State Sen. Sam Slom |
The lone Republican in the Hawaii State Senate was interviewed on the radio this morning, explaining that while he believes Barack Obama was born in the Aloha State, he questions what might be on theoriginal, long-form birthcertificatethat would prompt the president to go to such lengths to conceal it.
"I'm not a 'birther,'" Hawaii State Sen. Sam Slom told Jeff Katz of WXKS Radio in Boston, "and I followed this from the very beginning. At first I followed it with amusement, and then I got really concerned about it, because the question was if it was not just the birthcertificate, but otherrecordsas well – schoolrecords, academicrecords, workrecords– why would anyone spend millions of dollars in legal fees, particularly someone in public office, particularly someone in the highest public office, to not make thatinformationpublic?"
As WND has reported, besides Obama's actual birth documentation, the president has refused to release his Punahou schoolrecords, Occidental Collegerecords, Columbia Universityrecords, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law Schoolrecords, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medicalrecords, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, Illinois State Bar Associationrecords, baptismrecordsand his adoptionrecords.
"There are different theories," Slom continued. "One is that there is no birthcertificateat all; I don't think that's true, I think there is a birthcertificate. The second is there may be some very interestinginformationthat the president does not want released, for example, who his father really is or what's listed on the birthcertificate.
"In any event, here is the president of the United States," Slom said, "you've got to have [a birthcertificateto present], why don't we require that of the president?"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.