Wednesday, March 18, 2015
In
a post on the Harvard Law Review Forum, two well-regarded attorneys, Paul
Clement and Neal Katyal, recently addressed a question that has lingered over
the two most recent quadrennial presidential elections, the question being a
ticklish one of eligibility to be elected President. Setting aside more
considerable qualification considerations, such as experience managing a large
scale enterprise, familiarity with and competence for the duties of the office,
and the like, the question they addressed pertained to one particular
qualification for the Presidency stated in the Constitution.
That qualification requires, to be elected, one must be a “Natural Born Citizen”
of the United States.
That phrase, “Natural Born Citizen,” appears nowhere else in the Constitution
as originally enacted. It stands in contrast to its single exception, allowing
one to be elected president though not a “Natural Born Citizen” if, “a citizen
of the United States,
at the time of the adoption of the Constitution.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.