Sunday, November 30, 2014

The leader of the free world is actually a woman named Valerie Jarrett, a longtime crony of Barack and Michelle Obama, who appears to call all of the shots in the Oval Office.

PRESIDENT JARRETT: “Senior Adviser” Reportedly Calling All the Shots, Including Those In Ferguson

By: Doug Ross
Doug Ross @ Journal
For those who are wondering how Barack Obama — a man seemingly engaged in full-time campaigning, fundraising and rabble-rousing — could also have the bandwidth to weaken America both at home and abroad, the answer is really quite simple.
The leader of the free world is actually a woman named Valerie Jarrett, a longtime crony of Barack and Michelle Obama, who appears to call all of the shots in the Oval Office.
In the White House, Jarrett has been linked to a wide variety of scandals and other policy debacles.
There are credible reports that Jarrett blocked the attack on Osama Bin Laden’s compound on three separate occasions.
Similar reports indicate that she gave the “stand down” order to would-be rescuers in Benghazi on 9/11/2012.
In 2012, she was reported to have led Obama’s “secret negotiations” with Iran’s Mullahs. Subsequent accounts depicted Jarrett as working with Iran’s nuclear experts to ensure the Islamic Republic could continue on its march to build nuclear weapons.
On Thursday, the Wall Street Journal‘s Kim Strassel summarized the ramifications of Jarrett’s litany of policy failures in stark terms: everyone but her is expendable.

American blacks are suffering the negative effects of decades of Liberalism; liberals controlling our schools, controlling Hollywood and controlling the news media. Liberals have infected the hearts and minds of blacks, conditioning them to believe blacks are suppressed in America because of racism, while ignoring all facts, in plain sight, which prove otherwise. MUST READ...

Enough with The Ferguson Pandering

In all the media coverage of the riots in Ferguson, an annoying false premise has been allowed to stand as though it were an unquestionable truth. Talking heads on the left and right are saying while rioting is not the way, there is a need for change in America. What the heck change are they talking about?

By embracing the “need for change” premise promoted by Al Sharpton and company, the media is complicit in spreading the lie that America is racist and blacks are mistreated. For crying out loud, folks, look around. Blacks are thriving in every area of the American experience. The real need for change is for blacks to stop voting for Democrats in exchange for just-enough-to-get-by handouts and endless failed big government spending programs that make problems worse; the death of the black family. That is what desperately needs to change in America.


Saturday, November 29, 2014

If America doesn't wake up soon, when it does, it will realize that our children have inherited our stupidity. After all, stupid is what stupid sees and mimicks. If we want our nation back, then we'd better start mimicking the patriots who won this land from the British and built it5 into the greatest nation on Earth but decided apathy was easier than the struggle that would be necessary to keep this nation independently free and liberty both strong and pure. Because if we don't begin protecting our newborn Americans and protect the elderly whose sweat equity built America, all that will be left is the half million survivors of a dying world, wondering where all the people went.

The people the Global Money Barons Don't Want...from
babies to grandmothers and sick people in between. Those the government is killing at both ends of the age corridor.

Once you have all the money in the world, there are two things you don't want. First, you don't want a crowded world that encourages territorial strife and war; and second, you want a sufficient abundance of natural resources, food stuffs and all of the material things that the wealthy expect as their due. The Rockefeller clan, from John D. Rockefeller, Sr. in the 1880s to his grandson David in the 1960s, believed the world was rapidly becoming so overpopulated that people would soon decimate all of Earth's natural resources leaving a barren, desolate planet due to man destroying his ecosystem. You've been seeing Hollywood's stock movie flicks about the doomsday catastrophies of man caused by man destroying his ecosystem beginning with the 1951 movie promoting the United Nations in "The Day The Earth Stood Still" and the Charlton Heston flicks "Planet of the Apes" [1968] where war was the culprit destroying the planet; and a double dose of movies like "Solyent Green" [1973] and the 2011 TV miniseries "Terra Nova." Where "Planet of the Apes" dealt with humans destroying mankind through war, "Solyent Green" and "Terra Nova" dealt with industrial and man-made pollutants destroying the planet. Mixed in was a whole cistern of celluloid, including icee-cracking"The Day After Tomorrow" which is notable only because the movie's producer allowed Al Gore, Jr. to use its made-up footage from the movie to convince its audience (who had not yet seen "The Day After Tomorrow" movies like that global warming was causing the Arctic ice to melt and the Antarctic ice shelf to begin breaking apart. Preceded or followed by movies like "Catagory 6.5," Catagory 7," "Day of Destruction," and "10.5 Apocalypse" as well as a myriad of nickel and dime movies that blame man for the weather that is caused exclusively by the solar cycles of our sun that create both global warming and cooling that Al Gore and and the eco-thieves blame on man and flatulating cows.
When Gore brought "An Inconvenient Truth" to England and tried to show it to school children, the British high court would not allow the film to be shown in England without an explicit disclaimer denouncing the movie as lacking in fact. Inconveniently, Gore's Hollywood production, like the movies you watch on the silver screen (even those which are touted as factual biographies of both conservative and liberal politicians) are pretty much made up. Movies about former presidents are scripted to make conservatives like Ronald Reagan look bad and greedy tyrants like John Adams, Woodrow Wilson, FDR, Lyndon Johnson, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and, of course, Barack Obama, look like what they weren't—honest men.

By now, it’s hard not to notice that these are the Americans in various uniforms who support the edifice of law and order, even world order, that the Obama-ites are committed to dismantling. This would seem to explain the many cases where Obama administration sympathies, or even benefits of the doubt, unduly extend to the other side, whatever form it takes, from terrorists to mobs. As usual, this leaves the rest of us in serious trouble.

When the Enemy of the State Is the State

By Diana West

November 28, 2014
When St. Louis County Prosecutor Robert P. McCulloch explained that some exonerating testimony in the shooting death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, came from several African-American eyewitnesses who described Brown as having charged police Officer Darren Wilson before he fired the fatal shots, it was a powerful moment.
Such testimony was consistent with physical evidence establishing that Wilson had not fired at Brown’s back as repeatedly and poisonously alleged. Indeed, it would seem that the aggressor in this fatal encounter was not Wilson, but rather Brown. According to evidence the grand jury sifted and assessed, it seems that Wilson fired not in cold blood, as so often declared, but in self-defense.
It was this right to self-defense – “even” for a policeman – that the grand jury decision left sacrosanct when it determined there was simply not sufficient evidence to indict Wilson for any crime.
Shocking as it may seem, self-defense is not a bedrock right in some courts – specifically, U.S. military courts, where U.S. soldiers have seen their right to self-defense on the battlefield negated by murder convictions.
The St. Louis County prosecutor has now uploaded the grand jury proceedings (all 24 volumes), assorted evidence and witness interviews so all can see how the system worked, and how the grand jury came to its conclusion. This sets an unprecedented standard for transparency in the face of ongoing demagogic efforts to obscure or ignore these same facts. With incendiary talk of anger “rooted in reality,” as the president put it, the need for protests, the specter of federal charges and “change,” Barack Obama and an army of “racial arsonists” agitate not for justice, not for peace, but for power.
Listening to McCulloch’s discussion of how it was that an unarmed, but powerfully built 18-year-old (who had a large dose of THC, the judgment-impairing chemical in marijuana, coursing through his blood) posed a threat to an armed policeman, I couldn’t help but think about another case. When former Army Ranger Lt. Michael Behenna shot and killed an unarmed Iraqi terrorist named Ali Mansur in 2008, Behenna, too, claimed to have acted in self-defense when the Iraqi rushed him. Physical evidence supported Behenna’s version of events, but he was convicted and originally sentenced to 25 years for murder. When the highest military appeals court affirmed his conviction, it determined that in the circumstances, Behenna had “lost the right to act in self-defense and did not regain it.” Sickening.
Think of it. The military appeals court ruling tells us that justice would really have been better served had Behenna been killed in the altercation. I can’t help thinking the agitators in the Brown case, from Obama on down, feel exactly the same way about Darren Wilson. To them, self-sacrifice (someone else’s) is preferable to self-defense.
Earlier this year, an act of clemency released Behenna from the military prison at Ft. Leavenworth but not before he had served five years behind bars – for what? Surviving? The legal travesty of the Behenna case is unlikely to have occurred in civilian court, which is one excellent reason why such cases should be removed from military jurisdiction.
There are others. More U.S. soldiers remain behind bars whose main crime seems to be that they, too, remained alive after a do-or-die point of crisis. There is Sgt. Derrick Miller, whose fatal struggle with an Afghan inside the defensive perimeter over Miller’s own gun, earned Miller a premeditated murder conviction – and a sentence of life in prison without possibility of parole for 10 years. Miller, by the way, is an African-American who fails to rate the president’s “community of color” concerns, which tells me they are so much smoke to fire up the mob.
There is 1st Lt. Clint Lorance, currently serving a 20-year sentence on two murder convictions, having ordered his men to shoot at three Afghans approaching their checkpoint in Taliban territory. There is also Master Sgt. John Hatley, convicted of the murders of four detainees in Iraq in harrowing conditions. Not only were the bodies never recovered, the deceased were never reported missing. Hatley, however, is serving 40 years in Leavenworth. There is Pfc. Corey Clagett (18 years for following orders to kill from scot-free commanders), whose inhumane abuse at the hands of military wardens is an egregious travesty. There is Marine Sgt. Lawrence Hutchins, whose repeated prosecutions amount to Kafkaesque mental torture.
Surely, these veterans merit the same clemency that has released literally thousands of enemy fighters with American blood on their hands, from Guantanamo to Iraq to Afghanistan. Tragically, Uncle Sam doesn’t agree.
And this is where a disturbing pattern takes shape. The Obama administration at these fateful junctures is consistently and predictably callous or hostile to those who have protected it from our worst enemies abroad or maintained the peace at home. Did you hear even a word from Washington about the two sheriff’s deputies gunned down in California last month by a twice-deported illegal alien? No, you heard amnesty instead.
By now, it’s hard not to notice that these are the Americans in various uniforms who support the edifice of law and order, even world order, that the Obama-ites are committed to dismantling. This would seem to explain the many cases where Obama administration sympathies, or even benefits of the doubt, unduly extend to the other side, whatever form it takes, from terrorists to mobs.
As usual, this leaves the rest of us in serious trouble.
Source: Diana West

Diana West is the author of American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation's Character (St. Martin's Press 2013) and The Death of the Grown-Up: How America's Arrested Development Is Bringing Down Western Civilization (St. Martin's Press 2007). In Fall 2013, West brought out a companion volume to American Betrayal titled:The Rebuttal: Defending American Betrayal from the Book-Burners, which includes essays by Vladimir Bukovsky and M. Stanton Evans, among others.
Barack Obama: A Companion of Fools 
Jeannie DeAngelis  
For the average citizen, it’s a tad disturbing to realize that an alleged child molester has inserted himself so far into the political process that when he’s not sodomizing boys, he’s influencing presidential Supreme Court picks. More

...sitting atop our corrupt government is a bigoted anti-white socialist, who it has become clear not only despises Caucasians, but also Christians and Jews of all stripes. He is a black Muslim in the subtler mold of Louis Farrakhan and Malcolm X – only repackaged and warmed over to have duped enough Americans to have voted him into the presidency in 2008 and 2012. This destructive and evil man, Barack Hussein Obama, is more dangerous than Farrakhan or X...

Time to take a stand against Obama's racism
Posted By Larry Klayman 11/28/2014 

When I was a young boy, I watched scenes on television of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. speaking and fighting for equal rights for blacks. Even at age 10, I was moved not only by his inspiring oratory but also his steadfast determination to bring freedom to his people; indeed bringing freedom to all oppressed people. Be you black or white, the civil rights leader, a true giant among men, even with his leftist connections, set the tone for a nation in ascension.

Today, our country, now in steep decline, is not so fortunate as to have a civil rights leader like King. Rather, sitting atop our corrupt government is a bigoted anti-white socialist, who it has become clear not only despises Caucasians, but also Christians and Jews of all stripes. He is a black Muslim in the subtler mold of Louis Farrakhan and Malcolm X – only repackaged and warmed over to have duped enough Americans to have voted him into the presidency in 2008 and 2012. This destructive and evil man, Barack Hussein Obama, is more dangerous than Farrakhan or X; he is the nominal leader of the free world, an ironic position given that his view of governance is hardly one that fights for and preserves freedom, but instead through words and deed seeks to snuff out liberty for nearly everyone whose skin color and inherent Muslim faith does not match his own.

Instead, along with his black comrades, the likes of Attorney General Eric Holder and black activist colleagues and friends like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, he runs a divisive racist cabal that is designed to tear the nation apart at its seams. In so doing, they hope to create enough anarchy and chaos to wage a revolution against not just whites – who they feel must pay blacks back for the years of invidious discrimination – but also Jews and white Christians in particular. This, along with his Muslim roots, which he inherited from his anti-Semitic Kenyan father, helps explain Obama’s hostility toward Israel, the land of the Jewish people and the birthplace of Jesus, and the president’s favoritism toward everything black and Islamic.

My words today may at first seem extreme. They are not. They must finally be said, given the sad state of affairs we now find ourselves in – with time running out to confront and defeat Obama and his pliant leftist goons. More and more, Americans are starting to see these black racists for what they are. Fox News’ Megyn Kelly, Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity are now calling it like it is, but even ordinary Americans, also liberal ones, are also beginning to talk more clearly and openly about this threat to our formerly civilized society.

The scary saga of black mob violence in Ferguson, Missouri, this week, where a cop was not indicted for the killing of Michael Brown – a young thug who robbed a convenience store and then attacked the arresting officer – unmasks in greater detail the frightening racial divide and criminal reverse racism among many black Americans incited by the Obamas, Holders, Sharptons and Jacksons of the world. This lot, and their minions, has triggered a racial war – only one that is one-sided. White Americans and others of non-color have been slow to react and fight back, for fear of being branded racists and ostracized from their social and political communities. Indeed, if white Americans and their ilk would again act in this fashion – as they did to an extent in the old South and elsewhere in the middle years of the 20th century, by burning and looting stores, setting afire buildings and mugging innocent people based on their race – then they would be branded as modern-day versions of the Ku Klux Klan and prosecuted by Obama’s Justice Department, among other law enforcement agencies under his direction and control.

The now well-known and publicized volatile words of Obama and his black comrades like Holder, Sharpton and Jackson have fanned the flames and stoked the frightening violence in Ferguson and other cities around the country this week. They can no longer be ignored and rationalized as justifiable given past discrimination against blacks. African-Americans, no more than white Americans, cannot be allowed to explain away present racist actions as a simple reaction to past events and conditions. And, while conservative and truly religious Christian blacks like my esteemed friends Alan Keyes, Niger Innis, Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson and others have been brave to speak out, whites in particular have largely acted as cowards in confronting this growing lawless anarchy.

That there is a political and revolutionary method to Obama and his leftist enablers’ racist madness can be seen in the words of a “respected” black Clemson University assistant professor who just last Friday joined in a call for African-Americans to disrupt shopping on what ironically has come to be known as Black Friday, the commercial bonanza that historically occurs the day after Thanksgiving. Fox News reported on what occurred at a shopping center in Manchester, Missouri, as suburb of St. Louis, with regard to attempts to disrupt commerce at Walmart and other stores.
“At the Manchester Walmart, about two dozen people chanted ‘no justice, no peace, no racist police’ and ‘no more Black Friday’ after officers warned protesters risked arrest if they did not move at least 50 feet from the stores entrance …

“The mostly black group of protesters chanted in the faces of the officers – most of whom were white – as shoppers looked on.

“‘We really want the world to know that it is no longer business as usual,’ said Chenjerai Kumanyika an assistant professor at Clemson University. He added although part of the aim in disrupting Black Friday was to call attention to disagreement with the grand jury’s decision and the way the case was handled, Kumanyika said it was also to highlight other forms of injustice.

“‘Capitalism is one of many systems of oppression,’ he said as the group cleared out of the parking lot.”
This is just the latest indication of the war we are now in. If we do not fight back against this leftist-inspired black racism, with Obama at its helm, we risk losing the nation our Founding Fathers risked and gave their lives to win. And, that is why I have offered to represent the victims of mob violence in Ferguson and other cities around the country free of charge. It is time to no longer put our heads in the sand for fear of being branded racists against African-Americans and, instead, be fearless in waging the counter-revolution against racism of all types – racism that has larger designs and evil motives to transform the United States into Obama’s vision of a socialist utopia.

Media wishing to interview Larry Klayman, please contact

Friday, November 28, 2014

Flashback: In 2006, Obama called Kenya his home

Posted on November 28, 2014 by Dr. Eowyn |
Let me ask you a question:
If you were born in the U.S.A. but your father was born in Italy, but you had never ever lived in Italy, would you ever refer to Italy as your “home”?
But that’s exactly what then U.S. Senator Barack Obama (D-Illinois) did in August 2006 when he visited Kenya. He told the crowd: “I am so proud to come back home!”
See also:

The Ferguson Charade--Part II
 By Obie Usategui Full Story
The Ferguson Charade
At approximately 8:15 p.m., on Monday, November 25th, 2014, St. Louis County prosecuting attorney Robert McCulloch began his news conference at a courthouse in Clayton, Mo., by expressing his sympathies for Michael Brown’s family, noting that they lost a loved one to violence. On August 9th, Brown had been shot dead by police officer Darren Wilson, presumably, while using justifiable deadly-force in the line of duty as he defended himself from a life-threatening attack by Brown, pursuant to the latter committing a strong-arm robbery just minutes prior to his killing.

Illegal Alien Benefit Free-for-All
 By Arnold Ahlert Full Story
Illegal Alien Benefit Free-for-All
Apparently President Obama’s unilateral decision to grant de facto amnesty to five million illegal aliens was insufficiently outrageous. On Tuesday, a White House official told the Washington Post that many illegals now protected from deportation will be eligible to receive a “wide array” of government benefits, including Social Security and Medicare.

Thursday, November 27, 2014

Gauntlet is thrown; Obama spurns the People, Congress
 By A. Dru Kristenev Full Story
Gauntlet is thrown; Obama spurns the People, Congress
Immigration reform, Keystone XL, net neutrality, ObamaCare manipulation (Gruber disclosures), bankrupting coal, bankrupting business... Don’t forget the president’s encouraging the choreographed protests that followed the grand jury’s lack of an indictment of Officer Darren Wilson and Obama’s champion Eric Holder’s unwillingness to accept the ruling.

Illegal Alien Benefit Free-for-All
 By Arnold Ahlert Full Story
Illegal Alien Benefit Free-for-All
Apparently President Obama’s unilateral decision to grant de facto amnesty to five million illegal aliens was insufficiently outrageous. On Tuesday, a White House official told the Washington Post that many illegals now protected from deportation will be eligible to receive a “wide array” of government benefits, including Social Security and Medicare.


There is an established historical record that Barry Soetoro was raised as a Muslim. It is undeniable that he attended Islamic schools while growing up in Indonesia. His past history would prevent him from receiving security clearance into the White House. With his actions in regards to the Middle East, he has demonstrated a great propensity to show favoritism to the Islamic nations.

WJ: If Obama Is Not Eligible All The Other 
Issues Are Moot; Obama's Real Name Is Soetoro

The following op-ed published last week at Western Journalism about sums up the most blacked-out issue in American history >>>> Barry Obama's constitutional eligibility to serve as President of the United States.

Excerpt via Coach Dave @ WJ: The Law Of First Mention And Barack Obama

[...] In 2007, whispers began to be heard about Obama’s citizenship and whether or not he was a natural-born citizen of the United States.  Those who merely asked the questions were laughed off of the stage. The Alinsky tactic of ridicule was applied to anyone with the curiosity to even ask the question. They were called birthers, and truthers, and conspiracy theorists.

Barack Obama’s real name is Barry Soetoro. There is no denying it. There is zero evidence that he ever “legally” changed his name to Barack Obama. He is using a fake social security number. He has sealed all of the records of his college days. He has never produced any “indisputable evidence” that he was even born in this country.

There is an established historical record that Barry Soetoro was raised as a Muslim. It is undeniable that he attended Islamic schools while growing up in Indonesia. His past history would prevent him from receiving security clearance into the White House. With his actions in regards to the Middle East, he has demonstrated a great propensity to show favoritism to the Islamic nations.

He is a socialist. I am not afraid to say it, and I am not afraid to face the facts. His programs are socialist. His philosophy is socialist. He does not like America. He has no loyalty to anything but himself and his masters. His life’s biography is a mystery; and he appears to be a man with no father, no mother, no family, and no country of residence. He is the ultimate “man without a country”–except he has been selected to run ours.

President Obama is a malevolent liar. The record speaks for itself. The recent expose of the architect of Obama Care calling the voters “dumb” is damning.  But, for once, it is truthful. Americans ARE dumb…how else can you explain the mess we are in?

Some have assumed that Obama was merely stupid and that he couldn’t make very good decisions. But what if everything we have been told about him is a lie? What if his life is a reality show?

Who knows the truth about this imposter in the White House?  The internet is full of documented evidence.  At a time when there have never been as many tools to snoop on Americans, are we really to believe that those who are trained to know everything about everybody do not know more about the situation than some guy surfing the net out in the cornfields of Ohio?


Wednesday, November 26, 2014


What should Wilson not have done?
Posted By Jack Cashill  11/26/2014 

If you find yourself at dinner this Thanksgiving Day with family members bemoaning the murder of Michael Brown – the 300-pound thug attorney Benjamin Crump called that “little black boy” – ask them what Officer Darren Wilson should not have done.

Remember, you will have an advantage over them. You will have examined the evidence and read the transcript of Wilson’s grand jury testimony. They will mostly just have watched CNN or NBC or CBS.
They are the loudmouths hassling the waitress. You’re the Kung Fu master at the end of the bar. For the sake of your sweet old mom who hates controversy, dismember them gently.

Wilson found himself in that admittedly dangerous neighborhood by himself because he was responding to a call from a frantic mother with a sick infant only a few months old. Should he not have taken that call?

As Wilson drove down Canfield he saw two men, one very large with a marijuana symbol on his socks, walking down the middle of the street obstructing traffic. Should Wilson not have rolled down his window and said, “Why don’t you guys walk on the sidewalk?”

When the two men, Michael Brown and Dorian Johnson, ignored his request, and the large one, Brown, answered, “F— what you have to say,” should Wilson not have paid a little more attention to him?
When Wilson realized that Brown matched the description of the fellow who had just robbed cigarillos from a nearby market on West Florissant and assaulted the clerk, and that in fact he was openly carrying the cigarillos, should Wilson, wary of profiling young black men, not have called for backup?
And while he was waiting, should Wilson not have parked his car at an angle his car to keep Brown and Johnson contained?

How long can people remain asleep? To this I truly have no answer. Scientifically speaking, inherent racial stupidity obviously isn’t a factor, but I suppose one could convincingly argue in favor of collective stupidity. In this case, it’s definitely an aspect upon which liberal politicians and career civil rights activists have relied for a long time.


By TPATH Contributor
RoseAnn Salanitri

November 28, 2014 ~TPATH~ Since the Garden of Eden, the devil has done his best to corrupt man’s existence and his relationship with God.  Over the course of time, he has not changed his tactics.  Why should he when they are still as effective as they were over 6,000 years ago?

Back in the Garden the devil perverted the Word of God by taking the truth and twisting it a bit.  It was true - Adam and Eve did not die immediately after they ate the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. However, when they did, they were banned from eating the fruit of the Tree of Life, which led to their eventual death.  Consequently, they learned about good and evil in a most unfortunate way. But why would Eve believe the devil instead of God?

Eve saw that the fruit was “pleasant to the eyes” which made it a physical temptation but we frequently miss the next part of the verse that tells us she saw it was a tree that was desirable to make one wise (Genesis 3:4-6).  This represented the lure of the knowledge of the world that the devil is able to twist and uses to challenge the veracity of God.  This temptation is not as easily defined as physical temptations.  It is a temptation of the mind that carries with it strong undertones of peer pressure and intellectual intimidation.   Fast forward to 2014 and not much has changed since the Garden - except that now the devil has more children to act on his behalf.  And these children, like their father, are extremely skilled at what they do.  In classrooms around the world, they use Evolution to intellectually discredit God and His Word. In the political world, global warming is used to replace recognition of end time prophecies dealing with climate catastrophes and intimidation is used by calling bearers of the truth racists and domestic terrorists.

Lying and intellectual intimidation, however, are not the only tricks in the devil’s bag of temptations and not the only tricks he passes along to his children. The passage in John 8:44 not only attributes lying to the devil, it calls him a murderer.  When we recall that the man now occupying the White House voted to have babies born alive as a result of a botched abortion thrown into the trash, we should be asking who but a devil or his progeny would cast such a vote? 

While there has been much talk about where Obama was born and who his earthly father might have been, one thing seems clear:  he inherited from his spiritual father the spirit of a murderer, a liar, and a pervert.  In this case “pervert” is not a reference to his sexual preference.  It is a reference to his propensity to take the truth and either totally disregard it or twist it beyond recognition. 

Just last week we saw his brilliant perversion televised worldwide.  It was so brilliant and well executed that none of the political pundits seemed to understand what really transpired.  They commented about the many lies he has told through the years and some even protested that he dared to quote Scripture, but the perversion of Scripture escaped their minds and commentaries.  This is unfortunate because this perversion connects him to his father the devil in a most astounding way.

One of the best examples of a perversion is recorded in Matthew 4:1-10 when Jesus was in the desert being tempted by the devil. A casual read through seems pretty straight forward.  Jesus was in a vulnerable position and Satan tried to use it to his advantage. Jesus responded by quoting Scripture.  However, if you take the time to look up the verses that the devil was quoting in Psalm 91:11-12, you will find that the devil was accurately quoting the Scripture.  HOWEVER, while the quote was accurate, the interpretation was skewed. This is what a perversion truly is:  taking a truth and twisting it just a bit to make it seem like it’s actually saying something else.  Jesus experienced it in the desert when the devil was trying to tempt him.  Eve experienced it in the Garden when the devil successfully tempted her. And we experienced it during Mr. Obama’s recent press conference.  When Barack Obama quoted Scripture, he didn’t do it as eloquently as his father did in the desert, since he combined a number of Scriptures and rolled them into one.  He stated:  “We shall not oppress a stranger, for we know the heart of a stranger.  We were strangers once too.” The combo verse that Obama quoted came from Deuteronomy 10:19, Leviticus 24:22, Exodus 23:9, Malachi 3:5, and Hebrews 13:2.  

Here’s the heart of the perversion. These verses talk about treating strangers justly - the same as you would treat law-abiding citizens.  In this case, the aliens and strangers Obama is defending are not traveling through our land legally.  Furthermore, the great majority of them were criminals in their own countries before they came here and by virtue of the way they entered this country, they all became criminals.  Criminals in biblical times as in present times do not deserve the protection of law.  And if we desire to understand the hearts of these strangers, as Mr. Obama suggests, justice should be our first consideration.  Additionally, we were not all strangers once too as these interlopers are. Again, these strangers that Obama is referring to are illegally here.  Many of us are legal immigrants or the descendants of legal immigrants who are legally entitled to become American citizens and benefit from the many blessings that exist in this country.  To those who fall into this legal category, they are the ones entitled to the protection of the law, while those who do not enter legally are entitled to prosecution under the law, which is distinctively different than persecution.

Some may argue that Christians should be merciful to strangers.  That is true.  However, mercy best exists when it is accompanied by justice and humility.  Micah 6:8 says:  

                  He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the LORD require of you?                                                To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God.

So where is the justice in what Mr. Obama is proposing?  And where is the humility that these strangers in our land should be exhibiting?  If they were humble, wouldn’t they be repenting of their lawlessness, which in this case would mean returning to whence they came?  Perhaps I’m missing something but demanding rights from a country that you have illegally entered seems a bit arrogant to me.  I argue that there is no justice in the mercy Obama is ordaining by Executive Order.

  1. There is no justice for the many Americans who will be losing their jobs to these interlopers.  
  2. There is no justice for the college students who bumped American born students from enrollment or from receiving grants or scholarship monies.  
  3. There is no justice for the American taxpayer who is struggling to make ends meet but has continued to foot the bill for the many expenses incurred as a result of the lawlessness of these illegals interlopers.   
  4. There is no justice for the would-be legal immigrants who respect this country enough to abide by our laws.  
  5. In the case of amnesty, the quality of mercy is strained when it imposes injustice on law-abiding American citizens and would-be Americans.

And as for Mr. Obama:
Well if the character traits of the children of Satan are a murderous spirit, a lying tongue, and a perversion of the Holy Scriptures, the shoe seems to fit the man now occupying the White House. Perhaps Mr. Obama may be living the good life now, but according to the Book of Revelation, he will soon be joining other cowards, unbelievers, the abominable, murderers, the sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars in the lake that burns with fire and brimstone (Rev. 21:8).   Alas, we serve a merciful God, but He is also a just God - and no perversion of Scripture will change that, Mr. Obama.  While you may attempt to deliver this country to the gates of hell, many of us will not be joining you there.

Contact RoseAnn  HERE


Texas school teacher to whites who disagree about Ferguson: “Kill yourselves”

Vinita Hegwood is an English teacher at Duncanville High School in Duncanville, Texas.
On Nov. 7, 2014, Hegwood posted this racist obscene tweet at “crackers” (whites) who disagree with her about the police shooting of 300-lb. Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri:
Who the fuck made you dumb duck ass crackers [white people] think I give a squat fuck about your opinions about my opinions RE: #Ferguson? Kill yourselves.’
Vinita Hegwood
Hegwood’s violent outburst prompted a wave of reaction from enraged Twitter users calling for her suspension.
Officials of the Duncanville Independent School District (ISD) acted swiftly.
Yesterday, after meeting with Hegwood, school district officials suspended her without pay and confirmed her contract will be terminated following a board meeting in the next four weeks.
The school district explained in a statement that “Hegwood expressed an opinion on social media that is solely her own. While everyone has the right to free speech, as a teacher in the district, we believe the comments that are alleged to be made by Ms Hegwood are absolutely reprehensible and we do not condone it.”
Her Twitter account is now closed.
Hegwood, who has worked for the Duncanville ISD for two years, has been a prolific tweeter throughout the turmoil in Missouri following the shooting on August 9.
It has been suggested her profane tweet was a reaction to abuse she received from followers, Fox News reported. But Lari Barager with the Duncanville ISD told CBS that defense will not protect Hegwood from losing her job: “I can’t say it emphatically enough. The nature of the comments are reprehensible, and this district is about inclusion. It’s about diversity. It’s about respect for all people.”
Hegwood’s venom actually predates Ferguson, as evidenced by a tweet she had sent 9 months ago. Using a different Twitter account, she bragged about playing her music “Fuck the Police” loud as her car was tailed by the police.
Obama and the Roots of the Ferguson Rage
 By Arnold Ahlert Full Story
Obama and the Roots of the Ferguson Rage
And so the whirlwind, cultivated by Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Al Sharpton, the mainstream media and the army of thugs they enabled, is now being reaped. As the result of a St. Louis County grand jury refusing to indict officer Darren Wilson for the shooting death of Michael Brown, Ferguson, MO has become Ground Zero, in what irresponsible Missouri State Sen. Maria Chappelle-Nadali referred to on MSNBC as “St. Louis’s race war.”

Politicians and Media Incite Violence in Ferguson
 By Cliff Kincaid Full Story
Politicians and Media Incite Violence in Ferguson
With Ferguson in flames and mobs running rampant, it became apparent to everyone—except the liberals and libertarians—that the media-hyped “militarization” of the police was not the problem. Instead, the problem in Ferguson was, and is, a criminal element doing drugs and determined to engage in anti-police violence. The additional problem is outside agitation.

Tuesday, November 25, 2014

The lynch mob is egged on by the Radical-in-Chief. It is yet another success for America's first Alinskyite president

Ferguson in Flames
 By Matthew Vadum Full Story
Ferguson in Flames
Grand jurors in Ferguson, Mo., refused to indict local police officer Darren Wilson yesterday, heroically resisting pressure from President Obama on down to lynch an innocent police officer who fought off a violent attacker.
Obama and the Dispensing Power 
 Adam Yoshida  
Those who view this sweeping assertion of presidential authority by Obama through the prism of politics are missing the point. This is not merely a political outrage -- it is a historic offense against the Constitution and public liberty. More
Immigration and The American Dream
Much of American pop music was created by foreign born immigrants or their progeny and I considered what, in my view, was the motivation for their creativity. It was gratitude and pride in being allowed the privilege of living in a free country. No yokes around their necks and the opportunity for unrestricted advancement through merit.
Living conditions were not so attractive that one could describe all about America was peaches and cream; but opportunity was there for anyone to seize by personal effort.
Now look at today. Something is different. Yes, conditions have vastly improved, but do we appreciate it? If we don't...why? Opportunity and rewards still exist but do people in general take advantage of it? The very obvious answer is NO!
In those earlier days everyone worked whatever hours and jobs were necessary to improve their lot. Parents had nothing to offer their progeny so they had to earn their way ahead. Whatever gains they made were treasured. No task was beneath them if it meant improvement in living conditions or advancement in "society." A better life for themselves and their family. Their fathers were often artisans (tradesmen) who earned a meager living in their home country as bricklayers, stonemasons, or even menial labor such as field hands. They were determined to earn a better life for themselves. They aspired to family life...a wife and children, but they yearned to provide an improved lifestyle over what they had known.
Today we have a self indulgent society.  We have a government that is determined to destroy the American way of life, and we have families with no value system at all...and we must ask ourselves why. I think it may be because we are not first or second generation immigrants anymore. We, or our progeny, are American born and we ACCEPT what is available without having to EARN it anymore. It's no longer viewed as a PRIVILEGE to live here...its become a RIGHT without cost. Everybody must share the benefits even if they are not entitled. Wow! Where have I heard that word before?
Why is this so? Cut to the chase. Two major elements have caused the shift in our attitude about Americanism. A ton of details are closeted in the two elements and they are volatile and need to be exposed, but for now the simpler identification is that parents have abrogated their responsibility for raising their children to be patriotic and faithful to the precepts upon which America was founded. They have allowed their globalist agenda-minded government to assume their role as mentors and to lead our youth, like the Pied Piper, to a fate worse than death. They are being brainwashed to scorn America and its values.  Parents who fit that category, and they are a large segment in today's society, must wake up before it's too late.
Then too we are being invaded by people who don't want to be American, they just want what America has to offer. We hear the phrase 'illegal immigrant' often and although the noun does mean a person who comes to live permanently in a foreign country, I suspect that to legal immigrants and native born Americans immigrant means a legitimate entrant whose desire is to be an American in the constitutional sense...and the adjective illegal means forbidden by law. They cannot be juxtaposed in our American lexicon.
Our government is encouraging and abetting this activity and the only reason being that they want to further adulterate the American way of life. Most countries have some type of dictatorial government and their living standards and the rights of the people don't compare with the United States of America . They consist of two disproportionate layers of citizenry. A very thin layer of ruling class whose standard of living is extraordinarily palatial and mostly hidden from view, and the majority population who exist at a most abject level of misery.
A perfect example of this is Cuban dictator Fidel Castro who is always seen in public in army fatigues but who lives on a secluded two mile long tropical island paradise called Caya Piedra in absolute luxury while the population struggle for even the most basic needs. He is only one of a long list of tyrants who control the lives of an enormous number of poor people on this globe. It can happen in America and there is a very determined effort to make it so. Sticking our heads in the sand doesn't make it go away - it actually makes our rear ends very vulnerable.
The 2014 mid-term election result will accomplish very little to be satisfied about. Both parties are playing games with the citizenry. They are in league about globalization but present a different front for their constituencies. Party politics is the current evil in America and it must change. It's time to wake up!


Monday, November 24, 2014

Barack Obama did NOT issue an Executive Order. Instead, he used what is called Executive Action, which has no force of law behind it, whatsoever. In doing so, Obama acted under “the color of office” to openly subvert and circumvent U.S. law.

Obama Immigration Action is Illegal and Unconstitutional

The past six years of Obama’s reign in America have been littered with countless unconstitutional and criminal acts on a variety of fronts, too Obama Official Portrait Smilenumerous to chronicle in any column length article.

However, his recent Executive Action on Immigration might be the straw that breaks the camel’s back for millions of Americans, as he attempts to dictate law from beyond his constitutional authority and at odds with the overwhelming will of American citizens.

People have been scouring the Internet in search of Obama’s Executive Order on Immigration, with no joy. They have been unable to find a copy of the Executive Order because no such Executive Order actually exists.

Amnesty by Executive Action?

The American people were given the false impression that Barack Obama was signing an Executive Order providing amnesty for an estimated 4 million illegal immigrants residing in the United States.
Presidential Executive Orders are designed for emergency circumstances wherein there is no time for congressional action, the circumstance falls under the legal authority of the Oval Office, and the order is designed to carry out the duties of the Federal government under the U.S. Constitution and existing U.S. laws.
In the case of Obama’s recent Executive Action, the action is not within the legal authority of the Oval Office, it is not the result of any emergency circumstance of the United States, and it is not designed to carry out the sworn duties of the Federal government under the United States Constitution or U.S. laws. In fact, it is designed to subvert the U.S. Constitution and U.S. laws governing immigration and naturalization.
As a result, Barack Obama did NOT issue an Executive Order. Instead, he used what is called Executive Action, which has no force of law behind it, whatsoever. In doing so, Obama acted under “the color of office” to openly subvert and circumvent U.S. law.

The Alleged Legal Foundation for Obama’s Executive Action

According to the White House, Barack Obama has the legal authority to take unilateral action on Immigration on the basis that past presidents have done the same. This statement is also false.
The Facts
  • In 1961, President John F. Kennedy used Executive Action to delay the deportation of Cuban refugees seeking political asylum in the United States during the Cuban crisis. (1,000,000)
  • In 1975, President Gerald Ford used Executive Action during the evacuation of Vietnamese refugees with American ties at the end of the Vietnam War. (360,000)
  • In 1980, President Jimmy Carter used Executive Action for Cuban and Haitian refugees during the Mariel boatlift crisis. (150,000)
  • In 1987, President Ronald Reagan used Executive Action to shield from deportation, Nicaraguan refugees during the contra war in Nicaragua. (200,000)
  •  In November 1989, President George H.W. Bush used Executive Action to delay the deportation of Chinese refugees during the Tiananmen Square crisis. (80,000)
  • In 1992-93, Presidents Bush and Clinton used Executive Action to delay the deportation of Salvadoran refugees during the Civil War in El Salvador. (200,000)
  • In December 1997, President Bill Clinton used Executive Action to delay the deportation of Haitian refugees during mass civil unrest in Haiti. (20-40,000)
Note: Many have falsely quoted the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act as an example of Executive power. However, this Act signed by Reagan in 1986 was legislation passed by the Democrat controlled Congress. It was not a unilateral Executive Action.
In each case presented above, the Executive Actions of past presidents were within the authority of the Oval Office, did nothing to alter, subvert or circumvent U.S. Immigration and Naturalization laws, and were all “emergency” actions related to real refugees in real life threatening circumstances.
In the case of Barack Obama’s recent Executive Action, none of these conditions apply. As a result, all claims that “previous presidents have done the same” are FALSE!
Because Congress has so far refused to act against the will of American citizens by passing any form of amnesty for tens of millions of illegal aliens who have been allowed to enter and remain in the United States against U.S. laws, Barack Obama moved to fraudulently and unilaterally grant ALL ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS in the U.S. “refugee status” despite the fact that none of the illegal aliens involved are actually refugees from any crisis set of circumstance.
Once Barack Obama fraudulently declared all illegal aliens in the U.S. “refugees,” he then took illegal and unconstitutional unilateral actions to misuse our refugee policies to alter, subvert and circumvent the U.S. Constitution and U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Laws.
In sum, Barack Hussein Obama, acting “under the color of office,” abused Executive powers in an overt attempt to subvert and/or circumvent U.S. Immigration and Naturalization laws and usurp the Constitutional authority of Congress.
The actions of Barack Hussein Obama in this Executive Action are both illegal and unconstitutional. As they directly threaten national sovereignty and security, the act rises to the level of an impeachable offense, and may in fact rise to the level of treason.

How Obama Did It

In June of 2012, just ahead of the 2012 presidential election, Barack Obama, again fraudulently acting under the color of office, unilaterally created a policy known as The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) which took effect on August 15, 2012.
The DACA policy is the brainchild of a private “open borders” legal activism organization operating as Immigration Equality. Their About Us page states the following;
Since 1994, Immigration Equality has been proud to support and represent lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT), and HIV-positive immigrants seeking safety, fair treatment, and freedom. As the only LGBT organization with a staff of immigration attorneys, Immigration Equality impacts both the individuals we serve and the immigration system as a whole.
In addition, the organization broadly identifies “whom” they represent in terms of what types of circumstances they focus upon in their effort to make every illegal alien a legal U.S. citizen via Executive fiat.
In nearly 80 countries around the world, it is a crime to be gay. For far too many people, it is impossible to be out and proud if you also want to stay alive. For more than 20 years, we have been focused on providing free legal services to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and HIV-positive immigrants, including:
·         Asylum seekers forced to flee to the U.S. to find safety
·         Binational couples and families separated by oceans
·         Detainees trapped in immigration jail facilities
·         Undocumented LGBT people living in the shadows inside the U.S.
Operating in part by taxpayer funding from the Federal Government in the draft and implementation of Obama’s DACA policy, Immigration Equality is directly involved with the Obama Administration in the overt subversion and circumvention of U.S. Immigration and Naturalization laws, now functioning under the “color of law” via Barack Obama’s fraudulent use of his “color of office.”

The Executive Action

First and foremost, a distinction with a critical difference… Executive Orders are presumed to have the binding force of law, if the Executive Order is within the constitutional authority of the Executive Branch; or if the order is under a legal purview granted the Executive Branch by way of Congressional statute; or if the order is subsequently affirmed by Congress within the time allowed.
An Executive Action is non-binding by its very nature. It has no presumed or other binding force of law at its foundation. (Legal Reference)
The action taken by Barack Hussein Obama last week via Executive Action is an expansion of his 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy, which is in and of itself, illegal and unconstitutional as explained above. It is therefore, an illegal act for anyone owing an oath of allegiance to the United States to act upon or adhere to the Executive Action. Following orders on the basis of this Executive Action may also rise to the level of misprision of treason, or at a very minimum, a breach of oath and public trust on the part of Federal Law Enforcement Agents.
The operational extent of this policy is stated as follows by Immigration Equality.
Deferred action is a discretionary, limited immigration benefit by DHS. It can be granted to individuals who are in removal proceedings, who have final orders of removal, or who have never been in removal proceedings. Individuals who have deferred action status can apply for employment authorization and are in the U.S. under color of law. However, there is no direct path from deferred action to lawful permanent residence or to citizenship. And, it can be revoked at any time.
The facts that this policy is not law and the fact that as stated above, it provides “no direct path from deferred action to lawful permanent residence or citizenship,” makes Obama’s claim that “it is not amnesty” true.
Obama’s Executive Action as it currently exists, is not amnesty, as it provides no direct path to permanent residency or citizenship, and in fact, is not law.
However, what is does represent is an open refusal to faithfully execute the laws of our nation, to uphold the Constitution of the United States, to protect and defend national sovereignty and security, and it is a direct assault upon and usurpation of Constitutional Congressional authority.
Therefore, it is an overt act of usurping the U.S. Constitution, a direct violation of the Presidential Oath of Office, a direct assault on the American people and a direct threat to national sovereignty and security. It is an “impeachable offense” to say the very least and may very well constitute an overt act of treason. (18 U.S. Code § 2381)
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
All members of the Obama Administration, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court, who are in any way complicit in these actions taken by Barack Hussein Obama, are according to U.S. laws, guilty of misprision of treason, as co-conspirators to the act. (18 U.S. Code § 2382)
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
The final result of the action Barack Obama took last week on Immigration is he illegally ordered Federal agencies and agents to stand down on enforcing our nations’ Immigration and Naturalization laws, without any authority to do so, or any force or color of law supporting his order. He and his co-conspirators have ordered the Federal government to break the law, solely on his personal decree…

Congressional Authority and Duty

Currently, members of Congress are going out of their way to avoid their sworn duties under the U.S. Constitution. They are searching for any way possible to avoid their duty and authority to immediately move to the impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama and the removal of and criminal prosecution of all co-conspirators.
Prior to the current usurpation of Congress and abuse of the Oval Office, North American Law Center (NALC) had already called for the immediate impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama, drafting and releasing to the public and members of congress, a proposed set of Articles of Impeachment based upon a long string of past criminal acts within the Obama Administration.
Article II requires under Section I – that before anyone enter on the execution of the Oval Office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation:- “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
Under Article II – Section IV, the U.S. Constitution prescribes one single legal solution for any occupant of the Oval Office upon their commission of criminal acts – “The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”
As a result, former Federal Judge and Fox News Legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano called it exactly correct when he stated that “Impeachment is the only legal solution” for what Obama has done.
So, why are Tea Party stalwarts Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Rand Paul and Rep. Trey Gowdy working so hard to find a way out of doing their constitutional duty to impeach? Why did congressional Republicans adjourn and leave DC on Thanksgiving recess without putting a stop to Obama’s illegal and unconstitutional action? Two of the three are lawyers…

Misprision of Treason

Because Barack Hussein Obama has so many co-conspirator in his many acts of fraud, usurpation, abuse of office and treason against the United States and the people, all of whom are guilty of misprision of treason under 18 U.S. Code § 2382, it is impossible to know who might be able to legally succeed Barack Hussein Obama to office once all evidence of treason and misprision of treason are presented in an impeachment investigation and trial.
In short, everyone knows he should be impeached, removed from office and held on criminal charges after being removed from office. However, once the process of presenting evidence of treason and misprision of treason begins, no one knows how that process will end or who may be left standing to succeed Obama to the Oval Office.
As a result, massive efforts are underway in congress to find any solutions other than impeachment of the most impeachable administration in U.S. history.
However, due to the extreme nature of Barack Obama’s actions and their direct threat to national sovereignty and security, members of congress cannot avoid their constitutional duty to impeach without becoming complicit in the crimes. They too, will be guilty of misprision of treason, should they fail to immediately move to impeachment, allowing Obama’s actions to stand in direct violation of the law, the Constitution and the will of American citizens.
Many Americans believe that congress can simply escape their responsibility by refusing to act. However, congress can only refuse to act if the American people allow it. If the American people act, congress will be forced to act, or face the outrage of the American people along with Barack Obama.
When the Rule of Constitutional Law fails at the highest levels of government, the people have the right and the duty to alter or to abolish, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their Safety and Happiness.
(All information provided herein was carefully vetted by Constitutional Attorney’s at the North American Law Center prior to release. Proposed Articles of Impeachment are available to the public HERE.)
JB Williams is a business man, a husband, a father, and a writer. A no nonsense commentator on American politics, American history, and American philosophy. He is published nationwide and in many countries around the world. He is also a Founder of The United States Patriots Union and a staunch conservative actively engaged in returning the power to the right people in America. Patriots Union |·Veteran Defenders |·Archives E-Mail: