Read the article and watch the video!...We need more leaders speaking out!...

At Dayton Ohio Tea Party, Alan Keyes demands investigation into Obama's eligibility, defends Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, president must be a natural born Citizen, the crowd goes wild!

Don't tell the Tea Party Leaders! Via 68Truthseeker and some; Dr. Alan Keyes delivers the keynote speech at the Dayton,OH tea party convention to an audience of about 8,000 on 4-13-10. When the MSM makes...

The USURPER Who Hates America...A RECAP about why Obama must be stopped! A MUST READ!

By Joan Swirsky  of The Canada Free Press
In the last century, the impassioned words and actions of patriots like Winston Churchill – along with America’s heroic help and sacrifice – saved Europe. The eloquence and actions of “I’ve been to the mountaintop” Martin Luther King Jr. brought America to an unprecedented level of social justice.

The peerless oratory and tireless diplomacy of the man who would become Israel’s Foreign Minister, Abba Eban convinced the entire world that after the wanton murder of six-million Jews in the Holocaust its straggling survivors deserved their own state of Israel. The inspiring words and decisive actions of President Ronald Reagan ended the Cold War, tore down the Berlin Wall, and restored economic prosperity to America. The efforts of these towering figures resulted in a more highly-evolved world.

We have also seen the opposite in totalitarian leaders like Hitler, Mussolini, Fidel Castro, Pol Pot, Mao, and Saddam Hussein, among others, who exploited their masses, destroyed their economies, brought havoc, turbulence, grief and massive death within and outside of their countries, and made the world a more dangerous and threatening place.

The one thing all of these virtuous and evil men had in common was love for their respective countries, in fact a burning passion that superseded all else. The virtuous believed in freedom and democracy. The evil believed in subjugation of their peoples and lifetime tenures for themselves in order to actualize their goals of conquering their eternal enemies – Americans and Jews.

Today, we have a new crop of inveterate America- and Jew-haters, among them the Marxist leader of Venezuela Hugo Chavez, Nicaragua’s president Daniel Ortega, Iran’s “death-to-America-and-Israel” study-in-abnormal-psychology Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and the ever-sabotage-America and anti-Semitic “leaders” of the 22-Arab states that surround Israel.

I have either read about or observed firsthand all of these people. Yet in my decades of commenting on the political scene, I cannot recall a single leader of any country or regime who has ever spoken negatively of his country or tolerated others speaking ill of the land or the people he represented 
Until now

Bizarre and, yes, repugnant as it is to our essentially centrist country, America now has a usurpert who has broken that time-honored tradition. Barack Obama, on the campaign trail and as the leader of the free world is the first U.S. Usurper to proclaim to anyone within earshot that he, like his wife, is not proud of his country, and is all-too-willing to offer serial apologies – for America! – to Americans and foreigners alike.

As Ed Lasky writes: “We know that during the campaign [Obama] warned that criticism of his wife was `off-limits’. But criticism of America – well, that is fine.”

We also know that during his run for the presidency, Obama expressed sneering condescension towards all those bible-clasping, gun-owning yahoos who “cling” to those silly things, and that in Europe he consistently gave voice to America’s supposed “sins.” But all that pales in comparison to the clear contempt – looks more like hatred to me – that Obama feels for the United States of America and for its most revered founding document, the U.S. Constitution. (Obama is an agent of Islam working mainly for Saudi Arabia in that context)

In just the first 100-days of his tenure, Obama’s words and actions have demonstrated that he is no friend of the country he leads. This is only a smattering of what happened on his recent three-continent trip abroad and to Mexico: 

• In France, Obama told his audience that America “has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive” toward Europe.
• In Prague, Obama – in true utopian-kindergarten fashion – pledged “with conviction” that America will “seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons.” In other words, destroy big bad America’s ability to defend itself (Nearly every country has clandestine operations for Nuclear weapons)
• In London, Obama made clear that the world’s financial wealth was no longer made by those inferior leaders Roosevelt and Churchill, effectively ceding America’s leading role in creating and sharing wealth to nations that have never measured up to our country’s bountiful generosity or spirit of free-market entrepreneurship.
• In Venezuela, Obama sat passively while the Marxist Chavez handed him an American-bashing book and delivered another revile-America speech, while never once rising to defend our country.
• In Nicaragua, Obama again sat passively while the Marxist Ortega blamed the United States for a century of what he called terroristic U.S. aggression in Central America, again emitting not a whisper of defense on our country’s behalf.
• In Turkey, Obama said – incredibly and inaccurately – that America was not a Christian nation.
• And in his recent trip to Mexico, Obama said that the escalating border violence was essentially America’s fault.
  
• Obama bowed-dipped low and "kissed-pecked" the Saudi King Abudullah's ring. A Muslim custom of Subjects to their Masters. 

Scan you memory. Can you think of any other leader in world history who so consistently badmouths his own country, or fails to defend it? I can’t.

Wall St. Journal writer Dorothy Rabinowitz notes that Obama “had gone to Europe not as the voice of his nation, but as a missionary with a message of atonement for its errors. No sitting American president had ever delivered indictments of this kind while abroad, or for that matter at home. When [our allies] see Obama’s moral equivalence, they realize they are on their own and must cut their own deals to survive – understanding that multicultural trendiness is now a cynical cover for moral laxity and ‘can’t we all get along?’

Historian Victor Davis Hanson also noticed something odd about Obama’s apology tour. “Despite this fresh climate of atonement, there was a complete absence of a single apology from any other foreign leader…not a word came from Britain about colonialism…nothing from Germany on the Holocaust…not a peep from France about Algeria or Vietnam. Turkey was mum on the Armenian killings…Russia said nothing about the 30 million murdered by Stalin…Nothing came from China about the 70 million who perished under Mao…Mr. Medvedev said nothing about Putin’s brutish rule…We saw no concrete evidence of any help — or hope and change — from any foreign leader. Zilch.”

In addition, Hanson continues, “We hear nothing about our Gettysburg, or our entry into World War I. Iwo Jima and the Bulge are never alluded to. Drawing the line in Korea and forcing the end of the Soviet monstrosity are taboo subjects. That we pledged the life of New York for Berlin in the Cold War is unknown. Liberating Afghanistan and Iraq from the diabolical Taliban and Saddam Hussein is left unsaid. The Civil Rights movement, the Great Society, affirmative action, and present billion-dollar foreign-aid programs apparently never existed. Millions of Africans have been saved by George Bush’s efforts at extending life-saving medicines to AIDS patients — but again, this is never referenced.”

Blogger James Lewis says that Obama’s “obsessive need to put down his own country shows a stunningly ignorant man who has evidently never spoken to a concentration camp survivor, a Cuban refugee, a boat person from Vietnam, a Soviet dissident, or a survivor of Mao’s purges.”

And Media Research Center’s Brent Bozell adds, “Obama `gets’ the America-haters.” 
Abandoning allies, Embracing enemies

“If you are a longtime enemy of the United States, count on a grand reception from the Obama administration. All is forgiven and, worse, forgotten,” write Dick Morris and Eileen McGann. “But if you have a track record as an ally or friend, you won’t get the right time of day.”

Of course apologists for Obama & Co. point to “progress” in our foreign policy, ignoring, as Caroline Glick points out, that “America’s betrayal of its democratic allies makes each of them more vulnerable to aggression at the hands of their enemies – enemies the Obama administration is now actively attempting to appease.” Glick lays out the cold hard facts: 

• Obama abrogated America’s strategic commitment to the defense of our ally Japan when his administration reacted to North Korea’s ballistic missile test by saying the U.S. would only shoot the missile down if it targeted U.S. territory.
• Obama slapped our ally India when he refused to make ending Pakistan’s support for jihadist terror groups attacking India a central component of its strategy for contending with Pakistan and Afghanistan. (Obama is Muslim)
• Obama failed to assure our ally Iraq that democracy and freedom will be secured before U.S. forces are withdrawn next year. (Obama is Muslim)
• Obama de facto abandoned our allies in Eastern Europe when he announced his intention to forge a new alliance with Russia. “The Czech, Polish, Georgian and Ukrainian governments,” Glick says, “were quick to recognize that Obama’s strong desire to curry favor with the Kremlin and weaken his own country will imperil their ability to withstand Russian aggression.”
• Obama “is sacrificing the U.S.’s alliance with our ally Israel “in a bid to appease the Arabs and Iran by supporting the immediate establishment of a Palestinian state,” which, Glick warns, “requires Israel to commit national suicide in exchange for `peace.’” Obama also made clear “that from the administration’s perspective, an Israeli strike that prevents Iran from becoming a nuclear power is less acceptable than a nuclear-armed Iran.” In addition, Obama sent Hamas $900 million of foreign aid, “channeled through the UNRWA, a United Nations front filled with Hamas operatives” (Obama is Muslim)
• Obama slapped our ally England when he returned the bust of Winston Churchill to Prime Minister Gordon Brown.
• Obama slapped our ally Colombia and its president Alvaro Uribe when he refused to submit the free trade deal with Bogota to the Senate.

“What a great time to be our enemy!” Glick exclaims. “What a terrible time to be our friend!”

And speaking about appeasing Iran (Obama is Muslim), the Obama administration recently asked a federal judge to throw out a $6.6-billion class-action lawsuit against Iran filed by 52 American diplomats and military officials held hostage for more than a year at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran 30 years ago. Nothing like selling out Americans to make brownie points with a bloodthirsty dictator!

Barry Rubin explains: “Friends, especially in Europe, are pleased, applaud, but then add that they don’t have to give this guy anything because he is all apologies and no toughness. They like the fact that he is all carrots and no sticks. If, however, they are states more at risk…they worry that they cannot rely on the United States to help and defend them. Enemies or potential rivals…say that this guy is weak and defeated. He apologizes, offers unconditional engagements, and promises concessions…they’ll eat the carrots and, if possible, their neighbors as well.”

NY Post writer Ralph Peters, a former military intelligence officer, sums up the hate-America core tenets of the “Obama Doctrine” as follows:  

(1) We’re to blame,

(2) Problems can be negotiated away,

(3) Problems that can’t be talked out can be bought off,

(4) Islamist terrorism doesn’t exist, (Obama is Muslim)

(5) It’s all our fault,

(6) Israel’s the obstacle to Middle East peace, (Obama is Muslim)

(7) Our nukes threaten world peace and we need to get rid of them,

(8) Our military is dangerous, (Obama is Muslim)

(9) Our intelligence services are even more dangerous than our military,

(10) It’s only torture if we do it, and

(11) Blame President George W. Bush. 

Obama is clearly not satisfied with threatening the safety of our tried-and-true allies abroad. He is also determined to undermine the bedrock foundation of America’s security – our military and intelligence agencies. By disclosing interrogation memos – and planning to release photographs associated with military probes into prisoner abuse – he has betrayed every heroic person who risks his or her life for our country, and unforgivably given aid-and-comfort to enemies who seethe with virulent anti-Americanism and lust for our demise. And in the Department of Homeland Security’s infamous memo, he has called members of our military, among others, potential domestic terrorists!

“After September 1th, the general outcry was, ‘Why don’t we have better overseas capabilities?’” said Porter Goss, director of the CIA from September 2004 to May 2006. “I fear that in the years to come, this refrain will be heard again. It is certainly not trust that is fostered when intelligence officers are told one day ‘I have your back,’ only to learn a day later that a knife is being held to it.”

How horrifying to contemplate that it is the President of the United States himself who is wielding that back-stabbing knife! 
Questioning Obama’s patriotism

Before the November election, legal scholar Henry Mark Holzer wrote – and scrupulously documented – a stunning indictment of Obama in which he stated that Obama’s repeatedly professed claim to be a patriot is “a fraud on the American people – and an insult to the countless true patriots who, for over two hundred years, have loved and loyally and zealously supported the United States of America.”

“Patriots,” Holzer concluded, “don’t associate with and derive sustenance from terrorists, America-haters and anti-Semites; they don’t countenance fixed elections; they don’t keep secrets from voters; they don’t intimidate their enemies; they don’t denigrate and degrade our military; they don’t gratuitously interfere with their government’s efforts to protect our country; and they don’t disdain the symbol of this great nation, which for over two centuries men and women have fought and died: the American flag. Whatever Barack Obama is, we can be certain that he is no patriot!”

The events that have followed Obama’s election, Holzer says, “have compounded the proof of the president’s lack of patriotism,” which he has recently spelled out in a follow-up article. A few of the many examples he provides of what “a patriotic American president does not do include: 

• Bankrupt this country and court massive inflation in order to implement his vision of a fascist/socialist nation. (New World Order agenda - World under Islam agenda)
• Sit on his hands with a straight face while a South American thug insults his country.
• Appoint America-haters to his cabinet. (Federal Reserve appointed most of his cabinate for him. New World Order agenda - Obama only appoints Muslims otherwise)
• Cozy up to a soon-to-be-nuclear-armed Iranian madman. (Obama is Muslim)
• Impotently watch the probably-already-nuclear-armed North Korean Stalinists lob a ballistic missile across the Pacific.
• Fail to stanch the flow of illegal aliens across the Mexican-United States border.
• Cut the defense budget.
• Strangle innovation during a serious recession by raising taxes.
• Close Guantanamo Bay without a clue of how to handle the enemy combatants incarcerated there. (Obama is Muslim)
• Publicly announce what measures military and CIA interrogators can use to extract information from terrorists. (Obama is Muslim)
• Apologize to the world for what has made America great and grovel to persons, nations. and institutions unfit to shine our shoes!
• Cede American sovereignty to the American-hating United Nations. (New World Order - World under Islam agenda)
• Defy the Second Amendment and a Supreme Court decision by making an end run that substantially reduces the supply of certain ammunition.
  Repudiate the policy and practice of missile shield installation.”

Some dare call it treason

It is one thing to question a president’s patriotism, but even more serious to accuse him of treason. In an open letter to Obama on Treason, Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III (U.S. Naval Academy, Class of 1975) minces no words in accusing the president of sending Army forces to Samson, Alabama, and Boston in violation of the Constitution. Here are excerpts of his letter: 

“I have observed and extensively recorded invidious attacks by military-political aristocrats against the Constitution for twenty years. Now you have broken in and entered the White House by force of contrivance, concealment, conceit, and deceit. Posing as an imposter president and commander in chief, you have stripped civilian command and control over the military establishment… 

“We come now to the reckoning. I accuse you and your military-political criminal assistants of TREASON. I name you and your military criminal associates as traitors. Your criminal ascension manifests a clear and present danger. You fundamentally changed our form of government. The Constitution no longer works….

“I identify you as a foreign-born domestic enemy. You are not my president. You are not my commander in chief.

Fitzpatrick is not alone. John Smith – a blogger on Townhall.com, titled a recent article “Obama Is a Traitor.” Commenting on the president’s release of the “torture” memos, Smith says:

“Given the actions of Barack Obama in recent days, one has to wonder how many soon-to-be released State secrets have been gathered by radical left-wing traitors and hidden in the dark recesses of Washington, awaiting the Manchurian Candidate’s command to publish them…

“The motivation for Obama’s recent intentional disclosure of Top Secret CIA memoranda…was an act committed solely to increase his own political power through appeasement of the radical left…or was it …guided by the twisted moral imperative uniquely embraced by the Left, which dictates that only those actions that serve to limit individual liberty, punish patriotism, and destroy the traditions and culture of the United States of America are good?…

“Were Obama’s actions motivated by a deeply rooted desire to harm this Nation?…

“Article III of the Constitution defines Treason against the United States as “… levying War against them or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort…”.

“Top Secret information is the highest level of classification that we have on a national level. By definition, such material, if made public, will cause “exceptionally grave damage” to national security…

“The willful disclosure of Top Secret information is an act of Treason against the United States….A sitting President of The United States of America has committed Treason.”

Fitzpatrick and Smith are among a rising tide of voices – in and outside of the military – who have observed with growing horror Obama’s proclivity to destroy our capitalist economic system, subvert the U.S. Constitution, endanger our military and intelligence services, and obsequiously embrace America’s sworn enemies.

Dr. Jack Wheeler, a consummate Washington insider, goes one step further. “The evidence that the Usurper of the United States is a traitor is mounting. The evidence that the President of the United states is a mortal danger to America’s national security is mounting. The evidence that the Usurper of the United States will not defend America from threats and insults from every two-bit fascist dictator in the world …is not only mounting, it is overwhelming.”

Writer Amy L. Geiger-Hammer states: “I do wonder if Obama should be called a traitor or just incompetent…does he ever talk about what a great country America is?” 
And UK journalist Gerald Warner echoes that rising tide: “If al-Qaeda, the Taliban and the rest of the Looney Tunes brigade want to kick America to death, they had better move in quickly and grab a piece of the action before Barack Obama finishes the job himself. Never in the history of the United States has a president worked so actively against the interests of his own people - not even Jimmy Carter. Obama’s problem is that he does not know who the enemy is. To him, the enemy does not squat in caves in Waziristan, clutching automatic weapons and reciting the more militant verses from the Koran: instead, it sits around at tea parties in Kentucky quoting from the US Constitution. “ 
Is America Lost?

Multiple lawsuits to find proof that Obama is Constitutionally ineligible to be president are ongoing and will ultimately determine if he is an American or Kenyan or Indonesian or UK “natural-born” citizen. To this date, he has spent over a million dollars blocking the suits about his still-missing birth certificate, and there is increasing evidence that the birth certificate attested to by FactCheck.org, FightTheSmears.org, and DailyKos.com are forgeries. And of course we still have not seen Obama’s Selective Service record, medical records, multiple visas, college transcripts, et al.

If Obama is proven to be the fraud and interloper many suspect, every one of his edicts, bills, laws, dictates, Supreme Court selections, et al, will be overturned , leaving America to cope with serious problems – under the leadership of the incomprehensible Joe Biden – but nothing approaching this hate-America president’s far-left socialist domestic programs and appease-our-enemies foreign policy.

The huge national turnouts at the Tea Parties of April 15 were only the beginning of a movement that was spurred by ordinary Americans waking up to Obama’s destruction of our economy, his attempts to reshape America into a banana republic, the grave damage he’s inflicted on our military and intelligence services, and his unsavory predilection for embracing our enemies and apologizing non-stop for the most magnificent nation on earth.

In short, they are waking up to the president who hates his country.

Editor Charlotte Baker predicts that “the Tea Parties and other, more aggressive, protests will grow exponentially, and that the Obama juggernaut can and will be stopped.” It’s crucial, she says, “for all Americans to recall the history they learned in school – at least before the Left hijacked what used to be known as `education.’ The Europeans, Japanese and Russians were all taken over by one form or another of totalitarianism because their combined history was one of absolute rulers – kings, czars and `divine’ emperors. They were totally conditioned to tyranny.

“But the monstrous anti-American gang that rigged the voting system on November 4, 2008– as they do routinely in Obama’s Chicago Machine politics – to push Obama into We-the-People’s White House, have shown – even before his inauguration – the kind of overreaching that arrogant tyrants always demonstrate. Hitler, Mao, Tojo and Stalin all got away with overreaching, but they weren’t brutalizing Americans.

“Tolerating totalitarianism is simply not in the genetic code – the DNA – of Americans!” Baker adds. “Freedom and Liberty run in our blood!”

Indeed!

IF truth IS on your side...Why would you hide it?

spending over 1 million to hide a $15 certified copy of BC is the sign of insanity or massive fraud and treason

Posted on August 28th, 2009

Dr. Orly Taitz published

Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:54 PM

“Andrea Shea King” radiopatriot@gmail.com
If You Feel Like a “Birther” Nut, Maybe You Shouldn’t

by Kyle-Anne Shiver • August 14, 2009

My article, “You Might Be a Birther if…,” is the prelude to this post, and is meant to be read first. Adding to the thoughts expressed in the article, I offer the following for your consideration.

If Barry O and Bobby Gibbs, and their political operatives in media are beginning to make you feel like a nut for asking for verifiable documentation on the President, maybe you shouldn’t buy into it. This is not a matter of politics, except as it’s been made that by the White House. This is a simple matter of civics, an American’s civic duty, to be precise.

Why are we even having this very public discussion on things which should have been settled prior to the start of the Democratic primaries in 2008? Since there is no government agency with the express responsibility of ensuring that candidates do indeed meet all qualifications for the elected offices they seek, that burden has traditionally fallen upon the shoulders of the political parties, in this instance, the Democratic National Committee. Specifically, Howard Dean.

But as we saw in all its inglorious dimensions during the election campaign, anyone and everyone who dared to hold Barack Obama to the same standard set for white candidates was labeled a “racist” posthaste, so that it is now quite conceivable that the Democratic National Committee, white-guilt-ridden liberals all, were cowed into submission any time they attempted to verify the candidate’s “narrative” and other assertions. In fact, I doubt seriously if anyone within the party wanted to much mess around with even seeming to question this candidate very much. We all know how that would have been portrayed. Now, don’t we?

When it comes to being labeled as a “conspiracy nut” for merely asking normal questions about a man who seems to have one very shadowy past, we should be asking ourselves, who is the real “nutcase” here? When a grown man, the President, spends more than $1 million of campaign money (is this even legal?) to defend lawsuits in which he could merely produce a $15 document, isn’t that, in and of itself, a bit off the sanity mark? Either that or we’re dealing with a man who hasn’t an ounce of good sense when it comes to money, especially other people’s money. Spending this much to avoid producing a single document strikes me as crazier than a coon with rabies.

Some in the media have compared “Birthers” to “9/11 Truthers.”

What a bunch of preposterous poppycock.

We, the people of the USA, had a full accounting of what happened on 9/11, paid for by us, with hundreds of officials taking part, thousands of witnesses testifying, and they even put the findings out in a book: The 9/11 Commission Report. Anyone, who would compare these two issues and call them the same, must be a little short in the common sense department, if you ask me.

Now, as to the political ramifications of continuing to ask for proper verification from this President, I’m wondering whether we have become so enamored of political game-playing that we’ve lost all sense of civic duty. Not only that, but perhaps it’s been so long since we regularly saw public people standing upon principle, and refusing to be sidetracked, we’ve nearly forgotten what standing on principle looks like.

A principle is no small thing. Without principle, the whole world descends into chaos pretty darned quickly. If we, as Americans, have not the courage to think for ourselves, form a principle of belief, and then also lack the wherewithal to stand stalwart by that principle, we’ve become a shameful generation.

The Founders are aghast in their heavenly abodes, I’m quite sure, at those defaming citizens who say, “Show me.”

What in the world is this country coming to?

A principle is a principle. If we believe in our Constitution, if we believe that the citizens have a right to know all there is to know about their leaders — of any and every race — then we must continue to ask for all the facts, and not merely those we’ve been fed by a political machine from the most corrupt city in these United States. To ask the same things of a black president that we would most certainly ask of a white president is the very essence of non-discrimination and the utter fulfillment of King’s dream. Anything less than a colorblind approach bespeaks condescending racism, the kind that believes blacks are truly less capable. I shall never concede this point.

It is Barack Obama, the Democratic National Committee and those in the media who utterly failed to do their jobs on this, that have a lot of explaining to do. This is becoming a disgrace to democracy, and if this president is playing a cute political game, hoping to make fools of those who’ve asked for his life documentation, then he is playing with fire. Because he is the one who is diminishing our founding principles and our government like a crazed fool. And it is he who should be made to feel like a nutcase.

Any president, who thinks governing the greatest Nation in the history of civilization is just a game of political intrigue ought not merely have his head examined, but be branded the childish fool he is and be shamed into never showing his face in public again.

So, bottom line, we must all — as Americans doing our own civic duty — continue to decry this unnatural and entirely “fishy” state of things with this very historical president. To do less, in my opinion, belittles the entire concept of democracy, something of which I do not ever want to be found guilty.

Only those without an ounce of respect for this Country would dare to attack patriotic citizens for doing their civic duty. That’s as simple as the nose on one’s face.

–
THE ANDREA SHEA KING SHOW
Weeknights @ 9 pm EST
on BlogTalkRadio dot com

A QUESTION OF ELIGIBILITY - THE VIDEO - PART 1

From NATURALBORNCITIZEN: THE LEFT IS SHREDDING THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AT BREAKNECK SPEED!!!!!!!!!!

Obama Was A Natural Born Subject: the Founders’ Greatest Fear As To Commander In Chief.
Posted in Uncategorized on August 7, 2009 by naturalborncitizen


Our current US President was a Great British citizen at the time of his birth. He then became a Kenyan citizen followed by what appears to be citizenship in Indonesia. Perhaps he is currently a citizen or subject of a nation other than the US.

Obama’s own web site carried an admission that his birth status was governed by Great Britain. That admission was published by Obama’s Fight The Smears web site as quoted from a discussion of Obama’s UK citizenship written by Factcheck.org.

The Factcheck.org essay went even further than the admission quoted by Obama’s site. It further stated:

“In other words, at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was both a U.S. citizen (by virtue of being born in Hawaii) and a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC…Obama’s British citizenship was short-lived.”

Neither Obama nor Factcheck.org dispute that Obama was a British citizen at birth. As you can see, it has been admitted. All those who continue to dispute this fact are delusional. Obama was a British citizen at birth. Fact. Checked. Established. The only question that remains on the issue is whether he’s still a British citizen or subject.

Having been a British citizen at birth, Obama was therefore a natural born subject of Great Britain. Justice Gray – writing for the Supreme Court majority in Wong Kim Ark – quoted the following from a prior US District Court decision:

“In U. S. v. Rhodes (1866), Mr. Justice Swayne, sitting in the circuit court, said: ‘All persons born in the allegiance of the king are natural- born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens. Birth and allegiance go together. ”

Birth and allegiance go together. Obama’s father conveyed British citizenship upon his son at birth. His son, Obama Jr., was a natural born subject of the British monarchy. Even if Obama was born in Hawaii and was a US citizen at birth, nothing can change the fact that he was also a natural born subject of Great Britain as well as a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies.

The fact that Obama is a natural born subject has – up until this article – gone largely unnoticed. According to Blackstone’s Commentaries:

“all children, born out of the king’s ligeance, whose fathers were natural-born subjects, are now natural-born subjects themselves, to all intents and purposes, without any exception;”

Obama’s allegiance was – at the time of his birth – divided. And the framers would never have considered him eligible to be President. The same can be said for the Supreme Court in Wong Kim Ark which also indicated that the native born son of an alien was not natural born.

Now we shall turn our attention to the fears expressed by our founding fathers as to the possibility that foreigners might gain political footholds in our federal government. The issue was discussed explicitly by Alexander Hamilton in Essay 68 of the Federalist Papers wherein he stated:

Nothing was more to be desired than that every practicable obstacle should be opposed to cabal, intrigue, and corruption. These most deadly adversaries of republican government might naturally have been expected to make their approaches from more than one quarter, but chiefly from the desire in foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils. How could they better gratify this, than by raising a creature of their own to the chief magistracy of the Union? (Emphasis added.)

In George Washington’s farewell address in 1796, he stated these most important words which today would be soundly ridiculed by the propaganda of political correct sarcasm:

The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism…

It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which finds a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another…

If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed. The precedent must always greatly overbalance in permanent evil any partial or transient benefit, which the use can at any time yield…

As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent patriot. How many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practice the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the public councils. Such an attachment of a small or weak towards a great and powerful nation dooms the former to be the satellite of the latter.

Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government...

Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests…(Emphasis added.)

The main stream media would have you believe that a natural born subject – a citizen at birth of Great Britain – entangled closely with the nation of Kenya where he was a citizen until at least the age of 21 – and still may be according to Kenyan law – would be eligible to the office of President of the United States and to be its Commander In Chief. And they push this propaganda down your throat as if it weren’t even a serious issue.

They are lying to you and the depths of their lies betray their genuine recognition that a Constitutional crime has been committed against the Document and the judgment of the founders.

Your press, members of Congress, Senate and current Supreme Court have sold you out, America.

Something wicked this way comes.

And that wickedness comes in the form of a “citizen of the world” who declares our Constitution a flawed document out of one side of his mouth, while allegedly declaring an oath to protect it from the other. (Although the oath was taken in private, so who really knows.) When I recently said I wasn’t worried about Obama, what I meant was that I wasn’t worried about him anymore than the Bush cabal or the Clintons. They all perpetrated crimes against the Constitution.

So many of you are now so very very concerned about our Constitution. Your patriotic fervor has been stoked by Hamilton and Washington just now as you wipe those Constitutional tears away. Your heart burns for the Constitution and the nation, doesn’t it.

But let me take this chance to tell those of you who supported torture, unconstitutional wars and the murder of hundreds of thousands of civilians – children, mothers, grandmothers – by the last administration – you don’t deserve the protections of our Constitution.

The Iraq war isn’t Constitutional. There was no declaration of war by Congress. And the war on terror is a myth. “War” is only declared against a foreign state – not an ideology. Terrorism is a crime and 911 should have been handled as a crime scene. But the forensic evidence was shipped out to China. And the case was solved in 24 hours by the same people who allegedly failed to stop it.

I’m not saying 911 was an “inside job” because nobody really knows the whole story. But anyone who denies that elements of the crime have been covered up is lying or just ignorant of basic facts.

And we’re not supposed to do torture. But Scalia would have you believe that torture isn’t a form of punishment. He might just consider it punishment if he were subjected to it. Scalia knows with absolute certainty that torture is punishment. But the Constitution protects against cruel and unusual punishment, so Scalia has to play word games to get the desired ruling he seeks. This makes him an enemy of the Constitution too.

There are many enemies of the Constitution in high places. But you only care about Obama? None of the above bothered so many of you. But now you want to preserve the Constitution?

You’re too late.

This nation will not exist as a Constitutional republic for much longer. Nothing can be done to stop the utter dismantling of the Constitution. It will continue in name only. But the protections it once granted will be ancient relics of a failed experiment in liberty: not failed because our founding fathers didn’t prepare us – failed because we prostituted our ethics for revenge.

I’ve made the legal case that Obama is not a natural born citizen and should not be President. But he is President and Commander In Chief. NOTHING WILL CHANGE THAT [???? IS IT TOO LATE????]

This country does not have the will power to change it. The country sold its soul to Bush, Clinton, Bush… You didn’t care about the Constitution then and you’re gonna get what you got coming to you now.

CHANGE HAS COME TO AMERICA.

SECOND AMERICAN REVOLUTION?...

From The JagHunter
JOYCE ROSENWALD writes:

I went on the Internet and searched for everything I could find on the social and political climate in countries immediately before revolution.

We appear to be there.

Government debt and attempts to disarm citizens are the leading causes.

As governments coffers go dry, taxes are raised.

As taxes are raised, citizens make it known to those that govern that they are not happy.

When government begins to fear the wrath of the people they begin to fear for their own lives.

Government believes they have no choice but to disarm the people for their own protection and survival.

History has proven that this situation always causes revolution.

I don’t know of any remedy for this.

We are writing and calling and faxing our leaders to tell them of our discontent. We are having Tea Parties all over the country. We are still being ignored. None of the issues of the people are being addressed by government.

Their answer is to do a study on Americans and decide anyone who does not agree with government policies is a terrorist and a danger to government.

Actually, it’s the other way around.

Renegade government that treats citizens as if they were owned and can be compelled to do everything government mandates is an insult to people who have been educated to believe they live in a free country with government instituted by the people to serve them.

The attempt to disarm the people will fail.

It is the most irresponsible action government can attempt.

If government is so ignorant as to avoid what history has taught, they are doomed to repeat it.

Americans will never surrender the one mechanism they have to remain free.

They will fight to the death to stay armed.

It’s nothing short of folly for this government to think Americans will be willing to surrender their guns because a treaty with a foreign power was signed, or the majority of politicians are personally against firearm ownership and therefore Americans must be disarmed.

Consider this as notice.

We don’t care what Washington D.C. says.

We don’t care what the courts say.

We don’t care what the U.N. wants.

We will replace government before we surrender our guns.

Mr.and Mrs. Politician, read the Original Organic Constitution for the United States of America. The one that stood for the Republic, not the one you use that stands for your converted corrupt Democracy.

The Republic belongs to the people.

We will not lose freedom through edicts under your emergency rule.

You can have your created democracy. You can function under your own fraud.

Just don’t expect us to obey.

We have been good and honorable citizens and continued to serve the Republic even as you were dismantling it.

The Organic Constitution may be ignored by you, but to us, the people, it is alive and intact.

We will not accept corruption of the Bill of Rights.

If you attempt to make them null and void under color of law you do so at your own peril.

The people have spoken and we are resolute.

There is no compromise.

The people have been lied to, abused, made bankrupt, all their property and labor taken for use by you, an irresponsible criminal government.

We are no longer stupid.

We now know the truth of what has been done.

Knowing this we have not come for you.

We are telling you now……

End the corruption.

Rescind Emergency Rule.

Give the Republic back to the people.

We are involved in an imperfect war declared by you against us.

A declaration of war by government against its own citizens is TREASON!

Any attempt to disarm us will signal us to make your imperfect war against us perfect.

The people have drawn their line in the sand.

You have been placed on notice.

Ignore this at your own peril.

SEND THE GOVERNMENT THEIR PINK SLIPS!!!

WE THE PEOPLE are TEA'D Off!

* Are you fed up and TEA'D Off with politicians who do not live up to their Oath to Uphold, Defend and Protect the Constitution of the United States of America?
* Are you tired of being taxed without your consent?
* Are you tired of the government putting our entire nation into TRILLIONS of dollars in debt?
* Are you tired of the people in Washington D.C. that has abused their position of trust?
* If you have answered yes, then it is time to let the elected officials in Washington D.C. know that their "services" are no longer required or desired!

We are not done.. the first Pink Slip Campaign date has come and gone, however as you know, the scoundrels are not gone yet!

There is another scheduled march on Washington in September.

This protest day is a Saturday... another day when you KNOW the politicians are NOT going to be in office. So let's Pink Slip them again.

On 9/11 2009 put your Pink Slips in the mail, giving them a memorable post mark date. After the protest march when the politicians are back in the office, thinking they have weathered the protest and are ok now.... they will go to their mail, and be reminded once again that we are unhappy with their abrogation of their oath to the Constitution of the united States of America.

On September 11, 2009, Mail them their Pink Slips - Again!
You're Fired - Pink Slip

It won't cost you a lot of money, and it won't take much time.

Just print out the number of Pink Slips you want to send, put one each into a legal sized envelope, purchase a stamp for each Pink Slip and address it to your elected official of choice.

Drop it into the mail on September 11, 2009.
These are the oaths they have all taken.

They have not lived up to them.

Presidential Oath of Office

"I [NAME] do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Vice President and U.S. Congress Oath of Office

"I, [NAME] do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God."

Supreme Court Oath of Office

"I, [NAME], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as [TITLE] under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God."

It is time for them to go! Send them their Pink Slips!

GO TO http://yourefired.org/ for more information.

THE RELEVANT OBAMA ADMISSION

THE RELEVANT OBAMA ADMISSION

At Barack Obama’s web site, the following admission:
“FactCheck.org Clarifies Barack’s Citizenship

‘When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children…’ “

Read that last line again.

“That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children…”

That’s an admission that Great Britain “governed the status” of Barack Obama, Jr. Brack Obama has chosen to highlight this on his own volition.

And this leads to the relevant question:

HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN’S STATUS BE “GOVERNED” BY GREAT BRITAIN?

A natural born citizen’s status should only be governed by the United States. This is the core issue before the Supreme Court of the United States.

NATURAL BORN CITIZEN EXPLAINED AGAIN!

Not much information exists on why the Third Congress deleted "natural born" from the Naturalization Act of 1790 when it passed the Naturalization Act of 1795. There is virtually no information on the subject because they probably realized that the First Congress committed errors when it passed the Naturalization Act of 1790 and did not want to create a record of the errors.

It can be reasonably argued that Congress realized that under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, Congress is given the power to make uniform laws on naturalization and that this power did not include the power to decide who is included or excluded from being a presidential Article II "natural born Citizen." While Congress has passed throughout United States history many statutes declaring who shall be considered nationals and citizens of the United States at birth and thereby exempting such persons from having to be naturalized under naturalization laws, at no time except by way of the short-lived “natural born” phrase in Naturalization Act of 1790 did it ever declare these persons to be “natural born Citizens.” The uniform definition of "natural born Citizen" was already provided by the law of nations and was already settled. The Framers therefore saw no need nor did they give Congress the power to tinker with that definition. Believing that Congress was highly vulnerable to foreign influence and intrigue, the Framers, who wanted to keep such influence out of the presidency, did not trust Congress when it came to who would be President, and would not have given Congress the power to decide who shall be President by allowing it to define what an Article II "natural born Citizen” is.

Additionally, the 1790 act was a naturalization act. How could a naturalization act make anyone an Article II "natural born Citizen?" After all, a "natural born Citizen" was made by nature at the time of birth and could not be so made by any law of man.

Finally, allowing a child born on foreign soil to be President would have invited conflict with the foreign nation on whose soil the child was born. For example, Great Britain adhered to the concept of perpetual natural allegiance. Just imagine the Framers allowing a child born in Great Britain to two U.S. citizen parents (a perpetual natural born subject under English common law) after the adoption of the Constitution (post Article II grandfather time period) to be President and Commander in Chief of the United States. Also, “natural born Citizen” status, having a uniform definition under the laws of nations, could not be made to depend on the laws of the foreign country in which the child would be born to U.S. citizen parents. Congress realized their errors in passing the 1790 Act and corrected it in 1795.

What is important about these two naturalization acts which were passed in the early part of the founding of the Republic and which is also reflected in the Constitution itself, is that they show that the Framers of the Constitution clearly saw a distinction between a “Citizen” and a “natural born Citizen.” They show that the Framers rejected English common law which in addition to how it granted “natural born subjectship” through jus solis also made a child a “natural born subject” if born out of the King’s dominion to parents who were “natural born subjects” (jus sanguinis). Under the law of nations which the Framers adopted for the new United States, a “natural born Citizen” was a child born in the United States to a mother and father who were at the time of the child’s birth both United States citizens and a “Citizen” was any person who became a citizen by naturalization. A “Citizen” had the same civil and political rights as a “natural born Citizen” except he was not eligible to be President if born after the adoption of the Constitution. Only by becoming a citizen could a father and derivatively from him the mother give to their child the inherited right to be a “natural born Citizen.” Not including the American Indians because they belonged to a different nation and blacks because they were or their parents had been slaves, the United States was a new nation and only after its new citizens gave birth to a new generation of Americans could that new generation be called indigenous, natives or “natural born Citizens” of the United States. All those who were born British subjects before the adoption of the Constitution (which included the Founding Fathers themselves), actually became naturalized United States citizens by electing to become a United States citizen by adhering to the revolutionary cause rather than chosing to become British subjects by remaining loyal to Great Britain. They could not elect to become “natural born Citizens” because they were born British subjects.

From these early naturalization statutes, we can see that it is not sufficient to be a born “citizen” under the Fourteenth Amendment to qualify as a Presidential Article II “natural born Citizen.” While this amendment constitutionally makes those who qualify under its terms to be “citizens,” it does not nor was it ever intended to make these individuals Article II “natural born Citizens.” The framers of the Fourteenth Amendment were well aware that Article II refers to “natural born Citizen” and that Article I and Article IV refer to “Citizen.” By choosing the word “citizen,” they left intact the original meaning of “natural born Citizen” as it existed under the law of nations which the Founders adopted as the national law of the new United States.

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
185 Gatzmer Avenue
Jamesburg NJ 08831

THE LIES KEEP COMING...THIS IS FROM SOMEONE WHO REFUSES TO LET US SEE HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE...THE MAN IS A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR!

"President" Barack Obama used his weekly radio address to refute the claims of his most strident critics who assert that health care reform legislation will lead to a government takeover of health care and euthanasia.

“That’s simply not true,” declared Obama. “The defenders of the status quo and political point-scorers in Washington are growing fiercer in their opposition."

Obama used his address to silence his “misleading” naysayers and re-take control of the health care reform message.

“This isn’t about putting government in charge of your health insurance; it’s about putting you in charge of your health insurance,” Obama said, stressing that Americans could keep their insurance coverage and doctors under his plan.

[WHAT BULL CRAP THIS MAN SPEWS TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE EVERY DAY!]

Obama covered key improvements to health care included in his plan, such as providing insurance to 46 million Americans who have none and placing new requirements on existing insurance plans to cover more routine checkups and patients who have pre-existing conditions.

BARRY SOETORO AKA OBAMA IS CONSTITUTIONALLY INELIGIBLE TO BE POTUS AND HE HAS PROVEN THAT HE HAS AN ANTI-AMERICAN AGENDA AND CANNOT BE TRUSTED...HE NEEDS TO BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY...WRITE TO YOUR CONGRESSIONAL REPRESENTATIVES AND TELL THEM THAT FAILURE TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE AND OPEN HEARINGS IS AN ABROGATION OF THEIR SWORN DUTY TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION!

Thats The Facts Jack !!

Greg Goss said...
The Constitution and de Vattel’s Law of Nations has the answer to any questions regarding citizenship abroad and any laws crossing national boundaries:

EXCERPT 1. U.S. Constitution, Article II, §1:

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;

EXCERPT 2: de Vattel’s Law of Nations circa 1758 Book 1, Chapter XIX, § 212:

The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens…The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent.

Finally, the main item in the Constitution that ties both together:

EXCERPT 3: U.S. Constitution, Article I, §8:

The Congress shall have Power…To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations

Yes, Law of Nations is capitalized, meaning our framers were citing a proper name. There was only one Law of Nations in 1787 officially declared. And yes, Congress has the power to create and enforce ANY LAW mentioned in the Law of Nations written by Emmerich de Vattel! It was sitting right under our noses the entire time.

August 7, 2009 1:58 PM

sjc said...
To Greg Goss

Well Said, and the 3rd Congress of1795 further wrote into The Congressional Record, the statute defining Natural Born Citizen.

The original volumes residing in the National Archives Building in Washington D.C.

The same place where the original Constitution is displayed enclosed by a hermetically sealed glass case for all posterity to see.

August 7, 2009 4:08 PM
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

For the record the second comment is mine. I highly recommend this site www.puzo1.blogspot.com

Steve