Obama’s dozens of Social Security Numbers
Sunday, April 10, 2011 1:24
Discrepancies in Barack Obama’s history “that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President” have been accepted “quietly” for study by the U.S, Supreme Court, according to an Email this web site received just this week.
The memo which goes on to refer to “possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii,” is quite similar to an investigation coachisright.com posted on May 16, 2010.
According to a search done by former British police detective Neil Sankey, now a U.S. citizen and a licensed private investigator in Los Angeles, Barack Obama reportedly has 27 different social security numbers under 21 different personal and/or familial name variations in 22 different states plus the District of Columbia.
Along with PI Susan Daniels, Sankey generated a large social security public data base in his lengthy research project, titled “List of Properties associated with Barack Obama and his family.” Sankey’s research is featured in a web video entitled Dossier2MP4 produced by Jim Przybowski. The Sankey/Daniels social security investigation segment alleges Obama currently is using a Social Security number assigned to someone born in Connecticut in l890!
N.B. There is no indication that the Social Security Administration re-issues numbers upon the death of a number holder no matter how long ago they were originally issued.
Sankey and Daniels report that Social Security numbers connected to Barack Obama and the addresses they trace to are as follows: 363 Notlem St., 34982-7358 Fort Pierce, FL. A Social Security number beginning with zero is connected to “White House, Irvine, CA.” A number starting with 282 connects to “713 Hart Senate, D.C,” There was one connected to “White House, Baltimore, MD.” Six more Social Security numbers beginning in the 400s show up with addresses in Washington, Colorado, Georgia, New Jersey, Tennessee and Maryland.
Another five beginning with 500 connect to more cities in California, Washington, Maryland, and Georgia. Two starting with 600, trace to Florida and Texas. Of the three numbers beginning in the 700s, one is listed as “Pennsylvania Ave., Washington, Utah.”
Still more. . .. Three 900s connect to addresses in California and Utah postal box numbers. Fifteen Social Security numbers connect to addresses in Illinois. The same number appears twice for addresses in Sommerville, Massachusetts. One goes to 300 Massachusetts Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C.; the other traces to a postal box in Chicago.
Two odd entries have this same number, but no street address is mentioned. Three different social security numbers for the spelling “Barak” Obama appear in addresses on Happy Street in Covington, Washington, on Digital Highway, and Video Drive in Los Angeles, CA.
In the U.K.’s DAILY MAIL, a news story by David Jones, 27th November 2009, said Neil Sankey is trying to prove that “Barack Obama is guilty of the most audacious act of fraud in the U.S. political history, having become President when he was not eligible to run for office.” “Sankey is a former detective sergeant who served Hampshire police for 26 years and left with an exemplary record,” continues the DAILY MAIL story. “As a highly regarded young detective, Neil Sankey was once seconded to elite Scotland Yard units hunting down IRA bombers, dangerous anarchists, and organized crime barons,” the reporter says.
Several calls made to Sankey’s CA office were not returned. His data base could not be downloaded and apparently is protected research.
No copyright statement was attached to the many, many pages of Sankey’s painstaking research which I analyzed by collating his on-screen names and figures.
To contact your Congressional Representative use this link: www.contactingthecongress.org/
To read more use this link
www.scribd.com/doc/20976501/Neil-Sankey-Barack-Obama-Addresses-SS-Numbers
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.