supposed" to given out by the end of October.(why not 305 million?) By the end of April the last of the 20 million dose lots will be handed out. Some children are required to get 2 doses. At the very minimum 100 million of us are going to have to go without, suits me fine, I wasn't planning on taking it anyway. One other thing, if you ladies out there observe a cowardly male in line for his shot today or in the future, ask him if his great grandfather also stole a seat in the lifeboat on the Titanic. Women and Children first you buttheads.

Ahhhh Chuuu! If we were so threatened though by such a potentially deadly virus isn't waiting until the last minute cutting it a little thin? After all we do have the "World's Smartest Man" running things. All we have been talking about since August is Health Care................Well??..............How About It B.O...................Does H1N1 qualify as an important Health Care issue??

I guess B.O. would rather talk about the hypotheticals of insurance, rather than performing the reality of protecting,the citizens from an "actual" threat.

I would say The Great Leader's priorities are somewhat skewed here.

Try Using some Common Sense Jerk!!


Just thinking......


Steve