Friday, December 31, 2010

FBI Investigation Imminent? My Follow Up to WND

I am moved by the show of support I am finding.
Thank you so much. Happy New Year!

[UPDATE 2: I have been told that I should provide my real name in order to get answers from Mr. Kovacs, at WND, about this issue.
I am very sorry, folks...but, I am sure no one will blame me for having to draw the line at providing my real name to anyone, especially someone in the press. People are mean and cruel about this issue, and frankly, I don't feel very comfortable with giving out my real name at this point. I do hope people appreciate the work I've done thus far -- but, I don't wish to provide my real name. And, I don't see why it matters if I do.
The photographs speak for themselves. The evidence speaks for itself. The questions are there regardless of my real life identity.
Therefore, I hope it does not appear hypocritical that I ask if there is a person willing to help. I have talked to many of you online that appear to openly use your real names...
...Is anyone willing to ask for answers from Mr. Kovacs under your own real name?
And, I appreciate anyone in advance if they are willing and/or able to help. However, I do understand if a person would choose not to…MT]

[UPDATE: I have now heard back from both Mr. Farah and Mr. Kovacs, from WND, and must now eat my words on any criticism I implied about how quickly they responded to my request; although I do not yet have any answers to my questions to share with you. However, my communication with them just began. Please see the end of this post for my emailed response back to them.]
I have already sent a follow-up to WND because I find it curious that they are not more anxious to answer. After all, a crime has very likely been committed, according to the FBI and WND, themselves:
Dear Mr. Kovacs, ‘Letters’ Staff & ‘Corrections’ Staff-
I am surprised to have not heard from you yet on my amazing discovery and request for a correction because there’s zero doubt that We, the People, have been badly duped by someone concerning the President’s alleged letter to Kapi’olani Hospital. Therefore, I am sending you a clear visual aid which shows both of the close-ups in question (of the seal, and of the signature) placed on the image of the full view of the letter for comparison.
For this visual aid, I resized and skewed the ‘seal closeup’ to match the other seal in size, but did nothing to the color. Of course, one seal could never really be matched to the other because one seal is incised and one is not. One is from a cream fiber writing stock and one is from a smooth white stock. I have included this graphic, so that there is no confusion that a retraction is absolutely necessary, and quickly, as is an explanation from WND, the White House and Kapi’olani Hospital.
I understand you are aware from your own work on this issue that the FBI said they must investigate the matter at this point because this fraudulent letter was used by Kapi’olani Hospital for fund-raising purposes:
“Late yesterday, though, Peters finally responded to WND’s inquiry when the news site informed the hospital that the FBI and United States Secret Service said the matter could potentially lead to criminal prosecution were the letter determined to be fraudulent.
“It would be a charity fraud scheme,” said FBI spokesman Steve Kodak. “It would be investigated by us or the Secret Service. We both have jurisdiction over that.”
Peters says Kapi’olani actually has a reproduction of the “original letter” on display at the hospital.”

My Visual Aid:
For more information on paper, Google any paper mill/manufacturer and/or distributor online…or any office supply store. There you will find plenty of photographs of paper colors and close-ups of texture. Why? Because photographs serve as accurate visual references of the characteristics of a physical sheet of paper. In other words, don’t let anyone tell you a white, smooth sheet of paper with cool lighting could EVER be mistaken for a warm, cream colored, textured sheet of paper due to roughly a 3º camera angle change give or take a degree. The difference is visibly clear. The paper is just not a match. Not. Even. Close.
My readers are anxious for your statement, as am I.
Thank you again for your quick attention to this matter,
P.S. By the way, I am a 15 year veteran of print graphic design and have a Bachelor’s in Fine Art with a Concentration in Graphic Design and graduated magna cum laude and at the top of my class. I have 15 years of professional experience in dealing with print vendors, paper vendors, paper ordering and 15 years pre-press experience–including ordering embossed materials–and I have designed and ordered custom business letterhead too many times to mention. Six of those years I held the title of Creative Director. You can be certain my opinion is a professional opinion. Thank you again.
Dear Readers,
This cause requires you to play a part. Please help spread this info far and wide. You don’t even have to attribute it in any special way to me, just provide people a link so everyone can have the full information, links and images. This is too important, too criminal and it is too obvious to NOT put in their faces for answers.
I mean, talk about disrespecting the Office of the President… Someone is using bogus letters from the Office of the President and our White House for a fund-raising scheme. Geez.
Thanks! – MissTickly

[UPDATE cont. from above.....
After receiving two introductory/acknowledgment-type emails from WND, I replied with the following. I am posting it to keep everyone in the loop:]
“Thank you for the very quick responses, Mr. Kovacs and Mr. Farah. I prefer to remain anonymous, though–that has no relevance to the discrepancy I found.
First, let me clear this up, I expressed to WND, today that I was disappointed at the lack of their very immediate response. I felt I made it clear that I had set my sights very high in hoping for an immediate response from you and so any disappointment in your lack of response–in a single day, during the holidays–is clearly a reflection on my own anticipation. I made sure to state this upfront to you and at my blog.
Mr. Farah, I did not mean to put you on the defensive. I understand completely that no one would want to be accused of being responsible for perpetrating this brazen fraud on the public on purpose. But, it isn’t at all clear to me that WND is responsible for this fraud, and from reading Mr. Kovac’s article, it sounds like Kapi’olani Hospital took the photographs AND provided them to you.
I will make this insinuation perfectly clear on my blog when I report that I had quick responses from both of you today. Understand, too, I made a similar request for a retraction from that has gone completely unanswered for nearly a month–perhaps I projected that disappointment on WND without realizing it.
I want you to know that I have suspended personal judgment on who is to blame, despite the concern I am picking up from you. That’s why I took this to you guys, not Kapi’olani Hospital, for answers. I just want answers as to how a raised seal from a different colored and textured document was published on your website and captioned as if it was a close-up of the seal on the white letter to Kapi’olani Hospital that was photographed and featured with it?
This is a very serious matter.
Did Kapi’olani Hospital provide the photos you published? Did you publish them unedited?
Do you intend to correct the caption under the photo in question and get to the bottom of it with Kapio’lani Hospital and the White House, as well as with the FBI and Secret Service?
I only ask that you provide the answers as you have them…I would like to report on this find and it’s too important to suffer any feet dragging. Not that I believe you have dragged your feet. Certainly, you have been a leader and example in covering this issue.
Thank you,


Two Fairy Star Maj. Gen. Karl Horst

As I compose this, the grinch of the military and the scrooge of the regime, in Maj. Gen. Karl Horst and B. Hussein Obama have suffered themselves to create a POW of Lt. Col. Terry Lakin in his defending the United States Constitution from all threats foreign and domestic.

Interestingly, Barack Hussein Obama is both a foreign and domestic threat in being a foreign subject of Britain and Indonesia, and within on a mission of destruction of these United States.

It was in full authority for Maj. Gen. Karl Horst to grant clemency to Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, after his severe beating by that kangaroo court he faced convicting him of loving America. Yet, on Monday Karl Horst who looks like gay Karl Rove, and has that same Nazi sounding name like a group of other reich officers who are infamous for their bashing Jews about and throwing their own people into prisons, has decided in Obama allegiance to his flag to further torture Terry Lakin, United States Officer, Citizen and Gentleman.

I will inform each of you to consider that NONE OF THIS happened by accident. This entire kangaroo court was set up specifically to take in the Holy Days of Thanksgiving and Christmas, with the accent to throw Mr. Lakin into Leavenworth Kansas just before Christmas as a threat to EVERY UNITED STATES SOLDIER to go die for Obama in Obama's Cold Sore Wars now with the smell of sodomite excrement on the genitals.
So the Soldiers comprehend this, Lt. Col. Lakin was destroyed deliberately by the Obama regime and his political generals to threaten and terrorize Soldiers from asking questions of the telling answers.

Is it not amazing that Obama and Horst promote don't ask and don't tell, and yet will not allow anyone to ask about Obama's documentation and tell the "violators" to go to federal prison.

Maj. Gen. Karl Horst and his desk jockey, Col. Robert Manning are disgraces to the uniform, the service, this American Nation for their part in this. They are no more than the Vietcom in Hanoi knocking about US Soldiers for the brutality they have inflicted on Terry Lakin and his American family.

For the record, I located evidence which indeed is a psychological and command authority challenge to the kangaroo proceedings Karl Horst has tortured Terry Lakin with.

Not so amazing, the officer Horst has all of these photos of hisself standing with either undocumented B. Hussein Obama or his accompliced Aaron Burr Biden.

Is there not a matter of recusing oneself, moving a trial from enemy territory and upholding the Military Code, when you have a Soldier on trial concerning B. Hussein Obama, and all Horst is doing is sitting in the regime's lap giving the Heil Hitler?

Horst in photo evidence seems to suffer from Peggy Noonan Jungle Fever, as he can not grin more broadly or snuggle up to Mr. Obama close enough. Psychologically a fetish like that is a bias for Obama and a prejudice against Terry Lakin.
It is exactly what the entire Obamaniac corp which still has Peggy Noonan ranting in attacking Sarah Palin for simply loving America.

Therefore there are legal grounds all through this in gross prejudice against Terry Lakin on counts of his being caucasion, his challenging Horst's idiocy for being duped by undocumented Obama, and how this entire bias was heaped upon Terry Lakin in that kangaroo court by that disgraceful Denise Lind who oversaw the regime's crucifying of the Lt. Col.

There must be Congressional hearings on this, in Maj. Gen. Karl Horst being held accountable for what his military district engaged in, in terrorizing Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, and deliberately in conspiracy with Denise Lind, throwing Terry Lakin into federal prison to threaten all United States Soldiers.
These barbaric and heinous acts from inside the military, directed against an American Patriot in Terry Lakin is pure Red Square Pretty Peking Girl Baathist Iran.
This was no trial it was a sham lynching of Terry Lakin, just as every court hearing in America has been about defrauding Americans and protecting undocumented Obama.

When the GOP has more control of Congress in 2011, it is vital that Americans make Terry Lakin the issue to set him free, restore his honor, and to bring now Karl Horst, Denise Lind and Robert Manning to answer in Congress and the civilian courts for this torture of Terry Lind and his family.
This is not a matter any longer of just securing freedom for Terry Lind, but a matter of bringing his attackers to the criminal courts, whether it is next year, 2013 or twenty years from now. Terry Lakin has had his career destroyed, his liberty stolen and his reputation damaged by the Obama regime and his political officers.

This will make a most excellent early call for the Tea Party to set the demarcation line in supporting the under seige United States Soldiers who are being sodomized and criminalized by the Obama political corp.

They didn't need to come down on Terry Lakin in torturing this American, but chose to stomp him and grind him under their heals.

This jackboot thugocracy of Obama will be held accountable and the Karl Rove officer will be a first start in his employment at Leavenworth at hard labor for crimes against humanity.

Yes who is Barack Hussein Obama and why is Karl Horst and Denise Lind afraid of what is lurking under the Obama skin?

nuff said.


Amazing isn't it? What kind of a country does she think will there for her future baby? Does her Fox job mean so much that she has to sell her soul and the future of her children?...She's a fraud...just like BECK, O'REILLY, LEVIN, HANNITY and the rest of the gang at FOX. They have they're marching orders!...PROTECT AND PROP UP THE OBAMA REGIME AT ALL COSTS.

Why is Megyn Kelly refusing to ask tough questions about Obama’s background?

Why is Megyn Kelly refusing to ask tough questions about Obama’s background? »

IS SHE A REAL JOURNALIST, OR AN IMPOSTOR? December 31, 2010 Dear Editor: The following email was sent to Megyn Kelly of Fox News in response to her recent coverage of those questioning Barack Hussein...
December 31 2010  Read More »

Obama does not regularly make phone calls to families of fallen soldiers...Who does he call?...

Family of fallen soldier warmed by letters, stung by politicians

Posted By Adam Ashton on December 30, 2010 at 4:03 pm Bookmark and Share Share this
The parents of a Yelm soldier killed in Afghanistan earlier this month have received cards from friends and strangers expressing condolences, and they’re grateful for the support.
“As a father of someone killed, it is overwhelming,” said Lt. Col. Patrick Collins (Ret.). His son, Sgt. Sean Collins, was buried Wednesday at the Tahoma National Cemetery.
Among that outpouring of empathy, two politicians inadvertently stung the family.
One slight came in a letter of condolences the family received from the office of Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash.
At first, the Collins family appreciated that Cantwell had taken the time to send a letter acknowledging their son’s sacrifice.
But the letter misidentified the slain soldier in its last paragraph, which reads:
“Again, please accept my warmest condolences. May your memories of Bryn and the knowledge that he made a positive impact on the lives of so many serve as a source of comfort to you during this time of sorrow.”
The letter was dated Dec. 20 and delivered to Sean Collins’ mother, Linda Collins of Yelm. The error conveyed to the family that Cantwell had sent a form letter.
“They couldn’t even proofread it,” she said. “I’m sure if her son had died, she would’ve at least wanted his name spelled correctly.”
“That’s just sloppy staff work, that’s an embarrassment,” Patrick Collins said. He has not yet called Cantwell’s office to ask for an apology.
Cantwell’s office is on short staffing for the holiday week and has not replied to an email to its press staff. The Collins family was in touch with Cantwell’s office in the capital Thursday, and was told Cantwell’s staffers were looking into the mistake.
The other slight came when Patrick Collins called the White House and asked to have President Obama call his ex-wife, Linda, to talk about their son.
He was told that Obama did not regularly make phone calls to the families of fallen soldiers.
Later, Patrick Collins read a story about Obama’s phone call to Philadelphia Eagles owner Jeffery Lurie. Obama reportedly praised Lurie for giving quarterback Michael Vick a second chance to play football after serving time in prison for running a dog fighting ring.
“That burns,” Patrick Collins said Thursday.
“Any soldier that gets killed in action, you’d think the president would be calling someone in the family. There’s no politics in it. His predecessor did it,” Collins said.

Read more:

In the last waning hours of 2010, the Obama regime has given America a certain obscene gesture, yet again.

First, Janet Napolitano is at it again.  She wants to make sure the border is secured and is devoting United States military resources.  Officials from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Border Patrol, were working to enforce the border.

The problem?

The border is the border in Afghanistan.  If we are teaching the Afghans how to seal their border, do you think we could seal our own?

The family of Brian Terry, Border Patrol Agent, who was murdered earlier this month, might want an answer to that question.

Barack Obama gave Americans a big flip off at the end of the year.  He took a huge family vacation to Hawaii.  Being President is a stressful job.  No one argues that.  But America is in the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression.

Instead of taking an economic vacation, Obama is spending millions so he can have his two weeks in Hawaii.  Of course, the millions are not his money.  It is our money.  He could have cut the expenses considerably by staying on a military base.  This would have given him the same beachfront venue, but would have reduced security costs considerably.   No, not for Obama.  He is instead staying on a private property, about five minutes away from the military base.  Of course, he is going on base every day with his family, but why bother him with those pesky details, like saving tax dollars.

Most Americans would love to take a Hawaii vacation. Some of them would like any vacation.  Some Americans would like to have a job so they can take a vacation.  While gas prices climb through $3 a gallon and more Americans lose their jobs, Obama’s message to them is simple.  It is one last obscene gesture at the American people for 2010.  Expect more from him in 2011.


Christine O'Donnell to be Investigated by FBI as They Evade the 'Obama Eligibility Issue'. Is it Time for Christine to GO BIRTHER?

By Steve Cooper
The Conservative

Get used to tactics like this, because the Tea Party is the enemy of both not be fooled. I also find it interesting that this is taking place in the home state of Joseph "Stalin" Biden. I wonder if that has anything to do with this?

This is what happens under a communist regime. The members of "the party" walk around untouchable as their enemies get thrown into prison. This is tyranny at it's best and the Republicans will not even lift a finger to help this woman, because she is Tea Party.

My advice to Christine O' Donnell is "it is time to GO BIRTHER" and call out the hypocrisy of the Justice Department, the Republicans and Democrats for their cover up for this Kenyan fraud in the White House. How does a Kenyan become President? I thought you have to be a natural born citizen? Okay, Obama's communist mother was an anti-American. That is right, I forgot...

Christine O' Donnell? Do you hear me? This is your time to shine dear. Open your mouth and shake the very foundation of the corrupt bastards that want to persecute you. Where is the FBI investigation into John McCain when he swept a Senate hearing for Obama's eligibility under the rug KNOWING full well that there were pending lawsuits against Obama to release his records?

Start screaming birther my dear and scream it loud and proud. You will see the vermin scatter like the roaches that they are, because they fear this issue.

Have the guts to do what Glenn Beck and the rest failed to do. That idiot Beck is still talking about the founding fathers and Woodrow Wilson as the country is about to sink thanks to his assistance in squashing the eligibility issue. He is out of touch and so are the fools still watching him.

Any attractive conservative woman is seen as a threat to the left wing vermin, because they fear that they will lose the woman's vote.    

Click here for MORE
Who Cares where Barack Hussein Soetoro aka Obama was BORN?
International leftists and anti-American Democratic Socialists like MSNBC’s Chris Matthews(1) care,that’s who! These folks are the real “birthers,” desperate to prove that Obama is US born, with absolutely no help from their political messiah.

They care where Obama was born because they want to make the issue of presidential constitutional eligibility all about birth place, aka“native-born” status, instead of “natural-born” status, which has nothing to do with birth place. Leftists want anyone “born on US soil” to be eligible for the office of president, including “anchor babies” and even 14th Amendment citizens, none of whom are “natural-born citizens” of the United States. They want to rewrite Article II – Section I – Clause V via precedent and so far, they are doing a fine job of doing just that!

Leftists and even many ill-informed on the political right have worked tirelessly to make the issue of Obama’s eligibility all about nothing more than his birth place, alleged to be Hawaii. But birth place is only a demonstration of “native-born” status, not “natural-born” status.

History is Clear

Few modern day lawyers know what the US Constitution says or what it means. But historians do know and history is quite clear. History begins with understanding the difference between “natural law” and man-made statute. The term natural born citizen is based in natural law, and as such, it is a foundation for many man-made statutes.

During the formation of our new country, it was necessary to establish national sovereignty for the purpose of national security. The terms used to accomplish this had to meet standing international laws and treaties of the time, in order for our nation to be recognized by all other nations as a sovereign nation with sovereign citizens and citizens’ rights.

The international standard in place then and now is known as The Law of Nations. We see this term referenced in our US Constitution under Article I – Section VIII – the Enumerated Powers section of our Constitution, wherein it states that Congress shall have the power – “To define and punish - Offenses against the Law of Nations;” – note that Law of Nations is capitalized, referring to the international treaty defining national sovereignty and citizenship the world over.
To George Washington, President of the Constitutional Convention, Jay writes “Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government; and to declare expressly that the command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen.” Jay not only knew of Vattel, as can be seen from his correspondence with James Madison in 1780 during treaty negotiations with Spain, but he was also a proponent of Vattel as well. –More history here
The Law of Nations treaty is the foundation for our national sovereignty and the term “natural born citizen” is found, and was studied by our nation’s founders, in a book written by Emerich de Vattel in 1758. The book was a scholarly in-depth look at what constitutes a sovereign nation, a citizen and citizen rights, recognized throughout the civilized world.

In it, Vattel defines “citizen” and “natural-born citizen” – which became the standard that must be met by anyone seeking the highest office in our land, the office of President and Commander-in-Chief.

Book one chapter 19, § 212. Of the citizens and natives. – reads as follows – pay particular attention to the sections in BOLD.

“The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born.I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

The following section has created confusion for some – “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.

Yet this statement is not in conflict with the balance of the overall section. Both “native” and “natural” born citizens are indeed “citizens” by birth, born in the country (on US soil), of parents (two parents) who are citizens. This means that anchor babies, while “citizens” due to 14th Amendment laws, are neither “native” nor “natural” born citizens. They are only “citizens, via man-made laws related to immigration and naturalization statutes.

However, the sections pertaining specifically to the topic of “natural-born” citizens is very clear – “As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. - The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; - I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father whois a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

Intentional Confusion in the Political Class

The political left, which has worked for more than a hundred years to dismantle the US Constitution via judicial fiat and broad interpretations of constitutional text that borders on subversion and treason, hopes to limit the term “natural-born citizen” to nothing more than birth place, or “native-born” status and they don’t even see a need for a legitimate birth certificate from the applicant for President.

The political right hopes to rewrite the term “natural-born citizen” as well, adding to the “condition of their fathers” requirement put in place by our founders, a birth place and mother’s citizenship

People who opposed John McCain’s bid for the White House developed this interpretation from thin air for the purpose of disqualifying McCain’s campaign for the Presidency. However, this interpretation is just as improper and the left’s interpretation which asserts that essentially all citizens are natural-born citizens, including 14th Amendment naturalization citizens.

Intentional Misdirection

As Chris Matthews attempts in the MSNBC video clip linked here, leftists continue to speak about whether or not Barack Obama is a legal US citizen. Of course, the debate is not really over whether or not Obama is a legal US citizen, although that might be a valid question under his highly unusual family circumstances.
The constitutional question is based upon whether or not Barack Hussein Obama is a “natural-born citizen” as required for the office of President under Article II – Section I of the US Constitution, which reads - “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution (our founding fathers), shall be eligible to the office of President;

According to the actual definition of natural born citizen placed in our Constitution, Barack Hussein Obama cannot possibly be a natural born citizen of the Unites States no matter where on earth he may have been born. At birth, he naturally inherited the “condition of his father,” who was at no time in his life a US citizen.
Barack Obama’s father was a foreign national, a citizen of Kenya - then ruled by Britain. Inheriting the condition of his father at birth, Barack Hussein Obama was born with the natural citizenship rights of his father, a British subject and citizen of Kenya, not theUnited States.
As such, Barack Hussein Obama was born with foreign loyalties and as a result, he violates the natural born citizen requirement for the office he currently holds and everyone including all members of the US Supreme Court know it. Barack Hussein Obama is precisely the type of citizen the founders were attempting to block from holding the highest office in this land. Yet, Barack Hussein Obama is the sitting President of the United States, in great part due to the intentional misinformation floated and perpetuated on the matter.
No Matter Where He Was Born

Was Barack Hussein Obama born in Hawaii?

The truth is - nobody knows because Obama refuses to provide any legitimate proof answering this question, not even a simple birth certificate that every other natural born citizen of the USA has in their possession.

Was Barack Hussein Obama adopted by Lolo Soetoro as a citizen of Indonesia and did Obama naturalize to US citizenship upon return from Indonesia?

All evidence available says that Obama was indeed adopted by Lolo Soetoro, making him a citizen of Indonesia at the time. What happened next, nobody knows, once again, because Obama refuses to answer the questions.

Does Barack Hussein Obama have dual or divided loyalties?

Based upon his known family history as well as his focus on international interests versus national interests, one must honestly conclude that Barack Hussein Obama does indeed have at best, dual and divided loyalties.

Does being born in Hawaii answer the question of constitutional eligibility?

No… a birth certificate for Hawaii will result in establishing only the place of his birth, his “native born” status, NOT his “natural-born” status. His natural-born status is already answered in Obama’s own
statements, that he is the son of a foreign national. If a birth certificate shows someone other than Barack Obama Sr. as his natural birth father, then Barack Hussein Obama is a fraud and cannot hold
office for that reason.

So, I say again, who cares where Barack Hussein Obama was born?

A much better question is who is going to remove this fraudulent thug from office in handcuffs?
If Republicans don’t address this issue upon swearing into power in January, then Republicans are complicit, the constitution is dead, and the people are on their own.

The American patriot either gets this one right, or they get nothing else right. The world is not laughing at Obama, they are laughing at the ignorant spineless Americans who prefer politicking over their own constitution. As long as we fail to clean up our own house, the rest of the world has no reason to respect our opinions on anything else.

We right this wrong, or all wrongs stand! The entire free world is watching and so far, nobody is impressed!

JB Williams

Tacit Admission By The Media Left They've Been Lying All Along About Obama's COLB As Proof

Chris Matthews, Bill O'Reilly, Anderson Cooper, Megyn Kelly and the rest of the shill media, not to mention the entire 111th Congress have a problem on their hands.

Governor Neil Abercrombie shooting off his mouth about digging up Obama's B/C, followed up by Chris Matthews comments about wanting to see the "real" birth certificate too, has created a new fire storm.

The obvious question is-- "But Chris , and 111th, you've been telling the American people the COLB is the real deal, why the change ? Could it be you've all been lying all along?"

How is this going to play in DC when Congress reconvenes? Are any of the new guard going to want some answers? They should.

I have another posit I'll share after the holiday on this matter, but for now try to enjoy your celebration of the coming new year in the Un-united Socialist States of Amerika. Inshallah, Peace be with you Comrades.


Obama's Got A Problem


What Did Congress Know & When Did They Know It?

Thanks to


“On June 13, 2008, the Obama campaign released a copy of his birth certificate after numerous claims were made about his eligibility to hold the office of President. The released copy created additional questions, because it contained a blacked out department file number and was apparently missing a seal, and it was impossible to detect raised text, a common characteristic of official documents. There were satisfactory answers to such questions, however: the department file number had been blacked out to prevent hackers from breaking into the Health Department’s system, and the State places the seal on the back of the certificate. The website investigated the matter and provided high-resolution photos taken at multiple angles that revealed the raised text and the seal on the back of the document
Accordingly, it has been concluded that President Obama has met the constitutional qualifications to be President of the United States.

– Sen. Arlen Specter


Why did Arlen Specter say there was?

Close-up of seal impression found on the back of President Obama's COLB from photos.

And if Congress concluded based, in part, on ‘raised text’ appearing on the back of Obama’s COLB that he “met the constitutional qualifications to be President of the United States,” then they concluded WRONG.

What did Congress know and when did they know it?


Thanks to

Please, someone tell me that my eyes are deceiving me!

I was just having a look-see at the ‘Kapi’olani Letter’ allegedly sent from ‘Barrack’ Obama to Kapi’olani Hospital, and discussed by World Net Daily in their article, “BORN IN THE USA? ‘Birth hospital’: Letter for Real;” and imagine my shock when I noticed that the White House seal on the letterhead appears to be incised in the full view of the letter, but the “close-up” featured within the article shows a raised seal.
It’s not clear to me whether WND is responsible for this ‘fraud’ or whether Kapi’olani Hospital sent the ‘close-up,’ however, it appears someone is trying to pull ANOTHER fast one.
Take a look and decide for yourself, I’ve given you my opinion. What’s yours? Here’s the full image posted by WND:
Image from WND

Here is the “close-up” of the seal they featured and captioned as “A close-up view of the letter photographed by the Kapi’olani Medical Center reveals an embossed presidential seal as part of the letterhead:’
Image from WND

And here is a close-up taken by me from the full version (above). I cropped and enlarged it. I did not do anything else to this close-up but increase the resolution for a better view:
A close-up created by me from the WND full view photo above. I have cropped and englarged it.

Wow. There appears to be shadows where there should be highlights. The seal appears inverted although not reversed. In Photoshop, I adjusted the shadows to enhance them for my own curiosity and, yes, this appears to be fact. Here’s the enhanced version I created for other curious folks:
Shadow-enhanced close-up that I created

When is enough finally going to be enough? I am sick of this charade.
If anyone has any other images of this letter or any input to help me understand this one, please contact me using the form below. I just encountered this anamoly this evening so this little drama is still unfolding.
Wow. Wow.

[UPDATE: And by the way, the eagles' heads don't look anything alike when placed side-by-side:]
Comparison of the seals. The shape of the eagles' heads are completely different.

[UPDATE 2: Based on the full view of the letter (above), the lighting strongest lighting is coming from the left. There should be no shadows on the left of the seal’s features if it’s raised. The raised features would be highlighted from that direction. Instead there are shadows on the left of the emblem's details.
It’s pretty clear it is not a raised seal. Those shadows are within the incised areas of the seal's features.
Yuck. Congress stuck us with a common criminal. Just. Great.]

[UPDATE 3: It does appear that the full view version of the letter may be on a white sheet of paper while the close-up was taken from an off-white or cream colored stock with a visible tooth (cotton fibers). So strange...]

[UPDATE 4: Well, hello? The other featured close-up from the full view letter, of Obama's signature, is CLEARLY on a white sheet of paper, unlike the alleged close-up of the 'raised' White House seal which is on a cream colored sheet of paper. The paper in the two separate close-ups is not the same, at all. ***CASE CLOSED*** that raised seal is NOT a photo of the seal on the full letter presented at WND. There's no possible way. Again, HOW MUCH MORE OF THIS DO AMERICAN HUMAN BEINGS HAVE TO TAKE BEFORE SOMEONE, MEDIA OR CONGRESS, TAKES ACTION???
Here is the full view of the letter again and the two 'alleged' close-ups on cream and white paper with the captions from WND:
White paper stock. CAPTION FROM WND: "Barack Obama states in this purported letter from him on what appears to be White House stationery that he was born at the Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu. The letter was posted by the medical center for nearly six months on its website and used for fundraising before electronically hidden once WND disclosed it was not an actual paper letter, but merely HTML coding. The hospital now says it has a real document, though the White House has still not verified its authenticity."
White paper stock. CAPTION FROM WND: "A close-up view of the photographed letter reveals the signature on this document is a far cry from the crude, computer-generated graphic made to look like a letter on the Kapi'olani Medical Center's website.That online image was concealed by the hospital after WND revealed it was not a photo of an actual paper letter."
Cream paper stock. CAPTION FROM WND: "A close-up view of the letter photographed by the Kapi'olani Medical Center reveals an embossed presidential seal as part of the letterhead."
Those rich SOBs are laughing in our faces while blatant evidence piles and piles… Pigs at a trough. Let’s never elect pigs like this again. This has been a real eye-opener. All of America deserves lies and we deserve to be victims of fraudulent activity to protect ONE dirty rotten politician????????? Puke.]

[Author's Note: A higher resolution version of the full view photograph of the letter above must exist somewhere – it was taken with a digital camera less than two years ago. Where is the high resolution photo of the full version of the letter, because this clear cropped close-up indicates a much higher resolution photo exists? WND? Kapi'olani Hospital? Where did this photo come from? Just who is responsible for this photo of *ahem* ANOTHER fraudulent seal? Cough it up. We don't need a DIFFERENT larger photo, where is the one from above? It is EVIDENCE, it must be preserved so whoever has is it should NOT destroy it – that is a crime.
Most of us realize now that these criminals are laughing at us. They are laughing because in their arrogant minds, we were all too 'stupid' to know how to authenticate records. Oh, ha, ha. I guess being construction workers, teachers, mothers, graphic designers.....and plumbers must make us little guys look like a bunch of nothings to the political elitist rich bastards scamming EVERY American. These criminals aren't just scamming conservatives, they are scamming LIBERALS and independents. Everyone is getting the shaft. They make me sick. And any TOOL condoning this behavior must just love getting screwed by the political class. Shame on any Obama supporter for putting up with it, let alone, defending it or explaining it away. Find a little self-esteem, already. I am sick of living with YOUR LOW STANDARDS.]

Proof that a president is a natural born citizen should be publicly available. It's common sense. It's a no-brainer. And yet LTC Lakin sits in prison while "Obama" extends his Hawaiian vacation at taxpayer expense!

Did you know that current Hawaii Lt. Gov. Brian Schatz who as Chair of the HDP in 2008 authorized Obama's name be placed on the ballot...actually taught in Kenya and went to school there?...What are the odds?

 Thanks to JBJD.ORG:

Governor Abercrombie’s recent pronouncements indicate to me, he believes no documents were available in the public record which could have provided a basis for the oath taken in 2008 by his Lieutenant Governor Brian Schatz, then Chair of the HI Democratic Party, to HI election officials guaranteeing then candidate Barack Obama was Constitutionally eligible for the office of POTUS, which sworn statement was required under HRS  §11-113 before these officials could authorize his name to be printed on HI state ballots.

What does arouse my suspicion in HI is the ‘coincidence’ that Mr. Schatz, Chair of the HDP, taught in Kenya and went to school there, in the early ’90′s…  What are the odds?


originally published December 19, 2010
© 2010 jbjd
Regular readers of “jbjd” already know that documentary evidence available in the public record establishes Barack Obama stole the 2008 D Presidential nomination and then snookered a slight plurality of the American people into voting for him by tricking election officials in several states that require eligibility for office as a precondition to printing the candidate’s name on both primary and general election ballots, to print his name on the ballot, notwithstanding neither he nor anyone else who vouched he was qualified for office disclosed documentary evidence available in the public record that would establish, he is eligible for the job.   But you might have missed this.
Mr. Obama has begun wiping the 2008 slate clean, thereby announcing he intends to preserve the option to do this to us all over again in 2012.
Way back in August 2009 I published an article on this blog entitled, RUMORS, LIES, and UNSUBSTANTIATED ‘FACTS’ in which I established that Annenberg Political FactCheck (“APFC”), the source often cited by members of Congress to their constituents whose work they wrongly assert has ‘proven’ the ‘fact’ Obama is a NBC, does not actually check facts.  For example, I showed the image of a ‘newspaper birth announcement’ displayed on APFC’s web site which they accredited to the Honolulu Advertiser claiming the information they were posting on the APFC site had been uncovered by a “researcher” whose results an anonymous commenter then posted on the td (TexasDarlin) blog.   Based only on this chain of custody, that is, unnamed researcher->anonymous blogger->td blog->APFC, APFC now opined that this image they had thus obtained proved Obama was born in HI.  Just to be clear, clicking on the fourth hand image on APFC did not bring me to the work of this “researcher” or, to the birth announcement page of the edition of the Honolulu Advertiser APFC claimed was printed on “Sunday, Aug. 13, 1961.” Instead, it took me back to the td blog.
Yep; APFC claimed to authenticate Obama was born in HI with the use of an unauthenticated image of text they named “Obama’s birth announcement” only viewable through the aid of a computer screen. 
Well, since I first posted that article ‘outing’ APFC in August 2009, a couple of noteworthy changes have occurred.  First, the Honolulu Advertiser is now the Honolulu Star-Advertiser. (The paper ceased publication in July 2010.)
Second, APFC has amended that suspect link so that clicking on the image of that fake newspaper announcement posted on their blog now takes the reader not to the td blog but to the current front page of the recently formed Honolulu Star-Advertiser!  (H/T azgo.)
(APFC has posted several updates on that same page I referenced in my August 2009 expose. But, for some reason, while they note the date and reason for these other updates, they notably fail to mention they updated the link in the fake birth announcement image.)
For those people who bother to verify such information, winding up at the site of the Honolulu Star-Advertiser would be enough to end their search and to assume the information posted on APFC was true.  But we know better.
If you try hard, you can find a link on the front page of the Honolulu Star-Advertiser to Archives from the old Honolulu Advertiser. However, this archive  function only allows readers to trace articles back to 11.30.02.  So, even if this fictional Obama birth announcement was real, readers still could not locate this birth announcement via the on-line Archives, anyway.  If any birth announcements were published on Aug. 13, 1961, evidence of such publication might be found by researching microfiche or microfilm holdings of earlier publications.  These could be ‘screen captured’ and posted on the APFC site.  But they are not.  (Maybe that’s because the State of HI Libraries keep no copies of the Honolulu Advertiser from way back then. and!comres_train&index=.NK&term=honolulu+advertiser&x=9&y=8&aspect=basic_search)
So, it would seem even with their surreptitious tweaking, APFC again clearly intended to provide inquiring minds with no verifiable evidence the old Honolulu Advertiser carried a birth announcement for Barack Obama on Sunday, Aug. 13, 1961.  On the contrary, if they had meant to support their claims with verifiable documentation, they could have given readers more information than just their word, now or the last time they pulled such tripe.
Then again, why bother, when just their word was good enough to fool people the last time.

HEY ABERCROMBIE...Want to see the birth certificate? Check in with "NO SPIN" Bill O'Reilly...He's seen the birth certificate!...What say you Bill?...


Jeff Kuhner of Washington Times: Top Democrats & Top Senior Editors Concerned about Obama's Eligibility; Media Abdicating Their Responsibility.

Video: Jeff Kuhner of the Washington Times: People around the White House and in democratic circles including senior top editors afraid to pursue Obama's Eligibility and records concealment. Kuhner says...
Wonky Wheels Now Off the Warmist Ox Cart
 By Joseph A Olson, PE Full Story
No matter how hard these neutered steers pull on their yoke, there’s no denying that warmist views are a cruel joke.  There is no question that Climatology has operated with a scientific blind spot for decades.  Under normal circumstances this would have been resolved through debate with the wider scientific community.
WorldNetDaily Exclusive

Obama snubs Hillary, Senate in appointment Breaking News
Congress gets blown off with Syrian envoy pick


As for Obama, Winfrey remains a steadfast booster.

"He's doing a great job, and I don't use the term 'great' loosely," she said. "The amount of pressure and opinions coming at him from every direction, to be steadfast and solid in your own conviction about how you see this country and what you believe is possible for the future of this country. I think that takes a lot of guts."



Politics from the Nation's Capital

President and family on multi-million dollar Christmas vacation in Hawaii

Hawaii Reporter
President Obama and his family are enjoying a delightful Christmas vacation with friends and family in the chief executive's home state of Hawaii.
Nobody questions a president's right or need to take take away from the White House, but an investigation by Hawaii Reporter has turned up some eye-opening information about the costs and other aspects of the Obama get-away.
Just consider these estimates on part of the costs of the latest Obama Hawaii trip:
* Mrs. Obama’s early flight to Hawaii: $63,000 (White House Dossier)
* Obama’s round trip flight to Hawaii: $1 million (GAO estimates)
* Housing in beachfront homes for Secret Service and Seals in Kailua ($1,200 a day for 14 days): $16,800
* Costs for White House staff staying at Moana Hotel: $134,400 ($400 per day for 24 staff) – excluding meals and other room costs
* Police overtime: $250,000 (2009 costs reported by Honolulu Police Department)
* Ambulance: $10,000 (City Spokesperson)
TOTAL COST: $1,474,200
But that $1.47 million figure leaves out a number of signficant costs that simply could not be calculated by Hawaii Reporter:
* Rental of office building in Kailua on canal
* Security upgrades and additional phone lines.
* Costs for car rentals and fuel for White House staff staying at Moana Hotel (Secret Service imports most of the cars used here to escort the president).
* Surveillance before the president arrives.
* Travel costs for Secret Service and White House staff traveling ahead of the President.
White House spokesmen insist Obama's vacation expenses are in line with those of previous presidents, which may well be true, but, since the government refuses to disclose many important details about any presidential journey, nobody can know for sure.
There appear to be reasons to suspect the Obamas' trip could have been done for less, according to Hawaii Reporter.
"They could have chosen a less expensive and more secure place to stay such as a beachfront home on the Kaneohe Marine Corps Air Station – just a two-minute drive away from the Kailuana Place property where they are now," according to Hawaii Reporter.
"The president visits the military base daily to workout, bowl with his kids or enjoy the more private beach there. He also could have stayed at a home 15 minutes away on the beach fronting Bellows Air Force Base as President Bill Clinton did."
But Obama and friends opted instead to secure use of three luxury beachfront places, including the “Winter White House” – or Kailua home that the president rents two weeks a year.
That facility, Hawaii Reporter, noted, normally rents for an estimated $3,500 a day or $75,000 a month, according to the web site
The latter describes the place as a “7,000 square foot home [that] features 5 bedrooms, 5 ½ bathrooms, a media room with surround sound, a kitchen suited for a master chef, a dining room and great room, a secluded lagoon-style pool with tropical waterfalls and a lavish island spa. The ocean lanai and garden lanai showcase ornate landscaping and stunning views of Kailua Bay and Mount Olomana.”
For more from Hawaii Reporter, go here.

Read more at the Washington Examiner:

Thursday, December 30, 2010

"Historical analysis establishes, therefore, that ... respondent Obama, since his father was a Kenyan of British citizenship and not a U. S. citizen, was not 'eligible to the office of president,…' Therefore his appointment of the present Justices Sotomayor and Kagan are not valid appointments under the Constitution and they should not, therefore, be sitting as justices deciding upon our petition if this court itself observes the law it has set out under the Constitution as the supreme law of the land. Otherwise the concept of a rule of law based upon the Constitution, which we contend is at issue in our petition, is being flouted at the very outset of consideration of the petition," the motion explains.

WorldNetDaily Exclusive

Eligibility challenger wants
Obama Supremes excluded

'There is perception judicial appointments
have been made with expectation of favors'


Birds of a Feather

©2010 drkate
Question: What do Bush I, Clinton, Bush II, and Obama have in common?
Answer: The New World Order.
The World on the NWO Chessboard
Each of these individuals have been heavily supported, trained, schooled, and manipulated (willingly) by the elements of the New World Order, including the  Bilderbergs, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations, and several other secret societies whose goal is world dominance by any means. Their agenda is that of the NWO, whether hiding as a republican or a democrat.  They have all used the intelligence agency-created ‘Islamic jihad terrorists’ and the monetary system to wreak havoc in the United States and around the world…with the goal of using deadly false flag events to assert more NWO control over America and to reduce the population to slaves.
Obama, a CIA creature created out of whole cloth, is probably the ultimate combination of the deadliness of all three of his predecessors, with the added danger of befriending jihad and sharia law.  It is widely suspected that GWH Bush recruited both Clinton and Obama because of the connections to and plan to implement the NWO regime.  Obama was the new ‘face’ of the NWO, cynically designed to lull the masses into thinking something was ‘different’ about bald-faced lies he presented to Americans.
George H.W. Bush
GHW Bush, aka, George Scherff, was the son of a supposed U.S. Senator Prescott Bush who was intimately involved in Hitler’s rise to power, and after the war, in Operation Paperclip, recruited Nazi scientists and brought them to the United States.  Of Prescott Bush, the UK Guardian noted:
Continue reading ‘Birds of a Feather’




 DC Address:The Honorable Darrell Issa
United States House of Representatives
2347 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515-0549
DC Phone:202-225-3906
DC Fax:202-225-3303
Email Address:
WWW Homepage:
Twitter:No Known Twitter Account
District Office:
    1800 Thibido Road, Suite 310
Vista, CA 92081-7515
Voice: 760-599-5000
FAX: 760-599-1178