Friday, May 25, 2012

THE VERIFICATION FROM HAWAII DOESN'T EVEN HAVE OBAMA'S PURPORTED BIRTH DATE ON IT!...ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION BENNETT?

Hawaii State Registrar does not verify authenticity 
of President Obama's birth certificate
Washington Times

WASHINGTON, May 24, 2012 – The “Verification of Birth” letter sent by the Hawaii State Registrar Alvin T. Onaka Ph.D to Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett fails to respond to the fundamental question asked by Mr. Bennett in a March 30, 2012 letter to Hawaii Department of Health officials: Whether or not the image of President Obama’s “long form” Certificate of Live Birth, posted on the White House web site on April 27, 2011 is a “true and accurate representation of the original record in your files”.

The official whose signature appears on the “Verification of Birth,” as well as the copy of President Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth released by the White House is Onaka who is refusing to talk to Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (Ariz.) Cold Case Posse investigator Mike Zullo who was on the ground in Hawaii.

In response to an outcry from Arizona constituents troubled by the March 1, 2012 Cold Case Posse announcement there is probable cause the image posted on the White House website is a forgery, Arizona Secretary Bennett enclosed a printout of the White House website image with his letter, and requested verification that the image is a “true and accurate representation of the original record in your files”.

At question is that an “official birth certificate” provided on request is not the original document created at the time of birth. If you are from, say Chicago, you can order an official birth certificate from City Hall, but it is not the original or even an exact facsimile of your birth certificate. The document you receive carries the Secretary of State’s seal confirming that the same “information” that would be found on your original birth certificate records is accurately reflected.

On May 22, 2012, after more than six weeks of wrangling over the legal authority of Arizona’s request, the Hawaii Department of Health did produce a “Verification of Birth” which at first glance appears to answer Mr. Bennett’s original forgery question.

Arizona Secretary of State Bennett March 30, 2012 letter asked Hawaii health officials the following:

CONTINUED HERE: http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/freedom-press-not-free/2012/may/24/hawaii-state-registrar-onaka-birth-certificate-

WATCH THE COMPLETE SHERIFF JOE PRESS CONFERENCE ABOUT OBAMA'S FORGED IDENTITY DOCUMENTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/joe.html 

SHERIFF JOE TEA-PARTY PRESENTATION VIDEO HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/arizonavideo.html

-ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

3 comments:

  1. The verification from Hawaii said that every single fact on the copy of Obama's published long-form birth certificate that Bennett sent to Hawaii is exactly the same as on the birth certificate in the files in Hawaii.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The law is simple, a birth certificate from a state proves that you were born in that state. Hawaii–---both Republicans and Democrats–--says that Obama has a birth certificate from that state.

    That is all that is required. For you to prove that both the officials and the birth certificate are lying, you would have to prove that Obama was in fact born somewhere else. And the Kenya story just won’t cut it.

    Moreover, you would have to explain away the Index Data, which has been on file for years and which shows that there is a birth certificate file for Obama. And you have to explain away the birth notices in the Health Bureau Statistics sections of two Hawaii newspapers in 1961, which at the time were only sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii, and at the time the DOH of Hawaii only sent out those notices for births in Hawaii.

    Bennett said this: “They have officially confirmed that the information in the copy of the certificate of live birth for the president matches the original record in their files.”

    And that turns out to be true. The statement from the Hawaii official was “Additionally, I verify that the information in the copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr. Obama that you attached with your request matches the original record in our files.”

    That means that Hawaii compared item by item the facts on the image and on the original. Was the name of the father the same? Yes. Was the name of the hospital Kapiolani? Yes. Was the date of birth August 4? Yes. ETC.

    In short, Hawaii is saying that Obama was born exactly where his short-form and long-form birth certificates show—in Honolulu, Hawaii.

    And, guess what, Mitt Romney has not even shown his birth certificate, much less have Michigan confirm the facts on it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. UPDATE UPDATE UPDATE

    Update to the above.

    Today, apparently, Mitt Romney had his campaign release his birth certificate, and guess what, it is a computer-generated short-form birth certificate.

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/sns-rt-us-usa-campaign-romney-birth-certificatebre84s1gf-20120529,0,5483593.story

    It does not have the name of the hospital or the delivery doctor or any signatures from the doctor or the mother. The image of the document provided does not show the color of the security paper or an embossed seal, and there is a clear “void” on the document. What is Romney hiding?

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.