Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Surprise! The microfilm of Obama’s Kenyan ties now mysteriously missing


By George Spelvin, staff writer
One visit from Hillary Clinton and it’s all gone! 
 Four different recorded events involving the name of Barack Obama taking place in the then British Protectorate of East Africa have surfaced in British National Archives.  Details of the years between 1953 to 1963 were logged into the Kew branch of Britain’s public records office according to a communique dated July 18, 2012, authored by Dan Crosby.
   “A record of birth of a second son (of Barack Obama, Sr.) is significant because biographical information about Obama’s family indicates Obama, Sr., fathered only one other son prior to Obama II’s birth,” says Crosby.  Now, the spelling of “Burack” and Biraq” surfaced in hand written line records along with a listing of a marriage license registration dated 1954 and a 1961 birth. (2)  The problem researchers now are struggling with in attempts to verify this data involves Series RG36 reference books, but “researchers were denied access under Chapter 52, Sections 3 and 5 or the British Public Records Act of 1958.”
  Microfilm for the British birth registrations seems to be under the same lock down as microfilm Sheriff Joe Arpaio and lead investigator Mike Zullo have tried unsuccessfully to locate.  “Where is the microfilm?’ Sheriff Joe asked a recent East Orlando Tea Party seminar.
     Hillary Clinton traveled to Great Britain in 2009 as part of her junket to Africa, and “evidence shows these records were available for public access” before this trip.  She is alleged to have made “a sudden visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British agency which oversees Public Records Archives from colonial protectorates in early August of 2009. (3)   For some unknown reason Obama, Sr. did NOT include the birth of a son on his INS application to remain in America on his temporary visa status.  Now this anchor baby birth would have been very beneficial to a foreign national looking to remain in this country, and leaving out the birth of a son is very puzzling to researchers.  “Obama’s omission of the birth is astonishing and illogical” one observer said.
   Citing over 180 disparities and contradictions “to Obama’s claims of natal legitimacy as president,” the writer then says this: “If Obama’s cause as a usurper of power is to avenge his father’s culture, he made the worst possible error in lying about who he is.” (4)    The long term damage done to America’s citizens is the taking away of right of redress of grievances as given to them by the U.S. Constitution.  This sentence points to the toxicity of what is happening in the halls of our governance and judicial systems: “Judges have allowed a dangerous precedent in which any foreign invader can covertly usurp the power of the U.S. government simply by lying about their citizenship status and hiding documentation.”  The citizens’ right to know cries out of the horror of complicity of our legal system and the abject failure of our nationally available media to adjudicate here!
Follow Coach at twitter.com @KcoachcCoach
To reach your Congressional representative, use this link:
http://www.contactingthecongress.org/
To read more use these links:
 (1)  http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2012/07/obamas-kenyan-birth-records-discovered.html
(2) Ibid.
(3) Crosby’s report goes to the original source cited as   http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/access-to-public-records.pdf
(4) this goes back to (1)
To read about the Democrats close ties to Communism over the past 70 years get you copy of Coach’s new book Crooks Thugs and bigots: the lost hidden and changed history of the Democratic Party available at: http://crooksthugsandbigots.com 

1 comment:

  1. The people who have claimed to have gone to the British files are not identifying themselves.

    It has been THREE WEEKS since the Sheriff’s press conference, and nothing has happened. NOTHING. Nothing at all.

    No member of Congress (and there are 535 of them) has called for an investigation. Not even Rush Limbaugh wants to discuss it.

    John McCain, who is one of the Senators of Arizona as well as being the former Republican candidate for president, has recently called the Sheriff crazy. The CONSERVATIVE secretary of state of Arizona, who did his own investigation into Obama’s place of birth, has accepted Hawaii’s confirmation that Obama was born there, and he has not changed his mind following Sheriff Joe’s press conference.

    Could the explanation be that the whole world is part of the plot? Or, more likely, is it that they believe the birth certificate, and the officials in Hawaii, and the Index Data, and the birth notices in the Health Bureau Statistics section of the newspapers——and they do not believe the sheriff.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.