Senor Obama does not have an original Hawaiian hospital birth certificate and that’s why he can’t show the one that he’s used all of his adult life instead of needing to “request a copy” in 2008. What idiot would think that he never needed and never had a birth certificate before running for the office of President of the United States? You’d have to be the dumbest person on earth to believe that.

Obama’s Secret Origin

August 30, 2013 

last revision Aug. 31, 1 PM

The Hidden Past He Can’t Reveal nor Disprove

Barack Obama has been “proven” to have been born in Hawaii by the existence of images of old newspaper birth announcements that included his name.  If those newspaper listings of births are genuine and not counterfeit, then Obama’s birth would have been registered with the Department of Health and a registration number would not have to have been “lifted” from Stig Waidelich’s or Virginia Sunahara’s birth certificates (she having died within days of birth) some 44 years later during the presidential campaign in order to produce a counterfeit for Obama.  Such genuine birth announcements would thereby disprove all of the suspicions regarding the origin of his birth certificate number.
But there are two possibilities that would nullify that logic and require that the newspaper images assumed to have been “found” in the microfilm archives be counterfeit.

1.  His registration was over a year after birth.  His mother, who was not even in Hawaii two weeks after his birth, may have spent the last months of pregnancy in Seattle, and returned to Hawaii over a year later and attended college in Spring of 1963.  Since she didn’t attend either the Fall or Winter quarter of 1962-63, her return was certainly later than Aug 4. 1962.  Consequently only a late birth certificate would have been issued, which, if I recall correctly, would have stated clearly that it was a late registration (-just as amended birth certificates are required to be labeled as amended).

In that case the two images of the newspaper birth-record listings would have to be faked, -doctored.  Since the source of the newspaper images has never been revealed, and no one has come forward to testify that they can be found in the Hawaiian and the Californian and  Congressional microfilm archives, -and that they personally have seen them and therefore verify their existence, -and… since the reel on which the microfilm covering August 1-15, 1961 has been replaced with a reel unlike any of the others,  it is impossible to assume that if there was a need to create a fake birth certificate, that the newspaper records would have simply been ignorantly ignored or overlooked instead of being “fixed” to support a counterfeit birth certificate.  After all, what conspiracy of such great importance would not have been well thought out?

That’s not conspiracy thinking.  That is simply the way that amoral politics works, and, more often than not, politics is completely amoral.
READ MORE...