From the liberal rag-USA Today
obama: 'The buck stops with me'
"it" must not be talking about the euphamistic "buck" of Truman's day, because "it" has ben the biggest buck passer, ( in more ways than one) since Adolf Eichmann's orders are orders defense in Jerusalem. Now if we're talking campaign fraud yes those bucks do stop with the one.
***********
Hypocrisy of the liberal. A student took a poll of UC Merced students and found those who favored redistritution of wealth by taxing the rich, were opposed to sharing what they earned with the less industrious/fortunate. Specically GPA points. What selfish little fuks.
*******
tom vilsack says food stamps stimulate the economy. Same refrain as san fran nan saying unemployment is he best way to grow the economy there is, on a dollar for dollar bang for the buck basis.
No way.
The economic theory that every dollar circulates through the economy creating 5 more dollars in activity, applies to independently created dollars. When a food stamp dollar or an unemployment dollar is paid out, it comes from taxation. When those taxation dollars are removed from the free market, for very one of those, 5 dollars of economic activity dollars are lost. Food Stamp dollars or any taxation dollar produce a net sum of zero economic growth activity. This is why the government will never be able to spend it's way to prosperity. Capitalism in America has been able to prosper in spite of the government, not because of the government.
Ergo, as per usual the libs only speak in half truths, or shall we say flat out lies, by conveniently overlooking that minor detail.
If what vilsack and pelosi were saying was correct, then we should all collect food stamps and unemployment. I wonder what Standard and Poor's would think of that as an economic solution?
Steve
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
I guess the best country to ask how that is working for them is England. Look at the United States and just pick any state you would care to pick. Illegal's for a example in PA I know of one of thousand that have more than six children. Hospital paid,medical paid,dental paid, schooling paid and housing paid. How long is the taxpayer willing to keep this going? And the number above is tens times that in CA where I live.
ReplyDeleteAnd the person in CA gets $233.00 per child. So guess what it does have to end one way or another. When the well is dry the well is dry.
And what will happens when the lady which doesn't receive the money anymore. And the three or four men that produced the babies and then gets money from the mother and all that stops. What then?
Or how about the 30,000 students in Michigan which was receiving food stamps. And that now has been taken away and the students will have to work, as we did. It's coming to a town near you in the future.
JBH