The Strange Synthesis That Is Barack Obama BY RUSS HEPLER -

The Strange Synthesis That Is Barack Obama

BY RUSS HEPLER -

Perhaps one of the most polarizing Presidents in all of American history, Barack Obama has gone out of his way to destroy as many of America’s cultural, social, and political institutions as possible. The administration that promised the American people it would be the most honest and transparent in U.S. history has instead resulted in deceit, fraud, and abuses of power that other would-be dictators envy.

People on the right saw it coming. People on the left fawned at the possibility. And, people in the center have been scratching their heads for most of Obama’s term in office. What has this man wrought on America? How can he keep pushing his radical agenda against the clear wishes of those whom he has sworn to serve? Why does he lie with a straight face and then act incredulous when he is called on the fraud?

To answer these and many other questions about our current President, it is necessary to examine the main philosophical influences on his life. I would suggest that there are three main motivating factors which explain nearly everything Barack Obama does – his Muslim religious upbringing; his early and later educational love affair with socialism; and his radical liberation theology understanding of the Christian faith as taught to him by Rev. Wright and others.

READ MORE...

How Clinton and Obama Gamed America's Financial System to Expand Their Party's PowerMichael Bargo, Jr.The real estate bubble that burst in 2008 was created to finance one single entity -- the Democratic Party.  More

THIS IS THE MESSAGE THAT ALL AMERICANS MUST UNDERSTAND...

The political-media establishment is the enemy

by LAWRENCE SELLIN, PHD November 29, 2015

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/the-political-media-establishment-is-the-enemy?f=must_reads

The 2016 election is not a contest between the Democrat and Republican ideologies, nor is it a choice among various approaches to address the nation's problems, but something far more fundamental.

It is a battle between the entrenched power of the bipartisan political-media establishment versus the rights and liberties of the American people.

It is a conflict between those who want to adhere to the Constitution and the rule of law and the party leaders and a biased media, who wish to continue the practices of political expediency and crony capitalism.

It is a decadent system the political-media elite created and continues to nurture, one that benefits a few at the expense of the many.

There are only two issues that matter for the 2016 election: the political-media establishment is hopelessly corrupt and, although we have elections, we no longer have representative government.

It is a system, not incapable of, but largely unwilling to solve pressing national issues like illegal immigration, a moribund economy or the threat from radical Islam.

It is because solutions benefitting the American people conflict with the financial or ideological interests of the oligarchy, the Democrat and Republican establishments, the media and their financiers, who every four years hire a President.

It is a system that, through benign, if not criminal neglect, made possible the two-term Presidency of Barack Hussein Obama, who, if he continues unopposed, will fundamentally transform the United States from a capitalist republic based on Judeo-Christian democratic principles into some kind of Islamo-Marxist totalitarian perversion, a permanently weakened and fragmented America.

It is now but a tiny step to Obama's "America" from that which the oligarchy has already shaped, a composite government of J. L. Talmon's "totalitarian democracy" and Sheldon S. Wolin's "managed democracy."

That is, a political system in which lawfully elected representatives rule a nation state whose citizens, although granted the right to vote, have little or no participation in the decision-making process of government; a country where citizens are politically uninterested and submissive - and where elites are eager to keep them that way.

Thomas Jefferson feared that it would only be a matter of time before the American system of government degenerated into a form of "elective despotism" (1785), now fostered by corrupt politicians, enabled by wealthy special interests and facilitated by a compliant press.

"They should look forward to a time, and that not a distant one, when a corruption in this, as in the country from which we derive our origin, will have seized the heads of government, and be spread by them through the body of the people; when they will purchase the voices of the people, and make them pay the price."

Is it not true that members of Congress seek election, not to uphold the Constitution and serve the American people, but to obtain power, and to use that power to accrue professional and financial benefits for themselves and their major supporters?

Is it not true that all the traditional means for the American people to seek the redress of grievances have now been blocked by a self-absorbed permanent political-media elite unaccountable to the American people?

Is it not true that the current tenant in the White House leads a dishonest and lawless cabal of anti-American ideologues, who engage in activities and foster policies that risk the survival of the American republic, undermine the security of its citizens and abrogate their unalienable rights?

Is it not true that when the blatant and outrageous lies of the political-media establishment are no longer sufficient to soothe the electorate into complacency, such a government must begin to curtail liberty and oppress the people in order to remain in power?

Is it not true, as Thomas Jefferson predicted that corruption has seized the heads of our present-day government in a manner similar to that which sparked the American Revolution?

Ladies and gentlemen, we are now on our own.

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. Colonel Sellin is the author of "Restoring the Republic: Arguments for a Second American Revolution ". He receives email at lawrence.sellin@gmail.com.

-- 

"[w]hat is Obamacare? And single payer? Why do we call it single payer? It's communism. If the government controls [a person's] access to health care which is what this is about, as to what you can have and to what you can't have, ... that is communism" A MUST READ!...

November 29, 2015

Is America on Its Way to Fascism?

By Eileen F. Toplansky

In his 1954 book entitled Today's Isms: Communism, Fascism, Socialism, Capitalism, Dr. William Ebenstein cogently describes the various "isms" that continue to convulse the world.
As personal liberty is eroded in this country and Americans are uninformed about the "violence and terror of totalitarian communism and fascism," a reflection of Ebenstein's ideas is very much warranted.

When countering whether fascism is a threat to democratic nations, Ebenstein maintains that "the danger in a democracy like the United States is not outright fascism ... but the insidious and unnoticed corroding of democratic habits[.]"  Consider the burgeoning growth of intolerance against dissenting ideas that permeates so many American universities.
Ebenstein maintains that "the danger of not recognizing this pre-fascist attitude is that, should it become full fledged fascism (as it well might in an economic depression or in some other disaster of the sort that periodically shakes men's faith in democracy) recognition of it as a threat may come too late for those whose earlier judgment was too lenient."  That so many people cannot see the inherent danger of a Bernie Sanders is disturbing.  Matthew Vadum has written:

Communism is a political movement whose adherents believe that markets are fundamentally unjust [.] Suffice it to say that socialists and communists all want government or the collective to be master. In ideological terms, there is no bright  line or safe harbor that neatly separates socialism from communism.
Throughout his life, Bernie Sanders has been working for socialism, the transitional stage of society before communism. He calls himself a socialist, specifically a 'democratic socialist.'
[Sanders] declared that financial inequality 'is immoral, it is bad economics, it is unsustainable.' This is tantamount to saying that the only just society is one in which everyone has the same amount of money or that anyone who has the ability to make a lot of money is an enemy of the people.
Sanders described the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, as a 'modest' step towards forcing the U.S. to 'join the rest of the industrialized world and guarantee health care to all as a right.'

But as David Horowitz asks, "[w]hat is Obamacare? And single payer? Why do we call it single payer? It's communism. If the government controls [a person's] access to health care which is what this is about, as to what you can have and to what you can't have, ... that is communism" [see 3:43 on the video].

And that's exactly what Obama and congressional Democrats did in 2010 when they brought in Obamacare. Obama accepted the wealth-redistributing socialist half-measure that is the Affordable Care Act because he knows that it is destined to collapse, at which point he is gambling the American people will demand a single-payer system, the kind of thing desired by the people who raised him, including Communist Party USA operative Frank Marshall Davis.

Dinesh D'Souza in his latest book, entitled Stealing America, asserts that "American liberalism, is not a movement of ideas at all; it is but a series of scams and cons aimed at nothing less than stealing the wealth of the American people."  And lest one think this is hyperbole, consider that "President Barack Obama's Fiscal Year 2016 Budget ... includes a number of provisions targeting retirement accounts. With the mountain of debt that the government has incurred, "Obama now wants to extract money from personal retirement accounts."
Ebenstein asserts that "freedom from fear is basic in the Western concept of democracy.  No society can be called free unless its citizens feel safe from unwarranted intrusion into their affairs by governmental authorities."  Yet the government is collecting Americans' phone records and condoning spying that targets Americans.  Ariel Dorfman experienced such spying during the Pinochet era in Chile.  Dorfman's warnings about government spying on its citizens are not to be ignored.

The fact that technology now allows eavesdroppers to collect every conversation, every intimate exchange, every secret or joke should make Americans tremble. Tremble not only because the potential for abuse is so enormous, but also because such suffocating scrutiny will inevitably corrode and corrupt free expression.

"Rational empiricism is perhaps the most important single element in the free way of life" according to Ebenstein.  Yet daily we see dogmatism, and not an application of reason, at work in this country.  George Will recounts a litany of examples where students claim "absolute certainty of knowledge [leading] to intolerant repression[.]"
The democratic process is meant to "prescribe how truth is to be ascertained, not what specific truth is going to be discovered."  But anyone who dares to debate and argue is made a pariah.  Mob rule reigns.  Anti-Semitism is on the upsurge in the bastions of higher education.  To the dogmatist, even climate science is a settled idea, and evidence to the contrary is ignored.  As Ebenstein explains, "[h]istory is full of opinions held by one age as the last truth only to be considered false and absurd by subsequent ages."
Yet, intellectual brownshirts are marching through American classrooms and preparing the next generation to accept  that the "state is the master, [while] the individual [is] the servant."  This is totalitarian doctrine in a nutshell. 
In fact, "the political liberty of a society can best be measured by the margin of unorthodoxy that is tolerated in that society ... where unorthodox opinions may be freely presented, without legal, social, or economic penalties."  Yet freedom of expression in this country is now hampered, denied, and punished.  Edward Morrissey explains that "[a]ll of this amounts to an attempt to control the political sphere by either silencing dissent or demonizing it as 'bullying,' 'bigoted,' and worse." 
Finally, Ebenstein notes that "since dogmatism robs truth of its vigor and vitality, and is more likely to destroy truth than keep it alive," it is obligatory that "truth needs to be fully, frequently and fearlessly discussed," especially since "fascist movements must make the most contradictory promises to satisfy all their adherents."
While utopian dreams promulgated by the likes of Obama and others promise everlasting happiness, "this artificial [utopian] calm builds up tremendous resources of hatred."  For "when the lid comes off, the accumulated frustrations break out into open violence."  Is this one reason for the increase in anger in communities where Obama's hope and change has resulted only in greater misery, even though the messiah promised otherwise?
In 1916, the Rev. William J.H. Boetcker, in a leaflet entitled "Lincoln on private property," wrote the following:

• You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.
• You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
• You cannot help little men by tearing down big men.
• You cannot lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer.
• You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
• You cannot establish sound security on borrowed money.
• You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.
• You cannot keep out of trouble by spending more than you earn.
• You cannot build character and courage by destroying men's initiative and independence.
• And you cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they can and should do for themselves.

Perhaps more important are the "Seven National Crimes," also attributed to Boetcker.

• I don't think.
• I don't know.
• I don't care.
• I am too busy.
• I leave well enough alone.
• I have no time to read and find out.
• I am not interested.

Americans need to tremble at the stealth totalitarian forces that are encircling the nation – and be reminded that "[t]hose willing to repress individual liberty for the sake of a strong state" create a citizenry of "docile instruments."
Eileen can be reached at middlemarch18@gmail.com.

In his 1954 book entitled Today's Isms: Communism, Fascism, Socialism, Capitalism, Dr. William Ebenstein cogently describes the various "isms" that continue to convulse the world.
As personal liberty is eroded in this country and Americans are uninformed about the "violence and terror of totalitarian communism and fascism," a reflection of Ebenstein's ideas is very much warranted.
When countering whether fascism is a threat to democratic nations, Ebenstein maintains that "the danger in a democracy like the United States is not outright fascism ... but the insidious and unnoticed corroding of democratic habits[.]"  Consider the burgeoning growth of intolerance against dissenting ideas that permeates so many American universities.
Ebenstein maintains that "the danger of not recognizing this pre-fascist attitude is that, should it become full fledged fascism (as it well might in an economic depression or in some other disaster of the sort that periodically shakes men's faith in democracy) recognition of it as a threat may come too late for those whose earlier judgment was too lenient."  That so many people cannot see the inherent danger of a Bernie Sanders is disturbing.  Matthew Vadum has written:

Communism is a political movement whose adherents believe that markets are fundamentally unjust [.] Suffice it to say that socialists and communists all want government or the collective to be master. In ideological terms, there is no bright  line or safe harbor that neatly separates socialism from communism.
Throughout his life, Bernie Sanders has been working for socialism, the transitional stage of society before communism. He calls himself a socialist, specifically a 'democratic socialist.'
[Sanders] declared that financial inequality 'is immoral, it is bad economics, it is unsustainable.' This is tantamount to saying that the only just society is one in which everyone has the same amount of money or that anyone who has the ability to make a lot of money is an enemy of the people.
Sanders described the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, as a 'modest' step towards forcing the U.S. to 'join the rest of the industrialized world and guarantee health care to all as a right.'

But as David Horowitz asks, "[w]hat is Obamacare? And single payer? Why do we call it single payer? It's communism. If the government controls [a person's] access to health care which is what this is about, as to what you can have and to what you can't have, ... that is communism" [see 3:43 on the video].

And that's exactly what Obama and congressional Democrats did in 2010 when they brought in Obamacare. Obama accepted the wealth-redistributing socialist half-measure that is the Affordable Care Act because he knows that it is destined to collapse, at which point he is gambling the American people will demand a single-payer system, the kind of thing desired by the people who raised him, including Communist Party USA operative Frank Marshall Davis.

READ MORE...

Coming to a City Near You: Islamic TerrorismLauri B. ReganParis was a wake-up call. Will America awaken or slumber into disaster? More

LATEST ISSUE OF THE GLOBE...OBAMA MUST BE IMPEACHED!...

OBAMA MUST GO! WORSE PRESIDENT EVER 

WON’T FIGHT TERRORISTS

President Barack Obama must resign or be impeached for his outrageous bungling of the ISIS terrorist crisis!

By down-playing the horrific threat the evil killers pose, Obama has put Americans and the nation itself in harm’s way, experts declare.

Obama’s incredibly “arrogant” handling of the situation peaked when — the day before 129 people were slaughtered in a series of coordinated terrorist attacks in Paris — the President announced ISIS was “contained.”

Obama Spares ISIS Oil Facilities to Save the EarthDaniel John SobieskiObama would destroy the American economy to fight the mythical threat of climate change but protected the oil wealth of the very real and very deadly threat of ISIS.  More

JUST THE FACTS...

Hillary and MisogynyBruce WalkerHillary Clinton professes to support women, but she actually supports those who treat women atrociously, from her own husband to the woman-hating "religion of peace." More

FROM 1952...THIS MESSAGE FROM RED SKELTON APPLIES EVEN MORE SO TODAY...

MUST READ...Help me believe that this covert Muslim President is not one of them but one of us. Help me believe that Barack Hussein Obama has not set out to destroy our nation, as has become incessantly apparent through all his actions; help me to believe that Obama’s abiding resolve to disavow extremist Muslims and Islam as our true and only enemy, is not a part of an unconcealed campaign, a part of his pledge, to transform the nation, presumably now maybe even into another caliphate—another Islamic State group’s de facto capital, this time in Washington instead of Syria. But‚ most of all, help me understand, please, why you and I and a great majority of mainstream Americans have done nothing about all that is wrong with the nation; and have, instead, given carte blanche to this fundamentalist Islamic President to go out and destroy our nation at will, as well he has.

Help Me, Please!
 By Obie Usategui Full Story

Help me please. Have you noticed anything that is terribly wrong with our nation of late? Do you not think that there is something eerily wrong with where we are as a nation, when [the] President of the United States, himself, chooses to outright disparage the role of Islamic terrorism in the world? Discard them as a “set-back”? Or…treat them [ISIS] as a “Junior Varsity” basketball team?

New Hampshire Ballot Access Challenges Against Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio Fail for Want of Jurisdiction

New Hampshire Ballot Access Challenges Against Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio Fail for Want of Jurisdiction

New Hampshire Ballot Access Challenges Against Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio Fail for Want of
                                                           Jurisdiction

                                                    By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
                                                       November 25, 2015

Christopher Booth of Concord, New Hampshire, Cameron Elliott of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Robert Laity of Tonawanda, New York, filed ballot access challenges in New Hampshire against presidential contenders Senator Ted Cruz and Senator Marco Rubio, arguing that neither of them is an Article II natural born citizen.  The challengers are correct.

Still, the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission refused to rule on the question of whether the senators are natural born citizens because, chairman Brad Cook said, the issues were not under the panel’s purview.
“Our precedents say we don’t’ go there,” Cook said. “Personally, would I like the U.S. Supreme Court to decide these issues so we know what is, so it doesn’t keep coming up? Absolutely. Are we the vehicle to start that discussion? No, we’re not.”
http://www.wmur.com/politics/elections-panel-allows-cruz-rubio-to-appear-on-primary-ballot/36641254
~~~~~
The Commission refused to rule, basically saying that it does not have jurisdiction over the question of whether Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio are Article II natural born citizens.  It also said that it would like the U.S. Supreme Court to rule on the issue.

On the merits, neither Ted Cruz nor Marco Rubio are natural born citizens.  Neither the original nor amended Constitution defines a natural born citizen.  The unanimous U.S. Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett (1875) informed that we have to look outside the Constitution for its meaning.  It explained that at common law the nomenclature with which the Framers were familiar when the Constitution was adopted, all children born in a country to parents who were its citizens were "natives, or natural-born citizens," and that under that same common law all the rest of the people were "aliens or foreigners," who could be naturalized if they met the requirements of naturalization Acts of Congress. Minor v. Happersett (1875).

Cruz was neither born in the country, nor was he born to two U.S. citizen parents.  He was born in Canada, presumably to a U.S. citizen mother and a non-U.S. citizen father.  Unlike Senator John McCain, who was born in Panama to two U.S. citizen parents who were there to serve the military interest of the United States, neither of Cruz's parents were in Canada for purposes of serving in the U.S. military.  He therefore does not meet the definition of a natural born citizen.  Cruz is a citizen of the United States at birth only by virtue of a naturalization Act of Congress.  He is therefore not a "natural born citizen" of the United States by virtue of the common law.  A “naturalized born” citizen of the United States is not and cannot be a “natural born” citizen of the United States.

Rubio was born in the country.  But he was not born to two U.S. citizen parents.  He was born in the United States, but to two non-U.S. citizen parents.  Hence, he also does not meet the definition of a natural born citizen.  He is a citizen of the United States at birth only by virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment and not by virtue of the common law that provides the only definition of the clause.  He needs the Fourteenth Amendment because, while born in the United States, he was not born to two U.S. citizen parents.  Rubio is a "born citizen" of the United States only by virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment.  He is therefore not a "natural born citizen" of the United States by virtue of the common law. Simply being a born citizen of the United States under the Fourteenth Amendment does not make one a natural born citizen of the United States under the common law.
 
So, neither Cruz nor Rubio are natural born citizens.  It is treason upon the Constitution and the rule of law to see our political institutions kick the can down the road under the guise of want of jurisdiction.

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
November 25, 2015
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
####

Copyright © 2015

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

All Rights Reserved

Armed militias and concealed carry: It is Lexington and Concord time

by LAWRENCE SELLIN, PHD November 24, 2015

It is now clear that the US Government, for the most part is unable and, in some cases, refuses to protect Americans from external and internal threats to our security, whether that be through unregulated immigration, an impotent ISIS policy or the disarming of law-abiding citizens.

Under the Obama Administration's leadership, elements of the radical left such as Black Lives Matter have joined forces with the Islamist-supporting groups the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and funded by Michael Bloomberg's Everytown for Gun Safety,  George Soros' Center for American Progress and the Joyce Foundation, a group that funds gun control efforts.

While the Islamist groups want to render us defenseless against jihad in America, the political left wants to make us vulnerable to government tyranny.

Sebastian and Katherine Gorka, experts on counterinsurgency and counterterrorism, noted, in a recent 20-month period, 74 adults and eight minors have been interdicted by law enforcement for connections to ISIS, including four killed on US soil. These numbers translate to a 300 percent increase in terrorist arrests in the United States compared to the average monthly arrests of al Qaeda suspects since the 9/11 attacks of 2001. FBI Director James Comey has already testified that there are up to 900 terror-related investigations going on in every state in the union.

Of all those intercepted, almost half (48 percent) were planning to leave the country and fight for Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and ISIS in the Middle East. Another 19 percent were arrested for being facilitators, the talent-spotters who weren't going to fight themselves, but who identified potential jihadi recruits and eventually provided assistance for them to be "deployed" as terrorist operatives. The majority of the remaining ISIS suspects, a full 28 percent - or almost a third of all those arrested in the United States - weren't secondary facilitators or had any intention of leaving the United States to fight for ISIS in Iraq or Syria. These people had decided that the most effective way for them to serve Allah and ISIS leader Abu Bakr would be to kill Americans on US soil.

In a recent interview with Fox News' Megyn Kelly, Sebastian Gorka warned Americans that ISIS is already among us and that we should not be complacent and expect the government to protect us.

"Don't wait for Uncle Sam to protect you. Every American has a duty and responsibility to be aware of the threat and be prepared to protect themselves," Gorka told Kelly.

Even in the nation's capital, Washington DC, which is also the nation's gun-control capital, police chief Cathy Lanier advised citizens:

"If you're in a position to try and take the gunman down, to take the gunman out, it's the best option for saving lives before police can get there"

Ironically, Lanier has approved only 48 concealed carry licenses in the past year with a nearly 80 percent rejection rate. Of 233 applications sent for review since the Washington DC Metropolitan Police Department began accepting permits on Oct. 23, 2014, 185 licenses had been denied as of November 14, 2015.

I suppose what Chief Lanier means by taking out a gunman would involve appealing to the gunman's inner sensitive self, declaring a safe space or the employment of urinary incontinence.

Thomas Paine wrote in the "Rights of Man" (1791):

"The fact, therefore, must be that the individuals, themselves, each, in his own personal and sovereign right, entered into a contract with each other to produce a government: and this is the only mode in which governments have a right to arise, and the only principle on which they have a right to exist."

That is, government is a construct of and accountable to its citizens and whenever the actions of government are contrary to their interests and well-being, citizens have the right to defy or dissolve the government.

The legal authority for a local militia and the right to bear arms is enshrined in the Second Amendment to the Constitution. Implicit in those rights is the responsibility to act when higher authorities abuse their power or fail to execute their lawful duties, in this case, national defense from all enemies, foreign or domestic.

The country has reached its Lexington and Concord moment.

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. Colonel Sellin is the author of "Restoring the Republic: Arguments for a Second American Revolution ". He receives email at lawrence.sellin@gmail.com.

Terrorism Deaths Quadruple Under Obama

The Associated Press

by CHRISS W. STREET24 Nov 2015

The worldwide number of annual terrorist deaths has more than quadrupled since President Barack Obama was inaugurated in January 2009.

Deaths from terrorism increased 80 percent last year to an all-time-record of 32,658 people killed, compared to 18,111 in 2013. The number is up about 426 percent from the 7,654 killed by terrorists in 2008 under President Bush, according to the latest report from ‘Vision of Humanity.’

READ MORE...

OBAMA IS NOT CLUELESS...IT'S THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS THAT ARE CLUELESS WITH THE HELP OF COURSE OF THE COMMIE-LEFT MEDIA...OBAMA IS THE ENEMY...HE IS ON THE SIDE OF ISIS...WAKE-UP!...

Surveys: Obama Clueless on ISIS, Americans Want War Declared

Americans are beginning to sound the call for a war on ISIS – unhappy both with President Barack Obama's response to the radical Islamic terrorists' attacks in Paris and his strategy to defeat them, new polls show. [Full Story]

Dear Left: No one is 'giving in to fear and hatred' so you can put a sock in that lecture
 By Dan Calabrese Full Story

Before we go any farther in the current discussions about ISIS and how to fight them, we need to take a quick pause and destroy a rising narrative on the left. It’s the one where they lecture you not to “give in to fear.”

Phony compassion of Western leaders putting civilian lives at risk
 By Judi McLeod Full Story

That French premier Manuel Valls is positing that some of the suspects in Friday’s Paris attacks took advantage of Europe’s migrant crisis to “slip in” unnoticed, while French President François Hollande has announced he’s bringing in some 30,000 more Syrian “refugees”, it becomes rational to ask if the main droite(right hand) knows what the main gauche (left hand) is doing.

Exposed: Obama's Love for Jihadis and Hate for Christians
 By Raymond Ibrahim Full Story

Obama recently lashed out against the idea of giving preference to Christian refugees, describing it as “shameful”: “That’s not American. That’s not who we are. We don’t have religious tests to our compassion,” loftily added the American president.

A MESSAGE IN MY EMAIL BOX TODAY...

There is real, direct evidence that the Obama regime and their allies willfully funded armed and supported the notorious terrorist group, ISIS.   Why does not Congress investigate and act on this information?  Probably, because they willingly went along with it and approved funding for the terrorists.  Obama, Hillary Clinton and the congressional leadership of both parties belong in jail, or better executed for their crimes.  They created, funded and supported the worst gang of killers since the Nazi Einsatzgruppen, who also slaughtered innocent people by the thousands in the most horrific ways.

THIS IS RICH...A MUST READ...

November 20, 2015

Grand mufti of Chappaqua excommunicates millions of ISIS Muslims

By Ed Straker

Hillary Clinton, the grand mufti of Chappaqua, New York, on Thursday excommunicated millions of Muslims who support ISIS and other radical groups, saying, "Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism." We know that ISIS has many followers in Iraq and Syria.  The Taliban has many supporters in Afghanistan.  Boko Haram has many supporters in Nigeria.  It's not just the people actually doing the fighting; these radicals need a base of support to survive as they have.  Recent polling estimated that there are between 63 and 287 million supporters of ISIS.  And 100% of them just happen to be Muslim. In order to conclude that this is not a Muslim movement, however, the tens of millions of Muslims participating in it have to be deemed non-Muslim.  Born Muslim, religiously observant, they call themselves Muslims, even in the names of their groups, but the minute they support or take up arms for...(Read Full Post)

Left-Wing Arguments for Taking Syrian "Refugees" Are Stupid
 By Tim Dunkin Full Story

The battle of the refugees continues in Washington, DC.  With 33 state governors (at the time of this writing) refusing to take in any additional refugees, Pres__ent Obama (D-ISIS) has been absolutely flipping his wig, petulantly calling his opponents names while attempting to berate the governors into reversing their decisions.  The radical Left has not been negligent to back him up, either.  The past couple of days have seen them advance a number of arguments against rejection of the refugees—ranging from the simply wrong to the outright laughable.  I’d like to address some of these arguments below.

TREASON OF COURSE...BUT THAT ASSUMES HE IS ACTUALLY AN AMERICAN CITIZEN...

Obama: Incompetence Or Treason?
 By Ray DiLorenzo Full Story

As of late, there is a constant drone of political pundits, even from CNN, asking “Why is Obama doing this?  Why is he saying that?”  Even former President Carter, the weakest president of the twentieth century, has said “Obama is inept.”  Does Obama live in his own little world?  Is he truly inept or is there much more to this man that our miserable main-stream media didn’t tell us or bothered to find out?

The media seems to be playing the “we’re confused card.”  They scratch their collective heads and wonder in amazement about what Obama says and does.  They actually look as confused as so many of us.  Is he incompetent or does he have a plan he’s not divulging?  Or, did Obama plainly announce his plan in 2008 to “fundamentally change America?”

THE AUTHOR IS CLUELESS...BE SURE TO READ THE COMMENTS...CRUZ IS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN...

Trump's VP Choice and Eligibility
 By Nelson Hultberg Full Story

Patriots of America endorse Donald Trump for President. He transcends all other candidates. But if he wins the GOP nomination, an important question will be his running mate. What if Trump picks Ted Cruz for second spot on the ticket? Conservatives need to get united on this because it’s a distinct possibility. Nominees often choose one of their strongest challengers especially if they come from a state with lots of electoral votes. Cruz is from Texas (38 electoral votes). Trump is from New York (29 electoral votes). Only California has more votes (55) than Texas and New York.

FROM JB WILLIAMS...Is there anyone in America willing to fight for what is right? Willing to uphold, defend and enforce the US Constitution? Anyone, anywhere?

Why are people worried about Hillary Clinton in 2016 when they could end her political career and throw her in prison for her crimes in a 2015 Obama impeachment trial? Have “the people” not only lost their courage to be free, but their minds too? Are “the people” morally unfit as well?

Is there anyone in America willing to fight for what is right? Willing to uphold, defend and enforce the US Constitution? Anyone, anywhere?

The answer is YES… Everyone at The North American Law Center is ready, willing and able… and so are the members of the national coalition for Impeachment.

As a matter of fact, so are at least a few House Republicans…

This is a list of the ten most likely to impeach in the House, some of whom are already working with TNALC to advance the TNALC Articles of Impeachmentagainst Obama before the clock runs out. CALL ALL OF THEM, EVERY DAY!

Rep. Louie Gohmert (Texas) 202-225-3035
Rep. Randy Weber (Texas) 202-225-2831
Rep. Bill Posey (Fla.) 202-225-3671
Rep. Ted Yoho (Fla.) 202-225-5744
Rep. Curt Clawson (Fla.) 202-225-2536
Rep. Dave Brat (Va.) 202-225-2815
Rep. Paul Gosar (Ariz.) 202-225-2315
Rep. Walter Jones (N.C.) 202-225-3415
Rep. Thomas Massie (Ky.) 202-225-3465
Rep. Brian Babin (Texas) 202-225-1555

Who is this man that is called the ‘President of the United States’?

Tuesday, November 17, 2015 6:03

WHO IS THIS MAN WHO IS CALLED ‘THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES?’   

Mike Gallagher is the 8th most recognized talk radio personality in the country, and is heard by over 2.25 million listeners weekly.  He compiled and wrote the following essay entitled, “Obama:  It was You.”

  
President Obama:

This is why you didn’t go to France to show solidarity against the Muslim terrorists:

● It was you who spoke these words at an Islamic dinner -  “I am one of you.” 
● It was you who on ABC News referenced -”My Muslim faith.”
● It was you who gave $100 million in US taxpayer funds to re-build foreign mosques.
● It was you who wrote that in the event of a conflict -  “I will stand with the Muslims.”
● It was you who assured the Egyptian Foreign Minister that -  “I am a Muslim.”
● It was you who bowed in submission before the Saudi King.
● It was you who sat for 20 years in a Liberation Theology Church condemning Christianity and professing Marxism.
● It was you who exempted Muslims from penalties under Obamacare that the rest of us have to pay.
● It was you who purposefully omitted – “endowed by our Creator ” – from your recitation of The Declaration Of Independence.
● It was you who mocked the Bible and Jesus Christ’s Sermon On The Mount while repeatedly referring to the ‘HOLY’ Qur’an.
● It was you who traveled the Islamic world denigrating the United States Of America.
● It was you who instantly threw the support of your administration behind the building of the Ground Zero Victory mosque overlooking the hallowed crater of the World Trade Center.
● It was you who refused to attend the National Prayer Breakfast, but hastened to host an Islamic prayer breakfast at the White House.
● It was you who ordered Georgetown Univ. and Notre Dame to shroud all vestiges of Jesus Christ BEFORE you would agree to go there to speak but, in contrast, you have NEVER requested that the mosques you have visited to adjust their decor.
● It was you who appointed anti-Christian fanatics to your Czar Corps.
● It was you who appointed rabid Islamists to Homeland Security.
● It was you who said that NASA’s “foremost mission” was an outreach to Muslim communities.
● It was you who, as an Illinois ‘Senator’, was the ONLY individual who would speak in favor of infanticide.
● It was you who were the first ‘president’ not to give a Christmas Greeting from the White House, and went so far as to hang photos of Chairman Mao on the WH tree.
● It was you who curtailed the military tribunals of all Islamic terrorists.
● It was you who refused to condemn the Ft. Hood killer as an Islamic terrorist.
● It is you who has refused to speak-out concerning the horrific executions of women throughout the Muslim culture, but yet, have submitted Arizona to the UN for investigation of hypothetical human-rights abuses.
● It was you who, when queried in India, refused to acknowledge the true extent of radical global Jihadists, and instead profusely praised Islam in a country that is 82% Hindu and the victim of numerous Islamic terrorists assaults.
● It was you who funneled $900 Million in US taxpayer dollars to Hamas.
● It was you who ordered the USPS to honor the MUSLIM holiday with a new commemorative stamp.
● It was you who directed our UK Embassy to conduct outreach to help “empower” the British Muslim community.
● It was you who funded mandatory Arabic language and culture studies in Grammar schools across our country.
● It is you who follows the Muslim custom of not wearing any form of jewelry during Ramadan.
● It is you who departs for Hawaii over the Christmas season so as to avoid past criticism for NOT participating in seasonal WH religious events.
● It was you who was uncharacteristically quick to join the chorus of the Muslim Brotherhood to depose Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak, formerly America’s strongest ally in North Africa; but, remain muted in your non-response to the Brotherhood led slaughter of Egyptian Christians.
● It was you who appointed your chief adviser, Valerie Jarrett, an Iranian, who is a member of the Muslim Sisterhood, an off-shoot of the Muslim Brotherhood.
● It was you who said this country is not a Christian nation.

Mike Gallagher
 

AND TO THE ABOVE, WE ADD THE FOLLOWING ……… 

From:  Al Cuppett, former aid to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, White House

 

To this (above) I add:

 

It is you whose long form birth certificate, a complete fraud, brought to the surface by Mr. Trump, which says your father was born in Kenya, yet Kenya was not Kenya until 1963.  You were born on 4 Aug 1961. 

Kenya was the British East African Protectorate until 1963.  Therefore, no valid birth certificate issued in 1961 would have said “Kenya.”  The certificate supposedly produced in Hawaii was a complete fabrication.  I, sir, possess an image of your real birth certificate which shows you were born in the “Coast Hospital,” Mombassa, British East Africa, on 4 July 1961. 

Moreover, your long form bogus birth certificate reads that your father was Afro-American, whenthat term was not used until after 1963. 

Furthermore, you addressed a Jakarta crowd in November 2010 (I saw you on a live TV feed) fluently in the Bahasa-Indonesian language.  You, having lived in that Muslim country for at least 10 years, cannot pronounce the Hawaiian name “Kapiolani” correctly, but you claimed to have lived there at least eight or ten years. 

Moreover, I am an established linguist who lived in Hawaii 38 months, to include about twelve more years outside the contiguous 48 States, and I know how to say Princess Kapiolani’s name perfectly.  

 

You, sir, are an imposter!  No less than an illegal alien! 

 

Al Cuppett

former aid to the Joint Chiefs of Staff

White House

 

 NESARA- Restore America – Galactic News