In addition, the records indicate the number was issued between 1977 and 1979, yet Obama’s earliest employment reportedly was in 1975 at Baskin-Robbins ice cream shop in Oahu, Hawaii.
Well, the mute question, that require an explanation from white house, is why Obama is using a SSN reserved for Connecticut applicants that was issued at a date later than he is known to have held employment.
President Obama’s history is shrouded in controversy, lack of public documentation of certificates such as birth certificate, educational records, scholarly articles, passport documents, medical records, papers from his service in Illinois state senate, state bar association records etc.
Experts of ID theft security are of the view that this SSN should be questioned.
SSN has been issued to people in States where they do not live, but these are exceptional circumstances and good reason based. However, in case of Obama, what good reason would be that he has a SSN issued in Connecticut when he was resident of Hawaii.
The investigators came to conclusion that Obama is using SSN beginning with 042. On verifying the other alternative close numbers in database, they come to conclusion that it has been issue between 1977 and 1979.
The investigators arte of the view that here is obviously a case of fraud going on here. Does the Social Security Administration ever re-issue SSN?
Does the Social Security Administration ever re-issue Social Security numbers? It is against the law for a person to have re-issued or second SSN issued.
There is no record of Obama’s Connecticut connection, neither during campaign nor in white house records.
Therefore, what is the conclusion; Obama had different SSN when he worked as a teenager in Hawaii prior to 1977.
It is crime to use more than one SSN, under current law a person is not allowed to use more than one SSN in a lifetime.






An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
Wow!!! I'm convinced after all that evidence you just posted!!
ReplyDeleteHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!