Obama birth record, citizenship, unraveled for Alabama Supreme Court?
Barack Hussein Obama’s birth riddle is being analyzed in a 13 page, Amicus Curiae brief filed with the Alabama Supreme Court by Harvard Attorney Albert W.L. Moore Jr. The brief promises to offer a straightforward theory as to just who this man in our White House really and truly is. (1)
Moore summarizes what is going on: “He (BHO) was a natural born American on the date of his birth, but further official records prove that he lost American citizenship and constitutional eligibility to the Presidency as definitively confirmed by his 1983 naturalization as an American citizen. By law, this process of naturalization did NOT restore his constitutional eligibility.”
Filed on 13 May, 2013, Attorney Moore (pg. 10) is asking that the AL Supreme Court remand the Obama eligibility conundrum back to the trial court to seek discovery concerning the following: a. subpoenaing his (BHO) DNA; b. all of his Hawai’ian “vital records consisting of an original birth certificate showing his ACTUAL (CiR emphasis) birth parents and his amended birth certificate showing his adoptive parents.” The Moore Amicus further contends that Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama Sr, a Luo tribesman, adopted at birth the child now known as BHO II. “Obama’s (BHO II) real, original birth certificate will show two American citizen parents.”
On page 5 of Moore’s brief is the July 27, 2009, press release issued by Dr. Chiyome Leinaala Fukino, then the Hawai’ian Director of Health, which states: ” I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino. . .have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai’i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October, 2008, over eight months ago.” Attorney Moore cites this DoH document as being the linchpin of the whole Obama nativity mystery because (pg. 5) “this statement precludes any truly candid counsel from representing to a court that Obama’s father was Barack Hussein Obama, the alien black man.” ( the actual words in the brief)
Now, says Attorney Moore, this vital record revelation by Dr.Fukino shows that Obama at birth was a NBC because Dr. Fukino “was relying on the original birth certificate. . .she refrained from specifying that basis in deference to the confidentiality of adoption records.”
This Amicus Curiae further proposes that the Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) issued on 27-April-2011 in actuality was an amended birth certificate created to show the adoptive parents, but that the word “AMENDED” was cropped or somehow masked. Only court ordered DNA analysis will reveal who Obama’s birth parents are. The problem, now however, is that the man sitting in America’s Oval Office LOST HIS ELIGIBILITY to serve as President of the United States. Point 3, pg. 2, of Amicus states, “Obama was naturalized a citizen of Indonesia around 1968, when American Secretary of State Dean Rusk issued a certificate of loss of nationality to facilitate the Indonesian naturalization.” Somehow, this young man returned to his birth country on an Indonesian passport, and “Madelyn Lee Payne Dunham (was) appointed guardian-by contractual arrangement-with Catholic Charities of Connecticut.”
This sentence in the Albert Moore brief is crucial in attempting to determine Obama’s eligibility to serve as our President. “In 1979 (pg. 3) he confirmed as an adult his relinquishment of American citizenship in favor of his underlying Indonesian naturalization by REFRAINING FROM REGISTRATION WITH THE SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM!” (CiR capitalization) Additionally, the brief goes on to say that this man in 1981, traveled to Indonesia on his Indonesian passport, got a student visa and re-entered the U.S. on this foreign passport using the name Barry Soetoro. The Columbia University years were spent as a “foreign student.”
The brief then goes into detail about what is and what is not a Natural Born Citizen, versus a naturalized citizen, and the Constitutional definition of eligibility to serve as President. Attorney Moore concludes by citing his solemn oath as a lawyer to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America. The Missouri lawyer “prays the Court read and heed his (Moore) amicus brief to cut to the heart of Obama’s constitutional eligibility. . .”
SOURCE: (1) Case No. 1120465, Supreme Court of Alabama, Hugh McInnish et all., appellants v. Beth Chapman, Secretary of state, appeal from the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, CV 2012-1053
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.