Friday, May 31, 2013



By: Devvy
May 26, 2013

There is much speculation whether or not Hillary Rodham Clinton, will run for president in 2016.

The former co-president with her lying, cheating husband, Bill Clinton, received enormous support in 2008, but those who really call the shots decided a bi-racial, constitutionally ineligible candidate, Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama, would be the better choice to continue the planned destruction of America. Hillary Rodham Clinton carries a lot of old, dirty baggage. Perhaps wait eight more years to install Comrade Clinton.

Much of Hillary Rodham's support comes from ignorant women who have no facts other than the carefully polished image built to portray Comrade Clinton as a friend of women. By championing murdering unborn babies using clever propaganda like "protecting women's reproductive rights", Comrade Clinton is lauded by women who kill their unborn babies as some sort hero. By championing the filth of sodomy and promoting AIDS/HIV by supporting sexual deviants, Comrade Clinton assured herself a nice fat bankroll for her run for the senate and president. Bushels of money from sexual deviants in Hollywood.

Republican Insider: WH & Congress Meet Regarding “Holder’s Departure”

Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:54

After multiple requests, a brief update finally arrived from a Republican operative giving insights into the goings on inside the corridors of power of the United States Congress – namely the immediate future of one Eric Holder…

(Eric Holder spent years shredding the Constitution and being “Obama’s firewall”.  Those days may very well be coming to an end…)

“I apologize again for not getting back to you sooner.  I know I keep telling you that.  All of us are being very careful regarding off the record disclosures.  The situation keeps shifting right under us.  Will let you know of a  morning meeting this week involving members of the White House Legislative Affairs Office and members of the Senate Majority Office, the Senate Minority Office, the House Speaker’s Office, and the House Minority Office.  Meeting lasted nearly an hour.  I have confirmed four things from this meeting that I can share with you.
One, the primary subject of this meeting was the future status of Attorney General Eric Holder.  A secondary topic was Obamacare related.  ???
Two, direct discussions regarding Eric Holder’s departure and possible replacement.  Both sides wanted plenty of notice and prep time if and when that transition was to take place.
Three, negotiations for Eric Holder to stay on was presented by White House reps.  This negotiation was apparently shut down by both the Senate Office reps.  I find that very interesting and if I were Eric Holder, very troubling for his future employment status with the DOJ.  He’s losing the support of his own party.
continue article at The Ulsterman Report::
The scandal over the Internal Revenue Service's targeting of conservative groups is set to widen as evidence grows that the agency probed activists connected to the organizations. [Full Story]


What was Pres. Lucifer doing while Americans were being killed in Benghazi?

Where was Obama, the Commander In Chief (CIC), when a United States consulate was being attacked and an ambassador and three other Americans were being killed?
On Fox News Sunday, May 19, 2013, that’s the question asked of White House aide Dan Pfeiffer.
Where was Barack Obama’s whereabouts the night of Sept. 11, 2012, when our consulate in Benghazi was besieged and Ambassador Christopher Stevens, State Department official Sean Smith, and ex-Navy SEALS Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were killed? The terrorist attack lasted all night long at multiple locations in Benghazi. We now know that an unmanned U.S. surveillance drone was in the skies over Benghazi that night, and that the White House knew (and saw) what was happening, as it happened.
But while insisting that Obama had kept “in constant touch that night with his national security team and kept up to date with the events as they were happening,” Pfeiffer deemed the CIC’s whereabouts that night, and specifically whether Obama  was in the Situation Room, “a largely irrelevant fact.”
chris-stevens1Clockwise from top left: Amb. Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty, Tyrone Woods.
In an op-ed for Politico, Rich Lowry writes:
Obama’s actions and nonactions on that terrible night are a blank spot in his presidency. We simply don’t know much about them, and the White House has always been perfectly content to leave it that way.
We know he was meeting with Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey on an unrelated matter at 5 p.m. Washington time, when he learned of the attack. In congressional testimony, Panetta said he had no contact with the president or the White House after that point.
Dempsey said he didn’t hear from the president, either. [...]
Next, we know that the president talked to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at 10 p.m., when the assault that killed Chris Stevens and State Department computer expert Sean Smith was over but the mortar attack that killed two former U.S. Navy SEALs at another facility hadn’t yet taken place.
What about the rest of the time? [...]
The day after his mystery night, Obama publicly emerged. He gave a statement at 10:35 a.m. condemning the Benghazi attack — and left Washington at 2:20 p.m. for a fundraiser in Las Vegas.”
Kevin DuJan, a self-described “conservative homosexual” who lives in Chicago and blogs on HillBuzz, believes Obama was high on cocaine during those “missing hours” of the Benghazi attack.
In his post of May 24, 2013, DuJan writes:
If you’ve ever known anyone who is a drug addict, you’d see it’s obvious that Barack Obama was high on cocaine the night of Benghazi; it is the only logical explanation for his disappearance and the White House’s refusal to comment on what he was doing at the time.  Since this was a night of great crisis for our country, the only logical reason that the White House won’t explain where the president was is if this man was high as a kite on illegal narcotics at the time. [...]
According to Lowry’s timeline:
* Obama appeared sober on 9/11/12 at 5pm EST when he met with Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey. [...] Obama appears to have been still functional and ambulatory at 5pm that day.
* Lowry says that Obama learned of the death of US Ambassador Chris Stevens at this meeting…before Obama disappeared for many hours. These are the mystery “missing hours” that the White House refuses to talk about.
* Obama next emerged from cloister at 10pm EST 9/11/12 when he spoke with Hillary Clinton; it’s not stated if this was in person or if it was on the phone, but it sure feels like Obama was out of his mind on drugs when this happened.  Clinton would never bust him on this (because she can never say a bad word about this man if she wants to secure the black vote in 2016), but even people on a late-80s-Wall-Street-grade binge of cocaine can talk on the phone for a few minutes. [...]
* Obama then went missing until the next morning. [...]
* Lowry then says Obama was next spotted at 1035am EST on 9/12/12 when he pretended the Benghazi attack was about some YouTube video…and then he disappeared again until he boarded his plane for fabulous Las Vegas at 220pm EST later that day.
After reading Lowry’s article, my good friend Justine in California emailed me to ask whether I thought Obama was having sex with Reggie Love during the “missing hours” and if that’s where he was. [...]
I think Obama doing cocaine is a much better explanation for his missing hours, simply because at his age and with all the men he’s been with it’s not like he couldn’t just stop romancing Reggie for a little bit…and then get back to it when they were in Vegas. I know the stereotype of gay guys is that we’re all sex-crazed and can’t control ourselves, but even the biggest gay sexual glutton in the world can pull himself away from a hot guy long enough to take care of something important (if need be). It’s not like this would have been the first time that Barack Obama was having gay sex…so surely he could have pushed “pause” to be president for a while (before getting back to whatever he was up to when the crisis was over).
However, once you take drugs you are pretty much on another astral plane for however long it takes for the drugs to leave your system.  I’ve sadly watched a lot of incredible people in the nightlife scene ruin their lives with cocaine over the years, and once these people got high they stayed high until the drugs metabolized enough for them to function. [...]
The timeline Lowry fleshed out perfectly fits a scenario where Barack Obama retired to his private quarters (perhaps with Reggie Love…or maybe one of the other low-ranking young men who are forever suspiciously palling around with this president, unlike any president before him) sometime around 6pm EST or so on 9/11/12. He then seems to have taken drugs (which I believe most likely involved cocaine). Hillary Clinton either showed up to kill his buzz or she kept calling on the phone over and over again until he answered at 10pm. [...]
From then until the staff was finally able to rouse, dress, and make him presentable enough for the public at 1030am the next day. Barack Obama appears to have been out of his mind high on drugs.
Since the White House deliberately is insisting that it’s “irrelevant” where Obama was during those missing hours that Lowry has asked about, we must assume I’m correct and the President of the United States was incapacitated from heavy narcotics use.
I would gladly retract this story if the White House would sufficiently explain Barack Obama’s whereabouts during those missing hours and prove he was not out of his mind on cocaine at the time (or gluttonously engaged in gay sex, as my friend Justine believes). 
You should know by now that whenever the Obama Regime stonewalls and absolutely refuses to reveal information mysteriously, there is a reason for it.
With this particular president, that reason more often than not involves drugs or gay sex (or a combination of both)…and just like with John F. Kennedy’s own drug use and sexual escapades, there are many people who will refuse to believe this about Obama for decades. But, at some point in the future I hope you live long enough to see people openly talking about Obama’s drug use and homosexuality, as it’s as clear as day for those of us who are gay and have known people with drug problems as rampant as this president’s. It’s not like the man disappeared off the face of the Earth into another dimension during those “missing hours”.  But, I suppose it’s uncomfortable for a lot of people to imagine what he was really doing during that mystery time.
So what do you think the POS was doing in those mystery missing hours?
See also “Obama’s gay sex-cocaine romps with Larry Sinclair,” May 31, 2010.

Former Federal Prosecutor & Conservative Activist’s Citizen Grand Jury Indicts Obama

Conservative activist’s “citizen grand jury” indicts Obama By Tom McNiff @ Via Larry Klayman Web Email A former federal prosecutor who has gained national attention for his legal pursuits...


A Canadian's Version of David Letterman's Top 10...

10) Only in America...could politicians talk about the greed of the rich at a Liberal, $35,000.00 a plate campaign fund-raising event.

9) Only in America...could people claim that the government still discriminates against black Americans when they have a black President, a
black Attorney General, and roughly 18% of the federal workforce is black while only 12% of the population is black.

8) Only in America...could they have had the two people most responsible for our tax code, Timothy Geithner (the head of the Treasury Department) and Charles Rangel (who once ran the Ways and Means Committee), BOTH turn out to be tax cheats who are in favor of higher taxes.

7) Only in America...can they have terrorists kill people in the name of Allah and have the media primarily react by fretting that Muslims might be harmed by the backlash.

6) Only in America...would they make people who want to legally become American citizens wait for years in their home countries and pay tens of thousands of dollars for the privilege, while they discuss letting anyone who sneaks into the country illegally just 'magically' become American citizens.

5) Only in America...could the people who believe in balancing the budget and sticking by the country's Constitution be thought of as "extremists."

4) Only in America...could you need to present a driver's license to cash a check or buy alcohol, but not to vote.

3) Only in America...could people demand the government investigate whether oil companies are gouging the public because the price of gas went up when the return on equity invested in a major U.S. oil company (Marathon Oil) is less than half of a company making tennis shoes (Nike).

2) Only in America...could the government collect more tax dollars from the people than any nation in recorded history, still spend a Trillion dollars more than it has per year - for total spending of $7-Million PER MINUTE, and complain that it doesn't have nearly enough money.

1) Only in America...could the rich people - who pay 86% of all income taxes - be accused of not paying their "fair share" by people who don't pay any
income taxes at all.

Thursday, May 30, 2013

communist obama marxist socialist maoist gay usurper
Russia's Pravda on Obama:

"He is a Communist Without Question Promoting the Communist Manifesto"

Obama’s SEAL Team 6 Cover-up Demands order to reveal exactly what sickening secret Barack Hussein Obama is covering up.

SEAL’s parents told to keep their mouths shut
Obama’s SEAL Team 6 Cover-up Demands Investigation
“The loss of ‘Extortion 17’ was the worst loss of life in a single day since the war in Afghanistan began…
The parents of Navy SEAL Aaron C. Vaughn started poking around at the ‘official’ story and found not a rat, but a stinking swamp, a cover-up that went all the way to the top…
America must demand that a Congressional investigation drain the swamp of the Obama administration in order to reveal exactly what sickening secret Barack Hussein Obama is covering up.”
- Western Center for Journalism, May 30, 2013
May 30, 2013
by Kris Zane      
On August 6, 2011, a military helicopter— Extortion 17— carrying thirty-eight men (including twenty-five of the elite SEAL Team 6, five National Guard and Army Reserve, and eight Afghan commandos) was shot down over Taliban-controlled territory in eastern Afghanistan. They had been on a top secret mission to take out a high-value target.
It was the worst loss of life in a single day since the war in Afghanistan began. Per a 1250-page military report, it was simply the result of a “lucky shot” by Taliban soldiers perched on top of a building. Per families of those killed and military experts at a press conference held on May 9, 2013, this is a lie among a host of other lies.
After the families attended a several hour military briefing about this “lucky shot,” describing what happened and why their sons died, they smelled a rat and started digging around.
Billy and Karen Vaughn, parents of Navy SEAL Aaron C. Vaughn, started poking around at the “official” story and found not a rat, but a stinking swamp, a cover-up that went all the way to the top.
When the Vaughns began trying to drain the swamp, they received what the Obama administration is famous for: the shakedown. None other than one of the highest ranking officers in the nation—Admiral William McRaven, commander at U.S. Special Operations Command—paid the Vaughns a little visit, in essence telling them to keep their mouths shut.
What exactly happened on August 6, 2011? What went wrong—or in this case went right that has the Obama administration dispatching high-ranking officers as thugs?
There are two possibilities, according to information revealed at the press conference:
1. The Obama administration sent American soldiers on a suicide mission, or
2. Someone set up our American heroes—that is, had them murdered—that may include the Afghan government—or shockingly may include Barack Hussein Obama himself.
We learned seven major facts at the press conference:
1.  Thirty SEAL Team 6, National Guard, and Army Reserve were packed into a decrepit 1960s era CH-47 helicopter (something, according to military experts, that was unheard of.)
Per military experts, special operations were always conducted with the state-of-the-art MH-47 helicopter—the helicopter SEAL Team 6 exclusively trained in.
Further, never—ever—were that many special operations personnel packed into a single helicopter. They were always split up into small groups with multiple MH-47s. 
2. Although the military could have easily taken out the Taliban positions with a drone strike prior to the operation, as the families were later told, this was not done because there were possible “friendlies” among the Taliban; the United States wanted to “win the minds and hearts of the enemy.”
Billy Vaughn, father of Navy SEAL Aaron Vaughn, speaking at the press conference with rage in his voice, blasted this ludicrousness:
Aaron did not become a Navy SEAL Team 6 Gold Squad to win the hearts and minds of the Islamic jihadists. He became a Navy SEAL to fight for this republic and defeat the enemy!
3. Although the military had intel that the Taliban were planning on firing on a helicopter, although an intense battle had been raging for several hours, and although normal protocol mandated that the CH-47 required at least one gunship escort, all normal rules of war were suspended.
But now for the real cover-up by the Obama administration:
4. There were eight nameless Afghan commandos onboard the CH-47. Eight Afghan commandos were loaded onto the CH-47 along with their American counterparts; but at the last minute, they were replaced without changing the manifest. It was as if someone knew they were going on a suicide mission and pulled them out. The official in charge of the investigation (General Jeffrey Colt), in his 1250-page report, did not address this fact and did not even mention it. In fact, it is likely these original Afghan commandos contacted the Taliban, telling them the CH-47 was on its way. It appears the Taliban knew the exact time and route the CH-47 would be using; that the only way the “lucky shot” would have been possible with the helicopter thousands of feet in the air in cover of darkness would have been if the Taliban had been tipped off.
5. Everyone on Extortion 17 was immediately cremated without permission from the families, supposedly because the bodies were so badly burned in the crash. According to Charles Strange, father of Navy SEAL Michael Strange, this need to immediately cremate everyone aboard is a complete lie. Taliban on the ground in fact found the bodies of the crew. The Obama administration cremated everyone in order to cover up something.
6. The CH-47 black box was “lost” according to the military investigation—“washed away by an Afghan flood.” As most know, aircraft black boxes don’t get “lost”; they are virtually indestructible and carry a tracking device that makes them easy to locate. It was “lost” in order to cover up something the Obama administration wants to keep hidden.
7. Probably one of the most shocking revelations in the SEAL Team 6 cover-up, something that was first brought out during the press conference that shows Obama is no Christian but is in fact a closet Muslim, is that Barack Hussein Obama disallowed the name of Jesus to be spoken during the initial military memorial service in Kabul and permitted a radical Islamic Imám to curse our dead heroes.
Let every American demand that whatever Barack Obama is hiding, whatever the military brass is hiding, that it be revealed. America must demand that a Congressional investigation drain the swamp of the Obama administration in order to reveal exactly what sickening secret Barack Hussein Obama is covering up. Not next month. Not next week. Not tomorrow. But today.
Demand an investigation, America.

MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT! Obama Fraud Case - Never-before-seen evidence and information re: Obama Identity Fraud will be presented at the Constitutional Sheriff's Convention.

Thursday, May 30, 2013


PPSIMMONS News Exclusive Report - 
May 30, 2013   12:30 pm ET

As Promised: Things are beginning to move forward in the Obama Fraud Case!

Carl Gallups and Mike Zullo recently went to CPAC 2013 and Capitol Hill to begin to move the case forward to federal investigation levels. "Following is just the beginning. There may be much more to come  - very soon." Carl Gallups said.

Carl Gallups - "By the time this matter is over there will be media sources, major media personalities and certain government officials who will appear to be awfully inept. It is a shame they did not deal with this previously and properly when they had the opportunity to do so. As things continue to move forward, perhaps they will jump on board and do their constitutional due diligence."

*Mike Zullo - featured speaker at the Constitutional Sheriff's Convention
*Mike Zullo - to give FULL criminal disclosure to law enforcement and Congressmen
*Rep. Steve Stockman - to be in attendance and the Keynote speaker
*CCP Det. Don Jeffrey  - to make a FREEDOM FRIDAY appearance - Obama SSN# fraud
*Mike Zullo - to make a FREEDOM FRIDAY appearance live from the Sheriff's conference
*Sheriff's Conference - already enrolling record numbers to attend!


Zullo - Featured Speaker - Sheriff's Convention
Mike Zullo, lead investigator, for the Sheriff Arpaio Cold Case Posse Obama Fraud case has revealed to PPSIMMONS News that he will be a featured speaker at the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association Convention St. Charles, Missouri - this coming weekend, May 31-June 1. Hundreds of Constitutional law enforcement officers from around the country will be in attendance as well as U.S. Congressmen.
This event is open to the public but will also contain breakout sessions designed only for sworn constitutional law enforcement officials. Mike Zullo will be a featured speaker at the public session where he says he will do a full public presentation of the CCP Obama Fraud case.

Zullo said, "This presentation will contain no new information concerning the case. However, the presentation will be monumentally important because of the overall main stream media news blackout there will be many there who will hear this important information and criminal evidence for the very first time. We are certain that once they hear the information from this 15-month criminal investigation, they will be deeply concerned."

 Zullo - Featured Speaker at FULL CRIMINAL DISCLOSURE Conference
However, Mike Zullo informed us that he also will  be the featured speaker at two different 2-hour breakout sessions designed for law enforcement and congressmen only. Concerning these breakout sessions Mike Zullo said, "We will have official credential checks at the door. No one will be admitted except duly credentialed law enforcement officials and U.S. Congressmen. At this session, I will, upon the authority of Sheriff Joe Arpaio, be presenting the entire criminal case that we have in this matter. Never-before-seen evidence and information will be presented to these in attendance. We will be asking these attendees to support our efforts to move this entire matter forward to a full congressional investigation." 
Lately, this conference of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association has been touted in various news outlets as a meeting of constitutional law enforcement officers who are highly concerned with the restoration of our constitutional republic and liberties they feel have been greatly eroded in the past several years in particular.
Mike Zullo stressed, "I want to be clear. This conference is monumentally important to the CCP Obama Fraud Case. However, this particular conference and the potentially powerful outcomes of its presentation is not the only line of approach in which we are currently engaged. We have other people looking at this - very important people. We have other plans of action, currently in the works, in moving the case forward to a full federal investigation. All of these plans, including this conference have been the direct or indirect result of my trip to CPAC and to Capitol Hill with Carl Gallups earlier this year." 
Zullo went on to explain, "This conference could prove to be hugely important - but it only came about relatively recently. We were in the process of moving forward in very constructive ways before we had this conference opportunity. We are, however, extremely grateful for the opportunity to make this connection and these presentations. These are some of the people who have the constitutional authority and connections to make things happen in this case. We tried to give the mainstream media the opportunity to do their jobs in two different publicly announced press releases over the last couple of years. The media ignored the information of a credible criminal case. Now we will take investigation information to other sources."

Congressman Steve Stockman to be Keynote speaker and in attendance at Zullo presentations

U.S. Representative, Steve Stockman, from Texas is scheduled to be the Keynote Speaker on Friday evening of the conference. By the time Stockman speaks, he will have heard Zullo's CCP presentation.

Inside Convention sources have revealed to PPSIMMONS News that this year's conference is already swelling to record level attendance. Hundreds more than expected are already signing up to come.

Carl Gallups explained, "I have served as a Deputy Sheriff in two different Florida Sheriff's Offices. I know that Sheriffs are Constitutional law enforcement officers with a lot of power and tons of powerful connections. There are thousands of these law men all over the United States. Many of them are beginning to go on record as being very concerned with the turn our nation is taking in several unconstitutional ways. If any group of people can turn that tide of public opinion and public influence - it is a group of hundreds, and perhaps thousands, of United States Sheriffs. Mike and I are thrilled with this most recent opportunity to share what the CCP has known for almost two years now."

CCP Investigators Mike Zullo and Don Jeffrey to make appearances on FREEDOM FRIDAY

Mike Zullo will make a live call-in presentation to FREEDOM FRIDAY WITH CARL GALLUPS on tomorrow's (May 31) show at 4:30 pm Central Time. He will give us the very latest in the conference updates and in various other matters concerning the ongoing criminal investigation in the Obama Fraud Case.

Prior to Zullo's appearance on FREEDOM FRIDAY - Investigator Don Jeffrey of the CCP will be making a full Obama Social Security Number Fraud presentation  - live on Carl's show. His appearance will be from 4-4:30 pm Central Time.

Listen Live links to the show are below:

Listen live link #1
Listen live link #2

Podcasts of the show will be available by noon on Saturday (June1) at the following link:

PODCASTS of Freedom Friday With Carl Gallups

You can listen to Freedom Friday With Carl Gallups and ALL the 1330 WEBY AM - Northwest Florida's Talk Radio programming on the TUNEINRADIO APP on your smartphone.

Constitutional Sheriff's Convention - FRIDAY SPEAKING SCHEDULE
Constitutional Sheriff's Convention - SATURDAY SPEAKING SCHEDULE


Canadian Judge Confirms: 2011 Election Fraudulent

from ravenise004:
The Canadian Federal Court has confirmed that the country’s 2011 federal election, which led to the victory of Stephen Harper’s government, was fraudulent.
The court emphasized in a Thursday ruling that it has found in no uncertain terms that widespread election fraud took place during the vote.
The ruling also stated that “there was an orchestrated effort to suppress votes during the 2011 election campaign by a person with access to the [Conservative Party's] CIMS database.”
Accordingly, the Council of Canadians has called on the Conservative Party to investigate the issue. It says anything less at this point would be a cover-up on behalf of the Conservatives.
The ObamaCare Meltdown Begins
 By Arnold Ahlert Full Story
While Americans remain focused on the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups applying for tax exempt status, two recently filed lawsuits reveal a far deeper level of alleged corruption at the agency. On May 2, a group of small businesses challenged the IRS’s attempt to illegally implement health insurance subsidies contained in the Affordable Healthcare Act, aka ObamaCare.

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Iranian leaders have given the go-ahead to a coalition of terrorists to attack American soil, in effect all but declaring war on the United States.

A green light for Iran’s new terrorist war

Regime intends to shift the battleground stateside

By Reza Kahlili
Iranian leaders have given the go-ahead to a coalition of terrorists to attack American soil, in effect all but declaring war on the United States.
As I reported recently and according to a source in the Islamic regime’s intelligence apparatus, Iran created the Coalition of Muslim Soldiers to wreak havoc on the United States and its allies. The goal is to change the field of battle from the Middle East to the American homeland, and the opening salvos — if indeed the Boston bombing wasn’t the first — are due imminently unless U.S. authorities can short-circuit Tehran’s plans.
The source said the regime views the Boston bombing as a successful terrorist attack in which fear was created, U.S. intelligence was questioned and a sense of security was diminished. No link has been established yet to any group or nation for the Boston tragedy, which is the aim of this coalition of terrorists, formed by units of Lebanon’s Hezbollah, al Qaeda and Iran’s Quds Forces.
In a 2010 meeting, Qasem Soleimani, the head of the Quds Forces; Seif Adel, the operational head of al Qaeda; and Mustafa Badr al-Din, the operational head of Hezbollah, devised a plan for continued terrorist operations against America under a new coalition, dubbed the Coalition of Muslim Soldiers. It includes al-Shabab, an al Qaeda offshoot based in Somalia, and has its central command in the Iranian city of Kerman.
After the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists in recent years and again with the increase in sanctions, the Islamic regime’s supreme leader warned that the country’s strategy had changed to face “threats with threats,” a subliminal message that the regime will go on the offensive with terrorist covert operations. More recently, a senior commander of the Islamic regime had warned that terrorism was coming to America.
“If the people of America and Europe do not confront the aggressive policies of their governments, they cannot then remain far from the possible future [terrorist attacks],” Brig. Gen. Masoud Jazayeri, the regime’s armed forces deputy chief of staff, said in a Feb. 23 interview with Fars News Agency. Gen. Jazayeri, objecting to U.S. involvement in the Syrian civil war, warned that explosions similar to those in Syria would take place in other countries.

Have the Obama's been stashing money overseas?...

Let's look more closely at the Obamas' upcoming trip
By Rev. Dr. S. Summer

Here we are five months into Obama's second term, and Americans are confronted with a puzzle, searching through a maze of mixed messages, trying to sort out the truth from what we are being told by this administration. By now we should have a better grasp of who this president is and his actual agenda so that we could rally behind him. By now we should be able to trust our own president.

But these recent White House scandals have only affirmed some of our growing suspicions, that Obama's notion of "transforming" this country is not what we were led to believe, nor one we would have supported.

And so, when we hear Keith Koffler is reporting below, which came directly from the White House, we certainly have a good reason to wonder:

President Obama and the First Lady look forward to traveling to Senegal, South Africa, and Tanzania from June 26 – July 3. The President will reinforce the importance that the United States places on our deep and growing ties with countries in sub-Saharan Africa, including through expanding economic growth, investment, and trade; strengthening democratic institutions; and investing in the next generation of African leaders. Mrs. Obama, you may remember, traveled to South Africa two years ago for a trip that was half work and half vacation. And almost all taxpayer money.

In the absence of transparency, we are left to apply our deductive skills and pull together the pieces of this puzzle that are Barack Hussein Obama. One hint comes from the blogger of "White Hat Reports" who told us that the real motive for Michelle's trip to Spain in August of 2010 – you know, the little getaway that cost U.S. taxpayers $467.000 dollars – was to move the billions in "unaccounted for" Stimulus Bailout Package monies to a safe haven, far from the prying eyes and grasping hands of the Internal Revenue Service.

In light of impending indictments for the avalanche of scandals now befalling the entire Obama regime, could the upcoming trip to South Africa be for the purpose of stashing another nest egg, or perhaps adding to an already existing stash, or arranging a location for a swift retreat from Washington, D.C.? Or

The Obamas have managed to orchestrate themselves into the White House, to manipulate the media, to trample upon our Constitution, to deconstruct our military, and to sabotage our economy. With bold irreverence toward our American values, they have essentially sought to undo the United States of America – to the point that we now fear our government and are earnestly clinging to the last vestiges of law to protect us from these tyrants.

Clearly they were not prepared for the sudden pushback from the very God-centered nation they have treated with such contempt. But having surrounded themselves with minions of sycophants and Communist cohorts, the Obamas most likely believe that somehow, at the very least, they will manage to slither through the escape hatch with all of our taxpayer's hard-earned American money.

Should they succeed, it might appear that these usurpers would have won. But a "win" for them would simply mean dodging the rule of American law. Their loss would be lifelong exile from the greatest, strongest, most generous and magnificent country in the history of the world!

With piles of cash, to be sure, but be not deceived. Money does not compensate for the shame they are putting on their daughters who will have to live with the reality that Americans, as well as citizens across the globe who respect us, will always recognize the Obamas as enemies of the free world.

Barack Obama will have been demoted from his esteemed position as self-described Savior of the Suffering, Messiah of the Minorities, and The Great Hope of the Disenfranchised Masses, and he and his Mary Magdalene and their two privileged, entitled princesses – in one fell swoop – will be reduced to a bitter family without a country.

They will have their prepared rationales and answers ready to spin of course, but over time the remaining mysteries will surface. Truth has a way of coming out. This puzzle will not remain one forever; and then humanity will fully know who Obama is, the facts of his origin, what a terrific imposter and pathological liar he's been. There isn't enough money to protect him, nor is this earth so vast that there could exist any place remote enough where he can hide.

In the midst of this fog of inquiries, we cannot anticipate at this point the impact of criminal charges on the Obamas or how those consequences will effect this whole administration.

From a larger perspective, I am convinced the profoundly negative impact the Obamas' behavior has had on the Democratic Party and their platform for big government hasn't begun to register yet. The experiment of big government has failed miserably. In fact, this progressive administration has inadvertently awakened and galvanized America on just about every level, wherever they have intruded on our freedoms.

This horror-filled chapter of Communist over-reaching has actually done more for the conservative ideology than a series of outstanding conservative presidents could have achieved. America has been alerted.

Now we know what we don't want; now we know why we liberties are so precious, and now we know what compelled our founders to stand so steadfastly against tyranny.
Dishonoring America’s Veterans
 By Roger Aronoff Full Story
Fox News’ Jennifer Griffin called it “arguably the biggest scandal the Obama Administration is facing in Washington right now—the Department of Veterans’ Affairs disability claims backlog.” The average wait time, she reported, is 273 days. “Despite a half-a-billion dollar new computer system designed to improve efficiency at the VA, 97 percent of all the claims are still filed on paper.”

Meet one of Washington DC's most arrogant and, until May 10, 2013, most politically-invisible people in the Obama Administration—Lois G. Lerner.

eet one of Washington DC's most arrogant and, until May 10, 2013, most politically-invisible people in the Obama AdministrationLois G. Lerner. Lerner is generally, although mistakenly, viewed by the media as an apolitical, albeit leftwing, bureaucrat with no political axes to grind. The branding of Lerner was accomplished by Larry M. Noble (who retired from government service at the end of Clinton's reign. From 1979 until the end of 2000, Noble served as counsel of the Federal Election Commission [FEC]. Noble came into government near the end of Jimmy Carter's one term and left at the end of Bill Clinton's second term. Noble, whose own political pedigree is as opaque as Barack Obama's transparent administration, rose to General Counsel of the FEC in 1987. He hired Lois Lerner, whose questionable, partisan political ethics began there. Because questions arose early about Lerner's obvious discrimination against conservatives, Noble was forced to defend his associate general counsel in the pubic arena by assuring the Reaganites that she was completely apolitical, and that she was devoted only to increasing regulations while limiting the influence of money in politics—Republican money, it turned out.
Reports written by Lerner as the Associate General Counsel at the FEC (uncovered by National Review) show "...she was predisposed to back Republicans against the wall while giving Democrats a pass." National Review noted that while the reports, at that time, were signed by Noble, sources at the FEC confirmed that, given her role at the FEC, Lerner would have shaped the views and conclusions. "As head of Enforcement at the FEC, Lerner would have approved the drafting of every General Counsel's Report." Her thoughts. Her words. Her reports. Camouflaged with Noble's signature.
When former Gov. Haley Barbour [R-MS] was the chairman of the Republican National Committee, the RNC created the nonprofit National Policy Forum just before the 1994 political season when the GOP took control of Congress. The Democratic National Committee accused Barbour of funneling Hong Kong money through the National Policy Forum to the RNC. In 1994, the DNC accused the RNC of taking a contribution from Young Brothers Company, a US corporation owned by the sons of Hong Kong tycoon Ambrous Tung Young. What happened was that the Young brothers loaned the National Policy Foundation $1.6 million. The NPF used the loan to repay a loan owed to the RNC. The liberal media, including TIME, reported that Young Brothers was essentially a shell company with negligible assets and income. The FEC decided the loan was a contribution and not a loan; and that US election law prohibited campaign contributions from overseas sources; and it also prohibits funneling money through "front groups" that hide the true source of the money.
The report, over the signature of the general counsel, concluded that Barbour and the RNC treasurer, Alec Poiteviant "...knowingly and willingly violated federal law." The very prolonged investigation launched by Lerner ultimately stalled and finally petered out, leading to a partyline 3 to 3 stalemate among the six FEC commissioners. She was determined to put Barbour in prison, but she failed. On paper, Noble was the driving force behind the RNC probe. In the end, Attorney General Janet Reno found nothing she could hang her hat on—or hang Barbour and Poiteviant. Try as they did to concur with the FEC, the career lawyers in the Justice Dept. concluded that the loan was a loan, and not a political contribution.
This is Lois Lerner. A very complex, rabid leftwing activist who, since 1986, has been able to wear one of the largest leftwing pairs of hobnail boots in the government bureaucracy simply because Noble convinced the right that Lerner was apolitical—and his signature camouflaged her edicts. When you're the invisible enemy of the right, stealth is power.
Krauthammer: Obama Implementing Benghazi Cover Story Even Before Last Two Americans were Dead

Confirmed: Obama Brother Tax-Exempt Charity Tied To Genocidal Muslim Dictator & Terrorists

Obama’s Brother’s Non-Profit Tied  to Genocidal Muslim Dictator and Terrorists By Daniel Greenfield @ Frontpage Mag While the IRS was going crazy over anything with the words “Tea” and “Party”...

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Question over missing time deepens
 By Doug Hagmann Full Story
I first brought it up with specificity in my article titled The Benghazi Deception on May 16, comparing Obama’s missing “18 1/2 hours” during the time four Americans were being murdered to the 18 1/2 minute erasure of the Watergate tapes of the Nixon era. Exactly one week later, I clearly illustrated that Chris Wallace repeatedly asked David Pfeiffer, a top Obama official, “where was Obama” during the night when four American’s were murdered in Benghazi. Mr. Wallace actually did what a good newsman should do, and repeated the question no fewer than eight-(8) times, but never received an answer or explanation. Nothing, nada, zilch. Crickets.

Trevor Loudon's new book, "The Enemies Within: Communists, Socialists and Progressives in the U.S. Congress," uncovers the clandestine identities, activities, and agendas of our closeted commissars in Washington, D.C.

Oleg Atbashian Designs Cover for Trevor Loudon's New Book

Trevor Loudon's new book, "The Enemies Within: Communists, Socialists and Progressives in the U.S. Congress," uncovers the clandestine identities, activities, and agendas of our closeted commissars in Washington, D.C.

As much as these "agents of change" would like to take credit for their subversive work, such a premature outing can damage their efforts of dismantling America's foundation. They would rather wait until after this country is "fundamentally transformed," at which time they can safely unmask themselves before the bamboozled toiling masses, who wouldn't know what hit them. New books will be written then, so the public school students could learn about these glorious heroes of the revolution and follow their example. In this sense, Trevor Loudon's book arrives before its time.

Incidentally, the book cover is designed by another notorious time traveler, Oleg Atbashian, who claims to have come from the future to help his American comrades prepare for the socialist utopia that lies ahead.

Read the rest on Trevor Loudon's New Zeal blog.
What emerges could be devastating for both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton
More Benghazi Whistleblowers Ready to Step Forward
“If Hillary Clinton gave the OK to sell missiles to insurgents... it would reveal the utter callousness and calculated mendacity of a woman who knows full well ‘what difference at this point’ such a revelation would make…
Selling such missiles to anyone is usually a function of the CIA…
former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton chose to move forward because she wanted to overthrow Gaddafi on the cheap…
It is worth remembering that in assisting the overthrow of Gaddafi, Obama violated the War Powers Act of 1973 requiring Congressional approval of the use military force after 60 days…
It will be revealed the White house told Ham (AFRICOM Commander General Carter Ham) to stand down, and when he refused, the White House called his deputy and had the deputy threaten to relieve Ham of his command.”
May 27, 2013 By Arnold Ahlert
According to two former diplomats who spoke with PJ Media’s Roger Simon, more Benghazi whistleblowers will emerge and blow a giant hole in the Obama administration’s already shaky narrative regarding the deaths of four Americans.
Their revelations will focus on two subjects: the real purpose of Ambassador Christopher Steven’s mission in Libya, and the pressure put on former AFRICOM commander Gen. Carter Ham to stand down from any attempt to rescue those under attack. What emerges could be devastating for both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
The whistleblowers are reportedly colleagues of the former diplomats. They have yet to come forward because they are in the process of obtaining lawyers, necessitated by their work in areas that are not completely covered by the Whistleblower Protection Act.
Furthermore, Simon notes that, as of now, what the diplomats are saying is considered hearsay, “but the two diplomats sounded quite credible. One of them was in a position of responsibility in a dangerous area of Iraq in 2004,” he writes.
What the diplomats say the whistleblowers will reveal is that Christopher Stevens was in Benghazi to buy back Stinger missiles from al Qaeda, issued to them by the U.S. State Department. Selling such missiles to anyone is usually a function of the CIA, but they reportedly were against the idea of selling such advanced technology to elements of the “rebel movement” attempting to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi. Stinger missiles can endanger civilian aircraft.
According to the diplomats, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton chose to move forward because she wanted “to overthrow Gaddafi on the cheap.”
When the “rebels” who were sold the missiles turned out to be al Qaeda, Stevens was tasked with the job of cleaning up the fiasco. One of the diplomats noted that it was likely the same elements of the terrorist group to whom the missiles were sold ended up attacking the consulate in Benghazi, killing Stevens, State Department employee Sean Smith, and former Navy SEALs Glen A. Doherty and Tyrone S. Woods.
The unnamed diplomat was even more contemptuous of the Clinton-led effort, likening it to the movie “Charlie Wilson’s War,” the story of a Congressman who thought it was a good idea to supply Stinger missiles to the mujahedeen in Afghanistan during their fight to overthrow the Russians. “It’s as if Hillary and the others just watched that movie and said ‘Hey, let’s do that!’” the diplomat said.
National Review’s Jim Geraghty, who reviewed several public reports regarding the movement of Stinger missiles in Libya, insists the diplomats’ account can be corroborated and contradicted. His report highlights several critical elements, noting that rebel leaders did request the missiles, including Abdul Hakim Al-Hasadi, who was detained in Pakistan as a hostile combatant by U.S. forces in 2002 “while returning from Afghanistan where I fought against foreign invasion,” according to Al-Hasadi himself.
As for the U.S. directly supplying missiles to the rebels, Geraghty cites two different New York Times reports revealing other possibilities. The first report notes that the rebels were securing such missiles from the Gaddafi regime’s captured storage bunkers. The second report was far more devastating to the Obama administration, noting that it gave its blessing to Qatar to ship arms to the insurgency, before becoming “alarmed” that the weapons were ending up in the hands of “Islamic militants.” The Times insisted there was no evidence that such missiles were linked to the Benghazi attacks. But considering there’s been no specific identification of the Qatari weapons or the specific ordnance used to attack the consulate, such claims are dubious at best. Geraghty further notes that such shipments violate UN Resolution 270 prohibiting the direct or indirect sale or transfer of weapons to any party in Libya.
Thus, who sold Stinger missiles to the rebels remains in question. However, the diplomats’ contention regarding Stevens’ real mission in Benghazi was buttressed by an Oct. 23, 2011 column in The Telegraph. Reporter Con Coughlin revealed that ”teams of CIA officers, supported by other intelligence services such as Britain’s MI6, have been scouring Libya in search of the missing missiles” following the fall of Gaddafi’s regime in August. Reuters further noted that the consulate “had been a base for, among other things, collecting information on the proliferation of weaponry looted from Libyan government arsenals, including surface-to-air missiles,” a fact inadvertently revealed during a House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform hearing about security lapses in Benghazi. The day after that hearing Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank accused Republicans of ”boneheaded questioning” of State Department witnesses that left little doubt that the consulate was a ”CIA base.”
Geraghty sums up his investigative report with the other major, but as yet unsubstantiated, reason the CIA was in Benghazi. ”During this time, a large number of weapons, including anti-aircraft missiles, were leaving Libya and arriving in Turkey en route to Syrian rebels–and the CIA had personnel in both countries assigned to monitor and assist the arms shipments.”
The diplomats contend the whistleblowers will report that Stevens was attempting to procure the Stingers. This does not negate the possibility that the effort was being done to arm Syrian rebels, absent involvement that could be directly traced back to the Obama administration. It is worth remembering that in assisting the overthrow of Gaddafi, Obama violated the War Powers Act of 1973 requiring Congressional approval of the use military force after 60 days. The president sidestepped it by asserting that no American troops were put in harm’s way. If the administration is arming Syrian rebels, it would appear that both Resolution 270 and the War Powers Act are once again irrelevant, as far as the administration is concerned.
As troubling as the first assertion made by the diplomats is, the second one is far more damning. Their contacts insist that AFRICOM had Special Ops “assets in place that could have come to the aid of the Benghazi consulate immediately” (emphasis mine). They further insist that it will be revealed the White house told Ham to stand down, and when he refused, the White House “called his deputy and had the deputy threaten to relieve Ham of his command.”
Ham retired as head of AFRICOM in April. Yet the announcement of his retirement was released by the Defense Department on Oct 31, 2012. It said that Ham would eventually step down, even as he retained “the full confidence of the secretary of defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,” according to Pentagon Press Secretary George Little, who further noted Ham’s decision to retire was “entirely personal.”
It was also unusual. Ham was removed from a position with a three year rotation well short of that mark. On October 25, 2012, former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta insisted that, with regard to a rescue operation ”you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on; without having some real-time information about what’s taking place, and as a result of not having that kind of information, the commander who was on the ground in that area, Gen. Ham, Gen. Dempsey and I felt very strongly that we could not put forces at risk in that situation.”
Yet Ham himself never referenced any discussions with Panetta or Dempsey when he told Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) he was never given the order to secure the Benghazi consulate. Chaffetz also said Ham told him forces were available and “had proximity” to the consulate.
Obviously, whistleblowers providing credible information on both topics would prove invaluable with regard to giving Americans the truth about what happened on September 11, 2012, as a well as a motive for the administration’s disinformation campaign. If Hillary Clinton gave the OK to sell missiles to “insurgents,” her judgment at the very least, would be called into question, putting her chances of securing the Democratic nomination for president in 2016 in serious jeopardy. It would also reveal the utter callousness and calculated mendacity of a woman who knows full well “what difference at this point” such a revelation would make.
Yet whistleblower testimony regarding pressure to avoid rescuing Americans–that could possibly be corroborated by the former head of AFRICOM– would deal this administration a blow from which it might never recover.
Americans may countenance many things, but the idea that we would abandon Americans under fire in Benghazi to protect the Obama administration’s pre-election narrative that terror was “on the run” isn’t one of them. Nothing would make Obama’s promise to “fundamentally transform the United States of America ring any more hollow than that.
Arnold Ahlert is a former NY Post op-ed columnist currently contributing to, and He may be reached at