Monday, October 31, 2011



Sheriff Joe's posse delivers promised Obama surprise

Panel probing eligibility for 2012 ballot wants to see original birth certificate

Posted: October 31, 2011
© 2011 WND

Sheriff Joe Arpaio
Arizona's maverick Sheriff Joe Arpaio promised surprises in his jurisdiction's investigation of Barack Obama's eligibility for the presidential ballot and his Cold Case Posse is delivering – raising questions that touch on the authenticity of the long-form birth certificate issued last April and the possibility Obama is using a fraudulent Social Security Number.
Sources close to the investigation say the posse has decided it needs to see original birth records before it can conclude whether Obama should be eligible for the presidential ballot in 2012, not an electronic file or scanned copies.
The sources say the panel needs to examine the microfilm documenting Obama's birth, as well as the ink-and-paper original 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health is holding in its vault.
The PDF file and various scanned copies of the birth certificate that the White House released April 27 are simply not good enough, the posse has determined.
Autographed copies of Jerome Corsi's best-seller "Where's the Birth Certificate?" are available only from the WND Superstore
Earlier this month, WND senior staff reporter Jerome R. Corsi spent 18 hours over a two-day period in Arizona briefing the Cold Case Posse on a wide range of evidence regarding Obama's eligibility.
"The posse wants to see the entire microfilm roll containing Obama's birth certificate, not just a microfilm copy of Obama's long-form birth certificate in isolation," Corsi explained. "An individual microfilm copy could be forged, but forging the entire microfilm reel on which Obama's birth certificate is in sequence would be almost impossible."
Also, Corsi said, the posse wants the ink-and-paper original 1961 Obama birth records still held in vault by the Hawaii Department of Health to be released publicly and subjected to independent court-authorized forensic examination.
Corsi affirmed that the posse's conclusion it needs to see the Obama birth certificate microfilm is part of the "shock" that Arpaio warned would be forthcoming, when he spoke last week to the Surprise Tea Party group meeting in Surprise, Ariz.

Read more: Sheriff Joe's posse delivers promised Obama surprise

Herman Cain’s “Sexual Harassment”:High-Tech Lynching 2.0

Ben Johnson,The White House Watch

Twenty years after the media’s “high-tech lynching”of Clarence Thomas,the Left’s tactics have not changed a bit.
The political world is reeling over allegations that unlikely Republican frontrunner Herman Cain sexually harassed two women while he was CEO of the National Restaurant Association,which he headed 1996-1999. The two women,who accused Cain of acting “inappropriately,”reportedly received settlements “in the five-figure range.”
What was Cain’s offense? No one really knows,presumably including Cain and the reporters who published the story. Politico reports:“These incidents include conversations allegedly filled with innuendo or personal questions of a sexually suggestive nature,taking place at hotels during conferences,at other officially sanctioned restaurant association events and at the association’s offices. There were also descriptions of physical gestures that were not overtly sexual but that made women who experienced or witnessed them uncomfortable and that they regarded as improper in a professional relationship.”(Emphasis added.)
Cain announced just as this article was being written that one “gesture”in question was that Cain once placed his hand at chin-level,saying,“You’re about the same height as my wife.”He did not touch the woman,Cain said,but she felt “uncomfortable”about being sized up.
Mary Ann Cricchio,who served on the National Restaurant Association board at the time,had a different assessment. Cricchio said,“Herman treated everyone great.”
This morning,Cain took to the airwaves to defend himself. Cain told Fox News reporter Jenna Lee,“I’ve never sexually harassed anyone,and yes,I was falsely accused while I was at the National Restaurant Association. And I say falsely,because it turned out after the investigation to be baseless.”

Later in the day,he said substantially the same thing at the National Press Club.
Cain alluded to the allegations at the American Enterprise Institute earlier,saying,“I am an unconventional candidate,and yes,I do have a sense of humor,and some people have a problem with that.”
But when it comes to angry,gold-digging feminists,jokes can be deadly serious. The Austin-based law firm of Melton &Kumler answered the question,“What’s the difference between friendly joking and sexual harassment?” by saying,“The difference lies in how they are received.”If a woman is offended,the joke constitutes sexual harassment;if not,you may be the life of the party.
The infiltration of radical feminism into the legal system has criminalized a host of otherwise innocuous behavior,discussion,or unconscious actions and left besieged employers walking on eggshells. Mary Boland wrote in her book Sexual Harassment in the Work Place that an off-the-cuff reference to “dumb blondes”or stating the fact that women are more emotional than men could land you in court. In 2004′s Lust v. Sealy Inc. a litigant won $150,000 in damages (reduced from $300,000) after “proving”a boss was sexist by citing such outrageous statements as “oh,isn’t that just like a woman to say something like that,” and “you’re being a blonde again today.” A court allowed a case to proceed because a Wisconsin Agriculture Department employee made a joke about keeping women “barefoot and pregnant.”Another did so after a man nicknamed a co-worker who was expecting “Prego.”
The United Nations’definition of sexual harassment includes such offensive savagery as….
Read more.

Obama “Can’t Wait”—to Act Like a Dictator

Daniel J. Flynn,Human Events

Barack Obama campaigns against a “do nothing” Congress. The “do everything” president is the real problem.

“The truth is,we can no longer wait for Congress to do its job,” the president announced in his Saturday radio address. “The middle-class families who’ve been struggling for years are tired of waiting.”
The White House hammers the verbiage home on its website with the ubiquitous message:“We can’t wait on Congress:The time to act is now.” For the leader of the free world,like the leader of the Heartbreakers,the waiting is the hardest part.
So the president issues a series of frenetic executive orders. One involves limiting some annual student loan payments to 10 percent of debtor income. Another establishes a website. Another encourages community health centers to hire veterans.
This is what America has been waiting for?
It’s sad to see a president employing the impatient rhetoric of dictators. This is mitigated,however,by the meek deeds of a humbled chief executive. Actions speak softer than words here.
Perhaps we should be pleased that the president is going small. Launching an unauthorized war in Libya or using the Federal Communications Commission to impose internet rules that Congress had explicitly rejected were consequential usurpations. But shaving half of a percent off of a few students’ loans is Barack Obama channeling Bill Clinton on school uniforms. Who cares?
Circumventing the legislative branch is a tacit admission of leadership failure….
Read more.


Atty Van Irion Responds to Atty Orly Taitz's Unnecessary Criticism of Their Eligibility Lawsuit

Liberty Legal Foundation Responds to Unnecessary Criticism of Their Eligibility Lawsuit by Attorney Orly Taitz I was frustrated to read Orly Taitz’s blog criticizing our Class Action against the Democratic...
Where are the Muslim Brotherhood and the Obama Administration Taking America?
Dr. Essam Abdallah
In this article, published in the leading liberal pan Arab "Elaph, Egyptian liberal writer Dr. Essam Abdallah exposes the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood within the Obama Administration and the campaign led by CAIR and its allies against Middle East Christians, US experts and American Muslim reformers. Abdallah's article is powerful evidence to a reckless policy of backing Islamists, perpetrated by the Obama Administration and its advisors on Islamic affairs.  The Editors.
Disturbing reports are coming out of Washington, D.C. 

These reports reveal the depth of the below-the-surface coordination between the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), Hamas, Hezbollah, the Iranian regime and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt , Syria , Tunisia , Libya and Jordan . This bloc of regimes and organizations is now becoming the greatest Islamist radical lobby ever to penetrate and infiltrate the White House, Congress, the State Department and the main decision making centers of the US government. All of this is happening at a time when the US government is going through its most strategically dangerous period in modern times because of its need to confront the Iranian Mullahs regime, which is expanding in the Middle East, as well as penetrating the United States , via powerful and influential allies.

It looks like the near future will uncover many surprises after the fall of the Gaddafi regime, as we realize more and more that the popular revolts in the Arab world - and the Obama Administration’s position towards them - were determined by political battles between various pressure groups in Washington .  Moreover, pressures by these lobbying groups have left an impact on the region's events, the last of which was the canceling of the visit of Maronite Patriarch Rahi to Washington . A number of Arab and Western news agencies have leaked that one of “those who sought to cancel this visit was Dalia Mujahid, a top advisor on Islamic and Arab affairs at the State Department, who is of Egyptian origin. And that”, said the reports, “came at the request of the high command of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, who wish to see the US Administration support the Islamist Sunni current.” 
The real question now is: who is allowing the Muslim Brotherhood lobby to damage the relationship between the US Administration and millions of Middle East Christians?
…Where exactly are the Obama Administration and the Muslim Brotherhood lobby, together, taking America ? 
And why?
Dr. Essam Abdallah is an Egyptian liberal intellectual who writes for the leading liberal pan Arab "Elaph”.

If it is true that Ogden has turned over the goods, then this would represent a major turning-point in the ongoing investigation into what has become the single biggest political scandal and cover-up in U.S. history. [HUH?...WHAT ABOUT THE ELECTION FRAUD AND USURPATION OF THE PRESIDENCY BY AKA OBAMA????]...

D.C. whispers--major Gunwalker figure hands over documents

Today the whispers floating around Washington, D.C. among the 'inside-the-beltway' pundits concerning the Project Gunwalker case focus on former Deputy Attorney-General David Ogden, a key figure in the scandal. The rumor is that Ogden has handed over to Darrell Issa's House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform a stack of documents that not only vindicate ATF whistleblowers but confirm the guilt of the perpetrators of the scheme within the DOJ and the ATF.
One of the original Gunwalker reporters who first broke the story warns that such behind-the-scenes whispers may be a 'disinformation campaign' aimed at discrediting the allegations by raising false hopes only to see such hopes dashed later on.
Such disinformation is a common practice among government elites. The Clinton Administration, for example, was quite adept at propaganda campaigns aimed at hiding truth by diverting attention to other issues.
However, Issa's committee, when asked about the veracity of the rumors, would neither confirm nor deny that they possess such documents.
If it is true that Ogden has turned over the goods, then this would represent a major turning-point in the ongoing investigation into what has become the single biggest political scandal and cover-up in U.S. history.
Ogden was in on the Gunwalker scheme from the beginning, an Obama appointee and a Hillary Clinton crony who served in the Departments of Defense and State under President Bill Clinton. But only months after accepting the position at DOJ he suddenly resigned, citing administrative differences with Attorney-General Eric Holder.
But the issue that is of central importance to any information provided by Ogden is that the former Deputy Attorney-General was a major part of every meeting that took place in 2009 during which the 'Fast and Furious' scheme took shape. While these meetings never mentioned 'Gunwalker' or 'Fast and Furious' by name, it is clear from the agenda and from the issues discussed that the focus was on Administration policy on the southern border and the guns and drugs flowing in and out of the country.

CURL: The very angry first lady Michelle Obama 

The Washington Times
Michelle’s back, and she’s madder than ever. She was already pretty angry, seemingly unhappy with just about everything. As her husband wrapped up the Democratic nomination in 2008, she let fly her real feelings: “For the first time in my adult lifetime, I’m really proud of my country.” A few months into her job as first lady, her French counterpart asked how she liked the gig: “Don’t ask!” she reportedly spat. “It’s hell. I can’t stand it!”
She even seems to be mad at her silver-tongued husband. When the two were to set off on a luxurious 10-day vacation to Martha’s Vineyard, she left early - four hours early - and flew up alone. And those private vacations. She’s traveled to some of the world’s most plush resorts, taking 42 days off in the past year - that’d be eight weeks of vacay time if she held down a normal job.
Now, she is ready to spew her bilious disgust with America on the campaign trail. A dignified, transcendent first lady? No chance. Michelle is going to break with a hundred years of tradition and play the role of attack dog, heaping derision on her husband’s political opponents like no other first lady before her.
And it’s already begun. Mad Michelle this week popped down to Davis Island, Fla., to hobnob with the very people her husband despises - the 1 percent. At a massive mansion on the bay, filled with the wealthiest of the wealthy, America’s first lady launched into a tirade about “them” - the Republicans.
“Let’s not forget about what it meant when my husband appointed two brilliant Supreme Court justices, and for the first time in history, our daughters - and our sons - watched three women take their seats on our nation’s highest court. But more importantly, let’s not forget the impact their decisions will have on our lives for decades to come - on our privacy and our security, on whether we can speak freely, worship openly and love whomever we choose. That is what’s at stake here,” she said to applause.
Yes, Republicans hope to regain the White House so they can install Supreme Court justices who will trample Americans’ privacy, ignore the nation’s security, crush free speech and persecute the religious.
Oh, and they’re rich and racist to boot. “Will we be a country where opportunity is limited to just the few at the top? Who are we? Or will we give every child a chance to succeed no matter where they’re from, or what they look like or how much money their parents have. Who are we?”
That’s right, rich people (white, of course) certainly don’t want black people to succeed. They want to squelch success based on what people look like, how much money they have. “Are we going to let them succeed?” the first lady yelled. “Nooo!” the rich white people screamed.

Just as her husband’s re-election strategy is inanely simplistic - blame the Republicans for thwarting his brilliant, economy-saving policies - so too is the first lady’s. She will go to the opulent homes of rich people across the country to tell them how rich people are to blame for America’s woes and guilt them into giving millions for her husband’s campaign.
And the Princeton graduate will tell supporters they simply can’t comprehend the significance of what’s occurring today in America.
“It can be hard to see clearly what’s at stake - because these issues are so complicated, and quite frankly, folks are busy and they’re tired. We’re raising families and working full-time jobs, and many helping out in their own communities on top of all that. So many of us just don’t have the time to follow the news and to sort through all the back-and-forth, and to figure out how all of this stuff connects to our daily lives.”
Yes, only Michelle and her husband can truly understand, although she often tells those uninformed people that when the president returns from one of his campaign trips, “He says, ‘You won’t believe what folks are going through.’ ” So maybe she is the only person in America who understands.
So, America’s first lady will travel the country this election season to tell her fellow Americans just how bad it is out there (between lavish vacations, of course). Unlike President Ronald Reagan, who saw morning in America - that great shining city on a hill - Michelle will tell all who will listen that Republicans want to poison the air and water, stifle free speech, oppress the religious. She will offer not an uplifting vision of what her husband’s America could be but only a vapid view of what Republicans’ America would be.
That is the America she lives in, and by campaign’s end, it will be clear that she’s no longer “proud of my country.” Maybe she never really was.
Joseph Curl covered the White House and politics for a decade for The Washington Times. He can be reached at

Obama is the best thing that has happened to America in the last 100 years.

Gary Hubbell: The Redneck tree hugger

Barack Obama has awakened a sleeping nation

Barack Obama is the best thing that has happened to America in the last 100 years. Truly, he is the savior of America's future. He is the best thing ever.

Despite the fact that he has some of the lowest approval ratings among recent presidents, history will see Barack Obama as the source of America's resurrection. Barack Obama has plunged the country into levels of debt that we could not have previously imagined; his efforts to nationalize health care have been met with fierce resistance nationwide; TARP bailouts and stimulus spending have shown little positive effect on the national economy; unemployment is unacceptably high and looks to remain that way for most of a decade; legacy entitlement programs have ballooned to unsustainable levels, and there is a seething anger in the populace.

That's why Barack Obama is such a good thing for America.

Obama is the symbol of a creeping liberalism that has infected our society like a cancer for the last 100 years. Just as Hitler is the face of fascism, Obama will go down in history as the face of unchecked liberalism. The cancer metastasized to the point where it could no longer be ignored.

Average Americans who have quietly gone about their lives, earning a paycheck, contributing to their favorite charities, going to high school football games on Friday night, spending their weekends at the beach or on hunting trips — they've gotten off the fence. They've woken up. There is a level of political activism in this country that we haven't seen since the American Revolution, and Barack Obama has been the catalyst that has sparked a restructuring of the American political and social consciousness.

Think of the crap we've slowly learned to tolerate over the past 50 years as liberalism sought to re-structure the America that was the symbol of freedom and liberty to all the people of the world. Immigration laws were ignored on the basis of compassion. Welfare policies encouraged irresponsibility, the fracturing of families, and a cycle of generations of dependency. Debt was regarded as a tonic to lubricate the economy. Our children left school having been taught that they are exceptional and special, while great numbers of them cannot perform basic functions of mathematics and literacy. Legislators decided that people could not be trusted to defend their own homes, and stripped citizens of their rights to own firearms. Productive members of society have been penalized with a heavy burden of taxes in order to support legions of do-nothings who loll around, reveling in their addictions, obesity, indolence, ignorance and “disabilities.” Criminals have been arrested and re-arrested, coddled and set free to pillage the citizenry yet again. Lawyers routinely extort fortunes from doctors, contractors and business people with dubious torts.

We slowly learned to tolerate these outrages, shaking our heads in disbelief, and we went on with our lives.

But Barack Obama has ripped the lid off a seething cauldron of dissatisfaction and unrest.

In the time of Barack Obama, Black Panther members stand outside polling places in black commando uniforms, slapping truncheons into their palms. ACORN — a taxpayer-supported organization — is given a role in taking the census, even after its members were caught on tape offering advice to set up child prostitution rings. A former Communist is given a paid government position in the White House as an advisor to the president. Auto companies are taken over by the government, and the auto workers' union — whose contracts are completely insupportable in any economic sense — is rewarded with a stake in the company. Government bails out Wall Street investment bankers and insurance companies, who pay their executives outrageous bonuses as thanks for the public support. Terrorists are read their Miranda rights and given free lawyers. And, despite overwhelming public disapproval, Barack Obama has pushed forward with a health care plan that would re-structure one-sixth of the American economy.

I don't know about you, but the other day I was at the courthouse doing some business, and I stepped into the court clerk's office and changed my voter affiliation from “Independent” to “Republican.” I am under no illusion that the Republican party is perfect, but at least they're starting to awaken to the fact that we cannot sustain massive levels of debt; we cannot afford to hand out billions of dollars in corporate subsidies; we have to somehow trim our massive entitlement programs; we can no longer be the world's policeman and dole out billions in aid to countries whose citizens seek to harm us.

Literally millions of Americans have had enough. They're organizing, they're studying the Constitution and the Federalist Papers, they're reading history and case law, they're showing up at rallies and meetings, and a slew of conservative candidates are throwing their hats into the ring. Is there a revolution brewing? Yes, in the sense that there is a keen awareness that our priorities and sensibilities must be radically re-structured. Will it be a violent revolution? No. It will be done through the interpretation of the original document that has guided us for 220 years — the Constitution. Just as the pendulum swung to embrace political correctness and liberalism, there will be a backlash, a complete repudiation of a hundred years of nonsense. A hundred years from now, history will perceive the year 2010 as the time when America got back on the right track. And for that, we can thank Barack Hussein Obama.

Gary Hubbell is a hunter, rancher, and former hunting and fly-fishing guide. Gary works as a Colorado ranch real estate broker. He can be reached through his website,

Sunday, October 30, 2011

Editorials Redefining the GOP

Redefining the GOP »

WHEN DID THE REPUBLICAN PARTY CHANGE ITS STANCE ON INDIVIDUAL LIBERTIES? by Gary Stevens (Oct. 30, 2011) — Historically the Republican Party has truly been a party for and of the people. The strides of...
October 30 2011 / Read More »


Greetings Newsmax.
A conservative friend forwarded one of your emails to me about "The End of Obama."

While the message was just a sales pitch to subscribe to your magazine, I am totally supportive of your right to sell your publication and to make a profit - and generally supportive of the conservative slant. I do take issue with the dis-ingenuousness of the sales pitch itself.
Identifying yourself as conservative is all well and good, but you are not Constitutionalists. There is a vast difference. You do not tell the whole truth because there are a legion of us who are easily as well informed as you, who do know more truth than you have published - and we're confident that you are not willing to face up to your moral duty to inform the public - or to do your patriotic duty to protect America and its founding precepts.
That puts you in the same category as Obama and his socialist/communist minions, the Congress, SCOTUS, the judiciary, the unions and the media in all its forms. We are fully aware that many of the so called conservative think tanks who are always soliciting us for funds, are as complicit in the overall plot to destroy capitalism as you are. Hiding the real  truth from the public puts you all squarely in that cabal. 
I can elaborate at great length upon the decline of the USA and the reasons for it, but this is just a brief note to let you know that there are millions of us who are finally awake as to the evil that dwells within our borders. We know that we may have to vote for a Republican and it will probably be the engineered choice of the party - but the two party system is finished. It will be dismantled in the not too distant future to be replaced by a Constitutional Congress to govern until morality and the rule of law is reestablished. The adversarial political system has been finely tuned to control the citizenry. If all elected representatives had the Constitution and the welfare of the United States as their primary purpose - all differences of methodology would be manageable.
Your published content is about politics and manipulation of truth. It's never about the real issues that must be solved. Sure, we can take sides about politics - but we must never take sides about America and its principles.

Harry Wilmott.

PS: I'll never see this in print, will I? Why don't you publish it in your next edition and ask your readers to specifically comment - without editorializing by you? I'm going to post it on several blogs which are avidly read every day.

HICKS: Some belated parental advice to protesters

Call it an occupational hazard, but I can’t look at the Occupy Wall Street protesters without thinking, “Who parented these people?”
As a culture columnist, I’ve commented on the social and political ramifications of the “movement” - now known as “OWS” - whose fairyland agenda can be summarized by one of their placards: “Everything for everybody.”
Thanks to their pipe-dream platform, it’s clear there are people with serious designs on “transformational” change in America who are using the protesters like bedsprings in a brothel.
Yet it’s not my role as a commentator that prompts my parenting question, but rather the fact that I’m the mother of four teens and young adults. There are some crucial life lessons that the protesters’ moms clearly have not passed along.
Here, then, are five things the OWS protesters’ mothers should have taught their children but obviously didn’t, so I will:
• Life isn’t fair. The concept of justice - that everyone should be treated fairly - is a worthy and worthwhile moral imperative on which our nation was founded. But justice and economic equality are not the same. Or, as Mick Jagger said, “You can’t always get what you want.”
No matter how you try to “level the playing field,” some people have better luck, skills, talents or connections that land them in better places. Some seem to have all the advantages in life but squander them, others play the modest hand they’re dealt and make up the difference in hard work and perseverance, and some find jobs on Wall Street and eventually buy houses in the Hamptons. Is it fair? Stupid question.
• Nothing is “free.” Protesting with signs that seek “free” college degrees and “free” health care make you look like idiots, because colleges and hospitals don’t operate on rainbows and sunshine. There is no magic money machine to tap for your meandering educational careers and “slow paths” to adulthood, and the 53 percent of taxpaying Americans owe you neither a degree nor an annual physical.
While I’m pointing out this obvious fact, here are a few other things that are not free: overtime for police officers and municipal workers, trash hauling, repairs to fixtures and property, condoms, Band-Aids and the food that inexplicably appears on the tables in your makeshift protest kitchens. Real people with real dollars are underwriting your civic temper tantrum.
• Your word is your bond. When you demonstrate to eliminate student loan debt, you are advocating precisely the lack of integrity you decry in others. Loans are made based on solemn promises to repay them. No one forces you to borrow money; you are free to choose educational pursuits that don’t require loans, or to seek technical or vocational training that allows you to support yourself and your ongoing educational goals. Also, for the record, being a college student is not a state of victimization. It’s a privilege that billions of young people around the globe would die for - literally.
• A protest is not a party. On Saturday in New York, while making a mad dash from my cab to the door of my hotel to avoid you, I saw what isn’t evident in the newsreel footage of your demonstrations: Most of you are doing this only for attention and fun. Serious people in a sober pursuit of social and political change don’t dance jigs down Sixth Avenue like attendees of a Renaissance festival. You look foolish, you smell gross, you are clearly high and you don’t seem to realize that all around you are people who deem you irrelevant.
• There are reasons you haven’t found jobs. The truth? Your tattooed necks, gauged ears, facial piercings and dirty dreadlocks are off-putting. Nonconformity for the sake of nonconformity isn’t a virtue. Occupy reality: Only 4 percent of college graduates are out of work. If you are among that 4 percent, find a mirror and face the problem. It’s not them. It’s you.
• Marybeth Hicks is the author of “Don’t Let the Kids Drink the Kool-Aid: Confronting the Left’s Assault on Our Families, Faith and Freedom.” Find her on the Web at




In a campaign where nothing has been left to chance, we have America’s new First Family, the Obamas, all decked out in red and black! When I looked at this picture this morning, I thought the choice of clothing colors was a bit odd. Really, who puts black on a little girl and why red & black on the all four of the Obamas?
Why this combination of colors, when surely the campaign has been planning what the first photographs of the incoming faux president and his family would look like for weeks? Even the criss/crossed material on Michelle’s dress seemed odd to me. I had to dig a little deeper.
Think about it. Don’t we always see politicians in shades or combinations of red, blue, navy, etc. Examples that quickly come to mind include Nancy Reagan’s red dresses, Hillary’s many shades of blues dresses and pantsuits, Laura Bush her many shades of blue and royal blue . . . the men follow the same the same etiquette. Why, because subliminally we are supposed to think of the red, white, and blue in our country’s flag. I didn’t have to dig very deep . . . here’s the answer.


Black and red bisected symbolism

The red-and-black flag is the symbol of the anarcho-syndicalist and anarcho-communist movements. Black is the traditional color of anarchism, and red is the traditional color of socialism. The red-and-black flag combines the two colors in equal parts, with a simple diagonal split. Typically, the red section is placed on the top-left corner, with the black on the bottom-right corner of the flag. This symbolizes the co-existence of anarchist and socialist ideals within the anarcho-syndicalism movement, and to symbolize the more socialistic means of the movement leading to a more anarchistic end.

The CNT-FAI‘s version of the red-and-black flag
One of the most famous variations of the anarcho-syndicalist flag is that of Spain‘s Confederación Nacional del Trabajo (National Confederation of Labor, CNT), which still exists today. The CNT, along with the Federación Anarquista Ibérica (Iberian Anarchist Federation, FAI), a major militant faction within the CNT, was a major player in the popular anarchist movements in Spain of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. This group has its own version of the red-and-black flag with its initials on the flag. CNT is in the red, while FAI is in the black – the color of anarchy – as the FAI was founded in 1927 to keep the CNT dedicated to anarchist principles.

Black and Red Africa – Zabalaza Federation’s logo
Another variation on the red-and-black theme is the red-and-black Africa used mostly by the Zabalaza Anarchist Communist Federation (ZACF or ZabFed), a federation of anarchist groups in South Africa. ZabFed was inspired by the Organisational Platform of the Libertarian Communists. ZabFed members share a basic agreement in terms of theoretical and tactical unity, collective responsibility, and federalism as suggests by the Platform. In historical terms the Platformist tradition starts with The Organizational Platform of the Libertarian Communists, and in the post-war period many include documents like the Georges Fontenis’ pamphlet Manifesto of Libertarian Communism
Lest anyone think that campaigns and politicians don’t understand the importance and symbolism of the use of color in their campaigns, has anyone forgotten Hillary’s orange pantsuit the night of her speech at the Democratic Convention in August?
orange-pantsuitAt the time, I thought that was an odd choice too, until I realized that orange is a color of protest. HRC was so cool, protesting her unfair treatment by the DNC’s selection of Obama in her orange suit, and it went over most people’s heads. Way, to go, girl! It’s just one of the reasons we loved you!
Memo to the Obama team: the choice of red & black clothing for this all important introduction to the American people was either one of the dumbest moves I’ve ever witnessed, or was incredibility insensitive to the history of this country, or was intentional.
You may want to remember that the last time the world had to deal with a charismatic leader capable of keeping millions of people mesmerized with his rhetoric, his iconic symbol, also in red and black, looked like this . . .

New York Sovereign Citizen Informs County Sheriff of Anticipated Election Fraud


October 29, 2011

Dutchess County, NY has approximately 650 farms, and agriculture is a mainstay of the economy

From: Creg Maroney
Sent: Sat 10/29/11 

To: (
Cc: (

To: Sheriff Adrian “Butch” Anderson of Dutchess County NY,

Will you not speak out against election fraud and violations against The United States Constitution and the citizens of Dutchess County?

The NYS Board of elections WILL BE COMMITTING ELECTION FRAUD by placing Barack Hussein Obama on the Presidential ballot for the 2012 election.

“On 10/25/11 Liberty Legal Foundation filed two simultaneous lawsuits against the Democratic Party. Both lawsuits request injunctions prohibiting the Party from certifying that Obama is Constitutionally qualified to run for the office of President in the 2012 election.”
Federal Complaint:

WHEREFORE, plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court,
1) declare that a “natural-born citizen” is “all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens.”2) declare that with knowledge that Mr. Obama’s father was not a U.S. citizen, any representation by the Defendants that Mr. Obama is qualified to hold the office of President of the United States would constitute negligence or …fraud; and Case 2:11-cv-02089-SRB Document 1 Filed 10/25/11 Page 15 of 16
16 of 163) issue an order granting temporary and permanent in relief, including directives prohibiting the Defendants from issuing any letters, certificates, or other document to any Secretary of State of any state, any agent thereof, or any other official of any state, indicating that Mr. Obama is qualified to hold the office of President or that the Democratic Party has selected Mr. Obama as its Presidential candidate, or requesting that any state place the name of Mr. Obama on any ballot for the office of President of the United States for the 2012 general election; and4) retain jurisdiction of this action to ensure compliance with this Court’s decrees;
State Complaint:
WHEREFORE, plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court,
1) declare that with the current facts in evidence any representation by the Defendants that Mr. Obama is qualified to hold the office of President of the United States would constitute negligence or fraud; and2) issue an order granting temporary and permanent injunctive relief, including directives prohibiting the Defendants from issuing any letters, certificates, or other document to the Secretary of State of Tennessee, any agent thereof, or any other official of the State of Tennessee, indicating that Mr. Obama is qualified to hold the office of President or that the Democratic Party has selected Mr. Obama as its Presidential candidate, or requesting that the State of Tennessee place the name of Mr. Obama on any ballot for the office of President of the United States for the 2012 general election; and3) retain jurisdiction of this action to ensure compliance with this Court’s decrees;

A sheriff once said: “integrity to do what is right regardless of criticism, to Honor your Badge, and Protect the citizens with compassion and equality.”


Creg Maroney


Cain, Romney Finish at Top of Des Moines Register Poll

Republican presidential hopeful Herman Cain has taken the lead in the race to win the Iowa Caucuses, according to a Des Moines Register poll published Saturday. 
Cain finished with 23 percent, narrowly beating former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney who finished with 22 percent. The two are essentially tied however, as Cain's one point lead falls within the poll's +/-4.9 percentage point margin of error. 
Cain's finish shows a significant gain of support in Iowa, as he scored just 10 percent in the Register's first poll held in June. Romney's support relatively stayed the same. 
The retired pizza executive's numbers strengthened in Iowa despite him spending little time campaigning The Hawkeye State, with only one appearance there since Aug. 13 -- at the Iowa Faith and Freedom Coalition's presidential forum on Oct. 22.
In a post on Facebook, Cain said, "I am glad to hear that the people of Iowa want a proven problem solver offering real solutions ... Thank you."
Texas Rep. Ron Paul finished third in the poll on 12 percent, while no other contender polled more than 10 percent.

Read more:


Saturday, October 29, 2011


All this mystery surrounding Obama speaks to a great deficiency in the American way of doing things. No one seeking the office of the President of the United States of America, or any elected office for that matter, has the right to any expectation of privacy. The notion that one can say, in effect, " I want you to vote for me for President, for leader of the free world, but there are things about me that I don't want you to know," is an unacceptable absurdity! No one running for high office has the right to tell the electorate that there are things about themselves that they want to keep hidden! Clinton withheld his medical records, Kerry withheld his military records, and Obama has withheld his entire recorded history. Why the American people tolerate this nonsense is beyond my understanding. Anyone who aspires to be President of the United States of America had best be prepared to divulge every facet of their being to the American people, and withhold nothing! The People should demand nothing less! Should the People desire the candidate undergo a colonoscopy, he, or she, had best immediately bend over, or get the hell out of the race. Period! End of story!
During the last election cycle, I remember Charles Krauthammer writing a euphoric column because a Black man, Barack Obama was a serious presidential candidate. I felt that I needed to find out more about him before I thought he should be in the White House.  I also have read all I can about his origins, and the more I read the more disturbed I become.  All of his associations thoughout his life have been Maxists.  His early years are still in the shadows, and at times I think that even Barack Obama doesn't  know. But every action President Obama takes shows me that he does not like this country and is trying to destroy it.  If we give him four more years, we will allow the destruction to become permanent. 
Obama is "president" because he and his enablers committed what amounts to a bloodless coup d'etat to put him there. He and ACORN knowingly committed voter fraud, and his campiagn knowingly accepted illegal and/or foreign campaign contributions. His New Black Panthers menaced people at the polls. Nothing was done by the Bush DOJ. Using Senate Resolution 511 as political cover, Nancy Pelosi filed two (2) different certifications of election to place Barry Soetoro on the ballot as Barack Obama, thus knowingly committing fraud.
Members of the Congress knowingly violated the constitution, which clearly forbids a person of foreign birth from becoming CIC and chief executive, by ignoring Obama's background and known origins, and then failed to act upon the information when it became known. This is also a crime, known as misprision of felony. Obama is guilty of felonies at mutiple levels; his online electronic birth certificate has been conclusively shown to be a fake; he is using a social security number issued in Connecticutt, a state he has never lived in, and his selective service number is bogus.
Obama has had multiple names and may have a criminal record on one or more of them. He probably listed his origins as an Indonesian Muslim when applying to Occidental College, but his records have been redacted. Why was BHO's first act in office to use his new authority to seal his records? Hiding something you don't want us to see?

If yo are interested, seek out Larry Sellin's lengthy series of articles on Obama, at Canada Free Press (now archived) and the Post and Email websites. Dr. Sellin (LTC, USA, ret.) has done yeoman work in researching, analyzing and interpreting the whole lawless debacle. 
I have always been a pretty good judge of character, but, as a Lifelong Democrat in 2008, I saw right thru Obama's BS and Lies.  That was all I could hear coming from his mouth.  I vote on Past Record and Accomplishments.  Obama had neither, so I voted McCain, the second time in my life I had voted for a Republican.  I helped vote Carter in office and I helped vote him out after he proved worthless.  With Hussein, I could tell right off he was bad news, it was so obvious.  I did pray that he would prove me wrong and that he would make a great Leader, but that never happened and won't happen.  As in 2008, I will not vote for Obama or anyone in the Democratic Party, which actually does not exist anymore, instead, it should be renamed the Looney Tune Legion of Demons Party, would fit them so much better.  I hope to be Raising Cain in 2012! HERMAN CAIN 2012!  Mr Cain has more Intelligence and Common Sense in his nose than Obama has in his whole being or will ever hope to have!  

When is “Standing” an Issue? »

When is “Standing” an Issue?
OR SHOULD IT BE? by Sharon Rondeau (Oct. 29, 2011) — Two lawsuits have been filed by the Liberty Legal Foundation which question the...
Oct 29 2011 / 1 comment / Read More »


PRUDEN: The awful sin of Herman Cain

The Washington Times
82 Comments and 24 Reactions
Things have gone from bad to badder for the self-righteous artsy-fartsy elites, who for all their book-learning and self-regard just can’t figure out America.
The Herman Cain phenomenon is the latest puzzlement of those who think only they’re wise enough and entitled enough to tell the rest of us which fork to use. Mr. Cain’s sin is not that he doesn’t have the usual qualifications for president. Barack Obama established the precedent that presidents can attempt to do the job with on-the-job training. Mr. Cain’s sin is that he demonstrates, with considerable eloquence, that the notion that Republicans and other conservatives are mean-spirited bigots is the enormous lie of conventional media wisdom.
The media elites (and some who only want to be among the elite) are beside themselves with rage. Lawrence O'Donnell’s MSNBC interview is so far the most venomous attack on Mr. Cain, whom he painted as Uncle Tom who sat out both the Vietnam war and the civil rights revolution when white folks like Mr. O'Donnell were trying to show black folks how to sing and dance. He even asked Mr. Cain whether he was “grateful” — presumably to the white Lords and Ladies Bountiful like Mr. O'Donnell — when he was finally admitted to full citizenship, entitled to a share of the American dream. An Internet blog called AlterNet, which proclaims itself a builder of “community,” flings more lethal venom, finding “black garbage-pail kids fascinating not because of what they believe, but rather because of how they entertain and perform for their white conservative masters.”
The toxic reaction to Herman Cain’s hearty welcome to Republican and conservative ranks, his spectacular rise in the polling of Republican voters, is a grim preview of what lies ahead. The liberals (“progressives,” as they call themselves this year) are not actually frightened by the prospect of President Cain; they recognize, given the givens, the high improbability of that happening. What irks, galls, frustrates and infuriates the East Coast libsnobs is that the Republican embrace of the pizza man destroys the story line they want to reprise from 2008, that only bigots oppose President Obama.
In fairness to the facts, the diehards on the left tried similar insults of Ronald Reagan, too. When he died, recognized widely as the man who won the Cold War and put the Soviets in their place, they couldn’t even be gracious to the memory of the dead. The tattered remnants of what was left of the counterculture cried tears of baffled frustration that the passage of only a little more than a decade had conferred universal recognition of the remarkable accomplishments of the 40th president.
The Internet sites where embittered lefties gather to trade their toxins — “you show me yours, and I’ll show you mine” — were aglow once more with incendiary hatred. The Gipper was called a “stupid lizard”; one best-selling author said of him: “Killer, coward, con man — Ronald Reagan, goodbye and good riddance.” Ted Rall, a syndicated cartoonist, gloated over the Gipper’s death, certain that he was at last with Old Scratch: “I’m sure he’s turning crispy brown right about now.” A “gay activist” (another aspiring theologian) wrote that Mr. Reagan would “spend eternity in hell” because he was “responsible for 500,000 American AIDS deaths and 10 million worldwide,” which if true would have made the Gipper the studliest and busiest man in the bathhouse.
What turns these unworthies a deep shade of rage red is not that they think Ronald Reagan actually fit any of their mean descriptions, but that he transformed the politics not only of his country, but of the world. Margaret Thatcher got it right when she said more than two decades ago that Mr. Reagan’s greatest accomplishment was that “he has achieved the most difficult of political tasks, changing attitudes and perceptions about what is possible.”
In a much smaller way, Herman Cain has also achieved that most difficult of political tasks. He, too, has changed attitudes and perceptions about what is possible. The most remarkable fact about the Cain phenomenon is that three years after Barack Obama’s incompetence began to reveal itself, the other party, painted in vivid color as benighted and bigoted, demonstrates that it will happily consider a black candidate, too. The prospect of a choice between a black Democrat and a black Republican is the tale that beggars anything Hollywood could imagine.
This reality owes nothing to the media, politicians of any stripe, or to the self-righteous elites. It owes everything to the ordinary men and women of the America that is great because America is good.
Wesley Pruden is editor emeritus of The Washington Times.