Tuesday, March 1, 2016
Obama’s “Silence” Speaks Volumes
by Robert Quinn, ©2016
In previous letters, I mentioned how Obama claimed to have been born in Kapiolani Medical Center in Hawaii, yet, not one hospital, including Kapiolani will, to this day, confirm his claim. Even former Hawaii, Governor Neil Abercrombie, who personally went to that hospital to obtain proof of Obama’s birth, returned empty-handed and publicly admitted that his trip was fruitless. Please reflect on the above two sentences, for the words were not born of Republicans nor racists. They were pure and simple statements of fact. If anyone other than Obama had attempted to justify a personal eligibility withoutvalid evidence to confirm it, he would have been laughed out of every courtroom. Obama, however, had the last laugh, for he still had “lying” and “cheating” in his bag of betrayal, and he used them well.
The following example will illustrate how accurately the above paragraph heading identifies one of the most subtle means of defense Obama employs when his ineligibility is challenged. It’s called “Silence.” By ignoring questioners he keeps his deception secret, thereby forcing citizens to suffer for simply seeking the truth.
Consider Army Lt. Colonel Terrence Lakin, who had given 18 years of faithful service to our Country as a medical doctor and was a leading flight surgeon and a Bronze Star recipient. As he began to hear of Obama’s possible ineligibility, he went through military channels and got nowhere. He then wrote directly to Obama, who ignored his letter. After writing a follow-up letter to Obama, it, too, was ignored. Having already served one tour in Afghanistan, Col. Lakin simply wanted the growing nationwide doubts of Obama’s eligibility put to rest before going on a second Afghanistan tour of duty under a possible ineligible Commander-in Chief.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.