Wednesday, August 31, 2016

Only hours after meeting in Mexico City with Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto, Donald Trump announced an immigration plan Wednesday in Arizona anchored by "a great wall along the Southern border" — that Mexico is going to pay for — and a zero-tolerance policy for criminal illegals. "Mexico will pay for the wall," Trump told a cheering crowd at the Phoenix Convention Center. "Hundred percent." [Full Story]

Tuesday, August 30, 2016

Huma Abedin is Hillary Clinton's closest aide, and now she might be a liability

Before any of former U.S. Rep. Anthony Weiner’s creepy sexting even came to light, his wife had attracted unwanted attention for her boss, Hillary Clinton. Huma Abedin is a favorite target of Republicans. They accuse her of being a Saudi spy, a self-dealing insider, the mastermind behind a plot...

The Real Racist in the 2016 Presidential Race

As the polls tighten with Donald Trump pulling even or ahead of Hillary Clinton, the left is getting frantic.  Mrs. Clinton is reaching into the Democrat playbook, pulling out their go-to and typically successful Hail Mary fourth down play: the race card.  And not just a single card.  She is throwing the entire deck at Trump. Her speech last Thursday was an appeal to disaffected Republicans to abandon Trump and join the Clinton train.  The GOP establishment, from National Review and The Weekly Standard to Fox News and the rest of the inside-the-Beltway elites, have long ago ditched Trump, Pollyannaishly waiting for their unicorn candidate to magically appear.  Mrs. Clinton trotted out the usual canards – "dog-whistle", "hate speech", "far-right fringe" – with the only new bogeyman being the new "alt-right" movement.  Beyond the rhetoric, let's see who the real racist candidate is.  Sorry,...(Read Full Article)

Sunday, August 28, 2016


Tuesday, August 23, 2016

Pope Maker: The Soros Syndicate Featured

Written by  

your puppetOver a decade ago, with typical hubris, George Soros bragged, that he “is the Pope’s boss, now.” It appears that his boast became a self-fulfilling prophecy in the Francis pontificate.

The two most powerful men in the world joined forces to form a curious and troubling alliance. One of them, often referred to as the most dangerous man in the world, the other, the Vicar of Christ.
Within a few short months of Argentine Bergoglio’s papal election, the Soros inner circle was firmly entrenched at the Vatican, calling the shots, drafting documents, setting the Soros political agenda with the power and moral persuasion of the Vatican. The global eco movement finally found their critical missing component, the voice of moral authority. The greenies can now deposit their feckless leaders, Al Gore, Leo DiCaprio and Michael Moore in the recycle bin. 

Saturday, August 27, 2016

A very, very bad sign for HillaryAugust 27, 2016The run-out-the-clock strategy for dealing with the Clinton Foundation and email problems may already be crashing and burning. More

Wednesday, August 24, 2016

The End of the Wicked Witch of the Left?

Even the left-wing MSM seems to be sensing that events could be moving to a cataclysmic end for Hillary’s presidential aspirations.

Senator Sessions: Clinton Foundation may be involved in extortion

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Alabama) told CNN Tuesday that it “seems like” the FBI didn’t get around to fully investigating the actual relationship between the corruption-plagued Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation and the U.S. Department of State. (Sessions is an ally of Clinton’s opponent in the general election, Republican businessman Donald Trump.)

Monday, August 22, 2016

Kerry gives no proof of ransom payment source

As Democratic Party members march lockstep to try to elect corrupt former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to the White House, it becomes clearer that her successor, John Forbes Kerry, is not only corrupt but guilty of treason for his so-called diplomatic efforts that serve as a conduit for the U.S. funding of Iran’s terrorism-sponsoring regime.

Sunday, August 21, 2016

Huma Abedin, a top aide for Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton's campaign, had ties to a radical Muslim journal for 10 years on which her mother still serves as editor-in-chief, as the New York Post's Paul Sperry wrote Sunday morning. Abedin, Clinton's campaign...... [Full Story]


From years of observation and connecting the dots this is what I believe.
The successful foundational lie that Obama is something other than a total fraud is what drives the actions and inaction of Congress. As I have said many times, Congress, especially leadership, allowed and assisted an identity fraud con-artist to usurp America’s presidency when he was sworn in back in 2009. That is when Congress effectively blackmailed themselves by not stopping Obama before he was sworn in, they literally gave America’s government and her military to the enemy. Once that occurred, Congress was locked into continuing the charade of Obama’s being legitimate, forever if possible. Anything else could subject them to charges of treason, some at the highest possible level. So, they dug in and it was soon evident that no amount of evidence, lawsuits or anything else would ever make Congress impeach or investigate Obama. This is because they know what could be fully revealed and acted on in either case, and they must not allow that to happen. It’s personal because it could send them to prison or worse, and it covers them all because, at the very least, even the least involved in the Obama fraud are guilty of misprision of treason, itself a serious charge. They ignore their oath to protect the Constitution from her enemies and instead protect themselves. Obama knows this and does whatever he wants, even mocking Congress over their unwillingness to do anything to stop him, and he, of course, knows why. Many dedicated people spent much time, effort and money to try to reveal Obama’s usurpation and stop the intentional destruction of America……..but, it was never going to work because Obama and Company quickly owned Congress, the Department of Justice and the courts. I applaud those who tried and still are, and it’s not over till it’s over. For America to fully recover, the complete truth about Obama and the take-over of America’s government from the inside-out needs to be revealed and acted on….but, it is considered by many to be a,”crime too big to prosecute”, and the efforts to suppress the truth will continue.
Those complicit in the Obama fraud are panicked over a possible Trump presidency because a Trump Department of Justice and Mr. Trump’s friend, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio and others can still bust the charade of legitimacy the left is holding together and hold those complicit responsible for their actions, and inaction. That is why there is an effort like no one has ever seen before to stop Donald Trump and it is why America needs Trump as president. I don’t like saying this, but Trump is likely our last hope.

Friday, August 19, 2016

No-excuses woman blames Colin Powell for her schlock, homebrew e-mail server

Yesterday Rob informed you, during the moments when he was able to stop laughing, that Hillary Clinton considers herself to be a “no excuses” type of person. You know how it is. No matter what happens, if it’s under your watch, the buck stops with you. And you don’t mind taking responsibility because you can handle it. That’s how Hillary is!

Obama, the Worst President Ever, Except Maybe for Hillary

It's one thing for "Never Trump" Republicans to criticize Donald Trump, but Democrats, the liberal media and pedestal-perched professors who have enabled President Obama and now support Hillary Clinton have no standing to do so. President Obama set out to fundamentally transform America (read: systematically destroy America as founded). Measured in terms of accomplishing this goal, Obama has been one of the most successful presidents in history. Measured in terms of doing what is best for America, Obama undeniably ranks among the worst.


Sailor Denied 'Clinton Deal', Gets 1 Year in Prison for 6 Photos of Sub

The photos contained 'confidential' information, the lowest level of classification.

A former Navy machinist mate who admitted taking photos inside a nuclear submarine was sentenced to a year in prison Friday, with a federal judge rebuffing a request for probation in light of authorities deciding not to prosecute Hillary Clinton for mishandling classified information on a private email server as secretary of state. Kristian Saucier’s attorneys argued in a court filing last week that Clinton had been "engaging in acts similar to Mr. Saucier" with information of much higher classification. It would be "unjust and unfair for Mr. Saucier to receive any sentence other than probation for a crime those more powerful than him will likely avoid," attorney Derrick Hogan wrote. U.S. District Judge Stefan Underhill sentenced Saucier to one year in prison and a $100 fine, along with six months home confinement, 100 hours of community service and a ban on owning guns, his legal team says. Prosecutors had asked for six years behind bars.

Thursday, August 18, 2016


Letter to the editor: Unconstitutional for woman to be president

Unconstitutional for woman to be president
Received Jan. 22
A friend and I have unearthed a constitutional issue, which prevents a woman from becoming President.
Article II of the Constitution, concerning the executive branch of our government, refers to the President using the words “he,” “him,” and “his,” never as “she,” “her,” or “hers.”
So the intent of the Constitution is that the President be a man, not a woman. As further evidence of this, Amendment XIX, states “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.” Amendment XIX, therefore, gave women the right to vote in 1920.
It would be illogical to assume that, when the Constitution was ratified in 1787, one hundred and thirty-three years earlier, a woman could be President, although she was not allowed to vote.
Amendment XIX gave women the right to vote, however there is no Amendment allowing a woman to be President. This would disqualify Carly Fiorina and Hillary Clinton from becoming president. I have nothing against an otherwise qualified woman becoming President, however, at present, the Constitution does not allow that.
A Constitutional Amendment will be required.
(Word count: 195)


Why Clinton's Candidacy is Unconstitutional

By Yosef Rabin July 2016
I want to preface by saying that I am not against the idea of a woman being President of the US, but I am very much against Hillary Clinton, for more reasons than I can count. With that said, it seems to me that it currently it would be unconstitutional for a female to hold the Office of the Presidency of the United States of America.

When I say unconstitutional, I do not mean in violation of the spirit of the constitution, I mean against the technical reading of the constitution, which is just as important.
First, some background: Women were only granted the right to vote after the passing of the 19th Amendment in 1920. The amendment established that any citizen has the right to vote, but was this right also established for the highest office in the land?

ARTICLE II, SECTION 1, CLAUSE 5 states: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
On the surface, it would appear that any citizen of the United States is eligible to be president. Right?

Well, not so fast!

Clause 5 states clearly, "at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution" meaning that anyone who was not considered a citizen at the time of the signing of the constitution could not be president. This would include, blacks, women and even white men who were not landowners. In the early years, the status of married women was defined under the principle of “Coverture”, meaning that their status was “covered up” by the identity of the husband. 

In the 1760s, the famous English jurist William Blackstone defined "Coverture" as follows: “By marriage, the husband and wife are one person in the law: that is, the very being or legal existence of the woman is suspended during the marriage”. Women did not have any identity, because her “citizenship” was only by virtue of her husband's existence, the wife did not legally exist. Hillary Clinton’s married status, would have rendered her at the time of the constitution, as legally “non-existent”.
Furthermore, throughout the entire ARTICLE II the words He or His appears no less than 17 times. This affirms that in the intention of the Framers of the Constitution was that women should not be President. Although one could argue that the terms "He/His" is just a general reference to a human being and was once used interchangeably to refer to either a male or female, I would argue that this is not the case.
In response to the question of semantics, I would like to suggest the following. The Framers drew from biblical work or the so-called "Judeo-Christian Heritage", when drafting the constitution. In ancient Jewish legal texts the question is asked if female decedents from Aaron the High Priest may function in the Temple alongside males. The Talmud in Tractate Kedushin chapter 1, explains that when the Bible uses to term "sons of Aaron" in Leviticus 1:8, it comes to exclude women. Simply put, if all the children of Aaron were meant to serve in the Temple, the verse would have also mentioned “the daughters of Aaron. This is an early legal case that uses textual semantics to solve an important legal dispute.
The time has certainly come for an additional Amendment to article 2, which would explicitly permit women and others to run for president, but there is not enough time before the election to make that happen. So in the meantime, Hillary should either drop out or someone should take this to court.

Look forward to your thoughts.

Wednesday, August 17, 2016

Sheriff David Clarke on race riots: Progressive policies hit black community like a nuclear blast

Dear media outlets,
All the violence we’ve been witnessing in Milwaukee for the last few days? Yeah, that’s not a “protest.”  You keep calling it that, but the fact is you’re just plain wrong. These are “riots.” Ugly, violent, racist, riots.

Sunday, August 14, 2016

Friday, August 12, 2016


Hillary Would Give Us a Disastrous Third Obama Term

David Limbaugh
Posted: Aug 12, 2016
When it comes to unity, the Democrats talk a good game -- but in the end they promote disunity because their electability depends on dividing society into groups and inciting anger, resentment and distrust. I don't need to cite examples of Democrats' blaming Republicans for divisiveness and falsely extolling their own aspirations of unity. They are everywhere. It's what they do, from their talk of our "common humanity," to their glorification of all kinds of diversity, except diversity of thought, to their proclaimed monopoly on tolerance.


BUT...What difference does it make?...

The FBI has launched several investigations into possible corruption within the Clinton Foundation, The Daily Caller reports.... [Full Story]

Thursday, August 11, 2016

Wednesday, August 10, 2016

...newly released e-mails prove beyond any doubt that Hillary used her position as Secretary of State as an influence-for-money operation, with Mrs. Carlos Danger as her primary cash pimpette.

Newly released e-mails prove: Hillary turned the State Department into a pay-for-play racket

While the media are hyperventilating about “Second Amendment people” - pretending to believe Donald Trump meant something they know he didn’t mean, so you will be upset - newly released e-mails prove beyond any doubt that Hillary used her position as Secretary of State as an influence-for-money operation, with Mrs. Carlos Danger as her primary cash pimpette.

Monday, August 8, 2016


Of course either one is better looking than the amazon/tranny currently in the white house and out of these three it's quite obvious there is ONLY one lady. The other two are a perv and a tranny.

How does a British-Kenyan citizen with no ties to the United States overthrow the American Republic?

How does a British-Kenyan citizen
with no ties to the United States
overthrow the American Republic?
 What appears on the surface to be one, simple unanswered question is, in realty, several unanswered questions packaged as one. The United States Constitution outlines precisely who, and under what specific circumstances, can run for the office of President of the United States. Keep in mind, the drafting of the US Constitution began on May 25, 1787 with a quorum of members present at the Pennsylvania State House (renamed Independence Hall), and finalized on Sept. 17, 1787. Why is that germane? Because the laws enacted and enforced under the Articles of Confederation dealing with citizenship as well as the laws concerning what constituted being a natural citizen in 1787 are different than the verbiage in Article II of the Constitution that qualifies a candidate seeking office for the office he seeks. Had the Articles of Confederation remained the law of the land, Barack Obamawould have been qualified to run for the office of President of the United States.
Specifically, Article II says: "No person except a natural born citizen or a citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained the age of 35 years, and been 14 years resident within the United States."
Obviously, Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. was not a citizen, or even a resident, of the United States at the time of the Constitution's adoption since he would not be born for another 174 years. The $64 question is: was he ever a citizen, of any type, of the United States since 1961; and if so, where is the indisputable, or even circumstantial, evidence of that citizenship? Nordyke TwinsThere is a ton of circumstantial evidence that says he is not, and never was, a citizen of the United States, but none—under close examination—that says he was.
Forensically, Maricopa County, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio proved thatBarack Obama's Hawaiian birth certificate was a forgery. So was his driver's license, his Social Security card and his Selective Service card.Obama's birth certificate appears to belong to a girl named Virginia Sunahara who was born on August 4, 1961 at the Wahiawa Hospital and died the following day at the Kapi'olani Hospital where doctors could not save her life. Here comes the first big question buried in the original question: Sequentially, the number of the birth certificate issued to Virginia Sunahara should have been 61 10651. How do we know that? Because her birth immediately followed the birth ofSusan and Gretchen Nordyke, twin girls who were the 10,637th and 10,638th babies born in Hawaii in 1961. Sunahara was the 639th. Obama, who now carries Virginia Sunahara's birth certificate, was actually born at the Coast Province General Hospital in Mombasa, British East Africa (Kenya) and that he did not arrive in Hawaii until Aug. 8, 1961—4 days after his birth.Stanley Ann Dunham Obama didn't realize the ramifications of her son being born in Mombasa, Kenya but her mother, Madelyn Dunham did. Her grandson was not an American citizen. She set about fabricating the lie that would help him get the Hawaiian birth certificate he needed to be an American, rather than Kenyan, citizen. Her subterfuge began with the posting of birth announcements in the Honolulu Star Bulletin and the Honolulu Advertiser which said "...Mr. and Mrs. Barack Obamaof 6085 Kalanianaole Highway gave birth to a son on Aug. 4, 1961." Dunham knew that to claim a certificate of live birth in Hawaii a person not born in one of the State hospitals need only supply two pieces of evidence confirming the live birth did take place in Hawaii. Dunham apparently didn't realize the law meant two witnesses other than the parents who were present at the live birth, not two birth announcements.
However, since Sunahara was born and died within 24 hours, those who borrowed her birth certificate, believed to have been Loretta Fuddy, Public Health Director (who actually produced what she said was the originalObama birth certificate) didn't think anyone would think about theSunahara baby since she never lived beyond a very brief visit at two hospitals in Honolulu. Her birth certificate number was 61 11080—or 339 births after she was born before it was logged into the Hawaiian birth records. Fuddy needed to park Virginia Sunahara's birth certificate somewhere and, one imagines, 61 11080 was the first available parking space in Hawaii's birth records.
On Dec. 11, 2013 Fuddy was one of 9 passengers on an airplane piloted byClyde Kawasaki. The plane, according to the survivors (everyone exceptFuddy) experienced engine problems and had to ditch in the ocean, a few hundred yards from the shore. Fuddy, who had just been subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury to explain her role in "finding" Obama's birth certificate, was the first person off the plane in a life vest. Following her, and remaining close to her was her deputy director, Keith Yamamoto. For the first 25 minutes or so, the group floated close to each other. Then Fuddy andYamamoto drifted off from the others. Less than 20 minutes later Fuddywas dead. Still in her life vest, which kept her afloat, Fuddy drowned. US Coast Guard swimmers found Fuddy's body floating about 200 yards from the nearest survivor. The investigation into Obama's forged birth certificate ended with Fuddy's death. Someone in the Hawaiian state government seemed to think that without Fuddy's confession, there was no case even though the fake birth certificate went from Fuddy to Judith Conley, a lawyer in the law firm of Perkins Coie. From there, the birth certificate was given to Obama who posted the forgery on the White House website. The next question within that first question is, if Barack Obama was a natural born citizen of the United States, he would have had a real Hawaiian birth certificate, so why would he need a phony one to post on the White House website?
And, finally, if Barack Obama was a real American citizen, why would he enroll in Occidental College in California as Barry Soetoro, a foreign exchange student during the Vietnam War—without a Selective Service card, which he would need if he was citizen (but wouldn't if he wasn't) since the US military cannot draft non-citizens? He didn't need a Selective Service card until he transferred from Occidental to Columbia University (as Barack Obama) in 1981 because in 1981, Obama burst from the bubble of alien obscurity to become a natural born American citizen with citizenship rights from England, Kenya and Indonesia.
And finally, at the end of his quest to convince the American people that he is an Article II natural born citizen is a puzzle—how a theoretically Hawaiian-born citizen, living in Hawaii could be issued a Connecticut Social Security number number (which Obama claims as his own). Adding to that dilemma is the fact that the number Obama claims as his own—042-68-4425—was issued to a French immigrant named Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born around 1890. Ludwig's use of 042-XX-XXXX is now in question—at least in the mind of attorney Orley Taitz. Information received by her under theFreedom of Information Act [FOIA] suggested that an emigrant named Harry Bouncel, who migrated to the Bronx from Russia in 1912, was issued that same social security number in 1935. But, regardless who reported it, according to the Social Security Administration, only two people have ever used that social security number and Bouncel is not one of them. One of them is Obama. The second one was Ludwig since he lived in Connecticut.Bouncel lived in New York and since 042 is a Connecticut number, Ludwig is the only person to whom the number could have been officially issued. None of those whose name is associated with that SS number could have beenBarack Obama since, according to the Social Security Administration, social security numbers are not recycled and will not be any in the foreseeable future.
Given the 9-digit configuration of the social security number there are about a billion combinations that can be issued. To date, the government has issued about 450 million social security numbers. With talk of converting the 9-digit social security number to a 20-digit global unique identifier the combinations which will feature 6 fixed numbers and 122 random numbers and, if ever needed, letters. The total number of unique numerical GUIDs is 5.3 x 10 to the 36th power. Add the 26 letters of the alphabet to the mix, and the combinations becomes almost limitless—enough unduplicated personal identifiers to assign a 20 or 36 digit identifier to every man, woman and child on Earth.
What am I saying? I'm saying that those who believe Obama was deliberately assigned Ludwig's social security number by the Social Security Administration (which, his defenders claim, has run out of unused social security numbers is now recycling the numbers of deceased people) are either honestly mistaken, misled, or they are deliberately lying in order to mislead others. If two or more names are attached to any social security number it is only because all but the original person who was legally assigned that number by the Social Security Administration based on the State they were born in, stole the number for their own illegal purpose.
We know Obama was a naturally-born British citizen—and still is today. He is also a naturalized citizen of Indonesia. The only country he's lived in where he is not a citizen guessed it—the United States. We know for any man to be elected President of the United States he must not only be a citizen of the United States, he must be a natural citizen of the United States.
According to Emer deVattel, the author of The Law of Nations and the father of international common law as adopted by the Founding Fathers of the United States of America, more is needed to determine natural citizenship than just having the good fortune of being born here today. Mexicans and other Central Americans sneak across the border to have anchor babies, believing that having an American baby will provide them with the visa they need to stay. Anchor baby claims of asylum don't work in any other nation on Earth because citizenship is based on more than just being born in a particular country, its based on where your father—not your mother—was born. Your mother gives you life. For good or bad, your father gives you roots. There is no free pass to citizenship anywhere else in the world because freedom is not, and never should be, free. Things that are free have no true intrinsic value. The price our forefathers paid for freedom for their families was their own shed blood. Thousands of them died to break the yoke that shackled them to a tyrant king and an island nation 4.417 miles away from freedom.
As I wrote these words, I thought, I have proven my case that Barack Hussein Obama was never eligible to run for federal office—neither as a US Senator nor as President. But, I realized the "why" was not answered. Thewhy provide insight to the collusion between the princes of industry, the barons of banking and Barack Obama. By himself, a junior senator from the State of Illinois lacked the political wherewithal and financial power to completely obliterate his entire life from August 4, 1961 until today. Yes, today. The things Obama did yesterday have become the property of history's revisionists today. Transparency? In Obama's world, transparency does not exist. In Obama's world "transparency" and "opaquity" are synonyms not antonyms. In Obama's world, truth is a luxury government cannot afford.
As a 3rd grader at the St. Francis of Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia,Obama was told that he would be a ruler, and freely shared that information with classmates. Because he was a 9 year old boy he believed he was either Kenyan royalty or an Indonesian prince. He was convinced that, when he grew up, he would be the leader of one of those two countries.
Was Obama a Manchurian candidate from age 9? Who told him what the priest in charge of the St. Francis of Assisi school said was relayed to him about Obama's future as a national leader? In 1970, Obama's mother (now referring to herself as Ann Dunham), worked for the Ford Foundation and consulted for the United States Agency for International Development and the Asian Development Bank in Pakistan. Both of Obama's American grandparents, Stanley and Madelyn Dunhan were members of the Communist Party of the United States. Stanley DunhamStanley Ann's father, who is generally presented as a working class, barely successful communist sympathesizer, worked for Standard Oil, and later for David Rockefeller who became the driving force behind the Rockefeller family wealth. Dunham also had also developed fairly close ties to former CarterNational Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1972 when Rockefellercreated the Trilateral Commission and appointed Brzezinski to head it.Brzezinski also served as the head of the Council on Foreign Relations.Barack Obama first met Brzezinski while he was studying at Columbia, shortly after he transitioned from Soetoro to Obama. Suddenly, neither theObamas nor the Dunhams look like the working class families we've been led to believe they were. Turns out they were insiders or, at least, they worked on the cusp of real power.
Manchurian candidates in our society are not as much of a rarity as you might think. They are groomed for their roles in the shadows of political obscurity—sometimes for years and sometimes for decades—waiting for the moment when the princes of industry and the barons of banking and business can use them for their own nefarious purposes. Not all of them will be presidents or prime ministers, some may be Senators from Arizona or Massachusetts, and others may be judges or generals. At "their moment," they will thrust to the center stage, into the political limelight for all of the world to bask in their popularity.
From the end of World War II, the princes of industry have been grooming candidates for greatness whose role it will be, when the time is right, to dismantle the greatest nation on Earth, the United States of America. Because as long as freedom exists, world government cannot. As long as the United States is the best armed nation on Earth, the boots of our enemies will not walk our streets.
Thanks to the Council on Foreign RelationsRockefeller's Club of Rome and the Trilateral Commission, the industrial might of the United States that won both World War I and World War II has been broken up like the toys of a spoiled child, and dispersed to our enemies. We, the people of the United States, no longer possess the manufacturing wherewithal to hold our enemies at bay while our factories churn out the weapons of war needed to prevail because those factories are now closed and the products we made are now being made by our enemies.
All that protects the American people today is what's left of the frayed Bill of Rights, in particular the somewhat shredded 1st and 2nd Amendments that protect our right to worship God whenever and wherever we wish to pray to our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, and the right, given to us by God, to own and possess firearms in order to defend our homes, our families, and what's left of our nation.
The Amalekites in Washington, DC who are determined to destroy God are also determined to weaken America sufficientlyso that its enemies can destroy the nation God raised up to protect His creation. Obama, the Islamofascist, like the social progressives allied with him, who have not been able to repeal the 2nd Amendment, are determined to erase it by Executive Order simply by denying whatever classes of people he fears most the right to possess firearms. Once Obama succeeds in abolishing the rights of "the few," the rights of "the many" will be gone as well.
During the Clinton years, and again under the interloper in 2013, the far left socialist Southern Poverty Law Center, founded in 1971 by Morris Deesand Julian Bond, declared all U.S. military veterans were enemies of its government and argued that veterans, particularly retired veterans and those veterans who served in Iraq, should not be allowed to possess weapons. Why? Because, as Sen. Diane Feinstein argued in a hearing to ban military veterans from owning firearms, the returning vet might have PTSD and may turn on their family, friends or neighbor. I may be wrong, but I don't think a single mass murderer in the United States has ever been found to be a veteran with PTSD. Democrats believe when you grab for straws, always grab the biggest straw you can find. That argument, by the way, is the joint myth of the FBI colluding with the US Dept. of Veterans Affairs. The fairy tale originated in 2012, a year before the Southern Poverty Law Center began to banter it around the Hill.
Each month the VA Information Technology Center provides the FBI with an encrypted "Watch List" CD of suspect veterans who might be suffering from PTSD—even thought most of the 129,440 names on the July 12, 2012 CD had never been examined by VA doctors. What determines their "instability" according to a report first obtained by The Daily Caller in 2012, was how well the veterans manage their VA benefits. Thus, if a veteran is behind in his or her monthly obligations, he or she may be suffering from PTSD and should not be allowed to own a weapon.
The reality is, the totalitarians funding the social progressive wingnuts in Washington, DC and 50 State capitals, know when they make the move they will ultimately make to nullify the Bill of Rights and replace it with the UN Bill of Human Rights which is broken into the UN Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and theInternational Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. None of these four documents guarantee you the right to protect yourself with a firearm. And, all of the rights detailed in these four documents are retractable. The governments of the signatory nations can repeal them at will. Why? Because the right to own and carry firearms assures that all other rights a free people enjoy are permanent.
When US v Miller 307 US 174 was decided in 1939, Associate Justice William O. Douglas (a liberal FDR appointee) noted in the majority opinion that "...based on the privileges standardized by the States in the 18th century..." (which was, and still is, the superior government of the United States) "...the general public—not the State-controlled militias—has to be as well-armed as its central government since the people, and the States, view the federal government as much, if not more, a threat to liberty than any foreign intruder on American soil."
The American people need to heed Justice Douglas' prophetic words because we have reached that period in the twilight of America's existence when the Amalekites now possess Washington and are storming the gates of the cities and towns of America with unlawful edicts designed to erase our protection under the Constitution in order to destroy this nation and prepare it for its submissive entrance into what President George H.W. Bush called "the New World Order." It will be a brief topsy-turvey world order. It will last seven years and will end with the destruction of what author Hal Lindsey intuitively called "the late, great planet Earth" in the 1970s.Well, for what it's worth, once again, you have my two cents worth on this subject. Until next time...if there is one...
Had to share this joke with the Birther Report world. 

In Israeli doctor say: "In Israel, medicine is so advanced that 
we cut off a man's testicles, put them on another man, and in 
6 weeks, he is looking for work. 

The German doctor say: "That's nothing, in Germany we take 
part of a brain, put it in another man, and in 4 weeks he 
is looking for work." 

The Russian doctor say: "Gentlemen, we take half a heart 
from a man, put it in another's chest, and in 2 weeks he 
is looking for work." 

The American doctor laughs: "You all are behind us. Seven 
years ago, we took a Muslim with no brains, no heart and 
no balls and made him President. Now, the whole country is 
looking for work!" 

This joke actually won an award for the best joke in world 
competition held in Britain!

Sunday, August 7, 2016


Open Letter to the American People


by Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely (Ret), ©2016,
Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely served 32 years in the Army, having retired as Deputy Commanding General, US Army, Pacific
(Aug. 6, 2016) — Whereas, as retired military leaders or veterans responsible for implementing military policy, we are acutely aware of the many ways that Executive and Legislative Branch leadership failures can adversely impact US foreign policy resulting in unnecessary national security risks;
Whereas we believe that our representative republic rests on the foundation of principled free speech that seeks to achieve consensus through reasoned debate;
Whereas one of the biggest threats to national security is the failure to protect U.S. borders while allowing unfettered immigration;
Whereas we believe that clarity of thought, communication and knowledge of such existential threats to U.S. national security as well as honest dialogue are indispensable for those in leadership positions;
Whereas we believe a leader whose actions adversely impact the welfare and lives of U.S. military personnel and their families, especially with regard to the threat posed by open borders and insufficiently vetted immigrants, should be held accountable;
Whereas specifically, as Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives (second in line to the U.S. presidency), Representative Paul Ryan has failed to support border security and failed to hold the President responsible for enforcing U.S. immigration laws; and
Whereas these failures, which encourage aggression (rather than diminish it) amongst U.S. adversaries, demand a response and because the 9 August congressional primary in the State of Wisconsin provides the means for “We the People” to effect that response, thereby bringing an end to these failures;
Now therefore be it stated, we the undersigned, as a matter of conscience, oppose, unequivocally, the re-election of U.S. House Speaker Paul Ryan, Representative of the Congressional 1st District in Wisconsin, and support in his place Paul Nehlen, who will be a strong advocate for these important national security issues.
Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely (Ret), et al

Saturday, August 6, 2016

Paul Ryan Exemplifies The Need For Term Limits

Our Founding Fathers would be thoroughly disillusioned by how the form of government they envisioned has been altered and abused. The Founders thought they were creating a governing structure radically different from the British Monarchy the colonists had escaped from.


25 Reasons Not to Vote for Hillary Clinton

John Hawkins
Posted: Aug 06, 2016
Note: Given Hillary Clinton’s disgusting and corrupt track record, this could easily have been a much bigger list. In fact, I’m not even sure you could adequately cover how unfit Hillary is for the Presidency in a 200 page book, much less a column. With that in mind, I decided to keep this list at 25 items to make it more easily digestible.

 1) Hillary Clinton is almost 69 years old; she had a serious head injury after passing out in 2012 and she’s had a much remarked upon uncontrollable cough throughout much of this year’s campaign. The presidency is an enormously demanding job that visibly ages the person in the Oval Office. If someone who simply isn’t well enough to be President becomes the leader of the Free World, it could lead to devastating consequences as she futilely struggles to do the job.