Thursday, March 18, 2010

Glenn Beck PROVES in his own words...HE IS A FRAUD!...

Friends of the Constitution;

GLENN BECK is INTERVIEWED by PETER BOYLES on the ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY ISSUE

KHOW Radio, Denver, CO on 16 March 2010

From someone like Glenn (‘the Constitution matters’) Beck, I find his arguments against pursuing the Article II eligibility issue of Obama to be so weak and insipid that he further confirms my previous argument that “SOMEBODY MADE THEM AN OFFER THEY CAN’T REFUSE: SHUT UP, or YOU and your FAMILY MAY DIE!”

(My comments are in italics after some of his unbelievably ridiculous statements).

Check out these insipid quotes from Glenn’s radio interview on the Peter Boyles Show on Tuesday, 16 March 2010 (wherein the words ‘Article II’ and ‘Natural Born’ are never mentioned):

P.B. What do you think of ‘it’ (the ‘Birther’ thing)?

G.B. Let’s just say, for academic reasons, … he was not born in America. … If I were the President of the United States, I would want people to bring this up. (HUH?) With so many things that is (sic) going on in our country – so many verifiable – so many things that are easy to – uh- prove – uh…

If I were the President of the United States, and I was holding my own Birth Certificate – and I’m standing there in the Oval Office – I would have somebody come in and say: ‘Mr. President, let’s just produce the Birth Certificate, or let’s just go out and address this’. …

If I were the President, I would say: ‘Are you (heh, heh) kidding me. NO! SSSSHHHHHH. Quiet!

P.B.: Do all the missing documents mean anything to you?

G.B.: Yeah, but I don’t believe it’s a winnable argument. I haven’t looked into it all, except just kinda glanced at it, because there’s no way to win that. (Not unless you, Glenn Beck, were to speak about and demand – on air – proof of Article II eligibility. Then the Media and the Public would begin to make the ‘CASE’.)

P.B.: Of course there is. The Constitution is very clear …

G.B.: I understand that, but the Constitution also doesn’t include HealthCare. I’m not focused on this (the Article II eligibility issue). I’m focused on things that are happening right now!. If you want to go down that road, then I’m not with you. … If you can make that happen, then God Bless you.

P.B. What is it that you believe about the issue?

G.B. It doesn’t matter to me because I don’t think you can make the case – in the media or public opinion. The President wants this ‘case’ to be made. (HUH?)

G.B. Why have we spent this time talking about something that is not going to stop Healthcare, and it’s not going to stop your rights (?), - and when this government … really has control of every aspect of your life, you can talk about this all you want? (The fastest way to stop HealthScare, and all the other issues like abortion, amnesty, gun-control, rights for terrorists, etc., is to expose the Imposter – NOW, and therefore make all his actions null and void.) (And after this government has control of every aspect of your life, you will have NO CHANCE OF TALKING ABOUT THIS AT ALL!)

G.B. I’m not a Birther! (Anyone who believes in our Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land MUST be an Article II Constitutionalist – aka ‘Birther’. If not, they’re a ‘Treasoner’).

P.B. If you talk about rights being taken away, I thought it was the Constitution that granted those rights to you …

G.B. It is the Constitution …

P.B. … and if this guy (BHO) had … ‘melted’ that, then isn’t there something important about that?

G.B. Yes. If that were true. Yes.

P.B. And I believe it is.

G.B. Good. Peter, between the Birthers and the 9/11 Truther movements, you’re in dangerous territory on this. … But this is ‘dangerous conspiracy central’.

(And then, believe it or not, after previously ridiculing and ‘demolishing’ Debra Medina, candidate for Governor of Texas, for saying the there may be legitimate questions about 9/11 that need to be answered, Glenn said to Peter):

G.B.: There are legitimate questions about 9/11 that have to be asked! Such as,
what was Sandy Berger sneaking out in his underpants?

G.B. I’m the guy who says ‘Question with Boldness’. You question your way; I’ll question my way.

P.B. You don’t disbelieve this, do you (whether Obama is eligible or not?).

G.B. (Pause) I don’t know what to believe. (repeats) I don’t know what to believe. Where he was born? I don’t know.

P.B.: Would it matter if he was a dual citizen of another country?

G.B. Peter, I don’t think I can say it any clearer. The Constitution matters.

Now, if you can go and change the world with this line of thought, then God Bless you. But I’m not on board with you.

N.T. (If these are the best ‘arguments’ that Glenn can come up with for not stepping up to the plate to remove the Usurper from our White House, then it certainly confirms that SOMEBODY MADE HIM AN OFFER HE COULDN’T REFUSE!)

The Best of Peter Boyles--THE GLENN BECK INTERVIEW




5.0

The Best of Peter Boyles--THE GLENN BECK INTERVIEW

The Best of Peter Boyles--THE GLENN BECK INTERVIEW

Glenn discusses President Obama's birth certificate and the records that aren't available.

He says his eligibility under the constitution just doesn't matter to him.



Here's a worthy comment from one our readers. Anon. I agree 100%

Steve
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

f*@k glen beck and shaun hannity. don't get me started on levin. they are....simply put... in it for the money only. who do they think they are fooling? Any reasonable prudent person can PLAINLY SEE obama has an eligibility problem where the hell are they? spouting the g.d. constitution every day EXCEPT when it concerns the ELIGIBLITY issue in which case they will REFUSE to air discussion on this issue. i would not give any of the above mentioned individuals the credibility of having formed a crowd for them. this is obviously going to have to be done without them. How about a real patriot? Try Orly Taitz. Maybe she can appear at your rally. Yeah, english is not her native language, but she has really tried hasn't she? Been bashed to hell by everyone. Not the best lawyer. But she is right on point. obama is a fraud and a felony criminal. plain and simple.
(Anonymous) 8:51 PM

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.