Censorship and Disinformation in America
05.05.2012
By Lawrence Sellin
AP photo
You will not see an article like this appear in any American mainstream media outlet.
Barack Hussein Obama is an illegal
President. He is not now nor has he ever been eligible to be a candidate
for or hold that office because his father was a British subject at the
time of his birth.
Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the
U.S. Constitution requires that all candidates for the Presidency be
"natural born citizens." As defined in the binding Supreme Court
precedent of Minor v. Happersett (1875) and confirmed in the subsequent
ruling of U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) and others, all candidates for the
offices of President and Vice President must be second generation
Americans, that is, US citizens of citizen parents at the time of birth.
President and Vice President are the
only U.S. political offices with that requirement. It was the intent of
the American Founding Fathers that the chief executive and the
commander-in-chief of the armed forces would not have dual allegiance or
loyalty to a foreign power.
There is no ambiguity, although the
Democrat and Republican parties and the media are and have been
deliberately trying to confuse the American public as to the true
meaning of natural born citizenship.
Case in point.
On May 1, 2012, Fox News Channel anchor Bret Baier posted an explanation of the term natural born citizen that was so factually incorrect that it must be considered propaganda.
It is well beyond the scope of this or
perhaps any single article to document the full extent of the censorship
conducted and the amount of disinformation disseminated, which has
continued non-stop since the onset of the 2008 election cycle.
Why did that happen? The cause stemmed from political expediency and cowardice.
Since 1975, there have been numerous attempts by both Democrats and Republicans in Congress to redefine or amend the Article II "natural born citizen" clause.
Having failed to change it legally, politicians seized the opportunity to amend the Constitution by a political fait accompli through the unexpected victory of Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton in the 2008 Democrat Presidential primary.
Long before the 2008 campaign, however,
Obama supporters were already helping the candidate either hide his
genuine personal history or create a false one.
The censorship and disinformation
campaign about Obama's ineligibility had its origins in February 2008
about the time he began to overtake Hillary Clinton in the Democratic
Presidential primary.
Anticipating a likely challenge, Obama supporters, instead of reacting defensively, went on the attack through a fabricated controversy,
sustained by the media, which questioned the eligibility of Republican
Presidential candidate Senator John McCain. The basis of the challenge
was that McCain was born in a Panamanian hospital while his U.S. Navy
officer father and his U.S. citizen mother were serving at a U.S.
military base in the Panama Canal Zone.
The fake controversy was settled in
April 2008 through Senate Resolution 511, which, in essence, was a
political deal struck between the Democrats and Republicans that would
provide validation for McCain and, at least, cover for Obama on the
issue of eligibility.
SR 511, a non-binding resolution with an
unrecorded vote, had no force of law, but by passing it Congress
created the conditions whereby the Constitution could be amended de facto through a back-room political agreement.
Republican involvement in SR 511 and the
fear of being branded a "racist" prevented any meaningful vetting of
candidate Obama after he secured the Democrat Presidential nomination in
June 2008.
Thus began the conspiracy of silence and the disinformation campaign by the political establishment and the media.
Given the effort to prevent discussion
of Constitutional ineligibility, it should come as no surprise that the
politicians and media also protected Obama from investigation of allegations involving a forged birth certificate, a forged Selective Service registration and the use of a Social Security Number not issued to him.
The Democrats and the media don't want to discuss ineligibility and criminality because they want Obama re-elected.
The Republicans can't talk about those
issues because of their dereliction of duty, their complicity in a
cover-up and their unashamed cowardice.
Regardless of who wins the election in
November, it is and has been the intention of both political parties and
the media to bury forever questions regarding Obama's ineligibility and
crimes.
The truth would shake the American
political system to its core because exposing Obama would also expose
the endemic political corruption in Washington, D.C.
It is all about power and the financial
rewards it reaps. The politicians and the media have it and they intend
to keep it by any means necessary.
Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired
colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of
Afghanistan and Iraq. Colonel Sellin is the author of "Afghanistan and the Culture of Military Leadership". He receives email lawrence.sellin@gmail.com
...The Republicans can't talk about those issues because of their dereliction of duty, their complicity in a cover-up and their unashamed cowardice....
ReplyDeleteYes, but the question is WHY have they been knowingly complicit in this cover-up? They are not ignorant of the rules of eligibility in the Constitution. The rules are simple and there are only 3: be a NBC, min age of 35 and live in the U.S. for the last 14 years - easy to learn and remember, no? They have been knowingly complicit for one reason, and that reason is the GOP doesn't confront Obama on the ineligible issue because they want to be able to use it themselves! They have at least 2 Republican "super stars" in mind that are not NBCs and that they want to put in the White House, so they are hoping this issue will fade away and not be a hindrance to their own political plans. So much for caring about the U.S. Constitution and the Founding Fathers docs.