Just one more reason that citizens of Massachusetts should vote for Scott Brown for Senate
Coakley’s Democrat Operative Knocks Over Reporter, Coakley Lies About It
By Warner Todd Huston Thursday, January 14, 2010An operative for the Martha Coakley campaign, Democrat for Massachusetts Senate, assaulted a reporter from the Weekly 
As it happens long-time 
As I said, all the details of the assault was posted by the assaulted reporter, John McCormack, at the The Weekly Standard.
It’s all an example of the rough and tumble way that Democrats operate: Is there a reporter asking tough questions? Knock him down and prevent him from asking the candidate questions. It’s all very typical Democrat ignorance, typical Democrat hate for a free press, and for a typical Democrat desire to shield their candidates from the people. So, it’s nothing surprising to see a Democrat operative trying to beat someone up for daring to ask a question of a Democrat candidate. Democrats are thugs. Always have been. From the days when Democrats were slave masters wielding the whip against slaves that dared raise their heads, to the hanging tree upon which Democrats hanged “uppity” blacks during the early 1900s, to the streets of Selma where Democrats beat civil 
And now comes news that Senate candidate Martha 
The Boston Herald just reported that Coakley is playing innocent.
“I know there were people following, including two from the Brown campaign who have been very aggressive in their stalking. I’m not sure what happened. I know something occurred, but I’m not privy to the facts. I’m sure it will come out, but I’m not aware of that.”
She isn’t “aware” of the “facts”?
LIAR!!
She was standing right there watching the incident!
Want proof? Here is an AP photo showing Coakley two feet away and watching HER operative attack the reporter…
![]()
Martha Coakley is a liar. It’s just that plain.
Just one more reason that citizens of 






An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.