Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Guest Blogger
Our First Guest Blogger Now that's what I'm talking About-- Steve
tony p. to me
show details 8:30 AM (2 hours ago)
Obama's Motion to Dismiss, The Constitution.:
Part 1: Standing
If I can not require my Government to Enforce the Constitution!
Then there is no Constitution!
That is the Injury you Idiot Obama!
A-Article II Section 1 of the Constitution.
Article II Section 1 clause 5:
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
(In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.) (This clause in parentheses has been modified by the 20th and 25th Amendments.)
B-No One Has Standing:
If there exists no standing then that portion of the constitution (article II section 1 clause 5) , is meaningless as nobody can insist that it is enforced. If a court can not request proof of citizenship, then anybody who is not a citizen can claim they were born in Hawaii.
My understanding is that one must show that they are injured, to have standing.
C-Usurper in the White House:
The courts are so wound up in their legalize that they are missing an important point.
The man sitting in the oval office is holding the office illegally.
All of the orders he issues , people he appoints and laws he signs are illegal.
He is not the President.
He is an illegal alien.
1-I do not want government run health insurance.
2-He is ruining the economy, 10Trillion dollars in debt, 17% unemployment.
3-He is destroying the CIA, DOD.
4-He is establishing a communist state, taking over, banks, car companies, health insurance.
5-He is voiding the constitution.
D- The Injury- No Constitution
Have we become a country run by legal idiots?
What the Hell do you mean, I am not incurring injury.
I have no standing?
If I can not require my Government to Enforce the Constitution!
Then there is no Constitution!
That is the Injury you Idiot Obama!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II - Power is given to the People
I believe that Amendment 10 to the Constitution gives to the people , power
to ask Obama to prove he is qualified to be President under the Constitution article 2 sect 1.
Amendment 10 - Powers of the States and People. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States,
are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
The Constitution states what the qualifications are to be president, but it does not specify ,
what, who or that either the Federal or State Governments are given the Power to enforce it.
Therefore the people have the power to require verification, because of the 10th amendment .
The argument over standing is invalidated by Amendment 10 to the Constitution
Therefore You Dr. Taitz wins Obama loses!
From Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
The Tenth Amendment (Amendment X) of the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, was ratified on December 15, 1791. The Tenth Amendment restates the Constitution's principle of federalism by providing that powers not granted to the national government nor prohibited to the states are reserved to the states or the people.
Contents
[hide]
1 Text
2 History and case law
2.1 Forced participation or commandeering
2.2 Commerce clause
2.3 Federal funding
3 State sovereignty resolutions and nullification acts
4 Footnotes
5 External links
[edit] Text
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
[edit] History and case law
The Tenth Amendment is similar to an earlier provision of the Articles of Confederation: "Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled."[1] After the Constitution was ratified, some wanted to add a similar amendment limiting the federal government to powers "expressly" delegated, which would have denied implied powers.[2] However, the word "expressly" ultimately did not appear in the Tenth Amendment as ratified, and therefore the Tenth Amendment did not amend the Necessary and Proper Clause.
The Tenth Amendment, which makes explicit the idea that the federal government is limited only to the powers granted in the Constitution, is generally recognized to be a truism. In United States v. Sprague (1931) the Supreme Court noted that the amendment "added nothing to the [Constitution] as originally ratified."
From time to time states and local governments have attempted to assert exemption from various federal regulations, especially in the areas of labor and environmental controls, using the Tenth Amendment as a basis for their claim. An often-repeated quote, from United States v. Darby, 312 U.S. 100, 124 (1941), reads as follows:
The amendment states but a truism that all is retained which has not been surrendered. There is nothing in the history of its adoption to suggest that it was more than declaratory of the relationship between the national and state governments as it had been established by the Constitution before the amendment or that its purpose was other than to allay fears that the new national government might seek to exercise powers not granted, and that the states might not be able to exercise fully their reserved powers.....
see the rest by clicking the Wikipedia link.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART III- If Obama succeeds in voiding the constitution.
We become a country not ruled by laws but by men.
All Hail King Obama
Tony ,
JustA Roman Catholic Italian Kid from Williamsburg Brooklyn,
Where the World was Neapolitan.
tony p. to me
show details 8:30 AM (2 hours ago)
Obama's Motion to Dismiss, The Constitution.:
Part 1: Standing
If I can not require my Government to Enforce the Constitution!
Then there is no Constitution!
That is the Injury you Idiot Obama!
A-Article II Section 1 of the Constitution.
Article II Section 1 clause 5:
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
(In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.) (This clause in parentheses has been modified by the 20th and 25th Amendments.)
B-No One Has Standing:
If there exists no standing then that portion of the constitution (article II section 1 clause 5) , is meaningless as nobody can insist that it is enforced. If a court can not request proof of citizenship, then anybody who is not a citizen can claim they were born in Hawaii.
My understanding is that one must show that they are injured, to have standing.
C-Usurper in the White House:
The courts are so wound up in their legalize that they are missing an important point.
The man sitting in the oval office is holding the office illegally.
All of the orders he issues , people he appoints and laws he signs are illegal.
He is not the President.
He is an illegal alien.
1-I do not want government run health insurance.
2-He is ruining the economy, 10Trillion dollars in debt, 17% unemployment.
3-He is destroying the CIA, DOD.
4-He is establishing a communist state, taking over, banks, car companies, health insurance.
5-He is voiding the constitution.
D- The Injury- No Constitution
Have we become a country run by legal idiots?
What the Hell do you mean, I am not incurring injury.
I have no standing?
If I can not require my Government to Enforce the Constitution!
Then there is no Constitution!
That is the Injury you Idiot Obama!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II - Power is given to the People
I believe that Amendment 10 to the Constitution gives to the people , power
to ask Obama to prove he is qualified to be President under the Constitution article 2 sect 1.
Amendment 10 - Powers of the States and People. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States,
are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
The Constitution states what the qualifications are to be president, but it does not specify ,
what, who or that either the Federal or State Governments are given the Power to enforce it.
Therefore the people have the power to require verification, because of the 10th amendment .
The argument over standing is invalidated by Amendment 10 to the Constitution
Therefore You Dr. Taitz wins Obama loses!
From Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
The Tenth Amendment (Amendment X) of the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, was ratified on December 15, 1791. The Tenth Amendment restates the Constitution's principle of federalism by providing that powers not granted to the national government nor prohibited to the states are reserved to the states or the people.
Contents
[hide]
1 Text
2 History and case law
2.1 Forced participation or commandeering
2.2 Commerce clause
2.3 Federal funding
3 State sovereignty resolutions and nullification acts
4 Footnotes
5 External links
[edit] Text
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
[edit] History and case law
The Tenth Amendment is similar to an earlier provision of the Articles of Confederation: "Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled."[1] After the Constitution was ratified, some wanted to add a similar amendment limiting the federal government to powers "expressly" delegated, which would have denied implied powers.[2] However, the word "expressly" ultimately did not appear in the Tenth Amendment as ratified, and therefore the Tenth Amendment did not amend the Necessary and Proper Clause.
The Tenth Amendment, which makes explicit the idea that the federal government is limited only to the powers granted in the Constitution, is generally recognized to be a truism. In United States v. Sprague (1931) the Supreme Court noted that the amendment "added nothing to the [Constitution] as originally ratified."
From time to time states and local governments have attempted to assert exemption from various federal regulations, especially in the areas of labor and environmental controls, using the Tenth Amendment as a basis for their claim. An often-repeated quote, from United States v. Darby, 312 U.S. 100, 124 (1941), reads as follows:
The amendment states but a truism that all is retained which has not been surrendered. There is nothing in the history of its adoption to suggest that it was more than declaratory of the relationship between the national and state governments as it had been established by the Constitution before the amendment or that its purpose was other than to allay fears that the new national government might seek to exercise powers not granted, and that the states might not be able to exercise fully their reserved powers.....
see the rest by clicking the Wikipedia link.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART III- If Obama succeeds in voiding the constitution.
We become a country not ruled by laws but by men.
All Hail King Obama
Tony ,
JustA Roman Catholic Italian Kid from Williamsburg Brooklyn,
Where the World was Neapolitan.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)






An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.