Friday, May 25, 2012

MUST WATCH....CORSI SAYS OBAMA IS DAMAGED GOODS...REAL FATHER TO BE IDENTIFIED VERY SOON...TIME RUNNING OUT FOR KENYA BOY...

2 comments:

  1. It was Hillary's camp that started the first legal cases against Obama's eligibility two weeks after the 2008 DNC convention. Hillary knew Obama was ineligible. That's why, as the beltway-insider, in early 2008 she yanked him into an intentionally uncomfortable 6-person Senate committee to dig through McCain's eligibility. Initially Hillary probably planned to select Obama as her VP choice and surge to a clear victory with a stunning ticket; however, when Obama's own campaign for the WH overtook Mrs. Clinton's, thermo-nuclear war probably began between Dean, Soros, and the Clintons. Two weeks before the election, even Wolf on CNN said "If Obama is found ineligible, can Hilary win on a 2-week run?" The heat was on all the way to the end.

    Reid and Pelosi were reluctant on Obama as the Dem candidate and knew joining on the Obama bandwagon could end in prison like Colson got after Watergate. That's why Pelosi distanced herself as best she could by not certifying, at least for Hawaii, that Obama was Constitutionally eligible. She knew he wasn't.

    Yes Bush and Cheney most likely knew Obama was ineligible, so did Governor Lingle, so did Howard Dean, so did Aunt Bea and Andy Griffith. Everyone had to bend for two reasons: too many secrets, and to avoid national and international race and religious riots.

    For crying out loud, Howard Dean created the largest super majority in a half century and then just a few days after the 2008 election resigns as DNC chair. Why? Answer: Separation. Space. Distance. From what? Ending up like those tangled up in Watergate. Even Blago got his foot tangled in the 2008 grab-bag net.

    The bottom-line: Hawaii cannot produce the original piece of microfilm that has the Nordyke twins' full birth certs and Obama's connected to it. Obama's never existed. Everyone knows this to be true.

    That's why in 2008 the Hawaii Democratic Party Chair Brian Schatz wouldn't certify Obama as Constitutionally eligible as the Hawaii Dem Party did for Gore in 2000 and for Kerry in 2004. Like many others, to create some legal separation and distance from what was becoming a sticky problem, Brian only cited the DNC Convention guidelines rather than the Constitution regarding Obama's eligibility to run on Hawaii's ballot.

    In addition, new legitimate evidence indicates Obama's father is very likely Frank Marshall Davis, not Obama Sr. Where Obama’s mother gave birth to her son is still unclear, but Obama is the splitting image of Frank Davis, and bares no resemblance to Obama Sr. See 'Dreams of My Real Father' video.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Is anyone surprised in Hawaii gov's response?

    Former 2008 Hawaii Dem Party Chair Brian Schatz (elected in 2010 to LtGov for Hawaii) signed an official campaign document omitting the statement Obama was Constitutionally qualified to be on Hawaii's ballot. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=207197

    If the documents listed in this article are valid, Brian Schatz is waltzing scot-free regarding his signature and wording on this 27 August 2008 memo noted in the article. Someone needs to call Brian out publicly and nationally for signing this form and the wording he knew was in it. Now that he apparently provided a cover-up favor to the DNC which guaranteed he'd get Lt. Governor in Hawaii, Mr. Schatz needs to come clean on why he approved and authorized this release. Where has the ethical conscience and compass of our government gone? Forget what the media calls the birth issue, this has to do with why Brian validated for our state the national democratic presidential candidate while "clearly omitting" the authentication that the candidate was Constitutionally qualified. In stark contrast, two predecessors from Brian's party, Brikwood Galuteria and Alfred Lardizabul, did the right thing by clearly certifying John Kerry in 2004 and Al Gore in 2000 as Constitutionally qualified candidates. If we went back further in time, we'd probably find Brian's actions as Democratic Party Chair here are in clear contrast to far more than just documentation of the last few presidential elections. Brian most likely is not to fault in everything related to this. Many hands across our nation appear to have been deep in the cookie jar. The democratic party was fed a bad deal with what is most likely one of the biggest frauds in American history. Good people should have stopped it. Nothing excuses Brian Schatz, or any other elected or appointed leader, from actions of this weight and consequence.

    Our country has gone down a road where our children look up and wonder if anyone in leadership has integrity. Few leaders have touched an honest approach to the shadowy skullduggery surrounding the 2008 election...and the world is just suppose to be okay with it.

    Teenagers and young adults are in tune with what is going on and watching to see how we make decisions and lead. We can't blame them for not being engaged if we can't make them believe that "right" is worth championing for.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.