Look Behind The Glass, It's A Two Way Mirror

Is the TSA screening process the beginning of a slippery slope to the loss of our personal liberties? Is this "best technology" available a government dulling of our senses,so as to lead us unsuspectingly, in a direction they want to take us?

As a Christian it is strictly against my personal religious beliefs to have any mark whatsoever placed on my body, by a government entity. RFI chip technology is supposed to be the next big wave of technological record keeping, it can transact, track and identify. Some companies are loading employee data into these rice grain sized memory/transmit chips and implanting them under the skin of their workers. These chips allow/disallow the wearer, entry into secure work areas. Some companies see this as a way to streamline payroll and time clock management.

Mark Levin's guest host tonight was Houston's Michael Berry, the topic- the TSA screening fiasco. A caller made the relevant point, if we surrender our rights to the government in this current way for the purpose to travel by air, then what comes next, department store access denial, movie theater pat downs, restaurant frisks and sporting event strip searches... once it begins, where does it stop?

The TSA I repeat, says this is the best tech available and the usurper also endorsed it as such . But is it really? We haven't tried anything as simple as finger print identification or iris scans. There's the sniffer technology that samples the air for explosives. The Israeli profiling methods and probably several more methods.

What if this pat down mania is being used as a way to create a crisis, so it can be resolved by in appearances what we will be considered by many a less harmful solution?

What if this is the conditioning process before we are all asked to wear implanted ID's or something even more intrusive?

Obama in getting ObamaCare passed wants all of our medical records for his online data bank, he wants access to our bank accounts for fining us for not buying his mandated insurance, why not have our life's story on a chip for him or some Cass Sunstein type to be privy to? How better to control the masses than have incriminating information on them. Extortion, blackmail, character assassination, it would all be there for some one or some agency to use as they would against us.

Is this some far fetched conspiracy paranoia talk? Maybe. But isn't this Obama and the NWO's modus operandi? Take the BP oil spill, did you think Obama and Salazar did every thing possible or in the best interest of America to resolve the spill? You could say yes to that if you are a leftist environmentalist or anti capitalist marxist. The purposeful foot dragging was to provide more impetus for creating a tidal wave of outrage and a calling for a determined move away from a fossil fuel based economy. My personal opinion is Obama let that blown oil well bleed black crude, until the Gulf was nearly saturated, so as a to choke us fossil fuelers into submission. Obama wanted the environmentalists superheated over the BP damage going into the elections. Obama still wants a cap and trade redistribution of our wealth. Obama is doing everything possible to get things as Soros wants them. The playbook hasn't changed from when it was first handed to him by Soros.

Do I think Obama colluded with Al Qaeda on this UPS package scare? No but I think he has ulterior motives behind the moves we are seeing play out at the airports.

These Obama fixes are topical reactionary fixes, they are not getting ahead of the Al Qaeda terror curve, and Bin Laden knows it. There are any number of avenues they can still use to get to us. Take the southern border situation as an another prime example of Obama's attempt to steer the masses into accepting something we are loathe to, in exchange for perceived security on another front.

Obama wants illegals to vote so they can keep him or his successor in power. We have an unsecured border that not only allows illegals to cross, but terrorists as well. Obama has already offered us the false choice of border security for amnesty.

If Obama was FOR the security of America he wouldn't be trying to back us into these desperation corners.

These are the warning signs I see, Obama and his kind are master manipulators. It began with Obama at least, when he started campaigning and it continues to this day. We all must be alert to these traps. The ground we step on isn't always what it appears to be.

Steve