Mario Apuzzo Schools Obot Poster About Founders’ Utilization of Vattel on Natural Born Citizenship
Then, Mario Apuzzo, Esq. (see his blog: puzo1.blogspot.com), arguably the Dean of presidential eligibility crusader-attorneys, slapped him on the side of the head with his response, which follows Smrstrauss’ posting, below…..
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.’s response ….You are quoting Vattel, but there is no evidence that the writers of the US Constitution followed him. He is not even mentioned once in the Federalist Papers, while the common law was mentioned about twenty times.And the Wong Kim Ark decision was AFTER the Minor vs Happersett decision, and hence would have overturned it (if the Minor vs Happersett decision was actually a ruling on the matter, and it isn’t. It is merely dicta). And the Wong Kim Ark decision ruled six to two (one not voting) that the meaning of Natural Born comes from the common law (thus NOT from Vattel), and that it refers to the PLACE of birth (not the parents), and that every child born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats is Natural Born.THAT is why Meese had that quotation in his book. It corresponds to a ruling of the US Supreme Court. It does not differ from the ruling of the Supreme Court.’
READ MORE...






An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.