Washington D.C. – Two weeks ago Montgomery Blair Sibley released his Stuxnet-like Motion challenging Barack Hussein Obama, II’s eligibility to be President. That motion targeted specific federal inmates convicted under federal criminal laws putatively signed by Obama alleging that Obama is ineligible to be President and thus the criminal laws he signed are void.
Today, appropriately on President’s Day, Sibley has released a new computer-virus like Motion which seeks to emulate a computer generated Directed-Denial-of-Service network attack on the Federal Criminal Justice System. Sibley’s Nyguen Motion arises from the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Nguyen v. United States, 539 U.S. 69 (2003), which held that any decision of an improperly constituted judicial body must be vacated. In total, Obama has appointed 173 judges, namely two Justices to the Supreme Court, 30 judges to the United States Courts of Appeals and 141 judges to the United States District Courts.
The argument of the Nyguen Motion is straightforward: (i) Article II, Section 2, clause 2 grants the President the power to “appoint” federal judges, (ii) Obama is not eligible to be President as he is not a “natural born Citizen” and has refused to tendered any admissible proof that he is even a U.S. Citizen, (iii) therefore, his appointments are void under the holding of Nguyen v. United States and (iv) accordingly, all judicial acts by those judges – specifically including incarcerating prisoners – are void.
Sibley has released the Nguyen Motion to prisoners convicted by Obama-appointed Judges and their defense attorneys and expects his Motion to be filed in dozens of cases by them in the near future. Sibley said: “Like a DDoS computer attack, my Nyguen Motion will circulate among the prison population and criminal defense bar. Once the Motion is properly presented, the Courts will be forced to deal with the merits of Obama’s legitimacy as the doctrine of ‘standing’ will no longer be a barrier to adjudication. My Nyguen Motion forces the Courts to make the choice of issuing the requested subpoenas – thereby finally settling the issue of Obama’s eligibility to be President – or affirming that the Sixth Amendment has been repealed by Judicial fiat because it threatens the status quo. Either way, we will know as a People whether it is time to convene a Constitutional Convention to re-assert our fundamental rights.”