This is what Obama and Marxists in power are counting on in 2010...rig the system!

Election irregularities in NY-23rd too great to be ignored

Posted on November 27th, 2009 by David-Crockett

The Post & Email published

ST. LAWRENCE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS CERTIFIES NEGATIVE NUMBERS
by John Charlton

(Nov. 27, 2009) — The news out of New York State bodes ill for the survival of the American Republic. The widespread fraud involving voting tallies the night of the Election has given way to reports of election-machine tampering via a virus, consistently anti-Hoffman biased tallies, and other such irregularities that make one thing certain: there was no democratic election in the New York 23rd Congressional District. There was an un-democratic selection aided and abetted by Election Officials and workers who are so sloppy with their mathematics and ethics and the observance of the law, that in truth no number in the results to-be-certified remains undoubtable.

The latest news comes from St. Lawrence County, the northernmost in the district, lying along the St. Lawrence River and the international border with Canada. On Tuesday, Nov. 24th, the Country Board of Elections has certified election results in several precincts in which — get this — there are more votes counted for candidates than ballots cast!

Talk about a new twist on “stuffing the ballot box”!

Writing for the Gouverneur Times, Dr. Richard Hayes Philips, whom the paper describes as,

. . . one of the leading election fraud investigators in the United States. His book on the 2004 Ohio election, Witness to a Crime: A Citizens’ Audit of an American Election, based on examination of some 30,000 photographs of actual ballots, poll books, and other election records.

explains in detail how the results certified in St. Lawrence country are mathematically impossible, even though the ytally up. Impossible because they clearly indicate that the voting machines tallied more votes than the paper ballots which went into them.

For six election districts in St. Lawrence County (the 2nd, 4th, 6th, and 7th districts in Canton, the 14th district in Massena, and the 2nd district in Oswegatchie) negative numbers appear in the column for “blank” ballots, known in other states as “undervotes.”

Blank vote counts are ballots in which the voter did not choose any candidate in a given election and are determined by subtracting the total number of votes cast for the candidates from the number of voters who completed ballots. The remaining number would be those voters who didn’t cast a vote for that election.

In Canton’s 7th district, the certified results show a total of 148 ballots cast. The results of those votes were counted as 88 votes for Owens, 11 votes for Scozzafava, and 80 votes for Hoffman. The problem is that these numbers add up to 179 votes counted for the candidates, and there were only 148 ballots cast; St. Lawrence County certified these numbers to the state as accurate with the number of ‘blank’ ballots reported as -31.

Since these results have been certified, it is evident that the Election Board has consented to fraud, and is no longer legally incupable of prosecution for use of their authority under color of law to deprive the civil rights of voters in the said districts.

This is so, because there can be no excuse in accepting that machines tallied more votes than ballots cast, unless you consent to the very fact that the machines are recording a tally which ostensibly never occurred, and thus in accepting such a tally they are certifying the candidates’ votes not as the people voted, but as the machines voted. And that is not an election, it’s a selection. Whoever is responsible with tampering with the machines is involved in voter fraud, since they are attempting to make the vote appear differently than it would be, but the Board in certifying has committed Election Fraud, because it is giving its authority to patently erroneous results.

Dr. Philips entire article deserves reading.

In the comments on the article another noted investigator has given her opinion how such fraudulent results can be achieved. Bev Harris, founder of BlackBoxVoting.org, a “national nonpartisan nonprofit elections watchdog organization,” writes:

So one would expect that IF there was fraud in a New York election that had just converted to software-driven systems, the same “roll back the odometer” tactic might be used with the software.

That doesn’t mean there was fraud. But negative numbers do appear in the voting machine results in some locations. IF there was a rollback of the odometer method employed, the negative numbers would only appear if an insufficient number of voting transactions take place to roll it up into the positive. And that would mean that the negative number locations would only be the tip of the iceberg, in terms of the scale of the problem. Most locations would roll up into positive numbers, erasing the telltale signs. …

And with impossible numbers, NEGATIVE numbers appearing in some NY-23 locations, it raises questions about what precise code was on the machines and memory cards in all New York locations. Technicians were visiting some — but not all — machines to put in a fix, shortly before the election. They fixed something. But not always.

We just don’t know what they fixed. And probably, we never will know. And this is precisely the problem with concealed counting: We just handed ultimate control of our elections to some technician whose name we do not even know.

You can read all of Bev Harris’ commentary in the comment section of the article itself.

St. Lawrence County’s Vote-Discovery in favor of Owens

The Post & Email will now comment on the results that the St. Lawrence County Board of Elections certified, to highlight other anomalies which point to voter fraud and which should have been the basis for the Board to call for a paper recount.

At 3:05 pm on Nov. 6, the unofficial tallies of votes for Congressional Special Election were as follows:

St. Lawrence county is indicated as having tallied the votes in 99% of the precincts. This being the case, you’d expect the final tally to be very close to those numbers, but statistically it is not.

The certified results for the Congressional race give 13, 553 to Owens, 9,231 to Hoffman, and 1,545 to Scozzafava. That means that between Nov. 6 and Nov. 24, election officials found 799 votes for Owens, 527 for Hoffman, and 429 for Scozzafava.

The votes found should be near to 1% of the tally. But 1755 votes found out of a total of 24, 329 is is 7.2% of the vote!

And in a race in which Hoffman quite unexpectedly conceded on the grounds that he trailed by more than 3,000 votes, St. Lawrence County’s discovery of 273 more votes for Owens than for Hoffman meant that without that discovery Hoffman would have “lost” with 546 less votes. But St. Lawrence county is only 1 of the 11 counties, and its voter representation was only 16.54% of the tallies in the election. In other words, if the same rate of vote-discovery occurred elsewhere, there would be nearly 6 times the discrepancy in the vote count, for more than 3000 vote swing, enough to give Hoffman the election, fair and square. Though one cannot make such an extrapolation, because every county has a different voter turnout, it does show that someone in St. Lawrence County did their fair-share of the job to ensure an Owens victory.

If the vote-discovery had nothing to do with human intervention, one would expect that in other races on the same ballot in the same county, that 7.2% of the vote would have also been discovered after Nov. 6th.

15,620 Missing Votes are disturbing

Let’s take a look at each race, considering simply the total votes counted, and comparing this to the total votes in the Congressional race on the same ballot:

For the State Supreme Court race: 39, 969 votes

For the NY-23 Special Election: . . . . 24, 349 votes

For County Coroner: . . . . . . . . . . . . 29, 664 votes

District Attorney: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17, 541 votes

These are the races which all used the same 102 voting machines. Since the entire county voted for each race you’d expect nearly identical numbers, if there were identical interest in the different races. And while that nearly never happens, the Owen-Hoffman-Scozzafava race was surely the most followed in the national and local press.

That 15,620 more votes were cast in the State Supreme Court Race than in the Congressional Race, seems simply unbelievable. That means that nearly 40% of the voters who voted, cast no vote in the Congressional Race! Unbelievable!

You would expect the results to be nearly equal. That means as much as 40% of the votes actually entered were not tallied, or that 40% of the votes in the Supreme Court race were invented, or some kind of an in-between scenario.

Since Hoffman “lost” the election by little more than 3,200 votes, the discrepancy of 15,620 votes in St. Lawrence County is more than noticable. It’s disturbing. Are we to supposed that absentee ballots were cast, in which nearly all of them were solely for candidates in the State Supreme Court race?

Likewise, are we to suppose that 5, 315 more persons in St. Lawrence County are concerned with voting for the County Coroner’s job than for their U.S. Representative in Washington, D.C.. If not, where did those 5K votes go?

-------------------------------

THE ONLY WAY OBAMA AND THE LEFT CAN KEEP CONTROL OF THE GOVERNMENT IS TO PERPETRATE ELECTION FRAUD...THAT'S WHAT THEY DO BEST...HECK WE EVEN HAVE A USURPER IN THE WHITE HOUSE AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THE 2008 FRAUDULENT ELECTION.

OBAMA CANNOT POSSIBLY BE RE-ELECTED IN 2012 UNLESS THE SYSTEM IS 1. RIGGED, 2. AMNESTY FOR ALL THE ILLEGALS or 3. THE COUNTRY IS UNDER MARTIAL LAW. THEN YOU HAVE TO CONSIDER THAT IF THE REPUBLICANS CAN SOMEHOW CONTROL CONGRESS AFTER 2010 (NOT LIKELY BECAUSE OF MORE ELECTION FRAUD)... OBAMA WILL HAVE A LITTLE PAPERWORK PROBLEM...CAN YOU SAY BIRTH CERTIFICATE? OR HOW ABOUT NATURAL BORN CITIZEN?

KEEP YOUR EYES AND EARS OPEN...THIS GOVERNMENT IS SO CORRUPT...THEY WILL TRY ANYTHING!