The Left clings to Obama's Hawaiian newspaper birth announcements as if it were the Shroud of Turin.
A couple of local lines in an area newspaper going back to 1961 neither proves nor disproves anything. The sympathetic media purposely over exaggerates the importance of these announcements, by holding their mere existence as proof positive Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961. They also insult with Alinskiesque smugness, the intelligence of those who doubt, using the flawed logic of "as if Obama's parents were doing this for presidential election purposes 48 years in advance."
I dunno were they? What proof says they were or weren't?
Obama sealed his records as his first offical act, these were the loose thread records George Soros couldn't access to scrub for him in the preceding years as they readied candidate Obama for his ascendency. However who would be so naive to think all Obama records were sanitized? Some records were benign or provided support to the "story" and were left as is. The birth announcements were records team Obama wanted people to find because they provided that shred of evidence that slays doubt. And in the court of public opinion that shred has been overplayed by the media into, proof beyond all reasonable doubt.
These birth announcements for all we know could even have been forged and then planted, but I doubt that as well, because their nominal value does nothing to harm Obama. Besides the more files are tampered with, the chances increase somebody clumsily screws up and leaves behind a hair fiber, or their cellphone number or a janitor walks in during mid break-in. Why buy trouble unnecessarily? That's why I think the birth announcements are real, yet meaningless.
Grandmother Dunham, or Stanley Ann, had no idea Obama would become president some day. What they did know, there were government programs available for American citizens. Welfare comes to mind. A lot of 18 year old single mothers were on welfare roles during the 60's. I'm not sure the year when welfare started, if it was 1961 or not, who cares, the point is there were plenty of entitlement freebies available for Obama's hippie mother and her child. Hawaii has always been a state where maximizing one's monthly government hand out is the main topic of conversation at the lua. Grandma Dunham worked in a bank as an officer and later was it's president. She was a Commie and an Alinskite she knew about grants, and give aways, and she wanted to help her side by sucking off the US as much as possible.
Later on when Barry switched to Indonesian citizenship, before returning to Hawaii at age 10, his status was further reviewed by the Dunhams to see what was most advantageous for him. Indonesian Barry or American Barry. College tuition assistance for foreign students had to be part of Grandma Dunham's forte as well, having had a few discussions with Kenyan student Obama Sr. At that point in his life, I think Indonesian Barry won out. This would also explain why Barry didn't fill out his selective service documents by age 18. "F'that I'm Indonesian."
Here's my main argument for saying the birth announcements are probably real, but never the less worthless. Money talks. For a fee, you can get anything printed in a newspaper. The announcements were not an official proof document, so an ad salesman would have taken Dunham's money if Dunham announced her daughter birthed a zebra. Actually she did, but that isn't the point.
Grandma Dunham didn't have a Hawaiian birth certificate for baby Obama, if she did no annoucement ad would have been necessary, the hospital most likely would have placed the announcement complimentary. Funny no Honolulu hospital is claiming Barry the 44th president as being their work, and if he did have a Hawaiian B/C, Barry in 2011 would be, at this point, wearing it on his forehead just to piss everybody off.
Dunham's planting of the birth ad on August 8,1961 four days after the claimed birthdate, was the first act of larceny, (perhaps this inspired young Obama to be all be could criminally be as be grew into hoodlumhood )to scam the system. " Oh I can't find his b/c but here's his birth announcements from the newspapers when he was born." "Sure Barry can be in little league, Mrs. Dunham, we ask everybody for their b/c, but since he's black, and we know about those fatherless situations, we'll just say everything is O.K." When Barry needed a SSN he got one of those too, actually it looks like he got somewhere near 150 of them, even a Connecticut based number he's using to this day, for himself, Grandma Dunham was a loan officer, she had access to the SSN's of thousands of people, and when she could access the data base in the 80's attorney Barry could find a use for them in his Chicago real estate law practice. Grannie was just a phone call away.
This brings me to the birth certificate issue itself. A self fulfilling prophecy is the angle being played on that one. "Those extremist birthers wouldn't believe Obama was born in Hawaii even if he provides his vault copy." Hey what about the COLB? Didn't you say THAT was his b/c, what happened to that being proofed by Fact Check but you're correct about your self fulfilling prophecy obots. The long form birth certificate really doesn't matter. Why? Because on the photo shopped COLB, Barry listed Barack Sr as his father. In his book, Barry wrote it down-" my dad's a kenyan." Natural Born Citizenship requires both parents be US citizens at the time of their infant's birth in order to pass on such status. Barry Sr wasn't a US citizen and that sinks the usurper's boat as he squats in the white house. There are other issues as well, why further muddy the waters by going into them, the criminal justice system can do all of that, for our purposes the one citizen parent disqualifier issue is enough by itself.
In summary the birth announcements aren't a legal document. They are extraneous pieces of paper that tell nothing. Obama's b/c if ever produced would be just as much a hindrance as a help to him, because he's stuck with a bad cover story. African Barry ( sr.) was never a US citizen, that's it that's all. Born a Brit, Not Legit.
++++++++++++
I confess, two years ago, my recollection of all that is written in the constitution had faded into near oblivion. In my profession, I had little need to consult it, as a matter of fact, not since 8th grade civics glass had I studied it. I was typical. We've all allowed dust to collect on our knowledge of the constitution. Alas, that was B.O. Before Obama.
Gawd, I find it scandalous, D.O. During Obama, the level of constitutional unfamiliarity that exists, not only with the current edition of elected officials, but those who want to replace them. Campaigners, such as Donald Trump, sadly come to mind.
I've said here, "Trump may be acting uninformed to trap Obama..." and " His advisers will get him up to speed blah blah blah...." Knowledge is power, and in this instance, being armed with the knowledge on what constitutes a natural born citizen is crucial to the well being of the Republic. Donald if you are listening, you need to step up your game,pronto.
On January 6, 2011 when Boehner made Congress read the constitution aloud, and later we listen to our representatives misconstrue it's most elementary sections no matter the application.
Does anyone agree with me, that as part of the qualifications to hold public office, any public office, a proven working knowledge of the constitution might be a nice thing to have, is that asking too much? Dear God in Heaven, save us from ourselves.
Steve
Saturday, April 2, 2011
JERRY CORSI INTERVIEW...MARCH 31...STATING UNEQUIVOCALLY THAT OBAMA WAS BORN IN EITHER KENYA OR INDONESIA...
About 10-11 minutes into the interview with Peter Boyles, Jerry Corsi states unequivocally that Barack Obama was not born in Hawaii . Dr. Corsi believes that the two most likely birth locations are Kenya and Indonesia :
If this link does not work, go to:
and select the March 31, 2011 6am audio file.
OBAMA IS GOING DOWN VERY SOON!...
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/04/final-report-obamas-birth-announcements.html
A comment from CDR Kerchner (Ret) on this new field research report from Hawaii:
This is a very good report. This confirms what I had deduced using tools from years of being a hobby genealogist when I filed my lawsuit against Obama & Congress in January 2009. Here is my recitation of that deduced narrative to explain Obama's fraudulent nativity story and the two newspaper birth announcement to Bill Cunningham on his radio show in August 2009 broadcast out of Cincinnati OH.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmZpwcRf3FQ
Again this is excellent field work in Hawaii and if anyone doubts that Obama was only falsely registered (probably by Grandma Dunham) as physically born in Hawaii and not actually born there (which it is very obvious to anyone investigating all the reports about Obama that he was not really born there) this report puts the last nail in the Obot's spin and talking points coffin.
Obama Ineligible!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50610336/Obama-Ineligible-14-Mar-2011-Washington-Times-National-Weekly-edition-pg-5
Numerous Accounts from Sources in Africa that Obama was Born in Kenya:
http://www.scribd.com/collections/2441535/African-Official-Govenment-Records-News-Accounts
The Three Enablers in Washington DC of the Cone of Silence about this:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/23299370/Obama-s-Lack-of-Constitutional-Eligibility-The-3-Enablers-20091130-Issue-Wash-Times-Natl-Wkly-pg-9
A Catalog of Evidence - Concerned Americans Have Good Reason to Doubt that Putative President Obama Was Born in Hawaii | by Atty Mario Apuzzo
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/catalog-of-evidence-concerned-americans.html
CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
CDR USNR and P.E. Retired
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
###
Bill O'Reilly is no journalist...He not only hasn't investigated Obama's usurpation of the presidency...he has blatantly LIED to the American people!...He should be run out of town. What a pompous ass! What a FRAUD!...
As a final statement to Bill O’Reilly, Chris Matthews and the remaining ignorant slew of media hacks, we would like to say this:
Your failure to investigate these facts has undermined your profession and made you look pathetically wanton as journalists. If you would have taken just two more steps in your shallow observations, just one more level down into the actual truth, you have come to the same facts about Obama’s natal history as the internet community has. Instead, you chose to glance at the drive-by message and believe what some deceitful political animal told you about the matter. Now, Obama has made you look like a fool.
Your failure to investigate these facts has undermined your profession and made you look pathetically wanton as journalists. If you would have taken just two more steps in your shallow observations, just one more level down into the actual truth, you have come to the same facts about Obama’s natal history as the internet community has. Instead, you chose to glance at the drive-by message and believe what some deceitful political animal told you about the matter. Now, Obama has made you look like a fool.
BREAKING: "...that is a fact and that is the only reason NOT to disclose it. Because, if the original medical record supported his current identity, he would be stupid to keep it hidden. It would only support him in that case.”
FINAL REPORT: Obama's Birth Announcements Fail To Indicate "Natural Born" Status
A new investigation of Obama’s birth announcements appearing in Hawaii’s two primary newspapers in August, 1961 shows, conclusively, they were the result of a registration record taken by the municipal health authority, not a medically verified “Live" birth documented as occurring at a Hawaiian hospital, per an officially defined "vital event" by the U.S. Department of Health, National Vital Statistics Division protocols.
By Penbrook Johannson
Editor of the Daily Pen
In August, 1961, two announcements allegedly showing a “native” birth for Barack Obama were published in Hawaii’s two primary newspapers, the Sunday Advertiser and the Honolulu Star. For more than three years since Obama engaged his unvetted candidacy for the presidency, many of his supporters have lauded these blurbish announcements as the "holy grail" of proof that he was born in the state of Hawaii.
However, a detailed investigation of the history and procedures used by Hawaii’s municipal health department, and its relationship with the newspapers, shows that not only was it a matter of official policy that Obama’s birth would have been announced in the paper regardless of where he was born, the information used to publish the announcements is not even confirmed through any eye-witness medical authority or hospital in the state.
Also, in 1961, the two newspapers shared the same address and facility which means they received only one copy of the same vital records information from the Department of Health. Therefore, the format and content of information used in public announcements were published identically by both papers, including any mistakes, omissions, order or context, and no investigation was carried out by the editors to determine if the information provided by the DOH was actually accurate. The two newspapers have long since collaborated into one organization.
By Penbrook Johannson
Editor of the Daily Pen
In August, 1961, two announcements allegedly showing a “native” birth for Barack Obama were published in Hawaii’s two primary newspapers, the Sunday Advertiser and the Honolulu Star. For more than three years since Obama engaged his unvetted candidacy for the presidency, many of his supporters have lauded these blurbish announcements as the "holy grail" of proof that he was born in the state of Hawaii.
However, a detailed investigation of the history and procedures used by Hawaii’s municipal health department, and its relationship with the newspapers, shows that not only was it a matter of official policy that Obama’s birth would have been announced in the paper regardless of where he was born, the information used to publish the announcements is not even confirmed through any eye-witness medical authority or hospital in the state.
Also, in 1961, the two newspapers shared the same address and facility which means they received only one copy of the same vital records information from the Department of Health. Therefore, the format and content of information used in public announcements were published identically by both papers, including any mistakes, omissions, order or context, and no investigation was carried out by the editors to determine if the information provided by the DOH was actually accurate. The two newspapers have long since collaborated into one organization.
Now, however, collaborative information from the archive of the U.S. Department of Health’s 1961 Report on Vital Statistics of the U.S – Volume 1: Natality, and Hawaii’s Administrative rules governing the creation of vital records finally reveals the truth about how these announcements were published and why they are mistakenly used by pundits to promote a misguided message about Obama.
The Daily Pen’s, Dan Crosby, engaged a two month long research project on location in Hawaii, to, once and for all, close the door on questions about the facts and bring the long-due invalidation of the authority of these fallow Hawaiian birth announcements in quaint newspapers to support Obama's eligibility to be president.
Recall, for more than two years, major media personalities, such as Bill O’reilly, Chris Matthews and recently fired, Keith Olbermann have enjoyed poking fun with the announcements essentially saying to their viewers that the very presence of these announcements means one of only two exclusive options: 1. They are a legitimate and accurate indication of Obama’s geographic birth in Hawaii, or 2. They are the result of some crazy 50-year-long conspiracy concocted by members of Obama’s family and newspaper editors at the time in order to enable Obama to use the announcements some time later as primary evidence that he was born in Hawaii in the event he might run for president some day.
In his investigation, Crosby found confirmed and easily accessible evidence that neither of these choices apply to Obama’s records. In fact, the explanation is far less sensational and simple that it reveals that Mr. Obama (Soetoro) simply benefitted from a commonly used practice in the state of Hawaii applied for thousands of births which were registered there, but which did not occur there.
“The birth announcements were printed from unconfirmed information provided to the Newspapers by the Department of Health without the DOH or newspaper editors confirming the actual location of the birth with any hospital in Hawaii,” says Crosby in a phone call from Oahu, “I found thousands of birth registration records of children born outside of Hawaii who have their announcements published in these two newspapers by cross referencing the announcements with the U.S. Department of Health Vital Records Report for Hawaii.”
Recall that Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17.8 allows the state Health Department to register the foreign birth of any child as a native Hawaiian birth if the parents of that child can be proven to the satisfaction and criteria of the Director of the Department of Health only, they were residence of Hawaii within one year of the birth, regardless of the location of the birth. This law then mandates that the vital records registrar must register the birth with the vital records office in coordination with an official, original Hawaiian birth record.
“They (newspaper editors) don’t confirm “native” birth status,” continued Crosby, “The newspaper doesn’t care if the birth occurred in the local hospital. They don’t even print that. They merely published information provided to them directly and exclusively from the Department of Health in 1961, which means that any birth meeting the criteria of this law can be registered, and therefore published in a newspaper announcement.”
“The birth location is mistakenly implied by people because it appears in this newspaper. I also found several birth records in Japan for birth's registered in Hawaii.” A review of all the birth announcements in Hawaii in 1961 reveals other evidence suggesting a disconnect between the Department of Health and Hawaii’s hospitals.
First of all, as shown by Crosby, all the announcements show the parents as married and living at the same address.
“This is not merely a majority of the announcements, this is actually all of them. Every single one! Approximately 16,000 in all!” Crosby said.
He continued, “This is a significant indication that the newspapers actually do not investigate the information provided by the DOH (Department of Health). If they did, they would have seen that there are more than 1000 births recorded in Hawaii in 1961 in which the parents were not married and/or only the mother is recorded as the parent, yet the papers still publish Mr. and Mrs. ‘Whoever’ in the announcement because that is the information registered, not medically verified.”
If the DOH doesn’t include accurate information about the parents for birth announcements, in all cases, what makes people conclude a native birth even though the DOH also omits accurate information about the location of the birth, as well? Crosby also discovered that the announcements are in a tale-tell order which exposes a shocking fact about Obama’s birth announcements.
“Did anyone notice the announcements are not in any alphabetic order, or in order of birthdate? This is because, in 1961, birth registration numbers were issued based on the location of the local Vital Records office in which the registration was recorded. The hospital does not assign these numbers, the DOH does. It appears that Obama’s birth was registered in an office not used by any of the birth registrations offices who received birth certification from either Kapi-olani Medical Center, or Queens Medical Center which use two local offices near those facilities,” said Crosby.
He continued, “It appears Obama’s birth was registered with the satellite office near his grandparent’s home some distance from the offices nearest to and most used by the hospitals. This particular office was commonly used by indigenous people of Hawaii wanting to record births of children outside of the city. This is why the U.S. Department of Health created the Certificate of Live Birth template in 1959 with a check box indicating whether or not the child was born in the city limits and if the residence of the mother was a farm or not. It appears Obama’s birth at least did not occur in the city of Honolulu and, at most, did not even occur in the state of Hawaii.”
In 1956, the National Vital Statistics Division of the U.S. Department of Health issued a revised template version of the “Certificate of Live Birth” form to be used by state municipalities to record and medically verify births. Since Hawaii had not yet become a state, these revisions to the template would not be used in Hawaii until 1959. Therefore, birth records created after 1959 were subject to demographic clarifications and metrics prescribed by the federal authority of the U.S. Department of Health, not the state of Hawaii.
“This also explains why Obama’s birth announcements appear in the succession of announcements where and when they do. His alleged “Certification of Live Birth” is not approved by any federal authority as an official source of demographic data or medical verification of his birth. It is merely a record of birth registration. Therefore, the order of printing of announcements in the local papers comes directly from the list which is ordered based on the birth registration office location, not the chronological or alphabetical order of the medically verified birth.”
Crosby’s says the difference between “medically verified” and “registration” are significant. He interviewed former Vital Records Adminstration, Martin Hesch in order to gain understanding of the different procedures and authorities used to create vital records and public announcements in a medical verification process as opposed to merely registering a vital event with a municipal office.
“I think people simply want to believe a simple equation to this issue,” said Hesch, when asked why he thought so many people ignorantly believe what they are told about Obama’s records.
“That is why they think that a birth announcement in a local paper is somehow an automatic indication of a local birth. Unfortunately, they wrongly accept a locally appearing birth announcement as an indication of medically confirmed ‘local birth’ and that just simply is not the way it is in most cases in Hawaii in early part of its history. The media also wants Barack Obama’s natal circumstances and documentation to fit the traditional record model because it is too disturbing to them to think that they were so easily deceived… but we also now know they do not fit this model.”
Hesch went on to explain that there two primary authorities to consider when understanding vital records administration. First, you have the medical verification of a vital event, like a birth or death, and you have the administrative process which documents, records and files them.
“Birth events and deaths are unique because they require medical verification in the form of official original documentation attested by a medical authority, and, most importantly, the possession of that original documentation is maintained by the local authority,” says Hesch.
“However, an administrative process such as that used in birth registrations (not medical verifications), marriages, divorces or amendments to vital records are presided over by legislative rule, not medical standards. This means that they are not exclusive to some originating medical authority. That is not to say that a judge in a divorce case would not require a medical record in making legal decisions, it just means that the standards used to document administrative processes are different than those used to document a medically verifiable vital event in the U.S.”
Hesch explained this is why it is possible to publish a birth announcement for a non-native birth. The announcements in the newspapers are the result of the registration records held by the administrative authority, not the records created by the medical authority.
“The birth announcement is automatically triggered by the creation of the registration through administrative process, when the municipal record is provided to the newspaper, not the creation of a medical verification record by a medical doctor or hospital,” he said.
“The birth can actually occur anywhere and if the announcement does not disclose the location, there is no way to know from just the public announcement whether the vital event is a local occurrence or not.”
Hesch’s explanation brings clarity to Obama’s birth announcements. Conclusively, Obama’s birth was registered in the state of Hawaii, but the announcements were not an indication that it was medically verified as occurring there.
“So, let me get this straight. People who think that Obama's birth announcements mean that he was born in Hawaii actually believe that the newspaper editors of the 1960’s received thousands of different notices from thousands of different doctors from multiple hospitals and villages throughout Hawaii and then they organized them in some highly coordinated manner for publication in non-computerized publishing system?” asked Hesch, incredulously.
"That is utterly ridiculous," he continued, “that is why the DOH pools this information and provided it for public announcements and why the newspapers accepted the information from the DOH without verifying the facts. The verification process would have been staggering and so time intensive for the newspaper deadlines.”
“If people would turn off the T.V. and just investigate this stuff for five minutes, they would feel stupid when they realize how simple and unimpressive the reality is,” he said.
In fact, the evidence shows that the original medical verification, in the form of what would be a U.S. Certificate of Live Birth signed by an attending physician and attested by a hospital administrator, simply does not exist in a form or content which would promote Obama’s “natural born status”.
Hesch agreed that there is probably information in the original medical birth record which undermines Obama’s identity as a politician and that is the reason why Obama is refusing to disclose it.
“Oh, sure, he is hiding something,” he said, “that is a fact and that is the only reason NOT to disclose it. Because, if the original medical record supported his current identity, he would be stupid to keep it hidden. It would only support him in that case.”
When asked his opinion about Obama’s case, Hesch said that is a certainty in his mind that Obama’s birth documentation was subjected to administrative processes or amendments and that his medically verified natal records show information that the local vital records authority is able to protect under law under the guise of identity protection.
“Of course, it’s ridiculous,” said Hesch, “the Secret Service is not required here. This is natal information which occurred 50 years ago, not a public appearance where the president is under any threat. The only reason to hide the original record is to protect something Obama doesn’t want people to know about him and how that information adversely impacts his ability to be president. It’s plain and simple to me.”
In the medical verification process, a registered professional of a federal board must document the circumstances and metrics of a birth. However, the administrative process used to the document the event for municipal purposes is not bound by medical requirements to accurately express those same circumstances because the vital records data is applied under different authoritative functions. Census reports, vital records reports and demographic data serve a different purpose than health report data. Hesch explained that the reasons for this level of administrative complexity comes from Hawaii’s historically plural culture where you have indigenous, native Oceanic, Asian and, of course, American peoples mixing in the population. Since Hawaii is unique in this and that it was a remote, detached territory prior to becoming a part of the U.S., it was necessary to “customize” much of their vital records processes in order to include all those who would be eligible for U.S. citizenry after the island nation became a state. This meant that including non-native births was necessary because the islands of Hawaii were so permeable to migration.
Therefore, it has now been confirmed by authorities in Hawaii and abroad that Obama’s birth announcements appeared in two local Hawaiian newspapers without the birth having been medically verified as occurring in Hawaii. The announcements are automatically triggered from information provided by the Department of Health, not the hospital. Therefore, since we already know that Hawaii's Health Department registered foreign births, the announcements would include births for these registrations as well, along with local birth registrations.
As a final statement to Bill O’reilly, Chris Matthews and the remaining ignorant slew of media hacks, we would like to say this:
Your failure to investigate these facts has undermined your profession and made you look pathetically wanton as journalists. If you would have taken just two more steps in your shallow observations, just one more level down into the actual truth, you have come to the same facts about Obama’s natal history as the internet community has. Instead, you chose to glance at the drive-by message and believe what some deceitful political animal told you about the matter. Now, Obama has made you look like a fool.
Libya Was A Set Up
I think this warrants staying at the top of the blog for a couple of days.
Steve
++++++++++++++++++++
Written 3/31/11
Interesting what you can learn watching C Span. I allude to Congressman Dennis Kucinich's 3/31/11 floor speech. What follows is not a verbatim transcript, for that you may refer to the video link which is Kucinich himself.
Allow me to lay out a Tom Clancy like time line, which Kucinich stated based on sources such as the Congressional Research Service.
11/2/10- Great Britain and France sign a mutual defense treaty. Contained in the treaty are provisions for a series of joint exercises called Southern Mistrial. One such exercise named Southern Storm was planned to take place between 3/21/11 through 3/25/11. The purpose of the exercise was to stage a conventional air attack against a dictatorial ruler of the fictitious nation of South Land. Authorization for this air attack was to be based on a UN resolution.
2/11 The National Front For The Salvation of Libya- N.F.F.S.L commences demonstrations against Libyan Dictator Muammar Qadaffi.
Affiliated opposition leader, Col Califa Hipta, commander of NFFSL's opposition army known as the LNA ( Libyan National Army), having ties to the CIA due to a failed coup attempt against Qadaffi going back to the early 80's, has been living in Virginia for the past 20 years, without any visible means of support, but within the shadows of CIA headquarters in Langley,Virginia..
On or about 3/12/11 LNA Commander Col Hipta, flies from Virginia and re surfaces in Libya.
3/20/11 UN Resolution 1973 authorizing a “No Fly” zone is passed by the UN Security Council. Forces of the United States military are ordered by Barack Obama , to join Britain and France in commencing Operation Odyssey Dawn air strikes against Libya. Fictional exercise Southern Storm originally scheduled to begin 3/21/11 against “South Land” is canceled and substituted by actual operations, re tagged with new names- Odyssey Dawn and Libya, 3/20/11 one day ahead of schedule.
3/28/11 Barack Obama, without consulting congress, after launching his attack absent any overt provocation by Libya against the US, erroneously cites the War Powers Act. On national TV Obama justifies his act to the American people as an international moral obligation. What is now spun by Obama and the media as the Obama Doctrine's “Responsibility to Protect.”
3/31/11 Command hand off takes place- 6 days beyond exercise Southern Storm's end date.
This is an extreme amount of coincidental events. Orchestrated Events would be more accurate. The joint exercises concept called Southern Mistrial/Southern Storm preceded any protests in Tunisia, Egypt, or Libya by nearly three months. The duration of the ficticious exercise was to be 4 days. The duration of the US' “active” involvement prior to command hand off was intended to be days also, the actual hand off (delayed?) 3/31/11. A period of 12 days.
The military exercises scheduled 5 months beforehand, found the forces serendipitously on station ready to commence air strikes, on the same day the UN resolution is approved. Also these exercises were first conceived 11/2/10, Election Day in the U.S. An election which handed Barack Obama a stunning setback, effectively making him a lame duck president for the next two years.
What is the motive, behind staging a revolt in a third world nation, only to ride to the rescue at the last moment? A Messiah complex? Another term in 2012 ? Manipulating the domestic oil market, by destabilizing the OPEC region after declaring an offshore drilling moratorium ? An act causing economic inflationary pressure on an already strained American economy, effectively redistributing wealth by eroding savings,residential and commercial values of the non poverty income sectors?
Who affiliated with the Obama regime would stand to directly benefit, armed with a prior knowledge of an oil market spike? Multi-Billionaire George Soros, a convicted insider information trader? Barack Obama via his mentor George Soros? Was France and Britain originally told for their active participation of 4 days ( 3/21-3/25/11 the exercise dates) both countries could have special rights to Libyan Oil? France Italy and Britain were to date major importers/producers of Libyan oil.
For the sake of political popularity, has Obama reneged on the scope of France and Britain's involvement? Are these two countries, now involved in the conspiracy, on the hook to remain behind while Obama skips out?
The Arab League and UN Resolution 1973 were betrayed by Obama, by mis representing the “No Fly “ zone as a limited scope of action as originally portrayed, switching to that of active war participant providing tank busting, artillery concentration airstrikes and decapitation missions against Qadaffi, while openly allied with the LNA. Who is protecting the civilian non beligerients loyal to Qadaffi from being terrorized by the LNA? Does the flawed Obama Doctrine's Responsibility To Protect only apply in one direction?
We have effectively interjected ourselves into an Obama ordered/CIA fomented civil war. The Arab League has used this Obama betrayal as their excuse to back away from their original commitment of support.
Kucinich lays out most of this information in his 3/31/11 House floor speech. Here's another link to CSPAN which has the video. Go to the 1 hour 4 minute mark where he cites his sources.
Even if only half of the foregoing is true, if an Impeachable Offense hasn't been committed one never will be.
Link To CSpan Kucinich Video Although Kucinich reserves an hour to deliver his floor speech, it actually lasts under 40 minutes. It begins at the 35 minute mark and ends at about the 1 hr 10 minute mark. The last ten minutes Kucinich lays out his source information.
Steve
Steve
++++++++++++++++++++
Written 3/31/11
Interesting what you can learn watching C Span. I allude to Congressman Dennis Kucinich's 3/31/11 floor speech. What follows is not a verbatim transcript, for that you may refer to the video link which is Kucinich himself.
Allow me to lay out a Tom Clancy like time line, which Kucinich stated based on sources such as the Congressional Research Service.
11/2/10- Great Britain and France sign a mutual defense treaty. Contained in the treaty are provisions for a series of joint exercises called Southern Mistrial. One such exercise named Southern Storm was planned to take place between 3/21/11 through 3/25/11. The purpose of the exercise was to stage a conventional air attack against a dictatorial ruler of the fictitious nation of South Land. Authorization for this air attack was to be based on a UN resolution.
2/11 The National Front For The Salvation of Libya- N.F.F.S.L commences demonstrations against Libyan Dictator Muammar Qadaffi.
Affiliated opposition leader, Col Califa Hipta, commander of NFFSL's opposition army known as the LNA ( Libyan National Army), having ties to the CIA due to a failed coup attempt against Qadaffi going back to the early 80's, has been living in Virginia for the past 20 years, without any visible means of support, but within the shadows of CIA headquarters in Langley,Virginia..
On or about 3/12/11 LNA Commander Col Hipta, flies from Virginia and re surfaces in Libya.
3/20/11 UN Resolution 1973 authorizing a “No Fly” zone is passed by the UN Security Council. Forces of the United States military are ordered by Barack Obama , to join Britain and France in commencing Operation Odyssey Dawn air strikes against Libya. Fictional exercise Southern Storm originally scheduled to begin 3/21/11 against “South Land” is canceled and substituted by actual operations, re tagged with new names- Odyssey Dawn and Libya, 3/20/11 one day ahead of schedule.
3/28/11 Barack Obama, without consulting congress, after launching his attack absent any overt provocation by Libya against the US, erroneously cites the War Powers Act. On national TV Obama justifies his act to the American people as an international moral obligation. What is now spun by Obama and the media as the Obama Doctrine's “Responsibility to Protect.”
3/31/11 Command hand off takes place- 6 days beyond exercise Southern Storm's end date.
This is an extreme amount of coincidental events. Orchestrated Events would be more accurate. The joint exercises concept called Southern Mistrial/Southern Storm preceded any protests in Tunisia, Egypt, or Libya by nearly three months. The duration of the ficticious exercise was to be 4 days. The duration of the US' “active” involvement prior to command hand off was intended to be days also, the actual hand off (delayed?) 3/31/11. A period of 12 days.
The military exercises scheduled 5 months beforehand, found the forces serendipitously on station ready to commence air strikes, on the same day the UN resolution is approved. Also these exercises were first conceived 11/2/10, Election Day in the U.S. An election which handed Barack Obama a stunning setback, effectively making him a lame duck president for the next two years.
What is the motive, behind staging a revolt in a third world nation, only to ride to the rescue at the last moment? A Messiah complex? Another term in 2012 ? Manipulating the domestic oil market, by destabilizing the OPEC region after declaring an offshore drilling moratorium ? An act causing economic inflationary pressure on an already strained American economy, effectively redistributing wealth by eroding savings,residential and commercial values of the non poverty income sectors?
Who affiliated with the Obama regime would stand to directly benefit, armed with a prior knowledge of an oil market spike? Multi-Billionaire George Soros, a convicted insider information trader? Barack Obama via his mentor George Soros? Was France and Britain originally told for their active participation of 4 days ( 3/21-3/25/11 the exercise dates) both countries could have special rights to Libyan Oil? France Italy and Britain were to date major importers/producers of Libyan oil.
For the sake of political popularity, has Obama reneged on the scope of France and Britain's involvement? Are these two countries, now involved in the conspiracy, on the hook to remain behind while Obama skips out?
The Arab League and UN Resolution 1973 were betrayed by Obama, by mis representing the “No Fly “ zone as a limited scope of action as originally portrayed, switching to that of active war participant providing tank busting, artillery concentration airstrikes and decapitation missions against Qadaffi, while openly allied with the LNA. Who is protecting the civilian non beligerients loyal to Qadaffi from being terrorized by the LNA? Does the flawed Obama Doctrine's Responsibility To Protect only apply in one direction?
We have effectively interjected ourselves into an Obama ordered/CIA fomented civil war. The Arab League has used this Obama betrayal as their excuse to back away from their original commitment of support.
Kucinich lays out most of this information in his 3/31/11 House floor speech. Here's another link to CSPAN which has the video. Go to the 1 hour 4 minute mark where he cites his sources.
Even if only half of the foregoing is true, if an Impeachable Offense hasn't been committed one never will be.
Link To CSpan Kucinich Video Although Kucinich reserves an hour to deliver his floor speech, it actually lasts under 40 minutes. It begins at the 35 minute mark and ends at about the 1 hr 10 minute mark. The last ten minutes Kucinich lays out his source information.
Steve
©2011 drkate
The treasonous, impeachable language for the illegal Obama administration’s ‘action’ in Libya is this statement:
Continue reading ‘Barbarism of Buffoons’
usurper
…Libya was thoroughly debated and authorized by the international community…Clinton, Gates, Obama, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff know they are violating the Constitution of the United States and the War Powers Act of 1973, but they don’t care. They don’t know who they are fighting, who they are supporting, and if this was a ‘humanitarian mission’ the United States would have rescued many countries–even those that don’t have oil or water. Either can be used as a weapon of or reason for war.
Continue reading ‘Barbarism of Buffoons’
Glenn Beck On Donald Trump's Hospital-Generated Birth Certificate: "Worse Than Obama's" Forged Short-Form Certification of Live Birth
Video: How people can still watch these charlatans at Fox News I will never understand. Let me get this straight. Obama's campaign posted an image of a forged short-form COLB, on the internet, which list...
Friday, April 1, 2011
MEDIA MATTERS WEIGHS IN WITH THEIR USUAL LIES...RED INDIACTES OUR COMMENTS...
Can’t Wait For O’Reilly And Beck To Denounce Trump’s Birtherism
March 30, 2011 by Eric Boehlert (CERTIFIED OBOT)
I’m sure it will be just a matter of time now before Bill O’Reilly and Glenn Beck take to the Fox News airwaves to ridicule Donald Trump, who’s been out making easy headlines peddling the debunked birther conspiracy theory.
I’m sure O’Reilly and Beck will take aim at Trump, even though the rest of Fox News is cheering the misguided billionaire on, because, as Media Matters has noted, both Fox hosts are on the record condemning the birth certificate talk.
During the summer of 2009 when Lou Dobbs was doing what Trump is doing now (albeit while anchoring a CNN news show), O’Reilly dismissed the birther talk [emphasis added]:
Note to birthers: When Glenn Beck tells you your conspiracy has holes in it, it really is time to pack things up and go home. IS THAT RIGHT?... WE'LL SEE IDIOT!
I’m sure O’Reilly and Beck will take aim at Trump, even though the rest of Fox News is cheering the misguided billionaire on, because, as Media Matters has noted, both Fox hosts are on the record condemning the birth certificate talk.
During the summer of 2009 when Lou Dobbs was doing what Trump is doing now (albeit while anchoring a CNN news show), O’Reilly dismissed the birther talk [emphasis added]:
"That theory (?) has been around for a while. The Factor investigated, found out it's bogus. LIE! But Mr. Dobbs is still engaged.Beck has been even more pronounced in his condemnations:
...
Again, we found out that President Obama was born in Hawaii. LIE! We were sent the documents. LIE!And what are you gonna do? I don't know why it's still around. HOW STUPID CAN YOU BE?
Everybody says, "why is Barack Obama not just producing the birth certificate?" Ok, first of all, he did. LIE! And you're never going to get, you're never going to get a conspiracy theory to stop. IT'S NOT A CONSPIRACY THEORY BECK!.You're never.And:
Do you really think that that's the most pressing issue today, YES! that that's the one, that's the one that's gonna bring this guy down. Really? WHY WOULDN'T IT? IT'S CALLED ELECTION FRAUD! That one -- The birther issue. It's the biggest waste of time I have ever, ever seen. REALLY? HOW STUPID ARE YOU?And:
And these people, no matter who they are, it could be a Republican, it could be George Bush. It doesn't matter. Lindsey Graham, I don't care who it is. These people must not excuse birthers. AND WHY IS THAT BECK? AFRAID TO LOSE YOUR JOB?So yeah, there’s no way O’Reilly and Beck will turn a blind eye to the latest birther insurgence. Right?
Note to birthers: When Glenn Beck tells you your conspiracy has holes in it, it really is time to pack things up and go home. IS THAT RIGHT?... WE'LL SEE IDIOT!
Outrage: Freddie and Fannie Execs Pocketed $35 Million in Taxpayer Money Thanks to Democrats
Top executives at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were paid more than $35 million in the past two years while the two bailed-out mortgage finance giants were receiving $153 billion in support from taxpayers.
The huge payouts came to light in a new report published on Thursday by the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s Office of Inspector General.
“Although the Enterprises [Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac] have lost billions of dollars and continue to depend upon federal support to remain in business,” the reported states, “their senior executives continue to receive multi-million dollar salaries.” READ MORE...
NOTE- "SAVE AMERICA, STOP VOTING DEMOCRAT!"
The movement to impeach Barack Obama for his crimes and misdemeanors is moving forward, gaining followers from all political persuasions. Americans are fed up with the way our president spends his time picking NCAA brackets while gas prices skyrocket, the national debt multiplies, and unemployment numbers won’t budge. More average Americans are taking action by telling their friends, neighbors, and political leaders impeachment is the solution for our national ills. The Craig (Colorado) Daily Press on Friday printed a model example of citizen activism:
To the editor:President Barack Obama should be impeached. There are many reasons for this statement.Here are some:• He refuses to protect our southern border from the millions of illegal immigrants swarming across, including drug dealers, pimps, human traffickers, kidnappers, thieves, murderers, and even Islamic terrorists. That is called treason, and the U.S. Constitution says it is grounds for impeachment.• His Attorney General Eric Holder has sued the State of Arizona for lawfully protecting its own borders because the federal government has failed to do so. To add insult to injury, the president’s Secretary of State has reported Arizona’s actions to the United Nations as a human rights abuse.• He has, with Obama Care, illegally demanded that we private citizens purchase a product we do not want. Obama Care also requires the states pay for part of the program. Judge Andrew Napolitano says this method of paying for Obama Care is clearly unconstitutional because it amounts to “commandeering” the state legislatures for federal purposes, which the Supreme Court has already ruled as unconstitutional.• He has stolen the money of investors in private companies, like General Motors, by nationalizing those industries and using the assets to pay off his biggest supporters: the unions. That’s called theft, which is a high crime, and the Constitution says it is grounds for impeachment.Please see www.impeachobamacampaign.com for useful information.I am contacting Rep. Scott Tipton, and senators Mark Udall and Michael Bennett to protest. I am urging them to begin an inquiry for impeachment immediately.I hope you will protest with me.Why should we sit back and do nothing? Then we become guilty by default.
Rosemary Potter
It’s not only conservatives or Republicans who are waking up. The Topeka (Kansas) Capital-Journal ran a letter to the editor from Robert Rodriguez, who writes: “This president has done nothing but spend money ever since he got in office. It has to stop, even if it means impeachment for him. I voted for him, and now I’m sorry I did.” You can read the whole, brief letter here.
The letter is an example of grassroots activism. Here’s what you can do:
- Read our articles of impeachment – and remember they are only a partial list of impeachable offenses;
- Sign the petition to impeach Barack Obama;
- Contact your Congressmen – one Representative and two U.S. Senators – respectfully telling them you believe it is time to initiative impeachment hearings against the president;
- Call your local talk show and say it is time to impeach Barack Obama;
- Write a letter to the editor, or an op-ed for your local newspaper;
- Include the web address www.ImpeachObamaCampaign.com, so your readers can get vital information and take action themselves;
- Sign up for our daily newsletter and forward our e-mails to your friends and neighbors;
- Make a donation to keep our educational and activist campaign moving forward and reaching more Americans; and
- Send us copies of your letters, op-eds, flyers, or talk show appearances so we can show the country the American people do not side with Barack Obama’s massive tax-and-spend schemes.
A recent poll showed 60 percent of Tea Party members and half of all Republicans support impeaching Barack Obama. Now we see Democrats and left-wingers turning on their own president and old political hands like Hillary Clinton getting out of the administration while the getting’s good. We are getting through, and the opportunity is now. But the 2010 elections show us nothing happens unless the grassroots rise up and demand it – and keep on demanding it until Washington follows through. Washington insiders would be perfectly content to let Obama wriggle out of his crimes for their own political advantage. They need to see a citizens uprising before they will do the right thing, and you can be a leader in the effort. The nation will be thankful if we succeed and better because we try. Let’s get to work.
Donald Trump Gets Fox News Segment: 'Monday Mornings With Trump' (VIDEO)
A spat with Bill O'Reilly isn't enough to keep The Donald off Fox News. In fact, Donald Trump is getting a branded segment on the network.
The network revealed Thursday plans to launch a "Monday Mornings with Trump" segment on its morning show, "Fox & Friends."
"Bold, brash and never bashful, The Donald now makes his voice loud and clear every Monday on Fox," a network promo says.
As Mediaite's Frances Martel notes, while Trump is merely making a weekly guest appearance and is not becoming a Fox News contributor, "it is surprising to see a potential presidential candidate assume a media role so close to the election."
See the network's promo below, via Mediaite:
WorldNet Daily: Yes, It’s Time to Impeach Obama
March 31st, 2011 Joe Farah, WorldNetDailyNever before in the history of the United States has an occupant of the White House displayed less concern for the Constitution and the rule of law than Barack Obama.
It’s about time somebody said it: It’s time to impeach Obama.
Both Obama and his vice president stated explicitly and emphatically while serving in the U.S. Senate that the president did not have authority to take the nation into armed conflict without the express will of the U.S. Congress or unless the nation was under attack or faced imminent attack.
Sen. Joe Biden said a president who did so should be impeached.
I don’t often agree with Obama and Biden, but they were right then. And it’s time for them to be accountable to the same rule of law they saw so clearly in 2006 and 2007.
Watch Biden for yourself, if you think I exaggerate or misrepresent his point of view.
This nation is in crisis – economic, moral, political, security.
We need leadership that is not going to resort to the old “wag the dog” trick – getting our military forces involved in fatuous foreign conflicts that have nothing to do with national security and national interests, but everything to do with turning the public’s attention away from their own shortcomings and misguided domestic policies….
Read more.
A MUST READ...
How to Restore the Republic »
“A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT FRAUD AND TREASON” by Jedi Pauly & Theresa Cao (Apr. 1, 2011) — Greetings, readers of The Post & Email news. I bring you a report from the front in...April 1 2011 / No comment / Read More »
TRY SWALLOWING THIS WITH YOUR MORNING COFFEE...WHATEVER YOU THINK...MORE REASON TO FIGURE OUT WHO IS OCCUPYING THE WHITE HOUSE!!!!!!!!
The Creation of an Usurper: A Crash Course
by Don Nicoloff
In light of the ever-present confusion presiding over dialectical arguments concerning the origins of the current White House occupant and the resultant political coup currently transpiring in Washington, D.C., I offer an abbreviated summary – supported by several years of research.All of my research on “Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.” (BHO) is contained in my series of articles titled “The Three Stooges go to Washington,” posted on my web site, published in The Idaho Observer, and appears on thousands of independent and alphabet-agency websites, totally debunks any claims of U.S. citizenship and constitutional eligibility to serve as president of the United States. BHO was likely born of the seed of Michael Rockefeller and DNA extracted from the sarcophagus of Cleopatra, former two-time Queen of Egypt. There is overwhelming evidence that the technologies to create such a creature existed in Austria as far back as 1926, and was accomplished by 1952. Rockefeller’s faked disappearance in 1961, the alleged year that BHO was born, itself, a sequence of implausible events and cover ups, was designed to prevent anyone from ever learning the truth about available technologies and how those technologies were being used.
The Nazis, the Soviets and others, on behalf of the Illuminati, worked together to accomplish their goal: the creation of a New World Order, founded on a hybrid personality programmed to do their bidding. The above referenced articles specifically reveal faked photographs and video productions, and the trail to how BHO was created. My conclusions are born out of the previously undisclosed facts about Rockefeller’s ‘disappearance’ and the ever-present involvement of the Rockefeller-created “Dunham” clan , Obama’s supposed family– all Rockefeller agents.
The following are my deductions and conclusions, both before and after my research:
- BHO was not born in Hawaii. The ‘documentation’, ‘photos’, and biographies presented for public consumption have all been fabricated.
- BHO was not born anywhere in the continental U.S.
- BHO was not born in Kenya. The ‘documentation’, ‘photos’, and biographies have all been fabricated and do not hold up to scrutiny, nor to logical or methodical forensic examination.
- BHO was not born to an American mother and a Kenyan father. “Stanley Ann Dunham” was not an American and “Barack Hussein Obama, Sr.” did not attend the University of Hawaii at Manoa, nor Harvard University.
- The “Dunham’s,” alleged ancestors of BHO, were not born in Kansas or anywhere else on American soil. The “Dunham” name was borrowed from the husband of Emma Bernice (Bishop) Dunham, a Hawaiian relative and royal-family heiress who married an American ship captain, John Dunham, who had dealings in the Port of Chicago. Bernice’s uncle, Charles Reed Bishop, founded the Bank of Hawaii and trained Madelyn Dunham (aka Magdalena Maduna) in the intricacies of escrow accounting and mortgage lending. Charles Reed Bishop was likely a Rockefeller agent.
- BHO’s alleged “Dunham” ancestors were Soviet agents (spies) working with the CIA/Mossad and were brought into the U.S. via a phony “rescue of WWII refugees from a fictitious Italian concentration camp” and taken to Fremantle, Australia by passenger ship. Their surnames were “Maduna” and were also aliases. Their numbers on the ship’s passenger list were “0436, 0437, and 0438.” The list was found by researching the serial number, “YA-438,” (i.e. “Yugoslavia-438”) found on one of three pornographic photos of “Stanley Ann Dunham” (aka “Sofiya Maduna”). “Stanley Armour Dunham’” (aka “Mr. Al from Chicago and Lebanon”) was listed as “Friderick Maduna.”
- Fremantle is located on the Indonesian side of Australia, which gave the Dunhams the opportunity to set up future operations in Papua, New Guinea (the future location of Michael Rockefeller).
- Michael Rockefeller’s ‘disappearance’ and subsequent ‘rescue operation’ in late-November, 1961 was a staged media event, as analyzed in the above-mentioned article. Subsequent media productions and biographical accounts in books, magazines, TV shows and movies still dispute each other’s accounts, further adding to the fraudulent ruse orchestrated by Michael’s father, former NY governor and Vice-President Nelson Rockefeller.
- BHO was not ‘adopted’ by a “Lolo Soetoro” nor anyone else. The “Soetoro family photo”– the only one– was also faked.
- BHO’s appearance permitted him to pass as a Moluccan (from Mulaka), and he would have been raised as such.
- Claims that the “Soetoro” family existed and lived in Jakarta are false (i.e. the Hawaii/Kenya dialectical argument).
- BHO likely spent his early years on the island of Bali, Indonesia. (Recall the Bali nightclub bombing, 2004.)
- BHO’s actual birth records are hidden in Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. The 2004 Indonesian tsunami was an artificial event orchestrated to blackmail officials into complying with his request to hide his birth records. The earthquake that spawned the tsunami that killed 146,000 occurred one day after a child sacrifice that occurred in Maryland on December 25, 2004, the 110th anniversary of the death of “Charles Rolla Payne,” (another alias for a Rockefeller agent) and “Madelyn Dunham’s” alleged father and BHO’s alleged great-grandfather. The infant sacrificed, “Renee L. Abena Obama,” was BHO’s and lived 56 days. All of the numerology of these events symbolizes the number “11,” an Illuminati magical number symbolizing “the end of all things.”
- BHO’s claims to have been ‘schooled’ in Jakarta are false. Documents and photos are all fabricated, and no one recalls ever seeing or meeting him or anyone else in the “Soetoro” clan.
- BHO’s claims to have been ‘schooled’ at The Punahou School, Occidental College, Columbia University, and Harvard University Law School are also false. No one recalls him having been at any of those schools, and any ‘records’ that may exist will have been fabricated.
- BHO’s biographical claims, whether authored by him or William Ayers, have been substantially disputed and debunked in the series of articles “The Three Stooges go to Washington, Parts 3-7B.”
- The name, “Barack Hussein Obama” is a word puzzle. “Obama” is derived from two Moluccan words, “O,” which is a vocative, and “Bama,” which means, “when.” “Obama” means “O, when?” The first time this name was employed was in conjunction with the creation of this artificial, pseudo-biological being.
- The name “Barack,” also a ‘new name’ on the planet, is a conjunction of two names: “Barry Rockefeller,” i.e. “Bar(ry)” + “Rock(efeller)” = “Barack.”
- The two names say, “Barry Rockefeller, O, when?” Summarily, any official requests for BHO’s legitimate birth or school records have been met with denials, obfuscation, and political/media ‘spin’ and/or condemnation. Official bureaucratic agencies and educational institutions cannot produce what does not exist. Therefore, all parties who aid and abet in this fraud upon the American people (and the whole world) are equally culpable and should be immediately removed from office and/or positions of power– forever.
Don Nicoloff has specialized in genealogical research uncovering the true families and histories of previous U.S. Presidents, contenders for the presidency and other hidden information, bringing readers to the destiny the elite has planned for us. The Idaho Observer printed many of his earlier exposes, including “Deathbed Confessions: Photos support claims that George H. Scherff, Jr. was the 41st president” (April – June 2008), “The Three Stooges go to Washington – Parts 1-7” (2008 – 2009) and “Following the money backwards leads to President Reagan, Russian rubles and Ambassador Leo Wanta” (Jan. 2007). A couple of these articles were tightened due to space constrictions. His latest research on Dwight D. “Ike” Eisenhower also not having a real birth certificate from Texas is memorialized in “Eisenhower 1952 Birth-Certificate Fraud Revealed” and much more about “Eisenhauer” in “Teenage Mutant Ninja Eisenhauers - Parts 1 and 2” and was not printed in The I.O. due to space (the entire three part epic is over 20,000 words plus pictures.) We encourage all readers who have access to the internet to read Don Nicoloff’s articles at his website (see ad on next page.) His most recent research ties in “Wanta-gate” with “Eisenhauer”. Believe me, this is HUGE regarding the absolute control the banksters have over us, and how their plan has been in place and moving forward for centuries. Download it while you can and make copies for both your files and sharing.
Don's website is directlightproductions.com
Shocking New Van Jones Video Discovered. The Day After 9-11 Van Jones Led Rally Where They Cheered American Killers (Video)
How in the world did this radical scumbag get a job in the White House? HINT- Idiots...
Hero of the Left–
Kristinn Taylor and Andrea Shea King reported recently at Big Government on a long lost video of Van Jones leading a rally in Oakland, California the day after 9-11 where they cheered the American killers.
BizzyBlog reported on this video back on September 8, 2009. But, Kristinn just recently captured some of Jones’ remarks at the rally. The video also shows one speaker praising the 9-11 attackers as heroes.
Disgusting… Yet this radical activist is still a hero on the left. READ MORE...
CDR Charles F. Kerchner, Jr. (Ret) to U.S. Army: “Expose the True Traitor to our Constitution” »
OBAMA “UNFIT FOR COMMAND” Date: 31 March 2011 From: CDR Charles F. Kerchner, Jr. (Ret) To: Major Matthew Kemkes U.S. Army Trial Defense Service 204 Lee Avenue, Suite B12 Ft. Meyers, VA 22211-1199 Subject: LTC...April 1 2011 / Read More »
Why Obama Really Started the Libyan War
March 31st, 2011 Ben Johnson, FloydReports.com
However, in July 2007 the Associated Press reported, “Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama said Thursday the United States cannot use its military to solve humanitarian problems and that preventing a potential genocide in Iraq isn’t a good enough reason to keep U.S. forces there.”
Consider: in July 2007, Obama was discussing a war already in progress, one Osama bin Laden called “the most important and serious issue for the whole world today.” America’s most wanted terrorist called Baghdad “the capital of the caliphate” and said the Iraq war will result in, “either victory and glory or misery and humiliation.” Yet just as the surge and a series of agreements with northern tribal leaders began pacifying the country, Barack Obama said the Helpless Giant should turn the country over to the jihadists and stand by as they systematically exterminated our allies. (As president, he has conspicuously failed to take his own advice.) Today, he claims our vital national security interests demand that we take sides in an internecine feud between factions of pro-terrorist Muslims.
Why does the president really support the action in Libya?
1. It serves no U.S. interests.
For most Americans, the fact that a war in no way promotes U.S. interests would be a prima facie argument against initiating it. For left-wingers, the less our nation has to gain from a war, the more apt they are to support it. Liberals are afflicted with irrational guilt over privileges they believe Americans enjoy due to exploitation and militarism. These impulses can only be quieted through irrational acts of self-sacrifice on behalf of those who disregard, dislike, or actively hate us. Thus, liberals view “humanitarian” wars as a means of righting the wrongs their ancestors perpetrated over scores of generations – consider it a form of “redistribution of bloodshed.”
Consider Barack Obama’s statement that “as president, I refused to wait for the images of slaughter and mass graves before taking action.” That eerily echoed a section of George W. Bush’s opening salvo against Iraq in his 2002 State of the Union Address….
Read more.
BORN IN THE USA?
WorldNetDaily Exclusive
So whatever became of Lt. Col. Lakin?
Army doctor half done with prison term for questioning Obama eligibility
--WND
WorldNetDaily Exclusive
So whatever became of Lt. Col. Lakin?
Army doctor half done with prison term for questioning Obama eligibility
--WND
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
