No Recusals: U.S. Supreme Court Denied Without Comment Obama Eligibility Challenge
The U.S. Supreme Court in typical fashion denied without comment Dr. Orly Taitz's application for stay for the California electoral challenge Noonan v Bowen. Dr. Taitz sought to strip California's electoral votes from Barack Obama based on his Article II ineligibility, his forged birth certificate, his forged Selective Service, and his Connecticut Social Security Number. Included were Affidavits from DHS Special Agent Stephen Coffman and Debt Collector Albert Hendershot attesting to Obama's identity fraud.
It is reported that the U.S. Supreme Court Law Clerks did not even forward the pleadings to Five of the justices.
And as usual SCOTUS Squatters Sotomayor and Kagan did not recuse themselves. No conflicts of interest there, right?
FROM PAGE ONE OF THE SCOTUS ORDER LIST:
12A606 NOONAN, EDWARD, ET AL. V. BOWEN, CA SEC. OF STATE
The applications for stay addressed to The Chief Justice and referred to the Court are denied.
This is how it would read if they actually recused themselves:
Justice Sotomayor/Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Check back later for updates...
COMPLETE SCOTUS ORDER LIST BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/126169520
PLEADINGS IN QUESTION BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/124806553
REPORT: Supreme Court Clerks Never Forwarded Obama Identity Fraud Pleadings To Five Justices - DETAILS HERE.
PREVIOUS REPORTS: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/search?q=Noonan+Obama







An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
There is no order attached to 12A606 NOONAN, EDWARD, ET AL. V. BOWEN, CA SEC. OF STATE.....listed but no order attached ?!?!?!?
ReplyDelete12-736 SIBLEY, MONTGOMERY B. V. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL. denied