Why Was Sarah Herlihy Worrying About Article II?
Mitchell Langbert
first published in 2008
Contrairimairi has forwarded a post from Insight Analytical concerning Sarah Herlihy's article that was also discussed in the blog Count us Out. Someone had forwarded Herlihy's article to me and I blogged it on November 29. Herlihy works for the law firm of Kirkland and Ellis out of their Chicago office. The kicker is that Herlihy's article was published in the Kent Law review in 2006 and, notes Count us Out Blogger Creative Ogre:"While digging my way through the Internet last night, I came across the following paper, written by SARAH P. HERLIHY. It’s title: AMENDING THE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN REQUIREMENT: GLOBALIZATION AS THE IMPETUS AND THE OBSTACLE caught my eye, and had to read it…
"I had to ask myself, what would drive any American to want to change a clause in a document that is the very foundation of our government? So, I kept digging, and found that SARAH P. HERLIHY is employed by Kirkland & Ellis LLP
"Noting that this law firm is based in Chicago, the light bulb was shining a little brighter . Upon looking at the firm, and the partners, I found that Bruce I. Ettelson, P.C., is Member of finance committees of U.S. Senators Barack Obama and Richard Durbin.
"In addition, Jack S. Levin, P.C., another partner who, in December 2002 was presented the ” Illinois Venture Capital As sociation’s lifetime achievement award for service to the private equity/venture capital community” presented by Sen. Barack Obama
"So it sure looks like Obama’s people have looked into the matter of “Natural born” as far back as early 2006. What is even more disturbing is that it would appear that they are following the thought of "If the facts do not support the theory, Destroy the facts!”
Looks like the article has been scrubbed???...LINKS not working?
Contact Sarah and ask for a copy! LOL
Fax: +1 312-862-2200
The 2006 paper by Sarah Herlihy:
ReplyDeletehttp://web.archive.org/web/20090102200429/http://lawreview.kentlaw.edu/articles/81-1/Herlihy.pdf
the introduction to the paper is not there. Of course the obots have taken it off, or covered it up, at least made it inaccessible. should have known.
ReplyDeleteread it here: http://www.oilforimmigration.org/facts/?p=4078
ReplyDeletePut the blame where the blame REALLY falls... at the feet of the Republicans. The Republimarxists have been anti-Constitution for many decades. Read my rant at:
ReplyDeletehttp://independentconstitutionalist.blogspot.com/