A Criminologist Questions the Bin Laden Episode
Jason Kissner
Now that seriously conflicting accounts of Osama bin Laden's end have come out, what do we really know about his death? Less than you might think. More
 
Sasha and Malia Obama 'Learn What They Live'
Jeannie DeAngelis
The First Daughters are learning how to be highbrow aristocrats whose extravagances are enjoyed without embarrassment, in full view and at the expense of the suffering. More

Will John Roberts Betray Us Again?
 Doug Patton Full Story
In the tortured justification for his vote to sustain Obamacare last summer, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts pointed to Congress’s authority to levy taxes — an argument not even put forward by its advocates. (They, in fact, had argued that it was not a tax.) As a direct result of Roberts’s folly, the stark reality of Barack Obama’s “fundamental transformation of America” creeps closer each day.

Larry Grathwohl: An Extraordinary Life from the Weather Underground to the FBI and beyond
 Sher Zieve Full StoryLarry Grathwohl is one of those increasingly rare individuals who has led a truly extraordinary life. However, after speaking with him I found that he is an unassuming and truly humble man who has a strong belief in the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

Instead of defending your position on the DEFENSE of the Constitution, here are some ideas on how to go on the OFFENSE against those who would support and defend ‘the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people’

Citizens for the Constitution;

27 March, 2013

 

The best DEFENSE is a good OFFENSE!

 

Instead of defending your position on the DEFENSE of the Constitution, here are some ideas on how to go on the OFFENSE against those who would support and defend ‘the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people’ (© 2012 Clint Eastwood)

 

FAQs: Frequently Asked Questions

Vs.

FUQs: Frequently Unasked Questions

 

A.  FUQ for any U.S. Citizen:

 

If I put your Social Security number through E-Verify, The U.S. Government program for determining one’s eligibility to even be employed in the United States, do you think you would pass or qualify?

 

What do you think should be done to someone currently occupying a very high Office in the U.S. Government who self-publishes a stolen SS# 042-68-4425 that fails E-Verify, and therefore would be ineligible for employment in the United States?

 

 

Would you call for their arrest and removal from Office, and, if not, why not?

 

B.  FUQ for anyone who would call someone a ‘Birther’:

I gather from your willingness to call Article II Constitutionalists - ‘Birthers’ - that you also must have reached the conclusion that using a forged Certificate of Birth for identity purposes for employment in high Office would not make one guilty of Mispersonization of Identity – a felony punishable by up to 15 years in prison.

Knowing this to be true about the person now occupying the Office of President, would you call for their arrest and removal from Office, and, if not, why not?

 

 

C.  FUQ for anyone who asks why we should be concerned about Obama’s forged Selective Service Registration:

 

I am sure you are aware that in 1980, all male U.S. Citizens were required to register for the draft, and that failure to do so would make one forever INELIGIBLE for employment with the U.S. Government, to include the Office of President – but Foreign Exchange Students were exempt from this requirement, although also making them ineligible for the Office of President.

 

Did you register for the draft, or did you serve and take an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution, or were you exempt – from the requirement and therefore ineligible for the Office?

 

What do you think should be done to someone in a very high Office in the U.S. Government who submits a forged Selective Service Registration form to try to convince a lap-dog media and Congress, and a sheep-like public that he was not a Foreign Exchange Student?

 

Knowing this to be true about the person now occupying the Office of President, would you call for their arrest and removal from Office, and, if not, why not?

 

 

D.  FUQ for anyone and everyone you meet – worldwide:

 

1.    If you were paid on a binding contract with a bad check (a forgery) and you reported the ‘passer-of-bad-paper’ to the Police/Sheriff, what would you say or do if the Sheriff said “I’m not accusing the person who defrauded you by passing the bad paper of any crime, but I’ll be raising money to pay for my posse to go after the printing press operator who made the ‘checks’”?

Knowing that the ‘passer-of-bad-papers’ was unlawfully occupying the Office of President of the United States, would you:

a.    Demand that the Sheriff file formal charges with Congress against the ‘passer-of-forged-documents?, and

b.    Refuse to help fund his efforts to search for the printing-press operator until he did so?

… and, if not, why not?

2.    ‘Who (or what) has the power to make the issue of Obama’s INELIGIBILITY and acts of TREASON not fit for discussion, only derision … and to turn otherwise intelligent people into blithering idiots?’

 

 

When we start receiving reasonable and intelligent answers to these simple questions of our elected representatives, the Media and the Becks, the Hannitys, the Levins, the van Susterens, the Judge Napolitanos, the Cavutos, the Palins, the Rubios, the Cruzes, and our religious leaders, then perhaps we can get on with the business of restoring our Constitutional Republic.

 

Until then, keep asking the FUQs instead of the repeatedly asked and meaningless FAQs of why would the Congress, SCOTUS, and the Media continue to cover for the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people!

 

---

Neil B. Turner graduated from the University of Rhode Island in 1957 with a Bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering. He served his country for 7 years as an Army Aviation Officer, then lived internationally in such diverse countries as Germany, The Philippines, Hong Kong, and Australia. In 2008, he was a CA Elector for the Constitution Party’s presidential candidate, Dr. Chuck Baldwin, and has been involved in the Article II, Section 1 constitutional requirements for the Office of President ever since.

He can be reached at: NBTurner@RoadRunner.com

Allen West Won’t Help Expose Obama’s Ineligibility...

Sheriff Joe's Investigator To Allen West: Obama Birth Certificate A Proven Criminal Forgery

VIDEO FLASHBACK FIRST: 



Allen West Won’t Help Expose Obama’s Ineligibility

By Carl Gallups @ Western Center For Journalism

STEADFAST and LOYAL? We think not. Dear readers, I have been asked many times about our encounter with Lt. Col. Allen West at CPAC. I have been asked if he really declined to help Lt. Zullo and I move this criminal investigation forward. Yes, that is true. That was his response, and of course, he was free to make that response. I still hold out some hope that he might change his mind. I am not holding my breath in the matter, however.

Following is my account of what happened with Lt. Col. Allen West at CPAC. (MAKE CERTAIN you see the hypocrisy, in light of this article, which appears on Col. West’s website below!)

Lt. Mike Zullo and I spoke to Allen West the first night on the evening before CPAC. We were at dinner and Col. West walked right by our table. He had a small group with him. He stopped to talk to someone at the table next to us. After he finished, we introduced ourselves. He said he knew of the Arpaio investigation and Lt. Zullo and would be glad to meet with us for a few moments to discuss the evidence we had. His secretary, who was with him, gave us an email and told us to remind her and she would set an appointment time. We sent the email. The appointment from Col. West’s office was never made.

By the next evening we had still not heard back from him. That night, I approached him at a CPAC VIP dinner. He was preparing to be seated just a few tables from us. I politely reminded him of his promise to us. I told him that we had not heard from him yet. He told me that we should “stop by his display table tomorrow.” I felt then that he had no intention of meeting us privately.

The next day, Lt. Zullo was able to find Col. West in the crowd. Lt. Zullo asked Col. West to give him five minutes of his time. Col. West gave it to him. Lt. Zullo told him of the 100% solid evidence he had of a forged and fabricated document and the legal ramifications and possible national security issues of the matter. The bottom line of that conversation was that West told Lt. Zullo (after hearing and acknowledging the evidence of the case) that he couldn’t get involved in it because he might have future political aspirations - he couldn’t afford to be associated with the case. Lt. Zullo assured him this was NOT a birther issue – this was a proven criminal forgery and fabrication of identifying document issue. He assured Col. West that he would be backed up by a full and professional criminal investigation. Lt. Zullo asked Col. West if he could at least help us to open other doors with other VIPS. Col. West reaffirmed that he had no interest in helping us.

I still hold out hope that Col. West might jump on board if this thing goes public in the near future. We have the promises of other VIPS that they will help us to bring it public, perhaps within the next few months at the most. However, I know how politics work. I am not naive. We may wind up with many on board with us – or we might wind up with everyone of them backing out on us.

I’ve never seen anything like this in all my previous years in law enforcement. I have never heard of congressmen, courts, or federal law enforcement officials completely ignoring, refusing to investigate, or even look at the evidence that another law enforcement agency has investigated concerning possible criminal activity coming directly out of the White House. Remember Watergate? Remember Monica? This situation and the possible implications and ramifications of it, pales in comparison to Watergate and Monica.

CONTINUED HERE: http://www.westernjournalism.com/allen-west-wont-help-expose-obamas-ineligibility

FLASHBACK: Sheriff Joe's Lead Investigator Meeting More Officials About Obama's Identity Fraud - DETAILS HERE.

PREVIOUS REPORTS: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/search?q=Carl+Gallups

The Progressive homosexual agenda is a tool of those who are seeking the destruction of America.

We will be judged by our silence
 Doug Hagmann Full Story
What we are seeing today in the fight for “equal rights” by homosexual activists is the culmination of an agenda that was set in motion more than a half-century ago.  Before you can fully understand and appreciate what is taking place today, you must first understand that you are being lied to, hoodwinked and manipulated into the erroneous belief that the issue is about “civil rights” or “equal rights.” It’s not. It’s a deliberate perversion of the moral integrity of our society to advance a much larger and more nefarious agenda.

USURPER'S BLATANT IDENTITY FRAUD: MEDIA REFUSES TO REPORT AND GOVERNMENT REFUSES TO ACT AND INVESTIGATE ON BEHALF OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE...

OBAMA IS OBVIOUSLY AN IDENTITY FRAUD CRIMINAL!

SSA Crashed: Obama Used Another Social Security Number Assigned To Dead Woman

Taitz Crashes Social Security Administration Office: Obama Used Another Social Security Number Assigned To Deceased Mother Of Chief Actuary Of Social Security Administration - VIDEO EXCERPT BELOW: (...

Audio: Private Investigator Rips Media Over Obama's Use Of Bogus Social Security Number

Audio: Private Investigator Susan Daniels Rips Media Over Obama's Use Of Bogus Social Security Number; Says Obama Alias Harrison Bounel Bogus; Sheriff Joe Not Investigating Alias - AUDIO EXCERPTS HERE:...

Video: TYTinvestigates Takes On Obama's Bogus Connecticut Social Security Number

Orly Taitz: Long Form Birther - Lady Libertine - TYTinvestigates: I talk with Orly about her campaign to prove that Barack Obama is not eligible to be president of the United States. She tells me...

Attorney Mario Apuzzo Schools Western Free Press Contributor On Natural Born Citizen

Senator Ted Cruz Is Not a “Natural Born Citizen”  and Therefore Not Eligible to be President By Mario Apuzzo, Esq. March 25, 2013 It is pretty amazing to see to what lengths some will go to...

DICTATOR OBAMA CONTINUES TO STOCKPILE AMMUNITION...

DHS To Buy 360,000 More Rounds of Hollow Point Ammunition

Arms build-up continues as Congress demands answers

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
March 25, 2013

While the Department of Homeland Security continues to ignore members of Congress demanding to know why the federal agency is engaged in an apparent arms build-up, the DHS has just announced it plans to purchase another 360,000 rounds of hollow point ammunition to add to the roughly 2 billion bullets already bought over the past year.

The DHS has now purchased over 2 billion rounds of ammo.

A solicitation on the Federal Business Opportunities website details the DHS’ plan to purchase 360,000 rounds of “Commercial leaded training ammo (CLTA) Pistol .40 caliber 165 grain, jacketed hollow point.” The bullets are to be delivered to the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center in Artesia, New Mexico, the same destination for 240,000 hollow point rounds which were purchased only last month.

Although the DHS has attempted to explain its mammoth purchase of ammunition by claiming the bullets are being acquired in bulk to save money and that they are for training purposes only, this has been disputed by reputable voices such as former Marine Richard Mason, who told reporters with WHPTV News in Pennsylvania earlier this month, “We never trained with hollow points, we didn’t even see hollow points my entire four and a half years in the Marine Corps.”

Hollow point bullets are almost twice as expensive as full metal jackets, therefore the DHS’ explanation that it is buying huge quantities in bulk to “save money” doesn’t make sense.

As we reported yesterday, concerns about the apparent arms build-up are growing, with retired United States Army Captain Terry M. Hestilow sending a letter to Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) warning that the ammo purchases represent “a bold threat of war by that agency (DHS), and the Obama administration, against the citizens of the United States of America.”

Questions from members of Congress about why the federal agency is buying up ammo, exacerbating shortages across the country, have been met with silence.

- Kansas Congressman Timothy Huelscamp said last week that threats should be made to withdraw funding from the DHS if it didn’t explain why it was purchasing so many bullets, remarking, “They have no answer for that question. They refuse to answer to answer that.”

- Earlier this month, New Jersey Congressman Leonard Lance said, “Congress has a responsibility to ask Secretary Napolitano as to exactly why these purchases have occurred,” signaling his intention to get answers.

- Californian Congressman Doug LaMalfa and 14 of his House colleagues have written a letter to the Department of Homeland Security asking if the purchases are, “being conducted in a manner that strategically denies the American people access to ammunition.”

Although members of Congress are treating the matter with the seriousness it deserves, the mainstream and leftist media have attempted to ridicule the entire issue as a conspiracy theory, with Atlantic Wire even suggesting that the story had its origins in a debunked email, a report that completely failed to even mention the admitted fact that the DHS had purchased around 2 billion bullets.

While the DHS continues to purchase bullets in large quantities, police departments have been forced to barter amongst each other in a desperate scramble to meet their ammo needs.

YOUR TAX MONEY AT WORK!

KING OBAMA
3 LAVISH VACATIONS IN 3 MONTHS

White House Tours Closed to Public...
Too Expensive

Redistributing the wealth, Obama style means keeping the wealth for himself and friends. Because no one knows if he is really who he claims to be, or even a close facsimile, it’s the biggest mystery of modern times how Obama managed to capture America and then rape its riches before systematically dismantling it under the phony rubic known forevermore as “The Fundamental Transformation of America”.

The Perfect Photo that Tells the Real Obama Story
 Judi McLeod Full Story
Using the money of wealthy atheist Friedrich Engels, a mentally warped Karl Marx pioneered the Misery of the Masses known as Marxism.

THEY'RE COMING TO TAKE YOUR MONEY AWAY...HA HAA...HO HOO...HE HEEE!...

Eurozone chair says personal bank accounts of other countries can also be raided

Posted on March 26, 2013 by Dr. Eowyn

Mere days after the Eurozone had proposed to levy 10% of bank deposits in Cyprus, the governments of Spain and New Zealand already began making similar noises.
Sure enough, a day after Cyprus finalized its pact with the
DevilEurozone to confiscate 30-40% of bank deposits that are more than €100,000 ($128,630) for a €10 billion loan in return, a top Eurozone official announced that, if needed, Eurzone will raid the personal bank accounts in other financially-troubled European Union (EU) countries as well.
The Eurozone is an economic and monetary union of 17 EU member states that have adopted the euro (€) as their common currency and sole legal tender.

Eurozone Chairman Jeroen Jijsselbloem

Bruno Waterfield reports from Brussels for the UK’s The Telegraph, March 25, 2013, that ditching a three-year-old policy of protecting senior bondholders and large depositors (over €100,000) in European Union (EU) banks, Jeroen Dijsselbloem, the Dutch chairman of the eurozone, told the FT and Reuters that the heavy losses inflicted on depositors in Cyprus would be the template for future banking crises across Europe.

Dijsselbloem said:
“If there is a risk in a bank, our first question should be ‘Okay, what are you in the bank going to do about that? What can you do to recapitalise yourself?’ If the bank can’t do it, then we’ll talk to the shareholders and the bondholders, we’ll ask them to contribute in recapitalising the bank, and if necessary the uninsured deposit holders.

If we want to have a healthy, sound financial sector, the only way is to say, ‘Look, there where you take on the risks, you must deal with them, and if you can’t deal with them, then you shouldn’t have taken them on.’
The consequences may be that it’s the end of story, and that is an approach that I think, now that we are out of the heat of the crisis, we should take.
We should aim at a situation where we will never need to even consider direct recapitalisation. If we have even more instruments in terms of bail-in and how far we can go on bail-in, the need for direct recap will become smaller and smaller.
I think the approach needs to be, let’s deal with the banks within the banks first, before looking at public money or any other instrument coming from the public side. Banks should basically be able to save themselves, or at least restructure or recapitalise themselves as far as possible.”
By “direct recapitalization,” Dijsselbloem means a direct bailout of a heavily-indebted and financially-insolvent EU country by the three-headed Cerberus of the EU, European Central Bank, and International Monetary Fund.
The announcement is highly significant as it signals the mothballing of the euro’s €700bn bailout fund, the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), which Spain and Ireland wants to be used to recapitalize their troubled banks.
The eurozone had been planning to roll out the ESM as a “big bazooka” in mid-2014 that could help save banks and prevent financial turmoil in countries such Spain or Italy, a development that has been delayed by German resistance.
Although last night Dijesselbloem tried to row back from his “contagion” comment, he’d already made his point to countries like Ireland and Spain that had been hoping to access the ESM in order to restructure banks without killing off their financial sector by inflicting huge losses on investors.
Meanwhile, banks are still closed (on “holiday”) in Cypriot, until Thursday. Cypriot President Nicos Anastasiades made happy talk, saying that Cyprus could now make a fresh start after having come a “breath away” from collapse. He also said there would be a criminal investigation into the crisis.
See also:

• “Govt confiscates 30% of all large bank deposits in Cyprus,” Mar. 25, 2013.
• “The Left approve of stealing your bank savings,” March 21, 2013.
• “Cyprus copycats: NZ and Spain talk wealth tax on bank deposits,” March 20, 2013.
• “Confiscation of bank deposits: Can it happen in America?,” March 19, 2013.
• “Eurozone confiscation of Cyprus bank deposits: Fallout & Analyses,” Mar. 18, 2013.
• “Unelected Eurozone ministers to confiscate 10% of bank deposits in Cyprus,” Mar. 17, 2013.

How can you take an oath on the Constitution to defend the Constitution? Normally, one takes an oath with his hand on a Bible, or a Koran, on some other Scripture one holds sacred. Taking an oath to defend the Constitution by putting your hand on the Constitution is a skyhook. It is supported by nothing else. It neatly avoids the central question: Is this a valid oath? Can we rely on a person who creates such a stir by the simple act of taking an oath of office?

John Brennan's Spooky Swearing-In
Ken Blackwell and Bob Morrison
The reasons behind John Brennan's constituional swearing-in stunt remain mysterious. More

How insane is all of this?

Let me see if I got this straight, because of the sequester, our Military is being made to suffer, our personal safety is placed at risk, due to numerous FAA airport towers being shut-down. Hundred's if not thousands of programs are being cut, American worker's are being furloughed throughout many sectors of both government, and private industry, and at the same time, Obama just gave $80,000,000.00 to the Palestinian's, and additional $80,000,000.00 to the Syrian Freedom Fighters, that are comprised of al-Qaeda, prisoners, and Taliban fighters.  Obama also gave $250,000,000.00 to Mohammad Morsi in Egypt, along with billions of dollars worth of military equipment.

I am certain that Obama and his dysfunctional Administration, have also given hundred's of millions of dollars, if not billions of dollars, in support of the Libyan rebels, when they were fighting to remove Gaddafi from power, and replace him with the Muslim Brotherhood leadership.

Question, how is it the John Boehner, the Speaker of the House of Representatives allows all of this money to be funneled to countries for the most part that all hate America, especially at a time when America is in such dire financial straights, coupled with the sequester, and the negative impact that the sequester is having on all American's?

America presently owe's close to $17 trillion dollars, Obama-Care is expected to add an additional $6.2 trillion dollars, and at the rate that Obama and his dysfunctional Administration spends money, if Obama does not remain as emperor in 2016, America if it is still America, will owe well over $30 trillion dollars, how insane is all of that?

One has to think that all of the 535 Members of Congress have had lobotomies, and are clueless to what lays ahead for the American people, either that, or they have been told to follow the instructions that are sent to them by the Propaganda Minister David Axelrod, and those unwilling to comply will regret not having done so.  What else could possibly explain why Congress has done absolutely nothing to protect the American people, and at the same time, permit Obama, and his dysfunctional Administration to continue to bury America under a mountain of debt, one that they will never, ever, be able to repay? - GABOR ZOLNA

Congress needs to demand that Obama produce the documents that Donald Trump offered $5,000,000.00, to a charity of Obama's choice, by Obama simply producing those documents, which Obama declined to produce. The obvious question is why, the answer unfortunately is also obvious, because Obama simply cannot, since they would prove that Obama was never qualified to hold office, those documents would prove that Obama came to America, as a foreign exchange student and was granted admission under affirmative action, with an Indonesian passport.

Is Obama Following Hitler's Youth Program?

---

It certainly appears that way, based on the latest FEMA application, dated March 25, 2013  copy attached http://www.fema.gov/news-release/2013/03/25/fema-seeks-applicants-youth-preparedness-council-0

As you can see there are many similarities, FEMA's age requirements starts at 12 and include 17 year olds as well.  If I am not mistaken on October 19, 2012, DHS graduated their first class of 231 new graduates what DHS referred to as "Blue Shirts".  copy attached, 

Obama's Blue Shirts: Homeland Security graduates 1st class of ...

fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/.../obamas-blue-shirts-home...Share

Oct 20, 2012 – Obama's Blue Shirts: Homeland Security graduates 1st class of FEMA Youth Corps .... The Blue Shirts will now be deployed to their first assignments,... as well as President Obama's recent Executive Order, the answer is ...

Hitler Youth was first created in the 1920's, Their membership grew and by 1933 they had over 100,000 active participants.  Once Hitler came to power all other youth movements were abolished and the ranks of the Hitler Youth grew at a dramatic pace and by 1936, they had well over four million active members.

Boys beginning at the age of ten joined the "German Youth People," at the age of 13 they transferred into the "Hitler Youth" and remained there until they turned 18, when they were then able to join the regular military. Certain individuals that fit the stringent requirements established by the SS, were later chosen to join the SS.

Girls were allowed to join at the age of ten, and once they turned 14 they were transferred to the "League of German Girls,", they were trained to bear the future of Germany and produce health and strong future generations of German's.  There were significant demands of fitness required for both boys and girls.

It certainly appears that the pieces of the puzzle are all coming together, and the picture that they are creating is for those that are aware of what is going on, is terrifying.  I am amazed that 535 Members of Congress allow this madness to continue.  They all cannot be that stupid not to see the writing on the wall!

Congress needs to demand that Obama produce the documents that Donald Trump offered $5,000,000.00, to a charity of Obama's choice, by Obama simply producing those documents, which Obama declined to produce. The obvious question is why, the answer unfortunately is also obvious, because Obama simply cannot, since they would prove that Obama was never qualified to hold office, those documents would prove that Obama came to America, as a foreign exchange student and was granted admission under affirmative action, with an Indonesian passport.

Congress must demand that he prove otherwise, and until he does all of his powers as president will be frozen.  Contact all of your elected Representatives and demand that they begin protecting the American people by starting to honor their oath of office, which is to protect us from all enemies both foreign and domestic.

APUZZO: Since Ted Cruz was not born in the country (he was born in Canada) and he was not born to “citizen” parents (his father was not a U.S. citizen at the time of his son's birth), he is not and cannot be a “natural born Citizen.”

Monday, March 25, 2013

Senator Ted Cruz Is Not a “Natural Born Citizen” and Therefore Not Eligible to Be President

Senator Ted Cruz Is Not a “Natural Born Citizen” and Therefore Not Eligible
                                               to be President

                                           By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
                                                 March 25, 2013

It is pretty amazing to see to what lengths some will go to convince us that their favorite political candidate is eligible to be President. Greg Conterio has written an article in which he concludes that Senator Ted Cruz, who was born in Canada to a U.S. citizen mother and non-U.S. citizen father, is eligible to be President. The article can be read at http://www.westernfreepress.com/2013/03/23/birtherism-and-the-tyranny-of-ignorance/?hubRefSrc=email#lf_comment=65580535 .

I do not object to Mr. Conterio having a view that is different from mine on the definition of a "natural born Citizen." What is most objectionable is how he goes about attempting to prove that he is correct and others are wrong. In referring to those who do not agree with him, Mr. Conterio uses language such as “ ‘Birtherism’ and the Tyranny of Ignorance,” (the title of his article), “resurgence of the ‘Birther’ phenomenon,” “depth of ignorance,” “false assertions,” “sort of thing,” “completely wrong,” “nonsense,” and “twist themselves into knots.” What is really amazing is that he also tells us that it only took him “a few minutes to do a quick internet search” to come up with the correct answer on the meaning of a “natural born Citizen” and how Ted Cruz meets that definition. And how could I not mention that he tells us that “[s]ome guy with a blog, or some attorney with some bizarre sounding legal theory are NOT authoritative sources.” I wonder what attorney Mr. Conterio has in mind.

Mr. Conterio’s sole source for his definition of a “natural born Citizen” is Congressional statutes (8 U.S.C. Sec. 1401 et seq.). He cites and quotes those statutes and while conceding that they at most only declare persons to be “citizens of the United States” at birth, he says that Congress’s expression has the equivalent constitutional meaning as a “natural born Citizen.” There are several problems with Mr. Conterio’s argument.

First, given that the Founders and Framers inserted the “natural born Citizen” clause into the Constitution and they must have had a purpose for doing so, the clause had to have a specific meaning. As we shall see below, that meaning was a child born in a country to parents who were its “citizens” at the time of the child’s birth. The fact that there was in the Constitutional Convention no debate on the meaning of the clause gives us more evidence that the clause must have had a settled meaning. We also know that the Founders and Framers relied upon the clause to keep foreign influence and royalty out of the office of President and Commander in Chief. The historical record shows that the Founders and Framers were most concerned about foreign influence invading the administration of our new government. So, while they did have a concern with royalty occupying the office of President, the purpose for using the “natural born Citizen” clause was broader. As John Jay stated in his famous July 25, 1787 letter to then-General George Washington, he proposed that the Commander in Chief of the Military be a “natural born Citizen” so as to provide a “strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government.” The historical record contains statements from other Founders, Framers, and commentators as to the need to keep foreign influence out of the Office of President and Commander in Chief. Moreover, even assuming that the purpose was only to keep royalty out of the White House, the Founders and Framers would have required that a child be born to parents who were U.S. citizens to make sure that their child at the moment of birth did not inherit from either one of his parents titles of royalty or nobility.
READ MORE...

The people of Germany could not have imagined, until it was too late, the danger of allowing a tyrant this kind of power. We must not be so naïve as to think it will not happen to us as well if we remain passive toward this power grab by the Marxist Obama administration!

Retired Army officer says DHS must surrender their war weapons to Department of Defense

 

On Saturday March 23, Terry M. Hestilow, a retired Army officer with nearly 30 years of service under his belt, posted this letter he sent to Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) this week. Hestilow wants DHS to hand over their war weapons to the Department of Defense.

 

The Honorable Senator John Cornyn, State of Texas
United States Senate
517 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510

 

Re: Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and that agencies preparation for war against citizens of the United States of America

 

Dear Senator Cornyn,

 

It is with gravest concern that I write to you today concerning the recent appropriation of weapons by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that can only be understood as a bold threat of war by that agency, and the Obama administration, against the citizens of the United States of America. To date, DHS has been unwilling to provide to you, the elected representatives of the People,

justification for recent purchases of more than 7,000 mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) armored personnel carriers, 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition (with associated weapons), and other weapons systems, when, in fact, the DHS has no war mission or war making authority within the limits of the United States of America.

 

Significant is the fact that at the same time the Obama administration is arming his DHS for war within the limits of the United States against the People of the United States in accordance with his 2008 campaign speech claiming,

 

"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve gotta (sic) have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded [as the United States military]" -- Candidate Barack Obama, 2008.
/blockquote

 

The Obama administration is deliberately defunding, overextending, and hollowing the Department of Defense; the only legitimate agency of the U.S. government with a war mission.

 

This act of the Obama administration stands as a glaring threat of war against our nation’s citizens! This act of the Obama administration can only be understood as a tyrannical threat against the Constitution of the United States of America! If left unresolved, the peace loving citizens who have sworn to defend the United States Constitution "against all enemies, both foreign and domestic" are left no option except to prepare to defend themselves, and the U.S. Constitution, against this Administration’s "coup" against the People and the foundations of liberty fought for and defended for the past 238 years. We have no choice if we honor our oaths.

 

The only proper response to this threat against the American people is for the representatives of the People, the members of the U.S. House and Senate, to demand in clear terms that the Administration cannot ignore, that the Department of Homeland Security immediately surrender their newly appropriated weapons of war to the Department of Defense (DoD). Further, since the DHS has assumed a position in the Administration to enforce the tyrannical acts of this president against the People of the United States against the limits of the United States Constitution, it remains for the United States Congress to exercise its limiting power in the balancing of powers established by our founding fathers, to disestablish and dissolve the DHS as soon as possible. One needs only to look to the rise of Adolf Hitler, and his associated DHS organizations, the SA and the SS, of 1932-1934, to see the outcome of allowing an agency of government this kind of control over the free citizens of a nation. The people of Germany could not have imagined, until it was too late, the danger of allowing a tyrant this kind of power. We must not be so naïve as to think it will not happen to us as well if we remain passive toward this power grab by the Marxist Obama administration!

 

Finally, for more than two centuries the nation has lived in peace at home because of the protections of our legitimate military and the many appropriate state and federal law enforcement agencies, supported by Constitutional courts. We stand today at a cross-road. Will we allow this present Administration to overthrow our United States Constitution and its legal processes to amend

injustices, or, will we honor our obligations to defend the Constitution against a "domestic" enemy?

 

Our Constitution lays out the proper methods of resolving our differences; and it does not include its overthrow by a rogue agency of a Marxist leadership at home. You, sir, are our constitutionally elected agent to defend our Constitution at home. We are counting upon you. We remain aware, however, of this present threat and will not expose ourselves as an easy prey to the authors of the destruction of our nation.

 

I know that this letter demands much of you. We elected you because we, the citizens of the State of Texas, believe that you are up to the task at hand and will, against all threats, honor your oath and office. We are also writing to your fellow members of the House and Senate to stand in integrity with the Constitution and against this present threat by the Obama administration and his DHS.

 

We refuse to surrender our Constitution or our nation!

 

Resolved,

 

Captain Terry M. Hestilow
United States Army, Retired
Fort Worth, Texas
March 23, 2013

The one way to stop Obama's progression towards a "socialist utopia" is right in front of them. Its called the Constitution. The one way to stop Obamacare, the dissemination of our military and the destruction of the American economy is being ignored by all of them.

OBAMA CAN BE STOPPED
But Everyone Ignores the Hammer

Commentary By:
Dwight Kehoe

March 25, 2013 -TPATH -  Recently Glenn Beck made a statement that appears to have gone unnoticed by most. The context of what he was saying was cast to the mundane when he admitted, after years on TV and the radio of saying the opposite, that he was prevented from taking up subjects by the stations where he worked.  This not only included FOX, but FOX was the object of the comment.

What does this tell us about the so called hard nosed,  conservative commentators we welcome into our homes each day in search of an alternative to the progressive media?  Well, for the most part it tells us that each of them are hypocrites at best and lying traitors at worst.

Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin and even the exalted one, Rush Limbaugh are under orders and constraints to avoid topics, and each of them, day after day, lie about it.  The half truths and intentionally misleading information coming from those we have depended upon are actually worse when this deception comes from, supposedly, our side.

This probably explains why the eligibility issue and Obama's many forged documents have been consistently ignored and those that bring up the subject are belittled and ridiculed.  It may not explain however why Beck has been the most abusive to his listeners, coming in just ahead of Mark Levin in nastiness, now that he has his own network.  Oh but it does.  Mr. Beck is and has been working, from day one, to get his internet show on as many cable and TV outlets as possible.

If he knows that discussing Obama's crimes and ineligibility will prevent his show from being picked up, he will do what he needs to do, he just told us that.

Even though Mr. Beck claims that he has, in his words, "debunked" the birthers, he has done nothing of the sort.  In fact he admits that Obama's birth certificate is a forgery.  He says that Obama did this just to tweak the birthers.  This is debunking?  A couple of questions for Glenn.  Why?  Why would the Chief Executive of the most powerful country in the world forge anything?  Why would he not, many years ago, tell Hawaii to release the original birth certificate?  Maybe there isn't one?

Glenn thinks this is just some kind of game the usurper is playing?  Well, Obama has either authorized or ordered a forgery of an official document and then waved waved it in front of the world claiming its legitimacy.  To Mr. Beck, this is nothing more than a joke?  No, no its not.  Its called a felony.  Mr. Beck's charade against corruption, fraud and  unconstitutional happenings in this country, and in his words, by both parties, is just that, a charade.

Its not necessary to go into detail on all of the crimes Obama and his people have committed.  Every one of which is being hidden from the American people by all those who should be and are supposed to be the watchdogs of our laws and the future of our country.  The news media, and that is all of the news media, Congressmen, Senators, judges and prosecutors are all on the wrong side of history.  None of them will be able to say, " I didn't know".  Those who know are hiding it and those that don't know, don't want to.

As the Constitution is ignored, it is weakened. 

That is the very sad state we find ourselves in.    If all parts of a law are not enforced, no part can be.  This of course is the goal of the left and  Obama with his world order views.  But what is even worse, our side, those that rabble-rouse about the Constitution and then dismiss the attacks upon it for personal gain, are the most traitorous and egregious of the bunch.

If it wasn't before, it should be very clear now, that neither party nor any faux conservative talk show host, except Micheal Savage and Arron Klein,  want to stop Obama's leftist agenda.   They are all one and the same.  The lefties, while they may hide the extent of their agenda, are actually more honest than those claiming to want to stop it.

Here's why.  The one way to stop Obama's progression towards a "socialist utopia" is right in front of them.  Its called the Constitution.  The one way to stop Obamacare, the dissemination of our military and the destruction of the American economy is being ignored by all of them.
 
If you hired  carpenters to build an addition on your house and they proceeded to hammer nails with the handle of a screwdriver, instead of a claw hammer, your first thought should be aimed at getting them out of your house. 

Its way past time, we Americans do the same for our houses.

March 25, 2013 TPATH 

THE BENGHAZI SCANDAL...GETTING TO THE BOTTOM OF IT...

The Benghazi 9/11 Questions - Special Operations Speaks (SOS)

 

“We want the Truth! We are going to get to the bottom of Benghazi.”

 

 

Published on Mar 21, 2013

http://www.specialoperationsspeaks.com

This video is dedicated by Special Operations Speaks to the four Americans who were left to die and who gave their lives in service to our country in Benghazi, Libya, on that horrific night of September 11, 2012.

We must not allow their sacrifice to be forgotten by our nation or to be ignored by anyone involved for personal political gain. The dark lies, the fabricated cover-ups, and the egregious lack of leadership at the highest levels of our government must be revealed under the brilliant and unfailing lamp of TRUTH.

We owe that truth to the American people and especially to the families of our fallen comrades.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cX-5dcZSt0k

 

                  

 

 

Where was the Commander-in-Chief when we had the crisis in Benghazi and lost four American lives?

 

Why didn’t Obama take charge?

 

What was he doing?

 

Who was calling the shots?

 

Who gave the order to stand down?

 

Why haven’t we heard from the survivors?

 

Why were our air assets (located nearby in Sicily) not employed to assist the beleaguered Americans in Benghazi?

 

 

“There is a total cover-up of what happened in Benghazi.”

 

Larry Bailey, CAPT USN (ret), SEAL

 

 

****************************************************************************************************

 

An Internet Autopsy: How did Ambassador Stevens Die?

Stevens was the personal representative of the President of the United States. The rupture of that personal relationship is the great shame of Benghazi…To overlook his brutal death and betrayal is to overlook an injury to the nation and its citizens.

 

 

By Robert Klein Engler 

 

Saturday, March 23, 2013

 

According to a CBS News/AP story, posted on the Internet (September 12, 2012, 10:37 AM), US ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens died of “severe asphyxia,” sometimes referred to as smoke inhalation. It was reported to the media by a Libyan doctor, but was not an official autopsy report. In spite of this unofficial report, most Americans believe the ambassador was murdered.

To date, no official cause of death has been released. The results of an autopsy done on Stevens’ body after it was returned to the United States, has not been made public. In spite of that, rumors still persist that Stevens was tortured and raped before and after his death.

Grim photos of Stevens after the terrorist attack at the Benghazi mission are posted on the Internet. Most of them seem to have been taken with cell phone cameras. It is difficult to determine from this photographic evidence what happened to Stevens. Severe asphyxia is not readily photographed.

If we look at four of these photographs with a critical eye, we notice some unusual details that cause us to question the official explanation. The four photos at issue are labeled thusly:

1. Stevens on the ground.
2. Stevens on his back.
3. Stevens being carried through the street.
4. Stevens at a Benghazi morgue.

The photo of Stevens seemingly on the ground with his T-shirt under his armpits is most interesting (#1). Stevens’ face and stomach look to be covered in soot. There is what looks like a red gash on the left side of his forehead. This wound does not show up in any the other photos of Stevens after the attack. It is not seen in the photo taken of his body in the Libyan morgue. Was the body cleaned of evidence while the doctors waited for the Americans to claim it?

                      

It’s hard to tell just what is happening here. Most intriguing is that man with a cell phone in his mouth. Wouldn’t he put the phone in his pocket as you or I would do if we were suddenly called upon to help someone? Whose cell phone is it? It may in all likelihood be Stevens’ phone, the phone that was used to locate his body in the morgue.

The MailOnline has a video that supposedly shows a man, later claimed to be ambassador Chris Stevens, being pulled from the smoke filled “safe room” following the attack at the Benghazi mission. Photo #2 is a screen shot from that video.

“Libyans reportedly shout ‘God is great!’ after finding out that Stevens is alive and breathing. Another voice says, ‘He is still alive!’” It is difficult to say who is being dragged in this dark video. It’s also hard to tell what happened to Stevens after he was taken from the Benghazi mission based on this photo.

A photo posted on the Gateway Pundit (#2) shows what looks like the body of Stevens carried shoulder high. It is striking that the body is almost naked. You have to wonder if this were your injured brother, would you take him to the hospital that way. This photo has been used to fuel the rumor that Stevens was raped and tortured.

Then there is the question of Stevens’ collar injury. The ConservativeTreeHouse.com claims this injury is evident in the photo they posted (#3). The body seems dressed in the same shirt and pants as the body in the other photos, but there are signs of blood by Stevens’ right shoulder. There is also a hand on the left of the photo taking another cell phone photo. Why all this attention to getting pictures of Stevens? How does this help an injured man?

Finally, there is a video supposedly taken at a Benghazi morgue that purports to show the body of Stevens waiting to be claimed. The last photo (#4) is a screen shot taken from that video. The soot and grime evident in photo #1 looks to have been removed.

What can we conclude from this Internet autopsy? The photographic evidence leads us to question the explanation that Stevens’ death was caused by smoke inhalation. There are just too many possible wounds on Stevens’ body for that explanation to be the whole story. Smoke inhalation usually does not leave a wound on the forehead or shoulder that miraculously heals itself in a Benghazi morgue.

Until the official autopsy results are released to the public we are left to wonder how Stevens died at Benghazi. The White House has repeatedly claimed his death was the result of a protest to a video insulting to Islam. We know this explanation is a lie.

A rumor of rape and torture will persist until proven otherwise. Like most of the facts surrounding the Incident at Benghazi, it is hard to see the truth through the darkness and the smoke.

When we look at these grim images we must remember that they show how a representative of the United States of America was abused. Christopher Stevens was a US ambassador. To overlook his brutal death and betrayal is to overlook an injury to the nation and its citizens.

Beyond that, ambassador Stevens was the personal representative of the President of the United States. The rupture of that personal relationship is the great shame of Benghazi.

Robert Klein Engler lives in Des Plaines, Illinois and sometimes New Orleans. Robert’s books are to be found at amazon.com and Lulu.com. His long poem, The Accomplishment of Metaphor and the Necessity of Suffering, set partially in New Orleans, is published by Headwaters Press, Medusa, New York, 2004.

Robert can be reached at: RKleinEngler@aol.com

The Obama Administration, through its concentration of power in the White House and its staff; through its extensive use of czars, executive orders, bureaucratic fiat and now simple oppression seems to have stepped over the line with the American People.

Obama's Tyranny: Petty or Something More Sinister?
Matt Holzmann
the Administration is holding a gun to the head of almost every single American in its quest to inflict the maximum pain possible on each of us to achieve its political objectives. When has this occurred in our country's history? More

It is simply astonishing that the leader of the free world would agree to speak against a backdrop of a murderous terrorist with American and Israeli blood on his hands.

The picture of the Real Obama worth framing
 Judi McLeod Full Story
Radio talk show giant Mark Levin may want to know now that President Barack Hussein Obama’s back from his Israel trip, his White House schedule remains totally empty for Holy Week and Passover.