Saturday, April 30, 2011

Don’t Blink !!

•April 30, 2011 • MY OWN POINT OF VIEW
And here we are……..
A few days after the obama LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE made it’s debut and there’s pandemonium – as would be expected.  But not for the usual reasons.  And not by the usual pandemonium purveyors.

What is working it’s way through the public -  “birthers”, and  the adoring “faithers”, is, well, shock.

I am not surprised, nor shocked.  But I am pissed.  Let me explain it as I see it:  “Birthers” expected obama would never release the thing, and if he did it would be a top-notch fake that only the very best expert could expose.

Adoring “faithers” wanted obama to keep waving his man-bits about and telling everyone one ……… I mean to say is, the obama clingers liked that obama was being crushingly arrogant and insulting the American people he was elected to serve.  They hoped he would never release it.  Ahem, the long form birth certificate that is.
Well, both sides got it in the teeth.  We got a weird image that does things it has no business doing in being layered like an onion.  Even the one I saved on my desktop does crazy stuff when I simply increase the magnification.  I think it’s the first one I’ve ever had behave like that.  The clingers got taken down a notch when their hero dropped his pants after being taunted by Mr. Trump, and they are disillusioned.

I’m betting this did not go well with that crowd at all. 
In fact, it happens that a lot of hold-outs – those who didn’t give a shit about the whole birth certificate thing at all – are suddenly taking notice.  Not by saying; “See, there is the birth certificate, can we move on?”.  The press is trying that – well the ones that aren’t staring up at the sky and whistling softly – but the people who brushed it off as just silly, they are finding themselves very puzzled by the on screen antics of the birth certificate.  They are aware of how these things should look, should behave, and this has them stumped.
So, the experts are saying “layers”, the clingers and MSM are saying ;

“This was created by OCR scanning software……”
Geeks say: “HOW did it CREATE the CLIPPING PATHS?”
“They are Vector Based Objects just as Adobe Illustrator is as OBJECT based application.
Why would any Optical Character Recognition software NEED to be able to create Clipping Paths?”
I have no answer at all for the geeks, but I thank them for coming to the party. (can anyone tell me what in hella vector based object is? no-never mind)  The layers thing?  That has brought a lot of people to the party of “skeptic”.  Many, many thousands of tech savvy people are much bemused by finding an onion where obama’s authentic long form birth certificate should be.  They are sounding alarmed, and some sound pissed!  Welcome aboard I say!!
What else happened?  Well, lets see, oh!  I know!  Some documents were released about obama’s Haaarvard educated faaaather.   Not very complimentary ya know. The press is still looking up at the sky and whistling softly – they are probably suffering severe neck strain right about now.  One or two articles tried desperately to paint it up as Harvard being mean old racists.  Have fun with that.

Now we will get around to why this has me pissed off.
In some of those released documents are mention of Obama Sr. having a wife and son in HI.  OK.  Now we are getting somewhere.  Now we have something that looks more genuine and honest that says Obama Sr. did have a son with a woman he married in Honolulu.  She lived with her parents, he lived……….at a totally different address than the one his is listed at in the HI Polk Directory, and with the University.   ?????  Damn it!  Another anonymity.  Lets put my new little pet anonymity to the side for a moment, and get back to me.

Why am I pissed?  He is using us all.  Whichever side of this fence you are standing behind – you are getting punked.  He puts out a thing that even his supporters are saying looks like a lazy fake.  Like a thing INTENDED to be an obvious fake.  You are all getting that right?
He’s pitting citizen against citizen purposely.  Not republicans against dems – those politicians don’t care about this – he is putting the regular people against each other.  He is pfrucking with his own people just as badly as he is with the people on my side of the debate. 
Since these documents regarding his father do seem to support his being born in Hawaii, why is he playing with you all?  Not to mention ME!  Why go through all the nonsense, and still NOT release something that is simply the same sort of flat printed  paper copy of a long form birth certificate with a lovely clearly visible raised seal that others as recently as March 15 2011 have released?
Should a man who is the President of our United States, this huge country with over 300 million people (probably 400 mil if you toss in the illegals) spend his time and energy PUNKING the populace?  

Well, whatever it was that he released – he was still born a British subject through the man who is named on his birth certificate.  And since when has the definition of a dual citizen ever been the EXACT same as that of a natural born Citizen?
Here is the US State Department’s take:
The concept of dual nationality means that a person is a citizen of two countries at the same time.
click to enlarge
See, it has it’s own definition.  One knows that natural born Citizen can’t mean just any old thing – it must have a very specific definition.
Here is a little snip from The Post & Email, yes, it had occured to me also.  Link to article below.
It would be easy for the many citizen researchers who have worked so hard to unearth anything about Obama, The Mystery Man to start rejoicing in anticipation of the release of more records and assume things are unraveling for Obama. But I would caution my fellow Patriots to be careful. The papers are interesting, painting Obama Sr. as a “slippery character” and a definite womanizer BUT they also list Barack Obama II as being his son in Hawaii.
How convenient is that? And released on the very day his summarized abstract birth certificate that Director Fuddy copied and pasted together from how many source documents? (even taking Obama’s mother’s signature in two pieces, therefore from two documents) and to which Alvin T. Onaka, Ph.D., the state of Hawaii registrar, rubber-stamped his certification. WOW, that’s really something!
So, folks, there you have it.  Turns out he is treating his trusting base just every bit as basely as he is treating everyone else.
PS:  In the newly released docs-only a couple (notes) have mention of a wife and child IN HAWAII.  The others he filled out himself do not.  And he seems to have difficultly remembering if he was born in ’34 or ’36.  And now we have a total of FOUR different Hawaiian addresses for Obama Sr.
AND THIS GREAT SUMMARY CHART that is up on FreeRepublic:

Pant’s On The Ground

•April 27, 2011 • 58 Comments
obama long form birth certificate
edith_pauline_coats 1962 cert with same local registrar as Obama's fake cert
Danae's long form birth certificate issued in Sept. 2010
Danae Sept. 2010 long form birth certificate
obama "FactCheck" COLB
Hawaiian long form birth certificate issued on March 15 2011

You can see the imprinted seal.  This is Susan Nordykes, issued 5-5-1966
Now look at obama’s again:
Why no raised seal? Alvin too busy?
The Booth’s son’s long form birth certificate.  The same doctor “delivered” obama. 
HOLD UP !!!!!    LOOK AT THE HANDWRITING IN THE “DATE FIELD” WHERE THE MOTHERS SIGNED (in the two images below-I placed the pink mark).  – NEARLY IDENTICAL.  Also compare the Dr. signature in this crop below, it is the same Dr. as in the Booth BC above.
Stan Ann DATE signature & close-up of Dr. signature
Nordyke DATE signature
U k L Lee signature on 1962 Hawaiian long form BC

U K L Lee signature on New obama Hawaiian long form BC
Come on, who’s fricken buying the “Africa” thing?   Still, with no raised seal…………….just an auto-stamp  for Alvin O. on there ……….
Now, for what it’s worth, we have this released thingy.  A few questions. 
How could obama ever have legitimately used the name “Barry Soetoro?”  To do so he would have had to be adopted.  If he were adopted, how could he release this?  I’m sure he could have the adoption set aside as it was not the traditional type of adoption, but an adoption because of marriage.  The marriage dissolved, go get the adoption set aside.  Thing is that his original birth record should have  an indication/notation/something showing that history.  This is supposed to be a copy from the original.  Why is the certification number on his COLB different?
The image shown on drudge looks weird – the edge of the page – I have no idea why it would have that appearance.

Anyway, the best thing about this whole reactive action taken by obama is that he has officially proclaimed that obama Sr. is indeed his Daddy.  Now, I know, a lot of you are saying-hey-he already did that, he’s done it all along.  But no, no he has not – for that COLB has issues, and even this long form that was “released” has no raised seal.

This takes the hurdle of the birth certificate away, and proclaims obama once and for all times a Brit by birth.  A dual citizen.  (If a person who is born a man has a gender change operation, it doesn’t change the fact he was born a man, baby!)  Whether this birth certificate is the real deal, or if it’s a concoction, it matters not.  He’s finally gone on record.

He thinks that he has pulled the teeth of the millions of people that question his birth.  He has not.  No one will love him the better for producing this thing. Most of those millions are well aware of his ineligibility to meet the requirements set forth in Article II of our United States Constitution.  
A birth certificate can’t help obama.  It is not a magic shield.  It is too late for this.
Now the real battle begins. 

In Furtherance On Hannity's In The Tank Interpretation Of Natural Born Citizenship

According to Hannity a Natural Born Citizen only has to be born here. How ridiculous.

Let's say a man is born in Anytown, USA but his father is a Chinese citizen and his mother is American. They live here 13 years then move to China. This individual takes out Chinese citizenship, because his father prefers it. Now this person is a dual citizen. The parents divorce and the mother moves back to America.

Their son splits time in America and China, but never revokes his Chinese citizenship by age 18. This individual decides to enroll in an American college, graduates and gets a job and lives here.

War breaks out between the US and North Korea. China sides with the N Koreans and joins the war. This individual receives a notice he must return to China and join the military and the war effort against America.

He finds himself with equal jurisdictional ties and citizenship obligations to both countries. He loves China more however and returns to fight against American Imperialistic Running Dogs.

Some countries do have conscription beyond age 35. Israel for one. What if the example I wrote of, this person was a sitting President age 35, and he gets his draft notice from Beijing to report for military service. Better yet Beijing orders him to sabotage the US war effort from the oval office.

Single Allegiance Hannity. Single Allegiance.

Natural born citizenship entails more than being born on a certain piece of real estate.

Hannity isn't this stupid, he's a sellout, and he is commiting treason against this country for personal gain.


Letter to Sean Hannity – The great great great unAmerican and Traitor

 For the third night in a row, Sean Hannity, you the the great great great American traitor has broached on the Obama ‘birth certificate issue’.
 As a true un-American media mouth-piece that  knows little if anything about the United States Constitution, whereas Hannity repeatedly stated  that the United States Constitution requires you to be born in the United States to be eligible for the Presidency.
 In reality the United States Constitution Under Art 2 sec 1 – The President
 No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

 Where in the above Constitutional requirement, says that one has to be born in the country? It doesn’t. The requirement is a ‘Natural-Born Citizen’.

 Let’s educate Sean Hannity
 Benjamin Franklin’s (a signer of our Constitution) letter to Charles W.F. Dumas, December 1775
“I am much obliged by the kind present you have made us of your edition of Vattel. It came to us in good season, when the circumstances of a rising state make it necessary frequently to consult the Law of Nations. Accordingly, that copy which I kept (after depositing one in our own public library here, and send the other to the College of Massachusetts Bay, as you directed) has been continually in the hands of the members of our congress, now sitting, who are much pleased with your notes and preface, and have entertained a high and just esteem for their author”?
 The Law of Nations – Vattel in Bk 1 Sec 212, states the following.

§ 212. Citizens and natives.

The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.
 The following statement was made by the author of the 14th Amendment.
I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen -Rep. John Bingham, framer of the 14th Amendment, before The US House of Representatives ((Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291, March 9, 1866 )

Or this statement by Supreme Court Chief Justice Waite
The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.
-Chief Justice Waite in Minor v. Happersett (1875)

The 14th Amendment states the following;
1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Born in the United States but ‘JURISDICTION” is required.
Under Jus Soli, the following is written “The Supreme Court’s first holding on the sublect suggested that the court would give a restrictive reading to the phrase, potentially disqualifing significant number of persons born within the physical boundries of the nation. In Elk v. Wilkins 112 U.S. 94, 5 S.CT. 41, 28 L.ED. 643 (1884), the court ruled that native Indians were not U.S. citizens, even if they later severed their ties with their tribes. The words “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” the court held, mean “not merely subjct in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction, and owing them direct and immediate allegiange.” Most Indians could not meet the test. “Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States, members of, and owing immediate allegiance to, one of the Indian Tribes, (an alien through dependent power,) although in a geographical sense born in the United States, are no more ‘born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,’*** then the children of subjects of any foreign government born within the domain of that government ***. Id. at 102.
Baracka Abdallah Husein Obama stated the following on his campaign web-site;
“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children

However, Barack Obama has not proven his claim of being born in the United States. The Obama COLB is not a Birth Certificate. It is, instead, cursory information that a birth occurred. It is superficial, it is not thorough or detailed as the long form that it supports to represent. The fact that the Obama COLB has been proven to be questionable at best and a forgery at the least, and as there are no records per the current Hawaiian Governor backing it up. If there are no records backing up the document, how was the document produced in the first place?

Sean, stop lying to the American people. According to new poll & survey — 91% of Americans doubt Obama is constitutionally eligible! You are only fooling yourself and betraying your country. Learn the facts.
Your failure is the reason that an 18 year Army career LtCol. Sits in Leavenwoth Prision for standing up and demanding Obama prove his eligibility. Learn about Terry Lakin, and you’ll see why you don’t deserve to be in the same room as him. Or Charles Kerchner, Mario Appuzo,  Theresa Cao, Walter Fitzpatrick, and a host of other REAL GREAT AMERICAN PATRIOTS. Shame on you Sean, you should hang your head in disgrace.

A real American that has served this country.


Listen to internet radio with Hagmann and Hagmann Report on Blog Talk Radio



Let's hear from you. How about posting in the comments section, YOUR CAPTION?
A New Yorker article by editor David Remnick gives away the game in the headline, “Trump, Birtherism, And Race-Baiting.”
According to Remnick, the “irrepressible jackass” Trump has inspired idiot America to believe a series of fantasies about Barack Obama: “There is the birther fantasy; the fantasy that Bill Ayers wrote “Dreams from My Father”; the fantasy that the President has some other father, and not Barack Obama, Sr.; the fantasy that Obama got into Harvard Law School with the help of a Saudi prince and the Nation of Islam.” Remnick adds as a Harvard subset the fantasy that Obama is “intellectually incapable.”
“The cynicism of the purveyors of these fantasies,” Remnick continues, “is that they know very well what they are playing at, the prejudices they are fanning.” Bottom line, concludes Remnick, these fantasies “are designed to arouse a fear of the Other, of an African-American man with a white American mother and a black Kenyan father.”
Forgive me for taking this personally, but Remnick considers me one of the purveyors. Trump is at least worthy of his public scorn. I am apparently not. From the perspective of our Ivy-educated, Pulitizer Prize-winner, I and others like me are “the Other,” unmentioned and unmentionable. To set the record straight, let us tackle these “fantasies” in reverse order.View rest of article . . .


Time to Pull The Cloak of Invisibility Off Of Black Conservatives.
*    Posted by Lloyd Marcus
<>  on April 30, 2011 at

CNN traveled with us on Tea Party Express, to approximately 40 rallies
nationwide. I, a black conservative, opened each rally singing my "American
Tea Party Anthem". And yet, not I nor any of the other blacks on our team
were seen in the CNN documentary; thus, causing viewers to conclude the Tea
Party Movement
is a "white thing".

For the most part, the liberal media ignores black conservatives. And when
they do interview one of us, it is from a, "Can you believe this stupid
Uncle Tom," point of view.

Unfortunately, conservative media and most tea party organizers do not seem
to grasp the strategic wisdom in featuring and supporting black

Brothers and sisters, the Left is exploiting Obama's skin color for
everything it is worth. Their guy in the indestructible black coat of armor
is making all of their liberal dreams come true; usurping more power than
any "white" president could imagine in his wildest dreams.

You can't say "no" to Obama. He's black! All opposition is racist. Folks,
the left is fighting to win, working the "black thing" to the hilt. We can
not afford to leave our black weapons of mass influence on the sidelines.

Our economy is an unprecedented disaster. Pundits are saying under "normal
conditions" the president would be fired. However, they believe Obama will
be re-elected. "Normal conditions" means if the president was white. In
other words, pundits believe Obama's black skin is the ultimate trump card
deflating all opposition to his systematic destruction of America.

Patriots, a second Obama term is the end of America as we know it.

Meanwhile, black conservatives are giving it their all, tirelessly fighting
to defeat Obama; for the most part, in anonymity.

We have many great black conservatives on our side. They should be featured
front and center at our rallies, TV shows, radio shows and etc; not for the
sake of black conservatives, but in defense of our Tea Party Movement.

Here's how a black radio talk show host began his interview with me, "If
they (meaning white tea partiers) want to attract black people, the least
credible thing they could do is to stick a black guy out front wearing a
cowboy hat (meaning me)".

I wanted to say, "Screw you and end the interview". But, a still small voice
in my brain said,
"Hang in the there". I boldly espoused conservative principles. His
scheduled 10 minute radio interview with me went for 30 minutes. Remarkably,
every caller into the program agreed with me. Praise god! Folks, we have got
to take our message to the black community.

Also, funding should be targeted to take our Tea Party message to the black
community. Seasoned politicians say nothing gets votes like going to the
people; knocking on doors and showing up at community events.

Obama and his minions including the liberal media continue to lie about the
intentions of the tea party. In a soon to be released book, Obama says the
tea party is motivated by race. It's time we go to the black community and
tell our side of the story, the truth. Let black America know the tea party
has nothing to do with race and everything to do with preserving our
freedom, liberty and culture.

I am trying to launch a mini tour to black colleges titled, "Reach Your
Dreams". The message of my rallies targeted to black youths is, "The best
route to reaching your dreams is conservatism". The rallies will feature
mostly black conservative speakers including a few black conservative
rappers. I will emcee, speak and sing. I need sponsorship.

Two of my buddies, Joe the Plumber and Kevin Jackson have launched their
tour designed to deal with the "race" issue. Please support them folks
financially and with your presence at their events. Again, not for them, but
for America.

Black conservatives should be flying all over the country speaking,
performing and singing at tea party events.

Patriots, please do not think I am whining or asking you to feel sorry for
black conservatives. Heaven forbid, I am not. All I am saying is the Left is
exploiting Obama's race "big time", destroying America, while aggressively
pounding the drum more than ever that the Tea Party is racist. Meanwhile, we
have powerful black resources not being maximized.

Black Conservatives are valiantly fighting along side our fellow white
patriots in the Tea Party Movement. It is time to rip away the cloak of

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American

"Campaign to Defeat Barack Obama 2012". Please join us!
Please sign and encourage your friends to sign this petition at


Where’s the Indonesian Adoption?

©2011 drkate
No, its not a new campaign slogan or billboard…it’s a question that remains unanswered by anything “Obama” has released.
Where’s the vital record of Obama’s adoption by Indonesian national Lolo Soetoro?  And when did Barry Soetoro change his name back to Obama?
For all I care, “Barack Hussein Obama, II” could be called Jean Ludwig Soetoro, or Long-Legged-Mack-Daddy Soetoro, or Chester Arthur Soetoro…his legal name is still Soetoro.  And certainly never a natural born American citizen no matter what his birthplace actually is…even in the United States.
If Obama, aka Barry Soetoro is an American citizen, why use a stolen social security number and  submit a forged Selective Service Registration linking to that stolen social security number?
If ‘Barack Hussein Obama’ aka Soetoro truly is an American citizen why did he allow Terry Lakin go to Leavenworth?

I contacted the producers of the cartoon above asking that they add the evidence of name change from Soetoro to Obama, and this was their response:

Thanks for the encouragement…
We’ll add this if we do another version. The artist was already complaining about the length of the list! I mean, how many obscurities can one person have? //BrainReboot
Birth Records and Adoptions
As has long been suspected, not only would Obama seek to divert attention away from the British citizenship of BHO Sr., but would also divert attention away from his adoption by Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian citizen.  We know that Barry (Bearick) Obama II had to take the name Barry Soetoro (Soebarkah).

caught in a lie
We also know that Obama slipped up when discussing his trip to Pakistan in 1981 while attempting to brag about his ‘international’ credentials.  He’s never said another word about it and the latest electronic image’s poor quality is another attempt to divert attention away from his father’s citizenship, his Indonesian adoption and likely Indonesian citizenship.
Why hide the college records?  Occidental was Lolo Soetoro’s alma mater.  Why hide the Punahou records?  Punahou was for wealthy non-natives in Hawaii.
“Obama’s” adoption records are conspicuously missing…and I believe there are two: one by the Dunhams and the other by Soetoro.
Researching different states policies on what happens to birth certificates upon adoption, it seems to be varied but the general practice is to seal the original birth certificate from everyone except under extraordinary circumstances.  States issue completely new birth certificates as if the adoptive parents are actually the parents.
I also found this interesting reference for Minnesota:
There are little clues on the adoptive birth certificate to give clues to the very observant person who actually cares, or is just plain nosey.
If the person looking at the birth certificate, is also looking at the adoptive parent/s, and is actually paying attention to the information, there may be some other clues to indicate that the child might be adopted. Some states still list the race of the parents and of the child on birth certificates. If the parents are listed on the child’s birth certificate as black and the child as Caucasian, or vise versa, then that would be a clue that the child might be adopted.
Is the “African”  a clue that Obama was initially adopted from Kenya?
Not coincidentally, the same day as the release of “Obama’s” LFCOLB, BHO Srs. immigration records were ‘released’, indicating he had a child living in Hawaii that was born in Kenya…but with no name attributed to who his wife actually was.  Remember we saw a photo of Stanley Ann Dunham on the beach in Hawaii in July with no sign of pregnancy?
How Many Adoptions Did “Obama” Go Through?
If he was initially adopted from Kenya, it would have been Stanley Ann Dunham/Madelyn Dunham doing the adoption.  Now Soetoro, he would have found that certificate (and lost it) as reported in Dreams (with vaccination papers)…and by law that original birth certificate would have been sealed, destroyed, or is ‘missing’.
But why would the Dunham’s adopt Obama?  “Because they were communists!” (h/t Papoose)
The adoption by Soetoro would have been recorded as a vital document and is either missing, destroyed, being intentionally withheld for later political release or currently being forged.
So did he ‘forget’ to change his name? If he did, why does he need a stolen social security number? Nah.  As a foreigner he has no respect for our institutions so he just didn’t.  He couldn’t get a passport so skated until he became a U.S. Senator.  Then on a ‘diplomatic’ passport promptly went back to Kenya–his ‘home country’ to campaign for the murderer and his cousin Raile Odinga.
What’s Your Name?
I guess we know who your daddy is…but who’s your mommy:???:
How’d you get from Obama to Soetoro to Obama again? 
Oh, never mind…from this picture I can see it doesn’t matter.

No allegiance to the U.S.
Open thread.


Excellent one to pass around widely. We must continue to bang this drum.........and I would ask Question #34: "Why were you willing to see a decorated 23 year United States Army Lt. Col. [Terry Lakin] be denied his constitutional right of discovery at trial, then inevitably convicted and sentenced to federal prison, just because you want to continue to hide all pertinent facts concerning your eligibility to be president of this nation?......... or indeed if you are even a U.S. citizen at all??"
Mr. President, You hold enormous power in this country, and in the world. But you are also an elected representative of the people of America. As an American, I have a right to know certain aspects of your personal and professional history, in order to feel secure that you do not hold divided loyalties with any other nations or any other ideology that is not compatible with the interests of all Americans and with the constitution of the U.S. After all, you are the president and if Americans do not have a right to know about you — then who?
This is not about party politics. This is about national security. It’s about trust. No other president in history has been shrouded in so much secrecy, especially one who claims to be so “transparent.”
I have some questions:
When you were five years old, you were adopted by Lolo Soetoro, a Muslim like your natural father. You moved to Indonesia where you attended interfaith schools and were registered as Barry Soetoro. Your religion was registered as “Islam.” You remained there until age ten, at which time you returned to Hawaii to live with your maternal grandparents.
Question 1: When and where did you legally change your name back to Barack H. Obama?
Question 2: Did you ever, in fact, legally change your name back to Barack Obama?
Question 3: When and where did you reinstate your American citizenship, after being an Indonesian citizen for four or five years? (Then again, was it ever reinstated?)
Question 4: When and where did you obtain a United States passport, after being an Indonesian citizen?
When you attended Occidental College in 1979 to 1981, you used the name Barry Soetoro, as you did throughout your childhood.
Question 5: Was Barry Soetoro, or is it still, your legal name?
Question 6: What identification papers did you present to Occidental College for registration, i.e., passport, birth certificate, driver’s license, etc?
Question 7: Why do you purposely prevent public access to those school records?
Question 8: How and why did you happen to secure two roommates at Occidental who were Muslim men from Pakistan? (With rare exception, Muslims generally room with Muslims only.)
When you were 20 years old, you traveled to Pakistan with your Muslim friends, when Pakistan was experiencing serious uprisings and was considered under siege.
Question 9: What country’s passport did you use for international travel at that time?
Question 10: Was that passport under the name of Barry Soetoro?
Question 11: What was the purpose of your travel to Pakistan?
Question 12: How did you fund this travel venture?
According to records, and your autobiography, you enrolled in Columbia University 1981 to 1983, where you obtained a degree in Political Science. However, private investigators working for attorney, Orly Taitz, have obtained your attendance records at Columbia, which indicate you only attended Columbia from September of 1982 to May of 1983. (See link below – Item #27 of FAC lawsuit allegations)
Question 13: Are these attendance records inaccurate? If so, how?
Question 14: If they are accurate, where were you and what were you doing during the missing year between Occidental and Columbia?
Question 15: Could this be why so many people from your Political Science class, graduating in 1983, never knew you or saw you there?
Question 16: How was your Columbia University schooling funded, and by whom?
Question 17: Why do you refuse to allow America and/or the media in general, to view your enrollment records from Columbia University?
Percy Sutton, renowned Harlem attorney and the former president of Manhattan Borough of New York, publicly stated in 2008, that in 1988, he was approached by Radical Islamist, Dr. Khalid al-Monsour — a close advisor to Saudi sheik, al Walid bin Talal — to write a support letter of recommendation for Barack Obama to help him get into Harvard Law School. (See link, below)
Question 18: How and by whom did you fund your law school at Harvard?
Question 19: Did you receive support from any foreign sources?
Question 20: What were your relationships with Mr. Al Monsour and Sheik bin Talal?
Question 21: Why do you refuse to authorize release of your enrollment records at Harvard?
Question 22: Can you explain why your Social Security Number was applied for and secured in Connecticut, a state in which you never resided?
Question 23: Can you explain why your Social Security Number 042-68-4424, belonged to another person, Thomas Wood, who did live in Connecticut and died at age 19, between 1977 and 1979?
Question 24: When you applied for the bar exam in Illinois, you swore that you had never used any other name than Barack Obama. Is that true and did you knowingly lie under oath?
It was not until your presidential campaign was well under way when the character of the church you were attending for 20 years, and its pastor’s anti-American views, became public.
Question 25: Despite attending Reverend Jeremiah Wright’s church for 20 years, giving financial support and considering your close association with the racist pastor, should we believe that you never had an inkling that he held such radical views?
Question 26: Did you become a Christian because you accepted Jesus Christ as the son of God, or because it was politically expedient for your future ambitions?
Question 27: If your birth verification should not be an issue, why do you spend money on  legal teams to prevent the certified record from being made public?
The computer generated Certification of Live Birth (COLB)which your associates have posted on line, and which some media claims to be valid, fails to provide birthing facts generally present on all American birth certificates. Thus, it begs many questions:
Question 27: Why does the COLB fail to name the hospital you were born in?
Question 28: Why does the COLB fail to name the doctor in attendance?
Question 29: Why is the COLB unsigned/certified by any one in attendance?
Question 30: Why does the COLB fail to denote address of the parents?
Question 31: Why is the father’s race listed as “African” when, in fact, African is not recognized as a race on any census in America, especially in 1961?
Question 32: Why is the COLB generated on a computer, when computers were not in use in 1961, (your birth year) or for many years thereafter?
Some say it’s possible to legally obtain a Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth, even though you were born somewhere else.
Question 33: Is it true that your half sister, Maya Soetoro, has a Hawaiian COLB also, though she readily admits she was born in Indonesia? If so, that would explain how a person born elsewhere can still obtain a Certification of Live Birth in Hawaii.
If your presidency is to be so “transparent,” please answer the aforementioned questions so that Americans will feel confident that you have no hidden agenda, that you are as honest as you say, that your are wholly American and we can focus our attentions on important issues, domestic and foreign, without these constant distractions which only one person can clear up: That’s you, Mr. President.
Click here: FAC Filed in Lawsuit About Obama’s Bogus Social Security Number
Click here: Another Look at Obama’s Social Security Number
Click here: Obama records, IL bar application fraud,
Click here: YouTube – Percy Sutton (Malcom X’s Lawyer) Says Barack Obama
The following link is the Certification of Live Birth (COLB) as presented by the president’s team. Note all the absent or incorrect information.
Click here: Photo  
The following is an actual Hawaii Birth Certificate, note the difference in format and inclusive information:
Are The Obama Records Being Unsealed or Is It Something Else?

Are The Obama Records Being Unsealed or Is It Something Else? »

NEW INFORMATION REVEALED SIMULTANEOUSLY by Tracey M. Grissom (Apr. 30, 2011) — Dear Fellow Patriots, After the April 27th release of Obama’s long form birth certificate found here, amazingly enough, out pops another surprise. On...
April 30 2011 / 1 comment / Read More »







Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler   
Friday, 29 April 2011

This was the week Zero changed his middle name from Hussein to Pandora.  And it wasn't due to Trump, as the Cajun Clown James Carville is claiming, but to my buddy Jerry Corsi.

In fact, Jerry was set to write my biography - How We Won The Cold War:  The Greatest Adventure of Modern Times - when Joseph Farah prevailed upon him to write
Where's The Birth Certificate? instead.  Go for it, I told Jerry - helping to save America is infinitely more important than telling my story.

Jerry's book zooming to best-seller status the instant its publication was announced on Drudge last week (4/20) is what prompted Zero to release - finally! -  his long form BC exactly one week later (4/27) and becoming Pandora Obama thereby.

There is now no way Zero can close the box of troubles he has opened.  He cannot avoid sliding down the Slippery Slope of Transparency.  The demands will be deafening that he now release what he has refused to and spent millions on blocking:

His Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passports, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, Illinois State Bar Association records, baptism records and his adoption records.  

Then, of course, his BC release day before yesterday only makes the puzzle bigger:  Why now?  Why didn't you release this three years ago and end the controversy in the bud, why all the resistance and stonewalling?  For what?

Maybe because the BC release only heightens questions about it, such as Corsi's:  What is it about twin girls born day after Obama?

*  *  *  *  *  *
Yet here is the real issue with Zero.  It's not where he was born or who his parents were or whether he was adopted in Indonesia, etc.  It's that he's not an American in his soul.  There are millions upon millions of naturalized U.S. citizens far more genuinely American than him.

Zero is Anti-American in a fundamental way, far more deeply than the superficiality of where he was born.  He means us harm, he has already done grave damage to our culture, our economy, our military and national security, our future as a nation.

Thus anything that delegitimizes his presidency in the eyes of voters is a move in the right direction.  He may well be a fraud in the circumstances of his birth, his school accomplishments, his entire curriculum vitae.  Much more importantly, he is a fraud as an American.  That's why he is Not My President, nor is he truly America's.

*  *  *  *  *  *
Perhaps you've gotten as a viral email famed conservative economist Walter Williams' recent column entitled:  "No Matter What - Obama Wins in 2012."  It's all over the right-wing blogosphere such as

After seeing Walter claim that Zero can't lose because Blacks, Hispanics, most women and half of indies will vote for him, the question quickly arises, how could such a smart guy write something so dumb?  Answer:  he didn't.  It's a spoof by and lots of folks were suckered by it.

Walter is the John M. Olin Distinguished Professor of Economics at George Mason University - and
here is his GMU faculty website.  Note the link to an apology by the first conservative blog,, taken in by the MoveOn April Fool's joke.

In truth, victory in 2012 is being handed to the GOP on a platter because of what we could call Zero's Dilemma:  he's caught between his Marxist hatred of capitalism and the requirement for a booming economy to get reelected. 

It's not a matter of intellectual intelligence, although he's really not that bright.  It's that he hasn't got the emotional intelligence to solve the dilemma and do what he needs to do; he's blinded by his anti-American leftist fanaticism so he can't get the government out of the way of the economy to create jobs and prosperity. 

He can't do it, so the White House is the GOP's to lose.

*  *  *  *  *  *

Of course, the GOP is known as the Stupid Party for good reason.  One example is the excitement over Trump.  In
calling Charles Krauthammer a "sad fool" this week (4/27) for ridiculing his proposal to seize Iraq's oil, he exposed himself as an ignorant and dangerous fool.

If Trump had any real political brains, he wouldn't be going on jingoistic rants advocating outright violent thievery of another country's oil, but focus instead on our own oil and gas, on sweeping away by Executive Order the EPA and Luddite Environmentalists who are waging constant war on US energy production.  Their latest iteration is the assault on fracking.

Without this fascist greenie war, the US would not only be energy independent, it would be a major exporter of energy, e.g. liquefied natural gas, to the world.  But Trump is not a serious guy, just a self-promoting showman, so he's not into serious solutions.

Then there's the tingling running up libertarian legs caused by Ron Paul, who announced Tuesday (4/26) he was forming a presidential exploratory committee.

I know this is going to really tick off the Paulistas in the TTP crowd, but Paul makes me ill.  He is a cranky unsmiling old man with a hectoring voice like fingernails on a blackboard who has absolutely no desire to defend our country.

In all his years since being elected to Congress in 1996, he has not voted for a single Defense Authorization Bill, not one, not ever.

He is a Blame-America-First Libertarian in the mold of Murray Rothbard, the black flag anarchist founder of the Libertarian Party who never once in any dispute between the US and the Soviet Union during the Cold War took America's side - not once, not ever.
Yes, he's admired for his courageous advocacy of limited constitutional government, and rightly so.  Yet he's so charmless and humorless in his advocacy with that whiny scratchy voice and looking like he's sucking lemons, he's a real turn-off for many who could be persuaded by someone actually friendly.

Worse, though, is the danger that his constitutionalism may be associated in the public's mind by an unwillingness to defend America and stand up to the enemies that are actively trying to destroy her. 

Besides, he'll be 77 in 2012.  It's time for him to give up his octogenarian candidacy and stop being libertarianism's Harold Stassen.  Please, Ron, hand the baton to the next generation.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *
Speaking of that generation, it's little wonder that the enemedia is making fun of the GOP presidential aspirants among it, who are either goofy (Trump), spooky (Huckster), phony (Mitt), weird (Newt) or so wallflower colorless (Tim who? Mitch who?) they are as exciting as an enema.

But it's us who will have the fun watching the enemedia spasm out once America's Mama Grizzly announces her candidacy.  The enemedia's collective head is going to explode - picture a watermelon blowing up - the instant Sarah Palin says four words:  "I'm running for president."

This is going to be a media frenzy like no other.  She is going to suck every picogram of oxygen out of the presidential candidacy air.  So the question is the timing.  It's too soon now, for the frenzy can't be sustained that long - and she can afford to wait.

She wants to wait all the way to after Labor Day and summer's over.  The one consideration speeding it up would be the need to preempt Michele Bachmann should she try to be the female James Garfield (the only incumbent Congressman elected President, in 1880).

The Enemedia Spasm over Sarah will then go into Full Amok mode once she announces her running mate.  She'll most likely time that for January so they can campaign together for the primaries (the Iowa Caucuses are Feb. 6th, New Hampshire is Feb. 14th). 

Who will she choose?  She's got a short list, and two of the names on it are Allen West and Marco Rubio.  Either one would be dynamite, but I'd go for Palin-Rubio, with West as SecDef.  Don't be surprised if she names other cabinet choices during the campaign, who would also campaign with her, such as John Bolton for State.

By the end of the campaign, the enemedia will be babbling schizos.  And when she wins, wiping the electoral college floor with Zero, they will be catatonic.

Oh, yes, she might even pick Ron Paul for Treasury.

*  *  *  *  *  *
Here's the most hopeful headline of the week (4/28):  Debt ceiling: More Democrats threaten to vote against raising borrowing limit

It's crunch time when Congress goes back into session next week, and has to vote on raising the debt ceiling.  As I keep saying, this is the Main Event.  It's the one chance there is to curtail the chances for hyperinflation - and to eliminate ObamaCare lock, stock, and Zero's barrel. 

If Dems have been getting the message back home that they can kiss their reelection next year goodbye if they vote the debt raise, and join Pubs to block it, well, the Union may be saved after all.  Have plenty of popcorn on hand, and enjoy the show.

For if the ceiling is raised without zeroing out ZeroCare and other massive spending cuts, then Richard Rahn's "pessimistic forecasts" this week regarding inflation and interest rates will turn out to be wildly optimistic.  Richard is predicting both in single digits.  We'll be in Deep Double Digit City for both, and quickly.

*  *  *  *  *  *
As chronicled by
ShadowStats, the government's CPI (inflation index) is grossly distorted - which you verify every day that you go to Wal-Mart or put gas in your car.

This epitomizes Zero's being the problem and not the solution.  In addition to his demonizing oil companies and doing every thing he can to block their efforts at producing more US oil and gas, there's his Fed scam.

By keeping Fed rates at essentially zero, his government can finance trillion dollar government expansions at sub-basement interest costs.  This has resulted, purposefully, in the debasement of the dollar.  Thus ShadowStats points out (in their subscriber report of today, 4/29):

"It is the dollar's weakness that primarily has driven oil prices higher, more so than political tensions in the Middle East and North Africa, or Mr. Bernanke's suggestions of surging global oil demand.  As a result of Fed activity, the U.S. dollar has lost its safe-haven status and is hitting all-time lows against a number of major currencies."

Add to this Zero's overt fascism - state or crony capitalism - exampled this week by his attack on Boeing as described by South Carolina Governor
Nikki Haley
- and the contradiction between Zero's economic agenda and his election chances becomes gin clear. 

He's toast for a second term.
  It's the damage, the horrific, massive damage, he will continue to perpetrate until January 20, 2013 that is terrifying.  Which is why you'll see increasing calls for his impeachment before very long.


Barack Hussein Obama Senior: Nightmares of my Father

The Arizona Independent newspaper published the Immigration and Naturalization Service file on Barack Hussein Obama, Sr.

Barack Hussein Obama Sr. Immigration File

It is astonishing. Barack Hussein Obama's father's immigration file was just released under a F.O.I.A request, and what a ugly picture is paints. The BHO fairy tale narrative, made up out of whole cloth and sold to the American people, is blown to bits. BHO's impossible philandering, multiple wives and rampant bad behavior led to his removal from Harvard and the country. His polygamy is attributable to BHO Senior's Muslim faith. But at a time when America enforced her laws and immigration policy, Barack Hussein Obama Senior would be forced to leave Harvard, his visa not renewed.
He was a terrible man -- immoral and irresponsible. His treatment of women was incredibly callous and cruel -- not to mention the abandoment of his children and his multiple wives.
President Obama is indeed a bastard, literally and figuratively.
What a horrible man. Dreams of My Father. Indeed. Perhaps this explains President Obama's animus towards the United States.
Obama Senior was a polygamist and all-around bad guy. The fact that this NY Times writer tries to make this about racism and not about his pattern of abusive behavior and abandoment is telling. The writer in the article below ignores Obama Senior's abject corruption, and sees racism everywhere. It's like something of a mental disorder.
Was Barack Obama Sr. 'eased' out of Harvard, and America, for dating white women? by Andrew Rice
I think the file proves, fairly conclusively, that racism drove the president's father from the United States. I went back and forth a bit with Ben Smith (whose blog post brought this file to my attention) over whether "racism" is really the right word for the bureaucratic attitudes and actions these documents contain. There's no use of slurs or harsh language, certainly. What I think the documents reveal, though, is a subtle, institutionalized conspiracy that in a way seems more insidious than overt cross-burning racism, because almost surely none of its participants thought of their actions as discriminatory at all. In that sense, the file is an instructive artifact, not just of our president's biography, but of our nation's history of conflicted attitudes about race, foreign cultures, intermarriage and sex.
Hard as it may be to believe today, it seems clear from a close reading of the the file that the president's father was driven from this country because of his messy personal life. And reading between the lines, it's not hard to see a subtext of miscegenation.
First, a little historical background: the elder Barack Hussein Obama arrived in the United States in 1959, via an exchange program known colloquially in Kenya as the "Tom Mboya airlift," after the politician who sponsored it, a Luo tribesman of his. (These sorts of ethnic connections matter in Africa.)
During his first year of studies at the University of Hawaii, Obama took a Russian-language class where he met Stanley Ann Dunham, the president's mother. The earliest non-routine memo in Obama's file is a 1961 memo in which the I.N.S. is warned by a foreign student adviser at the University of Hawaii (a "Mrs. McCabe"), who informed the authorities that Obama had married Dunham. Further, the informant noted that he had been "running around with several girls" and had been "warned about his playboy ways." He had been confronted by school officials about another wife he had back in Kenya, from whom he claimed to be customarily divorced.
I have no intention of arguing that the elder Obama conducted himself honorably in his relations with women. However, having lived in East Africa, his explanation rings familiar to me. Even today, it is common for a well-traveled young person like him to have a first wife back in his home village. We call this "polygamy;" they see it as moving on with life.
First marriages fizzle out in Africa, as they do everywhere else. The difference is that culturally, legal divorce is very frowned upon: It's viewed as shirking financial and familial responsibilities. Epidemiologists, who have studied this cultural pattern because of its impact on the spread of H.I.V., often say that Africans tend to have "concurrent" relationships, while Americans have "consecutive" ones. That's a wild generalization, but the point is that Obama Sr. would not have viewed his first marriage back in Kenya as something disreputable. It clearly became worthy of investigation to school and immigration officials, though, after he started fooling around with white women.
After the 1961 report about Obama's marriage to Dunham, the I.N.S. resolved to keep eye on him. Polygamy is not a charge meriting deportation, the memo notes, adding that "If the subject were convicted of bigamy we might get a deportation charge but not before." But it recommends that Obama be "closely questioned before another [visa] extension is granted—and denial be considered." This sets the tone of the rest of the file, throughout which the issue of his American wife back in Hawaii keeps popping up.
The birth of Obama's mixed-race son—the one who would go on to be president—is duly noted, and then things go quiet for a couple of years. During this time, the president's parents separated and Obama Sr. went to Harvard to study for a graduate degree. The relationship went on as a long-distance proposition for a little while, though it was over by Jan. 1964, when Dunham filed for a divorce that Obama did not contest.
The same month as the divorce, another note appears in Obama's file. There seems to have been some kind of affair with a Kenyan exchange student (the file indicates a high school student, but that doesn't necessarily mean a minor—African children often started school quite late in the 1950s and '60s). The Unitarian Universalist Service, which had sponsored the woman's scholarship, is up in arms about the relationship and an unpermitted overseas trip. "The suspicion exists," says a memo, "that she may have gone to London for [redacted]."
We don't know what the couple was suspected to have done, but since this was a decade prior to Roe v. Wade, we can guess. A related memo reports that an informant considers Obama to be a "very slippery character."
Maybe he was. But again, what the I.N.S. really wants to know about is the elder Obama's situation with his wife back in Hawaii. The authorities get in touch with Harvard and ask officials there to press him on his marital status. Obama tells the school that he is separated from Ann Dunham, who is reported to be now living in the Philippines. (Though that's what the report says, it's inaccurate: Dunham was still residing in Hawaii in 1964, where she met her second husband, who did eventually take the family to Indonesia.)
In a handwritten note, the agent says a school official promises to talk to the student, "re his marital problems." Clearly, Harvard has decided that it has a problem with Obama's personal life.
In May 1964, Harvard gets back to the I.N.S. and reports that while the student has passed all his exams, the university is "going to try to cook something up to ease him out." The school follows up with a letter telling Obama that they don't have any more money to fund his scholarship and suggesting he finish up his thesis back in Kenya. Without the scholarship funding, his student visa won't be renewed. A follow-up memo says that Obama "was not satisfied" with the decision and has appealed.
Still, it seems that Obama can't stay out of trouble. In July, there's a handwritten note that says someone has called to complain that her 27-year-old daughter has agreed to marry him. This is almost certainly the mother of Ruth Nidesand, who met Obama's father at Harvard and eventually became his third wife. Again, another white woman. The I.N.S. investigates and determines that Obama had already departed for Kenya. The last note of interest in the file is a follow-up report—once more, circumstances strongly suggest it came from Nidesand's family—complaining that their daughter had eloped to Nairobi despite knowing that Obama had a couple of other wives floating around. The memo says there's nothing the government can do, since the woman was an adult and went of her own free will.
Again, the very fact that the memo exists and was placed in the immigration file—which presumably would have been consulted if Obama ever wanted to come back to live in America—is an indication of the seriousness with which the authorities at the time viewed the nature of his supposed misconduct.
It's clear that Obama Sr. marked himself as an undesirable from the very moment he married a white woman, and the racist subtext is pretty overwhelming throughout the documents. Sure, he seems to have behaved like a cad. But ask yourself this: if the male student involved was, say, French, is it conceivable that the U.S. government would have spent so much time investigating his romantic entanglements with various Americans? And, it seems clear, not-so-subtly nudging the Harvard authorities to cut off his scholarship? The answer to these questions is self-evident.
We know that Barack Obama Sr. died young, disappointed about many things. One of them, I have to imagine, was that his education at Harvard was cut short. Until now, it has typically been said that he "gave up" his doctoral studies, but this file makes it clear that he was never given a choice about leaving Cambridge. Who knows how his life might have turned out if he had been allowed to stay? Maybe he would have become an economics professor at some Northeastern liberal arts college, maybe he would have played a little more of a role in his son's life, and maybe his son would have never written Dreams From My Father, which would have been too bad, because it is a fantastic book and an unparalleled source of insight into the president's personal history and character.
For all the personal anguish described in that memoir, things turned out just fine for Barack Obama Jr. But we can't say the same for his father, who ended his life a disillusioned alcoholic, believing that he had been the victim of immense injustices. From reading this file, I think he had a pretty good case against the U.S. government.
He was "disillusioned." You can't make Times shiz up.
UPDATE: Interesting factoid by Jack Cashill at the Thinker:
The Obama Lie That Drove the Birther Movement

Newly released documents from Barack Obama Sr.'s immigration file,  obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, justify "birther" doubts about the nativity story on which Barack Obama based his presidential campaign.

The problems, of course, go deeper. According to divorce papers filed in 1964, Barack Sr. and Ann Dunham married in Wailuku, Maui, on February 2, 1961.  One has to wonder, however, whether it was a marriage in anything but name or whether there was a marriage at all. 

The immigration authorities certainly wondered.  An April 1961 memo notes, "If his USC [United States Citizen] wife tries to petition for [Obama Sr.] make sure an investigation is conducted as to the bona-fide of the marriage."

The facts get more problematic still.  After the birth of baby Barry in August 1961, Ann left for Seattle as soon as the doctors cleared her to travel. Once there, she enrolled at the University of Washington, not Washington Sate.  Barack Sr. stayed behind in Hawaii.

... based on these documents, the union, if there was one, ended before Obama was born.