In
all the media coverage of the riots in Ferguson, an annoying false
premise has been allowed to stand as though it were an unquestionable
truth. Talking heads on the left and right are saying while rioting is
not the way, there is a need for change in America. What the heck change
are they talking about?
By
embracing the “need for change” premise promoted by Al Sharpton and
company, the media is complicit in spreading the lie that America is
racist and blacks are mistreated. For crying out loud, folks, look
around. Blacks are thriving in every area of the American experience.
The real need for change is for blacks to stop voting for Democrats in
exchange for just-enough-to-get-by handouts and endless failed big
government spending programs that make problems worse; the death of the
black family. That is what desperately needs to change in America.
The people the Global Money Barons Don't Want...from
babies
to grandmothers and sick people in between. Those the government is killing at both ends of the age corridor.
Once you have all the money
in the world, there are two things you don't want. First, you don't want
a crowded world that encourages territorial strife and war; and second,
you want a sufficient abundance of natural resources, food stuffs and
all of the material things that the wealthy expect as their due. The Rockefeller clan, from John D. Rockefeller, Sr. in the 1880s to his grandson David
in the 1960s, believed the world was rapidly becoming so overpopulated
that people would soon decimate all of Earth's natural resources leaving
a barren, desolate planet due to man destroying his ecosystem. You've
been seeing Hollywood's stock movie flicks about the doomsday
catastrophies of man caused by man destroying his ecosystem beginning
with the 1951 movie promoting the United Nations in "The Day The Earth Stood Still" and the Charlton Heston flicks "Planet of the Apes" [1968] where war was the culprit destroying the planet; and a double dose of movies like "Solyent Green" [1973] and the 2011 TV miniseries "Terra Nova." Where "Planet of the Apes" dealt with humans destroying mankind through war, "Solyent Green" and "Terra Nova" dealt with industrial and man-made pollutants destroying the planet. Mixed in was a whole cistern of celluloid, including "The Day After Tomorrow" which is notable only because the movie's producer allowed Al Gore, Jr. to use its made-up footage from the movie to convince its audience (who had not yet seen "The Day After Tomorrow" movies
like that global warming was causing the Arctic ice to melt and the
Antarctic ice shelf to begin breaking apart. Preceded or followed by
movies like "Catagory 6.5," Catagory 7," "Day of Destruction," and "10.5 Apocalypse" as
well as a myriad of nickel and dime movies that blame man for the
weather that is caused exclusively by the solar cycles of our sun that
create both global warming and cooling that Al Gore and and the eco-thieves blame on man and flatulating cows.
When Gore brought "An Inconvenient Truth"
to England and tried to show it to school children, the British high
court would not allow the film to be shown in England without an
explicit disclaimer denouncing the movie as lacking in fact.
Inconveniently, Gore's Hollywood production, like the
movies you watch on the silver screen (even those which are touted as
factual biographies of both conservative and liberal politicians) are
pretty much made up. Movies about former presidents are scripted to make
conservatives like Ronald Reagan look bad and greedy tyrants like John Adams, Woodrow Wilson, FDR, Lyndon Johnson, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and, of course, Barack Obama, look like what they weren't—honest men. READ MORE...
When St. Louis County Prosecutor Robert P. McCulloch explained that some
exonerating testimony in the shooting death of Michael Brown in Ferguson,
Missouri, came from several African-American eyewitnesses who described Brown
as having charged police Officer Darren Wilson before he fired the fatal shots,
it was a powerful moment.
Such testimony was consistent with physical evidence establishing that
Wilson had not fired at Brown’s back as repeatedly and poisonously alleged.
Indeed, it would seem that the aggressor in this fatal encounter was not
Wilson, but rather Brown. According to evidence the grand jury sifted and
assessed, it seems that Wilson fired not in cold blood, as so often declared, but
in self-defense.
It was this right to self-defense – “even” for a policeman – that the grand
jury decision left sacrosanct when it determined there was simply not
sufficient evidence to indict Wilson for any crime.
Shocking as it may seem, self-defense is not a bedrock right in some courts
– specifically, U.S. military courts, where U.S. soldiers have seen their right
to self-defense on the battlefield negated by murder convictions.
The St. Louis County prosecutor has now uploaded the grand jury proceedings (all 24 volumes),
assorted evidence and witness interviews so all can see how the system worked,
and how the grand jury came to its conclusion. This sets an unprecedented
standard for transparency in the face of ongoing demagogic efforts to obscure
or ignore these same facts. With incendiary talk of anger “rooted in reality,”
as the president put it, the need for protests, the specter of federal charges
and “change,” Barack Obama and an army of “racial arsonists” agitate not for
justice, not for peace, but for power.
Listening to McCulloch’s discussion of how it was that an unarmed, but
powerfully built 18-year-old (who had a large dose of THC, the
judgment-impairing chemical in marijuana, coursing through his blood) posed a
threat to an armed policeman, I couldn’t help but think about another case.
When former Army Ranger Lt. Michael Behenna shot and killed an unarmed Iraqi
terrorist named Ali Mansur in 2008, Behenna, too, claimed to have acted in
self-defense when the Iraqi rushed him. Physical evidence supported Behenna’s
version of events, but he was convicted and originally sentenced to 25 years
for murder. When the highest military appeals court affirmed his conviction, it
determined that in the circumstances, Behenna had “lost the right to act in
self-defense and did not regain it.” Sickening.
Think of it. The military appeals court ruling tells us that justice would
really have been better served had Behenna been killed in the altercation. I
can’t help thinking the agitators in the Brown case, from Obama on down, feel
exactly the same way about Darren Wilson. To them, self-sacrifice (someone
else’s) is preferable to self-defense.
Earlier this year, an act of clemency released Behenna from the military
prison at Ft. Leavenworth but not before he had served five years behind bars –
for what? Surviving? The legal travesty of the Behenna case is unlikely to have
occurred in civilian court, which is one excellent reason why such cases should
be removed from military jurisdiction.
There are others. More U.S. soldiers remain behind bars whose main crime
seems to be that they, too, remained alive after a do-or-die point of crisis.
There is Sgt. Derrick Miller, whose fatal struggle with an Afghan inside the
defensive perimeter over Miller’s own gun, earned Miller a premeditated murder
conviction – and a sentence of life in prison without possibility of parole for
10 years. Miller, by the way, is an African-American who fails to rate the
president’s “community of color” concerns, which tells me they are so much
smoke to fire up the mob.
There is 1st Lt. Clint Lorance, currently serving a 20-year sentence on two
murder convictions, having ordered his men to shoot at three Afghans
approaching their checkpoint in Taliban territory. There is also Master Sgt. John Hatley, convicted
of the murders of four detainees in Iraq in harrowing conditions. Not only were
the bodies never recovered, the deceased were never reported missing. Hatley,
however, is serving 40 years in Leavenworth. There is Pfc. Corey Clagett (18
years for following orders to kill from scot-free commanders), whose inhumane
abuse at the hands of military wardens is an egregious travesty. There is
Marine Sgt. Lawrence Hutchins, whose repeated prosecutions amount to Kafkaesque
mental torture.
Surely, these veterans merit the same clemency that has released literally
thousands of enemy fighters
with American blood on their hands, from Guantanamo to Iraq to Afghanistan.
Tragically, Uncle Sam doesn’t agree.
And this is where a disturbing pattern
takes shape. The Obama administration
at these fateful junctures is consistently and predictably callous or hostile
to those who have protected it from our worst enemies abroad or maintained the peace at home. Did
you hear even a word from Washington about the two sheriff’s deputies gunned
down in California last month by a twice-deported illegal alien? No, you heard
amnesty instead.
By now, it’s hard not to notice that these are the Americans in various
uniforms who support the edifice of law and order, even world order, that the
Obama-ites are committed to dismantling. This would seem to explain the many
cases where Obama administration sympathies, or even benefits of the doubt,
unduly extend to the other side, whatever form it takes, from terrorists to
mobs.
As usual, this leaves the rest of us in serious trouble.
For the average citizen, it’s a tad
disturbing to realize that an alleged child molester has inserted
himself so far into the political process that when he’s not sodomizing
boys, he’s influencing presidential Supreme Court picks. More
When I was a young boy, I watched scenes
on television of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. speaking and fighting for
equal rights for blacks. Even at age 10, I was moved not only by his
inspiring oratory but also his steadfast determination to bring freedom
to his people; indeed bringing freedom to all oppressed people. Be you
black or white, the civil rights leader, a true giant among men, even
with his leftist connections, set the tone for a nation in ascension.
Today, our country, now in steep decline, is not so fortunate as to
have a civil rights leader like King. Rather, sitting atop our corrupt
government is a bigoted anti-white socialist, who it has become clear
not only despises Caucasians, but also Christians and Jews of all
stripes. He is a black Muslim in the subtler mold of Louis Farrakhan and
Malcolm X – only repackaged and warmed over to have duped enough
Americans to have voted him into the presidency in 2008 and 2012. This
destructive and evil man, Barack Hussein Obama, is more dangerous than
Farrakhan or X; he is the nominal leader of the free world, an ironic
position given that his view of governance is hardly one that fights for
and preserves freedom, but instead through words and deed seeks to
snuff out liberty for nearly everyone whose skin color and inherent
Muslim faith does not match his own.
Instead, along with his black comrades, the likes of Attorney General
Eric Holder and black activist colleagues and friends like Al Sharpton
and Jesse Jackson, he runs a divisive racist cabal that is designed to
tear the nation apart at its seams. In so doing, they hope to create
enough anarchy and chaos to wage a revolution against not just whites –
who they feel must pay blacks back for the years of invidious
discrimination – but also Jews and white Christians in particular. This,
along with his Muslim roots, which he inherited from his anti-Semitic
Kenyan father, helps explain Obama’s hostility toward Israel, the land
of the Jewish people and the birthplace of Jesus, and the president’s
favoritism toward everything black and Islamic.
My words today may at first seem extreme. They are not. They must
finally be said, given the sad state of affairs we now find ourselves in
– with time running out to confront and defeat Obama and his pliant
leftist goons. More and more, Americans are starting to see these black
racists for what they are. Fox News’ Megyn Kelly, Bill O’Reilly and Sean
Hannity are now calling it like it is, but even ordinary Americans,
also liberal ones, are also beginning to talk more clearly and openly
about this threat to our formerly civilized society.
The scary saga of black mob violence in Ferguson, Missouri, this
week, where a cop was not indicted for the killing of Michael Brown – a
young thug who robbed a convenience store and then attacked the
arresting officer – unmasks in greater detail the frightening racial
divide and criminal reverse racism among many black Americans incited by
the Obamas, Holders, Sharptons and Jacksons of the world. This lot, and
their minions, has triggered a racial war – only one that is one-sided.
White Americans and others of non-color have been slow to react and
fight back, for fear of being branded racists and ostracized from their
social and political communities. Indeed, if white Americans and their
ilk would again act in this fashion – as they did to an extent in the
old South and elsewhere in the middle years of the 20th century, by
burning and looting stores, setting afire buildings and mugging innocent
people based on their race – then they would be branded as modern-day
versions of the Ku Klux Klan and prosecuted by Obama’s Justice
Department, among other law enforcement agencies under his direction and
control.
The now well-known and publicized volatile words of Obama and his
black comrades like Holder, Sharpton and Jackson have fanned the flames
and stoked the frightening violence in Ferguson and other cities around
the country this week. They can no longer be ignored and rationalized as
justifiable given past discrimination against blacks.
African-Americans, no more than white Americans, cannot be allowed to
explain away present racist actions as a simple reaction to past events
and conditions. And, while conservative and truly religious Christian
blacks like my esteemed friends Alan Keyes, Niger Innis, Rev. Jesse Lee
Peterson and others have been brave to speak out, whites in particular
have largely acted as cowards in confronting this growing lawless
anarchy.
That there is a political and revolutionary method to Obama and his
leftist enablers’ racist madness can be seen in the words of a
“respected” black Clemson University assistant professor who just last
Friday joined in a call for African-Americans to disrupt shopping on
what ironically has come to be known as Black Friday, the commercial
bonanza that historically occurs the day after Thanksgiving. Fox News reported
on what occurred at a shopping center in Manchester, Missouri, as
suburb of St. Louis, with regard to attempts to disrupt commerce at
Walmart and other stores.
“At the Manchester Walmart, about two dozen people chanted ‘no
justice, no peace, no racist police’ and ‘no more Black Friday’ after
officers warned protesters risked arrest if they did not move at least
50 feet from the stores entrance …
“The mostly black group of protesters chanted in the faces of the officers – most of whom were white – as shoppers looked on.
“‘We really want the world to know that it is no longer business as
usual,’ said Chenjerai Kumanyika an assistant professor at Clemson
University. He added although part of the aim in disrupting Black Friday
was to call attention to disagreement with the grand jury’s decision
and the way the case was handled, Kumanyika said it was also to
highlight other forms of injustice.
“‘Capitalism is one of many systems of oppression,’ he said as the group cleared out of the parking lot.”
This is just the latest indication of the war we are now in. If we do
not fight back against this leftist-inspired black racism, with Obama
at its helm, we risk losing the nation our Founding Fathers risked and
gave their lives to win. And, that is why I have offered to represent the victims of mob violence in Ferguson and other cities around the country free of charge.
It is time to no longer put our heads in the sand for fear of being
branded racists against African-Americans and, instead, be fearless in
waging the counter-revolution against racism of all types – racism that
has larger designs and evil motives to transform the United States into
Obama’s vision of a socialist utopia.
Media wishing to interview Larry Klayman, please contact media@wnd.com.
If
you were born in the U.S.A. but your father was born in Italy, but you
had never ever lived in Italy, would you ever refer to Italy as your
“home”?
But
that’s exactly what then U.S. Senator Barack Obama (D-Illinois) did in
August 2006 when he visited Kenya. He told the crowd: “I am so proud to
come back home!”
At approximately 8:15 p.m., on Monday, November 25th, 2014, St. Louis
County prosecuting attorney Robert McCulloch began his news conference
at a courthouse in Clayton, Mo., by expressing his sympathies for
Michael Brown’s family, noting that they lost a loved one to violence.
On August 9th, Brown had been shot dead by police officer Darren Wilson,
presumably, while using justifiable deadly-force in the line of duty as
he defended himself from a life-threatening attack by Brown, pursuant
to the latter committing a strong-arm robbery just minutes prior to his
killing.
Apparently President Obama’s unilateral decision to grant de facto
amnesty to five million illegal aliens was insufficiently outrageous. On
Tuesday, a White House official told the Washington Post
that many illegals now protected from deportation will be eligible to
receive a “wide array” of government benefits, including Social Security
and Medicare.
Apparently President Obama’s unilateral decision to grant de facto
amnesty to five million illegal aliens was insufficiently outrageous. On
Tuesday, a White House official told the Washington Post
that many illegals now protected from deportation will be eligible to
receive a “wide array” of government benefits, including Social Security
and Medicare.
The following op-ed published last week at Western Journalism about sums up the most blacked-out issue in American history >>>> Barry Obama's constitutional eligibility to serve as President of the United States.
Excerpt via Coach Dave @ WJ: The Law Of First Mention And Barack Obama
[...] In 2007, whispers began to be heard about Obama’s
citizenship and whether or not he was a natural-born citizen of the
United States. Those who merely asked the questions were laughed off of
the stage. The Alinsky tactic of ridicule was applied to anyone with
the curiosity to even ask the question. They were called birthers, and
truthers, and conspiracy theorists.
Barack Obama’s real name is Barry Soetoro. There is no denying it. There
is zero evidence that he ever “legally” changed his name to Barack
Obama. He is using a fake social security number. He has sealed all of
the records of his college days. He has never produced any “indisputable
evidence” that he was even born in this country.
There is an established historical record that Barry Soetoro was raised
as a Muslim. It is undeniable that he attended Islamic schools while
growing up in Indonesia. His past history would prevent him from
receiving security clearance into the White House. With his actions in
regards to the Middle East, he has demonstrated a great propensity to
show favoritism to the Islamic nations.
He is a socialist. I am not afraid to say it, and I am not afraid to
face the facts. His programs are socialist. His philosophy is socialist.
He does not like America. He has no loyalty to anything but himself and
his masters. His life’s biography is a mystery; and he appears to be a
man with no father, no mother, no family, and no country of residence.
He is the ultimate “man without a country”–except he has been selected
to run ours.
President Obama is a malevolent liar. The record speaks for itself. The
recent expose of the architect of Obama Care calling the voters “dumb”
is damning. But, for once, it is truthful. Americans ARE dumb…how else
can you explain the mess we are in?
Some have assumed that Obama was merely stupid and that he couldn’t make
very good decisions. But what if everything we have been told about him
is a lie? What if his life is a reality show?
Who knows the truth about this imposter in the White House? The
internet is full of documented evidence. At a time when there have
never been as many tools to snoop on Americans, are we really to believe
that those who are trained to know everything about everybody do not
know more about the situation than some guy surfing the net out in the
cornfields of Ohio?
If you find yourself at dinner this
Thanksgiving Day with family members bemoaning the murder of Michael
Brown – the 300-pound thug attorney Benjamin Crump called that “little
black boy” – ask them what Officer Darren Wilson should not have done.
Remember, you will have an advantage over them. You will have examined the evidence and read the transcript of Wilson’s grand jury testimony. They will mostly just have watched CNN or NBC or CBS.
They are the loudmouths hassling the waitress. You’re the Kung Fu
master at the end of the bar. For the sake of your sweet old mom who
hates controversy, dismember them gently.
Wilson found himself in that admittedly dangerous neighborhood by
himself because he was responding to a call from a frantic mother with a
sick infant only a few months old. Should he not have taken that call?
As Wilson drove down Canfield he saw two men, one very large with a
marijuana symbol on his socks, walking down the middle of the street
obstructing traffic. Should Wilson not have rolled down his window and said, “Why don’t you guys walk on the sidewalk?”
When the two men, Michael Brown and Dorian Johnson, ignored his
request, and the large one, Brown, answered, “F— what you have to say,”
should Wilson not have paid a little more attention to him?
When Wilson realized that Brown matched the description of the fellow
who had just robbed cigarillos from a nearby market on West Florissant
and assaulted the clerk, and that in fact he was openly carrying the
cigarillos, should Wilson, wary of profiling young black men, not have called for backup?
And while he was waiting, should Wilson not have parked his car at an angle his car to keep Brown and Johnson contained? READ MORE...
November 28, 2014 ~TPATH~
Since the Garden of Eden, the devil has done his best to corrupt man’s
existence and his relationship with God. Over the course of time, he
has not changed his tactics. Why should he when they are still as
effective as they were over 6,000 years ago?
Back
in the Garden the devil perverted the Word of God by taking the truth
and twisting it a bit. It was true - Adam and Eve did not die
immediately after they ate the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.
However, when they did, they were banned from eating the fruit of the
Tree of Life, which led to their eventual death. Consequently, they
learned about good and evil in a most unfortunate way. But why would Eve
believe the devil instead of God?
Eve
saw that the fruit was “pleasant to the eyes” which made it a physical
temptation but we frequently miss the next part of the verse that tells
us she saw it was a tree that was desirable to make one wise (Genesis
3:4-6). This represented the lure of the knowledge of the world that
the devil is able to twist and uses to challenge the veracity of God.
This temptation is not as easily defined as physical temptations. It
is a temptation of the mind that carries with it strong undertones of
peer pressure and intellectual intimidation. Fast forward to 2014 and
not much has changed since the Garden - except that now the devil has
more children to act on his behalf. And these children, like their
father, are extremely skilled at what they do. In classrooms around the
world, they use Evolution to intellectually discredit God and His Word.
In the political world, global warming is used to replace recognition
of end time prophecies dealing with climate catastrophes and
intimidation is used by calling bearers of the truth racists and
domestic terrorists.
Lying
and intellectual intimidation, however, are not the only tricks in the
devil’s bag of temptations and not the only tricks he passes along to
his children. The passage in John 8:44 not only attributes lying to the
devil, it calls him a murderer. When we recall that the man now
occupying the White House voted to have babies born alive as a result of
a botched abortion thrown into the trash, we should be asking who but a devil or his progeny would cast such a vote?
While
there has been much talk about where Obama was born and who his earthly
father might have been, one thing seems clear: he inherited from his
spiritual father the spirit of a murderer, a liar, and a pervert. In
this case “pervert” is not a reference to his sexual preference. It is a
reference to his propensity to take the truth and either totally
disregard it or twist it beyond recognition.
Just
last week we saw his brilliant perversion televised worldwide. It was
so brilliant and well executed that none of the political pundits seemed
to understand what really transpired. They commented about the many
lies he has told through the years and some even protested that he dared
to quote Scripture, but the perversion of Scripture escaped their minds
and commentaries. This is unfortunate because this perversion connects
him to his father the devil in a most astounding way.
One
of the best examples of a perversion is recorded in Matthew 4:1-10 when
Jesus was in the desert being tempted by the devil. A casual read
through seems pretty straight forward. Jesus was in a vulnerable
position and Satan tried to use it to his advantage. Jesus responded by
quoting Scripture. However, if you take the time to look up the verses
that the devil was quoting in Psalm 91:11-12, you will find that the
devil was accurately quoting the Scripture. HOWEVER, while the quote
was accurate, the interpretation was skewed. This is what a perversion
truly is: taking a truth and twisting it just a bit to make it seem
like it’s actually saying something else. Jesus experienced it in the
desert when the devil was trying to tempt him. Eve experienced it in
the Garden when the devil successfully tempted her. And we experienced
it during Mr. Obama’s recent press conference. When Barack Obama quoted
Scripture, he didn’t do it as eloquently as his father did in the
desert, since he combined a number of Scriptures and rolled them into
one. He stated: “We shall not oppress a stranger, for we know the
heart of a stranger. We were strangers once too.” The combo verse that
Obama quoted came from Deuteronomy 10:19, Leviticus 24:22, Exodus 23:9,
Malachi 3:5, and Hebrews 13:2.
Here’s
the heart of the perversion. These verses talk about treating strangers
justly - the same as you would treat law-abiding citizens. In this
case, the aliens and strangers Obama is defending are not traveling
through our land legally. Furthermore, the great majority of them were
criminals in their own countries before they came here and by virtue of
the way they entered this country, they all became criminals. Criminals
in biblical times as in present times do not deserve the protection of
law. And if we desire to understand the hearts of these strangers, as
Mr. Obama suggests, justice should be our first consideration.
Additionally, we were not all strangers once too as these interlopers
are. Again, these strangers that Obama is referring to are illegally
here. Many of us are legal immigrants or the descendants of legal
immigrants who are legally entitled to become American citizens and
benefit from the many blessings that exist in this country. To
those who fall into this legal category, they are the ones entitled to
the protection of the law, while those who do not enter legally are
entitled to prosecution under the law, which is distinctively different
than persecution.
Some
may argue that Christians should be merciful to strangers. That is
true. However, mercy best exists when it is accompanied by justice and
humility. Micah 6:8 says:
He
has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the LORD require
of you? To act justly and
to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God.
So
where is the justice in what Mr. Obama is proposing? And where is the
humility that these strangers in our land should be exhibiting? If they
were humble, wouldn’t they be repenting of their lawlessness, which in
this case would mean returning to whence they came? Perhaps I’m missing
something but demanding rights from a country that you have illegally
entered seems a bit arrogant to me. I argue that there is no justice in
the mercy Obama is ordaining by Executive Order.
There is no justice for the many Americans who will be losing their jobs to these interlopers.
There is no justice for
the college students who bumped American born students from enrollment
or from receiving grants or scholarship monies.
There is no justice for
the American taxpayer who is struggling to make ends meet but has
continued to foot the bill for the many expenses incurred as a result of
the lawlessness of these illegals interlopers.
There is no justice for the would-be legal immigrants who respect this country enough to abide by our laws.
In the case of amnesty,
the quality of mercy is strained when it imposes injustice on
law-abiding American citizens and would-be Americans.
And as for Mr. Obama:
Well if the character traits of the children of Satan are a murderous
spirit, a lying tongue, and a perversion of the Holy Scriptures, the
shoe seems to fit the man now occupying the White House. Perhaps Mr.
Obama may be living the good life now, but according to the Book of
Revelation, he will soon be joining other cowards, unbelievers, the
abominable, murderers, the sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and
all liars in the lake that burns with fire and brimstone (Rev. 21:8).
Alas, we serve a merciful God, but He is also a just God - and no
perversion of Scripture will change that, Mr. Obama. While you may
attempt to deliver this country to the gates of hell, many of us will
not be joining you there.
Vinita Hegwood is an English teacher at Duncanville High School in Duncanville, Texas.
On Nov. 7, 2014, Hegwood posted this
racist obscene tweet at “crackers” (whites) who disagree with her about
the police shooting of 300-lb. Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri:
Who the fuck made you dumb duck ass
crackers [white people] think I give a squat fuck about your opinions
about my opinions RE: #Ferguson? Kill yourselves.’
Hegwood’s violent outburst prompted a wave of reaction from enraged Twitter users calling for her suspension.
Officials of the Duncanville Independent School District (ISD) acted swiftly.
Yesterday, after meeting with Hegwood,
school district officials suspended her without pay and confirmed her
contract will be terminated following a board meeting in the next four
weeks.
The school district explained in a
statement that “Hegwood expressed an opinion on social media that is
solely her own. While everyone has the right to free speech, as a
teacher in the district, we believe the comments that are alleged to be
made by Ms Hegwood are absolutely reprehensible and we do not condone
it.”
Her Twitter account is now closed.
Hegwood, who has worked for the
Duncanville ISD for two years, has been a prolific tweeter throughout
the turmoil in Missouri following the shooting on August 9.
It has been suggested her profane tweet was a reaction to abuse she received from followers, Fox News
reported. But Lari Barager with the Duncanville ISD told CBS that
defense will not protect Hegwood from losing her job: “I can’t say it
emphatically enough. The nature of the comments are reprehensible, and
this district is about inclusion. It’s about diversity. It’s about
respect for all people.”
Hegwood’s venom actually predates
Ferguson, as evidenced by a tweet she had sent 9 months ago. Using a
different Twitter account, she bragged about playing her music “Fuck the
Police” loud as her car was tailed by the police.
And so the whirlwind, cultivated by Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Al
Sharpton, the mainstream media and the army of thugs they enabled, is
now being reaped. As the result of a St. Louis County grand jury refusing
to indict officer Darren Wilson for the shooting death of Michael
Brown, Ferguson, MO has become Ground Zero, in what irresponsible
Missouri State Sen. Maria Chappelle-Nadali referred to on MSNBC as “St. Louis’s race war.”
With Ferguson in flames and mobs running rampant, it became apparent
to everyone—except the liberals and libertarians—that the media-hyped
“militarization” of the police was not the problem. Instead, the problem
in Ferguson was, and is, a criminal element doing drugs and determined
to engage in anti-police violence. The additional problem is outside
agitation.
FrontPageMag
Grand jurors in Ferguson, Mo., refused to indict local police officer
Darren Wilson yesterday, heroically resisting pressure from President
Obama on down to lynch an innocent police officer who fought off a
violent attacker.
Those who view this sweeping assertion
of presidential authority by Obama through the prism of politics are
missing the point. This is not merely a political outrage -- it is a
historic offense against the Constitution and public liberty. More
Immigration and The American
Dream
Much of American pop music was
created by foreign born immigrants or their progeny and I considered what, in my
view, was the motivation for their creativity. It was gratitude and pride in
being allowed the privilege of living in a free country. No yokes around their
necks and the opportunity for unrestricted advancement through
merit.
Living conditions were not so
attractive that one could describe all about
America was
peaches and cream; but opportunity was there for anyone to seize by personal
effort.
Now look at today. Something is
different. Yes, conditions have vastly improved, but do we appreciate it? If we
don't...why? Opportunity and rewards still exist but do
people in general take advantage of it? The very obvious answer is
NO!
In those earlier days everyone
worked whatever hours and jobs were necessary to improve their lot. Parents had
nothing to offer their progeny so they had to earn their way ahead. Whatever
gains they made were treasured. No task was beneath them if it meant improvement
in living conditions or advancement in "society." A better life for themselves
and their family. Their fathers were often artisans (tradesmen) who earned a
meager living in their home country as bricklayers, stonemasons, or even menial
labor such as field hands. They were determined to earn a better life for
themselves. They aspired to family life...a wife and children, but they yearned
to provide an improved lifestyle over what they had known.
Today we have a self indulgent
society.We have a government that
is determined to destroy the American way of life, and we have families with no
value system at all...and we must ask ourselves why. I think it may be because
we are not first or second generation immigrants anymore. We, or our progeny,
are American born and we ACCEPT what is available without having to EARN it
anymore. It's no longer viewed as a PRIVILEGE to live here...its become a RIGHT
without cost. Everybody must share the benefits even if they are not entitled.
Wow! Where have I heard that word before?
Why is this so? Cut to the chase.
Two major elements have caused the shift in our attitude about Americanism. A
ton of details are closeted in the two elements and they are volatile and need
to be exposed, but for now the simpler identification is that parents have
abrogated their responsibility for raising their children to be patriotic and
faithful to the precepts upon which America was founded. They have allowed their
globalist agenda-minded government to assume their role as mentors and to lead
our youth, like the Pied Piper, to a fate worse than death. They are being
brainwashed to scorn
America and its
values.Parents who fit that
category, and they are a large segment in today's society, must wake up before
it's too late.
Then too we are being invaded by
people who don't want to be American, they just want what
America has to
offer. We hear the phrase 'illegal immigrant' often and although the noun does
mean a person who comes to live permanently in a foreign country, I suspect that
to legal immigrants and native born Americans immigrant means a legitimate
entrant whose desire is to be an American in the constitutional sense...and the
adjective illegal means forbidden by law. They cannot be juxtaposed in our
American lexicon.
Our government is encouraging and
abetting this activity and the only reason being that they want to further
adulterate the American way of life. Most countries have some type of
dictatorial government and their living standards and the rights of the people
don't compare with the United States of
America . They consist of two disproportionate
layers of citizenry. A very thin layer of ruling class whose standard of living
is extraordinarily palatial and mostly hidden from view, and the majority
population who exist at a most abject level of misery.
A perfect example of this is
Cuban dictator Fidel Castro who is always seen in public in army fatigues but
who lives on a secluded two mile long tropical island paradise called Caya
Piedra in absolute luxury while the population struggle for even the most basic
needs. He is only one of a long list of tyrants who control the lives of an
enormous number of poor people on this globe. It can happen in
America and
there is a very determined effort to make it so. Sticking our heads in the sand
doesn't make it go away - it actually makes our rear ends very
vulnerable.
The 2014 mid-term election result
will accomplish very little to be satisfied about. Both parties are playing
games with the citizenry. They are in league about globalization but present a
different front for their constituencies. Party politics is the current evil in
America and it
must change. It's time to wake up!
The
past six years of Obama’s reign in America have been littered with
countless unconstitutional and criminal acts on a variety of fronts, too
numerous to chronicle in any column length article.
However,
his recent Executive Action on Immigration might be the straw that
breaks the camel’s back for millions of Americans, as he attempts to
dictate law from beyond his constitutional authority and at odds with
the overwhelming will of American citizens.
People have been
scouring the Internet in search of Obama’s Executive Order on
Immigration, with no joy. They have been unable to find a copy of the
Executive Order because no such Executive Order actually exists.
Amnesty by Executive Action?
The American people were given the false impression that Barack Obama
was signing an Executive Order providing amnesty for an estimated 4
million illegal immigrants residing in the United States.
Presidential Executive Orders are designed for emergency
circumstances wherein there is no time for congressional action, the
circumstance falls under the legal authority of the Oval Office, and the
order is designed to carry out the duties of the Federal government
under the U.S. Constitution and existing U.S. laws.
In the case of Obama’s recent Executive Action, the action is not
within the legal authority of the Oval Office, it is not the result of
any emergency circumstance of the United States, and it is not designed
to carry out the sworn duties of the Federal government under the United
States Constitution or U.S. laws. In fact, it is designed to subvert
the U.S. Constitution and U.S. laws governing immigration and
naturalization.
As a result, Barack Obama did NOT issue an Executive Order. Instead, he used what is called Executive Action,
which has no force of law behind it, whatsoever. In doing so, Obama
acted under “the color of office” to openly subvert and circumvent U.S.
law.
The Alleged Legal Foundation for Obama’s Executive Action
According to the White House, Barack Obama has the legal authority to
take unilateral action on Immigration on the basis that past presidents
have done the same. This statement is also false.
The Facts
In 1961, President John F. Kennedy used Executive Action to delay the deportation of Cuban refugees seeking political asylum in the United States during the Cuban crisis. (1,000,000)
In 1975, President Gerald Ford used Executive Action during the evacuation of Vietnamese refugees with American ties at the end of the Vietnam War. (360,000)
In 1980, President Jimmy Carter used Executive Action for Cuban and Haitian refugees during the Mariel boatlift crisis. (150,000)
In 1987, President Ronald Reagan used Executive Action to shield from deportation, Nicaraguan refugees during the contra war in Nicaragua. (200,000)
In November 1989, President George H.W. Bush used Executive Action to delay the deportation of Chinese refugees during the Tiananmen Square crisis. (80,000)
In 1992-93, Presidents Bush and Clinton used Executive Action to delay the deportation of Salvadoran refugees during the Civil War in El Salvador. (200,000)
In December 1997, President Bill Clinton used Executive Action to delay the deportation of Haitian refugees during mass civil unrest in Haiti. (20-40,000)
Note: Many have falsely quoted the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act
as an example of Executive power. However, this Act signed by Reagan in
1986 was legislation passed by the Democrat controlled Congress. It was
not a unilateral Executive Action.
In each case presented above, the Executive Actions of past
presidents were within the authority of the Oval Office, did nothing to
alter, subvert or circumvent U.S. Immigration and Naturalization laws,
and were all “emergency” actions related to real refugees in real life
threatening circumstances.
In the case of Barack Obama’s recent Executive Action, none of
these conditions apply. As a result, all claims that “previous
presidents have done the same” are FALSE!
Because Congress has so far refused to act against the will of
American citizens by passing any form of amnesty for tens of millions of
illegal aliens who have been allowed to enter and remain in the United
States against U.S. laws, Barack Obama moved to fraudulently and
unilaterally grant ALL ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS in the U.S. “refugee status”
despite the fact that none of the illegal aliens involved are actually
refugees from any crisis set of circumstance.
Once Barack Obama fraudulently declared all illegal aliens in the
U.S. “refugees,” he then took illegal and unconstitutional unilateral
actions to misuse our refugee policies to alter, subvert and circumvent
the U.S. Constitution and U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Laws.
In sum, Barack Hussein Obama, acting “under the color of office,”
abused Executive powers in an overt attempt to subvert and/or
circumvent U.S. Immigration and Naturalization laws and usurp the
Constitutional authority of Congress.
The actions of Barack Hussein Obama in this Executive Action
are both illegal and unconstitutional. As they directly threaten
national sovereignty and security, the act rises to the level of an
impeachable offense, and may in fact rise to the level of treason.
How Obama Did It
In June of 2012, just ahead of the 2012 presidential election, Barack
Obama, again fraudulently acting under the color of office,
unilaterally created a policy known as The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) which took effect on August 15, 2012.
The DACA policy is the brainchild of a private “open borders” legal activism organization operating as Immigration Equality. Their About Us page states the following;
Since 1994, Immigration Equality has been proud to support and
represent lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT), and HIV-positive
immigrants seeking safety, fair treatment, and freedom. As the only LGBT
organization with a staff of immigration attorneys, Immigration
Equality impacts both the individuals we serve and the immigration
system as a whole.
In addition, the organization broadly identifies “whom” they
represent in terms of what types of circumstances they focus upon in
their effort to make every illegal alien a legal U.S. citizen via
Executive fiat.
In nearly 80 countries around the world, it is a crime to be gay. For
far too many people, it is impossible to be out and proud if you also
want to stay alive. For more than 20 years, we have been focused on
providing free legal services to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender,
and HIV-positive immigrants, including:
· Asylum seekers forced to flee to the U.S. to find safety · Binational couples and families separated by oceans · Detainees trapped in immigration jail facilities · Undocumented LGBT people living in the shadows inside the U.S.
Operating in part by taxpayer funding from the
Federal Government in the draft and implementation of Obama’s DACA
policy, Immigration Equality is directly involved with the Obama
Administration in the overt subversion and circumvention of U.S.
Immigration and Naturalization laws, now functioning under the “color of
law” via Barack Obama’s fraudulent use of his “color of office.”
The Executive Action
First and foremost, a distinction with a critical difference… Executive Orders are presumed
to have the binding force of law, if the Executive Order is within the
constitutional authority of the Executive Branch; or if the order is
under a legal purview granted the Executive Branch by way of
Congressional statute; or if the order is subsequently affirmed by
Congress within the time allowed.
An Executive Action is non-binding by its very nature. It has no presumed or other binding force of law at its foundation. (Legal Reference)
The action taken by Barack Hussein Obama last week via Executive Action is an expansion of his 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals
policy, which is in and of itself, illegal and unconstitutional as
explained above. It is therefore, an illegal act for anyone owing an
oath of allegiance to the United States to act upon or adhere to the
Executive Action. Following orders on the basis of this Executive Action
may also rise to the level of misprision of treason, or at a very minimum, a breach of oath and public trust on the part of Federal Law Enforcement Agents.
The operational extent of this policy is stated as follows by Immigration Equality.
Deferred action is a discretionary, limited immigration benefit by
DHS. It can be granted to individuals who are in removal proceedings,
who have final orders of removal, or who have never been in removal
proceedings. Individuals who have deferred action status can apply for
employment authorization and are in the U.S. under color of law.
However, there is no direct path from deferred action to lawful
permanent residence or to citizenship. And, it can be revoked at any
time.
The facts that this policy is not law and the fact that as stated
above, it provides “no direct path from deferred action to lawful
permanent residence or citizenship,” makes Obama’s claim that “it is not
amnesty” true.
Obama’s Executive Action
as it currently exists, is not amnesty, as it provides no direct path
to permanent residency or citizenship, and in fact, is not law.
However, what is does represent is an open refusal to faithfully
execute the laws of our nation, to uphold the Constitution of the United
States, to protect and defend national sovereignty and security, and it
is a direct assault upon and usurpation of Constitutional Congressional
authority.
Therefore, it is an overt act of usurping the U.S. Constitution, a
direct violation of the Presidential Oath of Office, a direct assault
on the American people and a direct threat to national sovereignty and
security. It is an “impeachable offense” to say the very least and may
very well constitute an overt act of treason. (18 U.S. Code § 2381)
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against
them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the
United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer
death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under
this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding
any office under the United States.
All members of the Obama Administration, Congress and the U.S.
Supreme Court, who are in any way complicit in these actions taken by
Barack Hussein Obama, are according to U.S. laws, guilty of misprision of treason, as co-conspirators to the act. (18 U.S. Code § 2382)
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge
of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as
soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to
some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or
justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years,
or both.
The final result of the action Barack Obama took last week on
Immigration is he illegally ordered Federal agencies and agents to stand
down on enforcing our nations’ Immigration and Naturalization laws,
without any authority to do so, or any force or color of law supporting
his order. He and his co-conspirators have ordered the Federal
government to break the law, solely on his personal decree…
Congressional Authority and Duty
Currently, members of Congress are going out of their way to avoid
their sworn duties under the U.S. Constitution. They are searching for
any way possible to avoid their duty and authority to immediately move
to the impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama and the removal of and
criminal prosecution of all co-conspirators.
Prior to the current usurpation of Congress and abuse of the Oval Office, North American Law Center
(NALC) had already called for the immediate impeachment of Barack
Hussein Obama, drafting and releasing to the public and members of
congress, a proposed set of Articles of Impeachment based upon a long string of past criminal acts within the Obama Administration.
Article II requires under Section I – that before anyone enter on
the execution of the Oval Office, he shall take the following oath or
affirmation:- “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully
execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the
best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the
United States.”
Under Article II – Section IV, the U.S. Constitution prescribes
one single legal solution for any occupant of the Oval Office upon their
commission of criminal acts – “The President, Vice President and all
civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on
impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high
crimes and misdemeanors.”
As a result, former Federal Judge and Fox News Legal analyst
Judge Andrew Napolitano called it exactly correct when he stated that “Impeachment is the only legal solution” for what Obama has done.
So, why are Tea Party stalwarts Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Rand Paul and Rep. Trey Gowdy
working so hard to find a way out of doing their constitutional duty to
impeach? Why did congressional Republicans adjourn and leave DC on
Thanksgiving recess without putting a stop to Obama’s illegal and
unconstitutional action? Two of the three are lawyers…
Because Barack Hussein Obama has so many co-conspirator in his many
acts of fraud, usurpation, abuse of office and treason against the
United States and the people, all of whom are guilty of misprision of treason
under 18 U.S. Code § 2382, it is impossible to know who might be able
to legally succeed Barack Hussein Obama to office once all evidence of
treason and misprision of treason are presented in an impeachment
investigation and trial.
In short, everyone knows he should be impeached, removed from
office and held on criminal charges after being removed from office.
However, once the process of presenting evidence of treason and
misprision of treason begins, no one knows how that process will end or
who may be left standing to succeed Obama to the Oval Office.
As a result, massive efforts are underway in congress to find any
solutions other than impeachment of the most impeachable administration
in U.S. history.
However, due to the extreme nature of Barack Obama’s actions and
their direct threat to national sovereignty and security, members of
congress cannot avoid their constitutional duty to impeach without
becoming complicit in the crimes. They too, will be guilty of misprision of treason,
should they fail to immediately move to impeachment, allowing Obama’s
actions to stand in direct violation of the law, the Constitution and
the will of American citizens.
Many Americans believe that congress can simply escape their
responsibility by refusing to act. However, congress can only refuse to
act if the American people allow it. If the American people act,
congress will be forced to act, or face the outrage of the American
people along with Barack Obama.
When the Rule of Constitutional Law fails at the highest levels
of government, the people have the right and the duty to alter or to
abolish, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such
principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem
most likely to affect their Safety and Happiness.
(All information provided herein was carefully vetted by Constitutional Attorney’s at the North American Law Center prior to release. Proposed Articles of Impeachment are available to the public HERE.)
JB Williams is a business man, a husband, a father, and a writer.
A no nonsense commentator on American politics, American history, and
American philosophy. He is published nationwide and in many countries
around the world. He is also a Founder of The United States Patriots Union and a staunch conservative actively engaged in returning the power to the right people in America. Patriots Union |·Veteran Defenders |·Archives E-Mail: JB.USPU@gmail.com
Are you willing to continue the fight for freedom for our Posterity?
As people who believe in the principles and philosophies of the United States Constitution, we number in the majority. As folks that dare to consider standing against the tyranny being perpetrated by the Obama administration, we are in the majority across this great country. But the clock is ticking. Will we continue to entertain the idea that sitting on the couch complaining as we watch the news on television is an effective strategy, or are we ready to take action, and do more than rally at Tea Party events, or occasionally write an email to our representatives? Are we ready to do more than complain? Are we willing to, as the signers of the Declaration of Independence stated in the last sentence of the document, put on the line our “Lives, Fortunes, and sacred Honor?”
Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.
The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country. - E. Vattel
JUST HOW DEVIOUS AND CORRUPT IS OBAMA AND HIS BAND OF MISCREANTS, PERVERTS AND LIARS?
Keeping Track of Obama Lies, Broken Promises
By Peter Andrew – ConservativeAmerican.org – Leading the way Right.
“President Obama is himself a broken promise. The love affair Americans had with the idea of the beautiful racial harmony we would get if we elected a half-black man to the White House has been ruined by the reality that President Obama means nothing that he says and intends to keep none of his promises.” – David Kraemer, ConservativeAmerican.org
The list below contains all of the Obama Administration mistakes, blunders, broken promises, flip flops, gaffes, lies, etc. That’s too long of a name, so we called it “the Official Obama Administration Scandals List.” This list covers Barack Obama and his pals from day one through September 4th, 2011. At that point, the list was discontinued. However, you can see information on more recent scandals on our NEW Obama Scandals List by clicking here! We present this list to you as an accurate and complete historic detail of the Legacy of Lies President Obama leaves behind for the time period starting with his youth and going until September 4th, 2011. Not responsible for any broken or out-of-date links. They worked when we posted them. Some may redirect you to the wayback machine.
You can visit all the pages of the Official Obama Administration Scandals List!
Pending an acceptable outcome of the vitally-important 2014 election—which affords the opportunity to elect a Congress that is willing to initiate impeachment proceedings against Barack Hussein Obama, and thereby stop, or even remove from office, this fraudulent usurper and his inner circle of collaborators—We the People of the United States of America affirm our allegiance to the timeless principles upon which our nation was founded, as set forth in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States, and upon the foundation of those principles, declare the causes which impel us to seek this despotic president's impeachment and removal.
We hereby allege that the history of the current President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over the American people. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world—
ARTICLE 1—Contempt for the Constitution
Mr. Obama has engaged, throughout his despotic tenure as president, in rule by edict and executive decree, bypassing Congress, and thus the will of the people, to enforce policies entirely of his own creation. Ignoring the federal government's foundation of a separation of powers, he has routinely violated duly enacted statutes of the Legislature, as well as defied the Courts, in pursuit of ultimate supremacy over the United States of America. In so doing, he has exhibited an unmistakable pattern of contempt for the U.S. Constitution, which prior to his ruinous tenure had served two centuries as the Law of the Land.
We therefore demand that this criminal, treasonous individual be removed from office without delay and held accountable for his destructive behavior, and that all his unlawful acts as president be considered of no effect or validity. We believe that the only effective way to achieve this urgent goal is to initiate impeachment.
ARTICLE 2—False pretenses
Mr. Obama has attained the office of president in a verifiably fraudulent and criminal manner, and upon a false identity and false pretenses.
We therefore demand immediate release of all currently sealed documentation of who he is; what his true history entails; what his earlier school, travel, and other records reveal about him; what his original (not photocopied) birth certificate makes clear; and all other relevant information in the public record now suppressed or intentionally falsified regarding him. We the People of the United States have a right to know such things about a man who currently serves as Commander-in-Chief of our nation's armed forces and oversees the entire Executive Branch of the U.S. government. We believe that the only effective way to force release of these records is impeachment.
ARTICLE 3—Criminal fraud
Upon taking office, Mr. Obama criminally defrauded Congress and the American people with false promises, uttered repeatedly in the public record about the nature, scope, and effect of his signature legislative achievement, "Obamacare," in a deceptive effort to gain passage of this catastrophic measure, which authorizes a sweeping federal takeover of America's healthcare industry.
We therefore demand that this healthcare travesty be immediately revoked, defunded, and declared null and void, and that this president be held accountable for intentionally misleading and defrauding the citizenry by means of this insidious scheme—a scheme that has already diminished the rightful choice of most Americans regarding their healthcare, has caused millions to lose their jobs due to its workplace requirements, and will cost our nation its material viability and vitality if allowed to go forward. We believe that the only effective way to ensure the dismantling of Obamacare is impeachment.
ARTICLE 4—Deliberate bankrupting of the U.S.
In a deliberate scheme to force the financial collapse of the United States, Mr. Obama and his collaborators have pushed the nation's "public debt"—that is, the difference between public spending and public receipts—to an unsustainable 17 TRILLION dollars, an amount exceeding our nation's Gross Domestic Product (or total value of goods and services) and more than doubling the debt's previous rate of growth. The effect is to impose an indebtedness of over $50,000 upon every man, woman, and child in the U.S., and more than $150,000 per taxpayer, numbers that indicate the U.S. is headed toward insolvency and our posterity will be forced to bear the dire consequences. The effect is even more dire when "unfunded liabilities" are factored in.
We therefore demand that the individual behind this destructive scheme assume all liability, upon his own person, for the amount the national debt has increased during his tenure, in company with all others who have collaborated with him in the Executive and Legislative Branches of the federal government in enacting this policy, listing them by name, and that the American people at large be absolved—by binding decree—of any and all liability for such wanton abuse of the public purse. We believe that the only effective way to attain such simple, reasonable justice is impeachment.
ARTICLE 5—Treasonous national security policy
By insidious design and outright treachery, Mr. Obama has dangerously weakened America's national security—through his emasculation of our military; his unilateral reduction of our missile defense system, thereby weakening American military superiority and inviting nuclear conflagration at home and abroad; his deceitful promotion and arming of radical Islamic interests in Egypt, Libya, Syria, and elsewhere; his catering, in domestic and foreign policy, to the Muslim Brotherhood, which is on record seeking the destruction of the United States; his fraudulent relations with Iran that will likely ensure this radically hostile nation succeeds in developing nuclear weapons; his continuing disregard for the vital interests of longtime American ally Israel; his unreasonable handicapping of our military's rules of engagement, dangerously favoring America's enemies; his alarming pattern of dismissing high-ranking military officers for groundless or superficial reasons; and similar anti-American policies and actions too numerous to mention.
We therefore demand that the Obama administration be forced immediately to cease and desist from its treasonous, unconstitutional, conspiratorial plot to take down America, and our allies with it, and that a sane, pro-American policy be adopted in its place for the purpose of protecting our nation from all threats to its continuance. We believe that the only effective way to enforce this urgent demand is impeachment.
ARTICLE 6—Treasonous cover-up of Benghazi
Mr. Obama has deceitfully sought to cover up his administration's involvement in a covert operation in Benghazi, Libya, that ran afoul September 11, 2012. The president's fabricated narrative of the causes and nature of the episode, which resulted in the deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans, has been shown to be a cynical attempt to divert attention from what actually happened, including reports of treasonable administration dealings with terrorist insurgents in Syria. The administration's interference with investigations by Congress into the matter, and its the muzzling of witnesses and participants, hints that only the tip of the iceberg has yet been revealed regarding Mr. Obama's contemptuous behavior and dereliction of duty in this bloodstained scandal.
We therefore demand that all witnesses who have firsthand knowledge of the truth regarding the Benghazi fiasco be permitted to come forth without threat of retaliation and give their account of any and all relevant facts—including mounting evidence of Obama administration sympathy for Islamic terrorist organizations. We believe that the only effective way to ensure such unsuppressed testimony is impeachment.
ARTICLE 7—Plot to disarm the citizenry
Mr. Obama has repeatedly attempted to take advantage of isolated acts of violence in our nation involving firearms in the hands of deranged individuals to deprive law-abiding Americans of their constitutionally-guaranteed right to keep and bear arms, in a direct assault on the Second Amendment by someone who himself poses a growing threat to the security and well-being of our nation; and he has repeatedly made known his intention to succeed with his unconstitutional goal of disarming the people despite any setbacks he may encounter in Congress. So intent is he on imposing gun control that he even engaged in a deadly gunrunning hoax known as "Fast and Furious" to incite sympathy for tightening U.S. gun laws, then invoked executive privilege to cover up his administration's criminal involvement. He and his administration have also withheld or destroyed vital physical evidence that would corroborate events at Newtown, CT, in which 20 schoolchildren and six adults were reportedly killed by a disturbed gunman with an assault rifle—an incident the president has shamelessly exploited in his push for oppressive new gun legislation.
We therefore demand that the president immediately abandon such pursuit of tyranny and seek refuge in a nation more to his liking, one that already bans, or severely restricts, gun ownership by law-abiding citizens in consequence of despotic notions of governance. We believe that the only way to hasten this outcome is impeachment.
ARTICLE 8—Undermining U.S. border security
Similarly, Mr. Obama has repeatedly sought to undermine U.S. border security, and by extension America's very independence, by pushing misnamed "immigration reform" that would in reality open wide our borders, overburden the public coffers, and grant amnesty to the many millions of unlawful occupiers who have entered the country by stealth. Unable to achieve this agenda lawfully, through Congress, he has undertaken to achieve it dictatorially, in open violation of the Constitution and statutory immigration law. Ostensibly, the president intends, by his abandonment of longstanding U.S. immigration policy, to create a permanent under-culture of dependent immigrants who have little allegiance to America's founding ideals, upon whom to stand to remain in power indefinitely—either by himself, or in the person of likeminded schemers within his party.
We therefore demand that our nation's borders be made effectively secure, that existing immigration laws be reasonably and fairly enforced, that all persons seeking citizenship play fundamentally by the same rules, no matter the petitioners' origins, and that Mr. Obama's immigration policy and initiatives be rejected by Congress as the threat they are to our nation's security and strength, with his deceptive drive for "immigration reform" relegated permanently to the backwaters of history. We believe that the only way to ensure this outcome is impeachment.
ARTICLE 9—Engaging in mass surveillance
Mr. Obama has engaged in notorious overreach regarding domestic surveillance. A certain degree of targeted domestic surveillance may be considered justified, even essential, to protect American citizens from harm if conducted with appropriate oversight and in harmony with reasonable law—but indiscriminate spying on all citizens is indefensible and constitutes the very essence of a police state.
We therefore demand that the routine eavesdropping now being conducted by the National Security Agency (NSA) be curtailed to conform with appropriate safeguards, to permit only those functions that can be constitutionally defended. We believe that the only way to leverage this outcome is impeachment.
ARTICLE 10—Abusing IRS authority
Likewise, Mr. Obama and his IRS subordinates have notoriously abused the public trust by singling out, and arbitrarily penalizing, patriotic organizations awaiting approval of tax-exempt status so they might fundraise legally. By delaying approvals and sharing confidential information with potential adversaries, for purely political reasons, the Obama administration has violated federal statutes, and unlawfully handicapped these groups in their efforts to counter Mr. Obama's tyranny.
We therefore demand substantial monetary damages for these aggrieved organizations, and expedited approval of all "Tea Party," "conservative," and "libertarian" groups in the future. More to the point, because of its unavoidably political nature, we seek abolition of the IRS itself, and its replacement by a reasonable consumption or flat tax. We believe that the only way to bring about such an outcome is impeachment.
ARTICLE 11—Subverting America's morality
Most far-reaching and adverse of all his insidious deeds, in the acknowledged biblical perspective of our Creator, is that Mr. Obama has undertaken to subvert America's moral strength and means of perpetuation by promoting measures that weaken the natural, God-ordained family, and escalate the unthinkable aborting of America's posterity. As part of this corrupt effort, he has sanctioned the unconstitutional silencing of conscientious citizens and clergy who oppose homosexuality and its growing inclusion in lawful marriage; and he has approved stipulations in his healthcare plan that would force Americans opposed to abortion, or to anything related involving abortifacients or contraceptives, to directly fund such morally-offensive practices. These immoral, destructive policies—integral to the president's sweeping plan to transform America—militate not only against the Constitution, but the foundations of Judeo-Christianity upon which America is historically premised, to which the president appears to have an aversion.
We therefore demand that biblical morality be once again allowed the place of respect it has long enjoyed at the center of our nation's culture—on its own merits, without federal interference of any kind that would violate the First Amendment. We also call for immediately ending the moral and material travesty known as "Obamacare," including any requirement that American citizens or businesses personally underwrite abortion. We believe that the best way to ensure this fortuitous outcome, and reverse these federally-enforced intrusions, is the president's impeachment.
In every stage of these and other oppressions that could be cited, we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms—but our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury and blatant lies. A fraudulent usurper whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant is unfit to be the ruler of a free people, much less their president.
We the People, therefore, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do solemnly publish and declare, that because Barack Hussein Obama has verifiably corrupted, compromised, and endangered the essential institutions of the American Republic, as well as threatened the nation's very survival, we hereby appeal to the next Congress of the United States—which will convene in January 2015—to begin impeachment proceedings against Mr. Obama, and his fellow lawbreakers and facilitators within the Executive Branch, for the purpose of removing them from office with all diligence.
For the support of this action, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine providence, We the People mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor, to save our beloved nation and preserve the rights and freedoms bequeathed us by God and protected by our revered Constitution.
These are just a few of the problems with this document. There are many other problems with this document that you can read at various web sites such as:
The MCSO Cold Case Posse (CCP) is a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. We are awarded no tax dollars and have no paid staff. We are supported by membership dues as well as donations from corporations and individuals in the county we serve.
If you would like to make a contribution to the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Cold Case Posse, please click on the "Donate" button directly below. Your donation is greatly appreciated. Remember, in most cases, your donation to CCP is deductible. Please consult with your tax professional regarding any tax related questions.
By clicking on the below "DONATE" Link, you will be leaving the MCSO Cold Case Posse website. Within a few seconds, your browser will be redirected to a secured Paypal site at which point you can safely and securely make your donation.
MCSO Cold-Case Posse P.O. Box 74374 Phoenix, Arizona 85087
Translate
THE TERRY LAKIN STORY
Barack Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” and is thus constitutionally ineligible to be the President and Commander in Chief of our military. Obama was born to a FOREIGN NATIONAL FATHER who was NEVER a U.S. Citizen nor was Obama’s father even an immigrant to the USA or even a permanent resident in the USA. For no other U.S. President in the history of the nation since the founding generation (who were exempt from the natural born Citizen clause in the U.S. Constitution via a grandfather clause in Article II Section 1) was that the case, i.e., having a foreign national father who was never a U.S. Citizen or even an immigrant to this country. Obama being seated as the putative president is an outrageous violation of Article II Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, the presidential eligibility clause. Obama was not born with sole allegiance to the USA. Sole allegiance and unity of Citizenship at birth was the goal and purpose for putting the natural born Citizen clause into Article II Section 1 of the Constitution as to who could serve as president once the founding generation has passed away. Obama (II) was born a British Subject via his foreign national father Obama (Sr.) who was a British Subject. Obama is not a “natural born Citizen of the United States” to constitutional standards since he was born with dual allegiance and citizenship. The founders and framers did not want anyone with foreign allegiance to ever get command of our military, i.e., be the president. Obama is constitutionally not eligible to be president and commander in chief of our military.
The Obama constitutional eligibility issue is not a fringe issue! South Carolina Poll Results – A poll done by Public Policy Polling (PPP) shows that almost 2/3 of GOP voters want Obama’s constitutional eligibility and true legal identity investigated. This is not a fringe issue: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=340805
CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLAR DR. HERB TITUS(Not Mark Levin)
DESCRIBES "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN"December 12, 2011 (TPATH) The honorable John Jay, the first leader of the United States Supreme Court, initiated the insertion of "Natural Born Citizen" into the Constitution for the purpose of setting a higher standard for the office of the President.
All of the verbal gymnastics being put forth by the left, as to the meaning of the term, will eventually be proven to be just what it is.
Unlawful defense of an individual and political party at the expense and detriment of this country.
When you watch this video you will begin to wonder how this country continues to allow such simple and precise language to be twisted, manipulated and convoluted.
WATCH THE VIDEO PART ONEWATCH THE VIDEO PART TWO
We have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on.
On MARCH 23, 1775, Patrick Henry spoke to the Second Virginia Convention, which was meeting in Richmond's St. John's Church due to British hostilities:
"I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery...
We have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated...We have prostrated ourselves before the throne...
Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence."
Patrick Henry continued:
"There is a just God who presides over the destines of nations...who will raise up friends to fight our battle for us.
The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave...
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God!
I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death."
Miki Booth’s book, Memoirs of a Community Organizer in Hawaii, will be released in late November, 2011. The book chronicles events and experiences over a lifetime culminating in the biggest adventure of all for the writer—an “Adventure in American Politics.” When Miki found others that shared her
Usurper In The White House-Constitutional Crisis
AMERICA IN DISTRESS
Obama Sr a Kenyan was never a US Citizen. He could not pass on US Natural Born Citizenship status to Barack Obama Jr. No matter what is on Obama's birth certificate, no matter where he was born, he can NOT satisfy Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of the Constitution.....No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of the President, neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
"Our safety, our liberty, depends upon preserving the Constitution of the United States as our fathers made it inviolate. The people of the United States are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts - not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution." -- Abraham Lincoln
"Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it." -- John Adams
The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite." -- Thomas Jefferson
"If you love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." -- Samuel Adams
THIS ARTICLE SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO ALL MEMBERS OF CONGRESS
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
It has been reported how past Hawaiian State practices with its birth certificate procedures have presented opportunities for birth certificate fraud. An example of such fraud is that of Chinese native, Sun Yat Sen, one of the founders of the Republic of China, who was born in China but was able to obtain a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth in 1904 based on his fraudulent affidavit and evidence submitted by witnesses to the Hawaiian authorities stating that he was born in Hawaii on November 24, 1870. http://www.scribd.com/doc/9830547/Sun-Yatsen-Certification-of-Live-Birth-in-Hawaii. See also the September 2000 report of the Office of Inspector General, entitled “Birth Certificate Fraud,” which provides an update on the nature and extent of birth certificate fraud, found at http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-07-99-00570.pdf. Because of critical importance of knowing for sure who the President is, the potential for birth certificate fraud, and since Obama’s original long-form birth certificate housed in the offices of the Hawaii Department of Health can be some type of certificate (even a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth) that is based on some family member’s affidavit of personal knowledge but which includes no documentary evidence of an actual birth in Hawaii, it becomes crucial to confirm whether there exists any corroborating evidence of Obama actually being born in Hawaii. Consequently, various members of the public have tried to obtain information that would adequately confirm Obama’s and the State of Hawaii’s statements that he was born in Hawaii. These concerned citizens have made requests to the State of Hawaii and to various hospitals there for such information. The State of Hawaii, Kapi’olani Medical Center, and Queens Medical Center (originally claimed by Obama’s sister to by his birth place) have publicly stated that they cannot release the needed details of Obama’s birth, including whether his deceased mother was even a maternity patient in any of those hospitals, because of Obama’s state and federal privacy rights. Not being successful, some of these concerned citizens, feeling duty bound to the Constitution and our country, have filed law suits and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) actions against Obama and others to obtain this information.
Given that Obama and/or his agents have already publicly released some information regarding his place of birth, one commentator, William, has asked me on my blog ( http://puzo1.blogspot.com/. ) whether Obama has waived his privacy rights to such birth information. At least two arguments can be advance that Obama has waived any privacy right that he might have in his birth information located in the State of Hawaii and in its hospitals. One is that he has waived his privacy rights to his alleged long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate by posting his COLB on the internet for the world to see. A problem with this argument is that the COLB does not disclose all his private information (name of hospital, doctors, etc.) and he can argue that his waiver is only as to the information contained on the COLB and no more. As a response, it can be argued that Obama waived his privacy right as to the identity of the hospital in which he was born given that he allegedly wrote a letter dated January 24, 2009 to Kapi’olani Medical Center in which he acknowledge being born there and which letter the hospital posted on its web page (suspiciously posting not a scan of an actual paper letter but only a computer-generated image created with HTML code) for the world to see. For more details, see the WND story on the letter at http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=104146. I have grave doubts whether this letter is authentic given that both Obama and U.S. Rep. Neil Abercrombie D-Hawaii, who allegedly gave the letter to the hospital and publicly read the letter during the hospital’s centennial celebration, refuse to confirm whether this letter is real.
The second argument is more powerful and convincing. Under Article II, a would-be President must be a “natural born Citizen” to be eligible for the Presidency. Hence, any candidate knows that such “natural born Citizen” status is required to hold the public Office of President. No one winning an election and wanting to fill that public office has a reasonable expectation of privacy as to where he/she was born given that job’s eligibility requirement that one must be a “natural born Citizen.” See my article on this blog entitled, Obama’s Personal Right To Privacy Cannot Trump The Right Of The People To Know Who Their President Is, at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/obamas-personal-right-to-privacy-cannot.html. Of course, that person’s obligation to prove his/her “natural born Citizen” status includes providing credible, competent, and sufficient documentary and other evidence of, among other things, place of birth. Clearly and without doubt, the public interest in knowing that the President-elect is eligible for the office he/she seeks to fill by far out weighs any privacy interest that the person may have in his/her birth documents. It is also clear that knowing who the person is who will occupy the Office of President and Commander in Chief concerns national security and the safety of the United States and the whole world. It is not reasonable to believe that such a person’s privacy interest would out weigh the People’s need to safeguard national security and for self-preservation. Simply put, it would be beyond absurdity to honestly contend that such a person has a right to shield from the same People that he/she is constitutionally duty bound to serve and protect information that he/she must provide to them to show that he/she is qualified for that singular and all-powerful public position which would vest him/her with great power to affect every aspect of the People’s lives.
But underneath the privacy rights question lurks a much more serious concern. We can see the absurdity of Obama sitting on privacy rights to conceal his long-form birth certificate from the public. It is downright despicable for our media and Congress and others to apologize for Obama and let him get away with it. They know full well that he has no such privacy rights. The birth information and documents that Obama refuses to reveal to the public surely are revealing of whether his is eligible to hold the Office of President. Why has the media not filed any legal actions against Obama, the State of Hawaii, and other parties, seeking to legally lift any privacy barriers to Obama’s birth information as it has so many times in the past filed actions against others running for public office who sought to prevent the public from learning details of some aspect of their private lives? What is a travesty of justice is that Obama was probably able to win his U.S. Senate seat because the media (Chicago Tribune) filed a legal action against rival Republican Jack Ryan in which it was successful in getting the “kinky sex” details of his divorce released to the public. Why the media in our country would believe what type of sex two consenting married adults practice is more important than making sure that the national security of our country is protected is beyond comprehension and represents the quintessence of warped priorities. I do not believe that anyone who truly cares about our country and Constitution can express enough in words the outrage that he/she feels about how cowardly our political leaders and media have acted with Obama on the question of his place of birth.
Congress has abdicated its constitutional oath and the media, the so-called fourth branch of our government, has failed to perform its journalistic duty to the People of the United States to assure them that Obama’s election to the highest and most powerful office in the land adhered to our Constitution and laws. Congress has been given a chance to correct its failings and still it refuses to perform its constitutional obligation. With the assistance of its media cronies and others, they all ridicule and suppress the efforts of those who are fighting to make sure that our Constitution has been respected in the last Presidential election and that our nation is safe with Obama currently occupying the Presidency and being the Commander in Chief of our military might.
We must then ask ourselves why Congress and the media have not pressed Obama for the necessary and relevant birth information for at least the sake of the integrity of the Presidential election process and the safety of our nation? Moreover, Obama cannot be an Article II “natural born Citizen” because under the British Nationality Act of 1948 when Obama was born in 1961 his father was a British subject/citizen and Obama himself was born a British subject/citizen. See Obama, the Putative President of the U.S., Is Currently Also a British Citizen, located at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/obama-president-of-us-is-currently-also_29.html. Like a naturalized citizen who is not eligible to be President, Obama was born with an allegiance to a foreign power and is therefore not eligible to be President and more so not eligible to be the leader of our military men and women. To allow Obama to hide his birth information and to not challenge him for not being an Article II “natural born Citizen” is nothing more than at best, politicians and those in their coterie allowing corrupt party politics, self-interest, and/or cowardice to blind their constitutional duty to protect and defend our country and Constitution, at worst, part of someone’s plot to attack and destroy the United States from within, or both. Given that any attack on the United States will most likely come from within, these latter two scenarios must be given serious consideration and ruled out only after sufficient evidence exists to so rule them out. Hence, the deliberate or reckless failing by those who are supposed to protect and defend our country and Constitution is tantamount to treason.
All members of Congress that have allowed and continue to allow the raping of our Constitution and the placing of our nation at risk to being attacked from within need to be removed from Congress, without any exceptions. As to what to do with those members of the media and others who have failed and continue to fail to do their job to adequately protect and defend our Constitutional Republic, that is a question for another day.
Mario Apuzzo, Esq. 185 Gatzmer Avenue Jamesburg, New Jersey 08831 October 18, 2009
EDUCATE YOURSELF! EVERYTHING ABOUT OBAMA FROM BIRTH THRU HIS FIRST 100 DAYS OF USURPATION
The
leader of the free world is actually a woman named Valerie Jarrett, a
longtime crony of Barack and Michelle Obama, who appears to call all of
the shots in the Oval Office.
"The Day After Tomorrow" which is notable only because the movie's producer allowed Al Gore, Jr. to use its made-up footage from the movie to convince its audience (who had not yet seen "The Day After Tomorrow" movies
like that global warming was causing the Arctic ice to melt and the
Antarctic ice shelf to begin breaking apart. Preceded or followed by
movies like "Catagory 6.5," Catagory 7," "Day of Destruction," and "10.5 Apocalypse" as
well as a myriad of nickel and dime movies that blame man for the
weather that is caused exclusively by the solar cycles of our sun that
create both global warming and cooling that Al Gore and and the eco-thieves blame on man and flatulating cows.
numerous to chronicle in any column length article.
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
