Sunday, April 3, 2011

Fox News .... Consider Yourself Faced

OOhhh that Sharon Rondeau ! She makes the pen sing....

Steve
+++++++++++++

Open Letter to Roger Ailes, President of Fox News

YOU HAVE SOLD OUT YOUR COUNTRY FOR THE ALMIGHTY DOLLAR
by Sharon Rondeau

The Fox News Channel was launched on October 7, 1996
(Mar. 30, 2011) — The following letter will be sent to Mr. Roger Ailes, President of Fox News Channel and Chairman of Fox Television Stations Group:

March 30, 2011

Mr. Roger Ailes
President, Fox News Channel
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036

Dear Mr. Ailes:

Despite your leadership of the “profit engine” of News Corporation owned by Rupert Murdoch and a recipient of $23,000,000 in salary and bonuses last year, you have failed the American public by refusing to report the questions regarding the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief of the United States.

One of your recommendations for success is for your staff to “read the U.S. Constitution.” When is the last time you read Article II, Section 1, clause 5, which states:

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

With your extensive and impressive history in media production, politics, consulting and business, you have steadfastly refused to allow your staff to report on the most pressing matter possibly in the history of the country: whether or not the person currently occupying the White House has a constitutional right to do so according to Article II.

Another of your slogans is reportedly “See things other don’t. Do things others won’t.”

Then why won’t you? Why haven’t you?

During the 2008 presidential campaign, your reporters asked Obama no tough questions. You must have heard that even Chris Mathews of MSNBC stated in 2007 that Obama was born in Indonesia, as did a reporter for a Hawaii newspaper. Did that not make you curious?

Apparently not. The fine investigative journalism which millions of Americans had come to expect from Fox News Channel was glaringly absent. The tough, tenacious questioning of E.D. Hill disappeared, only to be replaced by other blondes with shorter skirts and increasingly lower necklines but no ability to investigate anything. You allowed a man who has hidden his past completely from the American public to gain a place on the ballot in every state and to actually be elected president without one scrap of evidence that he was constitutionally eligible.

None of your reporters ever performed any in-depth questioning of Obama during the campaign nor gained access to his background. Just when did he go to Indonesia, and what proof did you obtain that he was born in Hawaii? How many people did you interview who knew him as a child, either in Hawaii or Indonesia? Why did you not subpoena his Illinois state senate and U.S. Senate records so that they could be open for inspection by the American people? And your pompous, overrated evening host, Bill O’Reilly, whose slogan is “We’re looking out for you,” lied when he stated on-air that he had “seen” Obama’s original birth certificate. He never saw any such thing, because no one has, at least not anything issued in this country. O’Reilly has seen only what the rest of us have seen: an online image which has been widely debunked as a forgery due to its four different versions, alterations (affirmed by the state of Hawaii as invalidating the certificate), and contradictory statements made by two different Hawaii governors unreported by a complicit media, which includes you.

If O’Reilly had seen Obama’s birth certificate, then Donald Trump wouldn’t be calling for it now.

Of all the cable channels, Fox News Channel has refrained the longest to report anything about the question of whether or not Barack Hussein Obama has a U.S. birth certificate. Only recently have you been forced to allow the airing of this urgent matter because Donald Trump has raised it as an important constitutional issue. Until now, your anchors nervously laughed off the question posed by Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, a decorated 18-year Army veteran and former flight surgeon, misrepresenting the matter by calling it “a political statement.” Again, another blonde anchor who, instead of investigating before Lakin’s court-martial was posing, failed to report when Lakin was sentenced to six months at Ft. Leavenworth, having been denied discovery by a complicit, treasonous military as if he were living in the former Soviet Union.

Your reporters remained complicit about this travesty of justice and over more than two years as multiple lawsuits have been filed against Obama and even Congress, as the military ran scared, and now that a citizen is facing criminal charges for publicly exposing Obama’s lack of proof that he is constitutionally eligible to serve.

And what about that alleged Kenyan birth certificate, Mr. Ailes? Did you know that Mr. Smith has publicly stated that he will testify in front of Congress about its authenticity? What if he is telling the truth?

Recently your popular showman, Sean Hannity, has been labeled a traitor by a veteran of the U.S. military.

The fact that Donald Trump has recently released both his short-form and long-form birth certificates proves that O’Reilly was misinforming the public when he stated that he had seen Obama’s. Why would Trump and millions of Americans still be demanding it if O’Reilly, your all-powerful arrogant media mogul, had seen it and shown it on national TV?

Besides, read the Constitution, Mr. Ailes! Being a “citizen” is not enough to be President!

Several months ago, Fr. Jonathan Morris made the statement on Fox & Friends Weekend that Obama was “born in a Muslim country, Kenya,” after which the three anchors nervously and vehemently denied it. Rather than asking how Fr. Morris obtain his information, they tried to quell any curiosity about it and correct the record as quickly as they could to state that Obama was born “in this country.” How do they know? Have they seen the birth certificate and not said anything?

In early 2009, I personally mailed to you presentments from the American Grand Jury charging Obama and others with treason and fraud. You did nothing. Obama has unconstitutionally taken over the health, banking and automobile industries, and your anchors continue to soft-pedal and smile as they silkily mention “President Obama.” If the man is ineligible to hold the office, is a usurper who has committed massive election and possibly identity fraud against the American people, why are you even referring to him as the “president?”

Because you received the AGJ presentments, you also received a copy of the criminal complaint for treason filed more than two years ago by LCDR Walter Fitzpatrick, a retired Naval commander with 25 years of service. More than 3,100 other citizens have done the same, and the FBI refuses to respond. What do you think that means, Mr. Ailes? A retired military member accusing a seated “president” of treason should have been arrested, but he has not been. Neither the FBI nor the Secret Service has taken any action; instead, the complaint remains open and unanswered. Why do you think that is, Mr. Ailes?

Now that your obscenely-paid anchors such as Steve Doocy, Brian Kilmeade, Gretchen Carlson, Greta Van Susteren and Geraldo Rivera have had to choke out a few questions about Obama’s birth certificate and therefore his presidential eligibility with Donald Trump, you might as well have them begin reporting the following:

There are multiple ways to obtain a birth document in Hawaii, one of which includes merely a statement from one relative who has resided in Hawaii for a minimum of one year claiming that a birth took place. Particularly in Obama’s time, no corroborating information was required. Perhaps this is why Obama does not seem to have an original birth certificate from the state of Hawaii and the reason why the state of Hawaii has obfuscated and refused to answer questions for almost three years. Neil Abercrombie, the new governor, has even gone so far as to say that no original birth certificate exists for Obama, agreeing with former Hawaii elections clerk Tim Adams.

There is more than ample circumstantial evidence that Obama’s birthplace is Kenya, not Hawaii. Kenyan officials such as th[e ambassador to the United States and members of Parliament have stated such on the record. Why would you not report such information to the public? Is that not the purpose of Fox News Channel, or is your real purpose to push an agenda?

While on Monday evening, Greta Van Susteren played dumb when Donald Trump stated that Obama has spent millions of dollars to hide his original birth certificate, if he even has one, and lamely stated that she “hadn’t seen her birth certificate lately,” Trump truthfully affirmed that Obama has concealed his past, official public service records, and that people “on the internet” are asking legitimate questions.

A follow-up report on his telephone interview with Van Susteren inaccurately stated that Trump “doesn’t want to become a ‘birther.’” He never said any such thing; rather, he said that the term “birther” is a pejorative to marginalize those who are asking justified questions about where Obama was born, whether or not he is eligible to serve, and what he is hiding about his past. So despite having to now cover the issue, your reporters are still trying to deny that there is a serious question about Obama’s truthfulness, birthplace, qualifications and therefore a constitutional crisis in which every law and treaty he has signed, every appointment made, and every executive order issues, might be subject to invalidation.

Your staff has known about this potential problem for over two years but pretended that it didn’t exist, much to the detriment of your company. Years ago, I and millions of others relied on Fox News for accurate and timely information, but you have lost any credibility you once had.

I am in possession of documentation from the state of Hawaii which shows that the Hawaii Democrat Party changed the required wording on its nomination certificate for Obama and Biden in 2008. I had to prepare to file a lawsuit to obtain this information. There is also evidence that it sought cover from the Democrat National Committee to certify that Obama and Biden were constitutionally qualified. Therefore, officials in Hawaii would not have been the ones to certify his eligibility if what we are now discovering was uncovered. Why has your huge news organization not obtained and reported on such documentation which clearly reveals election fraud?

Moreover, why aren’t you reporting that Obama could never have been eligible because he inherited British citizenship from his father? Even Obama himself admitted it. Why have you let all of this slip by without one report on it?

Instead, your anchors make fools of themselves by reporting that the “first celebrity” was “bounced from ‘Dancing with the Stars’” as our country sinks deeper and deeper into a Marxist coup and unparalleled economic crisis under a constitutionally-ineligible de facto chief executive. And you continue to pay them their outrageous salaries for sitting there and looking good rather than reporting what is really happening.

And how about the accusations and evidence that Obama committed social security fraud? When will you be reporting that to the American people? Notice how the report states that Col. Hollister could be brought up on charges when Obama is suspected of criminal wrongdoing!

Mr. Ailes, the charade is over. There is no “President Obama.” There is a man who is foreign-born with a foreign father who no more qualifies as a “natural born Citizen” than the Pope. Instead of trying to cover up the truth, why don’t you return to your original mission which included the late Tony Snow and other reputable journalists who sought the truth, regardless of where it led? Had you done your job in 2007 and 2008, our nation would not be close to destruction due to the election of an ineligible person to the presidency. Instead, you aided and abetted the usurpation and have masked the many crimes of which there is ample evidence he has committed.

Even if only one or two of these charges prove to be true, Obama’s crimes against America far outweigh those of President Richard Nixon. Wouldn’t that be worth reporting to save your $23,000,000 salary, Mr. Ailes?

Could there be any more pressing issue than whether or not the man making decisions to send our servicemen and women into war, sign legislation passed by Congress, appoint Supreme Court justices, signing treaties with foreign governments and invading sovereign countries is legitimate?

And what about his treason, Mr. Ailes?

Sincerely,

Sharon Rondeau
Editor
The Post & Email, Inc.
P.O. Box 302
Stafford Springs, CT 06076
203-987-7948
editor@thepostemail.com
www.thepostemail.com

COLB Image Removed from Factcheck.org Website »

COLB Image Removed from Factcheck.org Website ARE THEY GETTING NERVOUS, OR ARE THE WALLS COMING DOWN? by Sharon Rondeau (Apr. 3, 2011) — It has been reported that the image...
Apr 3 2011 /  Read More »

PLEASE SUPPORT GIVE US LIBERTY...HELP SPREAD THE WORD!...



STARTED JUNE 14, 2009, THIS BLOG WAS INTENDED TO EDUCATE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ABOUT BARACK HUSSEIN'S ELECTION FRAUD AND HIS USURPATION OF THE PRESIDENCY. AFTER NEARLY 22 MONTHS  WE ARE RAPIDLY APPROACHING OUR 10,000th  POST OF ARTICLES, VIDEOS AND PICTURES IN OUR TIRELESS EFFORT TO EDUCATE THE AMERICAN PUBLIC. 

IF YOU LIKE THIS BLOG PLEASE TELL US AND PLEASE, PLEASE TELL YOUR FRIENDS!

WOULD YOU BE SO KIND AS TO E-BLAST AT LEAST 10 OF YOUR CONTACTS TODAY AND REFER THEM TO GIVE US LIBERTY? WE HAVE NEVER ASKED FOR DONATIONS AND HAVE NO INTENTION TO DO SO. WE DO HOWEVER ASK THAT YOU HELP EXPAND OUT VIEWER/READERSHIP DURING THIS TIME OF NATIONAL CRISIS. 

PLEASE HELP SPREAD THE WORD TODAY. HELP MAKE A DIFFERENCE.

Thanks so much for your loyalty and your help.

giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com

FROM FEBRUARY 2008...AMERICA WAS BEING WARNED...BUT THE STUPID AND IGNORANT DID NOT WISH TO OPEN THEIR EYES...

Obama and Anti-Semitism, Racism, Hatred of Israel



by Bill Levinson
A growing number of bloggers such as Richard Cohen, Brigitte Gabriel, Sharon Hughes, Charles Krauthammer, Kenneth Blackwell, Naomi Ragen, Debbie Schlussel, Ed Lasky, and William Levinson are pointing out Barack Obama’s numerous connections to unsavory individuals and organizations that espouse and promote hatred of Jews, Catholics, white people, Israel, and/or the United States.
On February 8, Ira Forman of the National Jewish Democratic Council allowed himself to make the following noises about this rapidly widening campaign to expose Obama for his choice of friends i.e., Jew-haters, racists, Israel-bashers, anti-Catholic bigots, and America-haters.
    It is time all of us organizations and individuals take the responsibility for outing and yes, even shaming, the purveyors of sinat chinam in our community  to protect our values and to protect our communitys genuine political interests. —Ira N. Forman is executive director of the National Jewish Democratic Council.
That is what Ira Forman said, but the following picture is what he means.
NJDC's trousers
I identified myself to NJDC as one of the leaders of efforts to expose Barack Obama for cavorting openly with vicious anti-Semites, racists, and/or hate organizations like Al Sharpton, the National Action Network, Jeremiah Wright, and MoveOn.org, and I am still waiting for NJDC to even try to “out and shame” me.
As stated by James Fenimore Cooper’s Last of the Mohicans,
    “Your tongue is loud in the village, but in battle it is still. None of my young men strike the tomahawk deeper into the war-post–none of them so lightly on the Yengeese. The enemy know the shape of your back, but they have never seen the color of your eyes. Three times have they called on you to come, and as often did you forget to answer.”
The National “Jewish” Democratic Council is not going to out or shame anybody for speaking truths that need to be spoken. Imagine a political version of Sir Robin from Monty Python and the Holy Grail, or Falstaff from King Henry IV, Part I. I will not, however, compare NJDC with George MadDonald Frazier’s incarnation of Harry Flashman, the bully from Tom Brown’s School Days, because Flashman would actually fight when backed into a corner.
I have called NJDC at least three times to back up its threat to out and shame me, and as often, it forget or failed to do so. NJDC is now going to take my assessment because it fears a face-to-face confrontation in front of cameras, microphones, or other media. An organization with such a long record of misrepresenting (e.g. about the “Left Behind: Eternal Forces” computer game), whitewashing anti-Semitism, and promoting hatred of Christians for political gain knows its statements are indefensible.
Having dismissed it for what it is, I will now go into the specifics against Barack Obama.
Bill Levinson:
We do not, to the best of our knowledge, know of any racist or anti-Semitic statements that Obama has made himself. He either does not understand or just doesn’t care, however, that his promotion and solicitation of bigots empowers and enables their bigotry against Jews, white people in general, and/or Catholics.
(1) Obama belongs to a church whose pastor said that “white America” got its “wake up call” after 9/11, and that Israel occupies Palestinian land illegally. Jeremiah Wright also compared the United States to Iraq under Saddam Hussein.
The same church has a “non-negotiable commitment to Africa.” Don’t most Christian churches have non-negotiable commitments to the teachings of Jesus, along with the equality of all human beings regardless of race or ethnicity? Obama’s church also gave an award to the vicious anti-Semite and racist Louis Farrakhan, although it must be said that Obama distanced himself from Farrakhan.
(2) Obama endorsed Al Sharpton and his National Action Network, both of which have a long track record of promoting hatred of white people and especially Jews.
Sharpton and Obama
(3) Obama solicited and accepted the support of MoveOn.org. MoveOn’s now-disgraced Action Forum served as a platform for hate speech against Jews, Catholics, Israel, and Evangelical Christians, along with 9/11 conspiracy theories that blamed Jews and/or the U.S. Government for the terrorists’ actions. Many Action Forum entries added that Israel has no right to exist. An official MoveOn.org bulletin blamed Israel for Palestinian violence while citing references like the Electronic Intifada.
Obama and MoveOn PAC
General Betray Us ad
Naomi Ragen
Naomi Ragen dismisses the smear and makes frontal attack on Obama
The Jews who are considering voting for Obama (or Clinton) should be doing a lot more research. Even if they don't care if Israel is wiped off the map, do you really want a man whose Church gives out awards to people like Louis Farrakhan? Do you want a man whose volunteers sit under Che Guevara posters (according to the picture shown on KRIV-TV iin Texas)?
How many times can a voter turn his head and pretend that he just doesn't see?
If I've made a mistake, please debunk me. Until then, I guess I'll have to believe what I see. Just a reminder: I am a U.S. citizen who pays taxes and I have every right to express my opinion on candidates running in an election in which I plan to vote.I don't mind telling you: It won't be for Barack Obama.
Don’t worry, Naomi, NJDC has burrowed so deeply into the hole that it just pulled in after it that it won’t come out until Groundhog Day in 2009, much less by Election Day in 2008, to say a word against you. As for the Che Guevara picture, here is a screenshot.
Obama supporters and Che Guevara
Pamela of Atlas Shrugs
Obama’s Pastor is a Total Hater
Obama’s Pastor sounds more like a hate spewing imam. I am shocked this hasn’t gotten real media play (oh yeah, it’s Obama.) The more you peel back the layers of the Obama onion, the more rotten it is at its core.
[Per Tucker Carlson, quoting Jeremiah Wright]: Nine-eleven, he [Wright] says: “White America got their wake-up call after 9-11. White America and the Western world came to realize people of color had not gone away, faded in the woodwork, or just disappeared as the Great White West kept on its merry way of ignoring black concerns.” So 9-11 was payback for white racism. I mean, it goes on, and I will read more.
Right, Jeremiah, “white America got its wake-up call on 9/11.” Maybe your Caucasian counterparts (as in KKK) think the Negroes in New Orleans got their wake-up call during Hurricane Katrina, although “Negroes” isn’t exactly the word they use. Actually, it was some cheap televangelist (i.e. one of Barack Obama’s “religious” counterparts) who said New Orleans got want it “deserved” for welcoming a gay pride event. We do not find the gay lifestyle particularly attractive, but what consenting adults do in private is none of our business or society’s business, and only Islamic supremacists think people deserve to die because of their sexual orientation. Anyone who agrees with those Islamic supremacists, or is glad that people of a particular skin color were murdered by terrorists, is more than welcome to get out of our country.
Richard Cohen
Obama’s Farrakhan Test
Barack Obama is a member of Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ. Its minister, and Obama’s spiritual adviser, is the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. In 1982, the church launched Trumpet Newsmagazine; Wright’s daughters serve as publisher and executive editor. Every year, the magazine makes awards in various categories. Last year, it gave the Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. Trumpeter Award to a man it said “truly epitomized greatness.” That man is Louis Farrakhan.
Maybe for Wright and some others, Farrakhan “epitomized greatness.” For most Americans, though, Farrakhan epitomizes racism, particularly in the form of anti-Semitism. Over the years, he has compiled an awesome record of offensive statements, even denigrating the Holocaust by falsely attributing it to Jewish cooperation with Hitler — “They helped him get the Third Reich on the road.” His history is a rancid stew of lies.
Sharon Hughes
Barack Obama's Very Controversial Pastor
[Jeremiah] Wright, who performed Obama's marriage and baptized his daughters, is also his close spiritual advisor. Barack's 2004 keynote speech to the Democratic National Convention was based on a sermon by Wright called 'Audacity to Hope, which also inspired Barack's book, 'The Audacity of Hope."
In the November-December 2007 issue of Trumpet, their church's publication, Rev. Wright praised Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, who has described whites as blue-eyed devils and Jews as bloodsuckers. In the magazine Wright wrote, "He brings a perspective that is helpful and honest and will be remembered as one of the 20th and 21st century giants of the African-American religious experience. His integrity and honesty have secured him a place in history as one of the nation's most powerful critics and a religious leader who is sincere about his faith and his purpose".
…Recently Obama distanced himself from Farrakhan, but not from his pastor or his praise for Farrakhan. Why not?
For the record, it was Farrakhan who said:
"They call (Hezbollah) terrorists, I call them freedom fighters. No one asks why they would do such a thing. Why would they do such a thing? What has driven them to this point? That's what the UN, the U.S. and Europe doesn't want to deal with because the Zionists have control in England, in Europe, in the United States and around the world."
"The white man is our mortal enemy, and we cannot accept him. I will fight to see that vicious beast go down into the lake of fire prepared for him from the beginning, that he never rise again to give any innocent black man, woman or child the hell that he has delighted in pouring on us for 400 years."
"Hitler was a very great man. He wasn't great for me as a Black man but he was a great German and he rose Germany up from the ashes of her defeat by the united force of all of Europe and America after the first World War."
"Now, that nation of Israel, never has had any peace in forty years and she will never have any peace because there can never be any peace structured on injustice, thievery, lying and deceit and using the name of God to shield your dirty religion [Judaism] under His holy and righteous name."
'Do you know some of these satanic Jews have taken over BET? Everything that we built, they have. The mind of Satan now is running the record industry, movie industry and television. And they make us look like we're the murderers; we look like we're the gangsters, but we're punk stuff."
"This Koran says that the Jews have altered the word of God out of its place. They did not want the masters of the people to know what Jesus really said, what Moses really said, because then you wouldn't have a yardstick to measure their deviations."
Charles Krauthammer
Obama is Burt Lancaster in a remake of  'The Rainmaker' or 'Elmer Gantry'
Obama has an astonishingly empty paper trail. He's going around issuing promissory notes on the future that he can't possibly redeem. Promises to heal the world with negotiations with the likes of Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Promises to transcend the conundrums of entitlement reform that require real and painful trade-offs and that have eluded solution for a generation. Promises to fund his other promises by a rapid withdrawal from an unpopular war – with the hope, I suppose, that the (presumed) resulting increase in American prestige would compensate for the chaos to follow.
Democrats are worried that the Obama spell will break between the time of his nomination and the time of the election, and deny them the White House. My guess is that he can maintain the spell just past Inauguration Day. After which will come the awakening. It will be rude.
We think this is what Mr. Krauthammer means, and we agree.
Empty Suit
Brigitte Gabriel
Speaker at federation event slammed for calling Obama an "anti-Semite"
"Barack Obama is an anti-Semite," said Gabriel, who founded the nonprofit organization American Congress for Truth following the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. "No Jews should support him. Jews should vote for Hillary Clinton."
I don’t agree with the latter statement because Clinton also promoted Al Sharpton while backing MoveOn.org’s insult to General David Petraeus, and I will vote for McCain in November. However, Aesop was right about birds of a feather flocking together. Obama surrounds himself with so many anti-Semites, racists, and other bigots that it is difficult not to take him for one himself.
Ed Lasky, the editor of The American Thinker
Barack Obama and Israel
The ascent of Barack Obama from state senator in Illinois to a leading contender for the Presidential nomination in the span of just a few years is remarkable. Especially in light of a noticeably unremarkable record — a near-blank slate of few accomplishments and numerous missed votes.
However, in one area of foreign policy that concerns millions of Americans, he does have a record and it is a particularly troubling one. For all supporters of the America-Israel relationship there is enough information beyond the glare of the klieg lights to give one pause. In contrast to his canned speeches filled with “poetry” and uplifting aphorisms and delivered in a commanding way, behind the campaign facade lies a disquieting pattern of behavior.
One seemingly consistent theme running throughout Barack Obama’s career is his comfort with aligning himself with people who are anti-Israel advocates.
Kenneth Blackwell, NY Sun
Beyond Obama’s Beauty
Start with national security, since the president’s most important duties are as commander-in-chief. Over the summer, Mr. Obama talked about invading Pakistan, a nation armed with nuclear weapons; meeting without preconditions with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who vows to destroy Israel and create another Holocaust; and Kim Jong Il, who is murdering and starving his people, but emphasized that the nuclear option was off the table against terrorists  something no president has ever taken off the table since we created nuclear weapons in the 1940s. Even Democrats who have worked in national security condemned all of those remarks. Mr. Obama is a foreign-policy novice who would put our national security at risk.
How to fix Social Security? Raise taxes. How to fix Medicare? Raise taxes. Prescription drugs? Raise taxes. Free college? Raise taxes. Socialize medicine? Raise taxes. His solution to everything is to have government take it over. Big Brother on steroids, funded by your paycheck.
Finally, look at the social issues. Mr. Obama had the audacity to open a stadium rally by saying, “All praise and glory to God!” but says that Christian leaders speaking for life and marriage have “hijacked”  Christianity. He is pro-partial birth abortion, and promises to appoint Supreme Court justices who will rule any restriction on it unconstitutional. He espouses the abortion views of Margaret Sanger, one of the early advocates of racial cleansing. His spiritual leaders endorse homosexual marriage, and he is moving in that direction. In Illinois, he refused to vote against a statewide ban  on all handguns in the state. These are radical left, Hollywood, and San Francisco values, not Middle America values.
Obama is not merely pro-partial birth abortion, he is pro-live birth abortion as shown by his central role in derailing Illinois’ Born Alive Infants Protection Act–and even NARAL Pro-Choice America did not oppose the Federal version. We suspect both from context and Obama’s record that “he refused to vote against a statewide ban  on all handguns in the state” is a misstatement, and that Obama supported the handgun ban.
Debbie Schlussel
Obama's Nation of Islam Staffers, Edward Said & "Inflexible Jews" Causing Mid-East Conflict: An Obama Insider Reveals the Real Barack
But a former Obama insider says that Obama's sudden aversion to NOI and Farrakhan is belied by the fact that Obama employed and continues to employ several Farrakhan acolytes in high positions on his Illinois and U.S. Senate campaign and office staffs. I have verified that this person who agreed to talk on the condition of anonymity held a key position in the Obama campaign. The insider was so close to Senator Obama that they frequently personally discussed and exchanged direct e-mail messages on campaign and policy matters. This person is not connected with the Clintons and is not a disgruntled employee.
Obama and Edward Said
Schlussel cited this picture as follows: “Barack Hussein & Michelle Obama with Palestinian Activist, PLO/Arafat Advisor Edward Said @ Arab Fundraiser
(Photos From Electronic Intifada)”
Common sense says that, if a public figure appears with a prominent Klansman while praising the Klan, he is promoting and empowering racism even if the N word never leaves his own mouth. While Barack Obama has not personally said anything against Jews, Catholics, white people in general, Israel, or the United States, his open association with and promotion of individuals and entities that do these things enables and empowers their unsavory agendas. The fact that he either does not understand this or does not care is why he should not be President. All decent people must stand up on the Internet and in letters to the editor to expose the loathsome “Obamanation” behind the phony smile on top of the empty suit. We will gladly lead this effort and, if the National “Jewish” Democratic Council wishes to try to “out and shame” us, we have three words for them: “Bring it on.”
I will shortly prepare a set of viral E-mails and letters to the editor for people to use to discredit Obama. All will be placed in the public domain.

FROM ATTY MARIO APUZZO...

...on July 4, 2010, Lucas Smith provided each member of Congress with his or her own personal copy of the Coast Province General Hospital Kenya Birth Certificate, bearing Certificate No. 32018, which shows that Obama was born on August 4, 1961, at the Coast Province General Hospital in “Mombasa. British Protectorate of Kenya.” On March 12, 2011, Mr. Smith called into the Hagmann-McLeod Report on CFP Radio, a radio show on which Commander Charles Kerchner and I were guests. I directly asked Mr. Smith if he is willing to testify under oath and under penalty of perjury before Congress as to how he obtained this birth certificate. He said that he has always been ready to do so.


One may listen to the show via podcast at: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/cfp-radio/2011/03/13/hagmann-mcleod-report .[2 hour podcast well worth your time]. Despite all this, Congress has not asked for any investigation into the authenticity of the Lucas Smith birth certificate. Nor has this Kenyan birth certificate yet been proven to be a forgery.

Obama’s short-form birth certificate, which states that it is only prima facie evidence of place of birth, is not only unreliable, but fails to adequately prove Obama’s place of birth in light of all this other conflicting evidence. Evidently, Obama’s internet-posted COLB has not convinced a great majority of Americans. A new poll and survey shows that 91% of Americans doubt Obama is constitutionally eligible to be President. In other words, only 9% believe Obama has adequately documented his eligibility to be President. See the recent WND story by Bob Unruh, entitled, “Shocking scientific poll on Obama's eligibility” at http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=276865.

Atty Mario Apuzzo and CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) were on the Peter Boyle Radio Show on KHOW 630 in Denver CO - Monday 28 Mar 2011 @ 8 a.m. EST

Atty Mario Apuzzo and CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) were on the Peter Boyle Radio Show on KHOW 630 in Denver CO - Monday 28 March 2011 @ 8 a.m. EST.

The topic will be the lack of constitutional eligibility of the putative president Obama and Obama's unwillingness to provide any hard evidence and documents to controlling legal authorities to back up his claim of a Hawaiian birth. Also, Donald Trump's recent statement calling on Obama to release his alleged long form birth certificate, if Obama has one.

Factual and legal issues will be discussed. Obama was born to a British Subject foreign national father and Obama himself was thus a British Subject at birth. Obama is not a "natural born Citizen" as is required by the U.S. Constitution Article II, Section 1 for that reason since his father was not a U.S. Citizen, not even an immigrant to the USA, nor even a permanent resident. Obama's birth may have been registered in Hawaii but with the contrary statements coming out of Kenya, and in past years before he ran for President such as these, it is likely that he was not physically born in Hawaii but only falsely registered there as being born in Hawaii by his maternal grandmother after the fact to get her new foreign born grandson U.S. Citizenship using a simple mail-in form available back in Hawaii in 1961. The false registration of his birth would account for the short-form certification of live birth record and the 1961 newspaper accounts of the birth being registered with the Hawaiian Health Department which placed those public service announcements in the weekly papers for all birth registered, real or falsified. See Atty Mario Apuzzo's "Catalog of Evidence" for and against Obama's claimed Hawaiian birth nativity story.

Listen to this show on Podcast at this link:
http://a1135.g.akamai.net/f/1135/18227/1h/cchannel.download.akamai.com/18227/podcast/DENVER-CO/KHOW-AM/03282011PETE6A.mp3

For information on the Peter Boyle Radio Show see:
http://www.khow.com/pages/boyles.html

Posted by:
CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
####

COME ON DONALD...TIME TO GET UP TO SPEED...

Follow The Bouncing Ball

I was mulling over some of the little nitpicky things that people on both sides of the obama eligibility battle tend to get hung up on.
Lets begin, and if I don’t finish this up today, I’ll add to it in a few days.
Some say…..obama can’t produce a certified copy of his original long form, hospital generated birth certificate because it’s sealed due to the adoption by Lolo Soetoro.

Answer:  Then how is it that Obama Sr.’s name appears on that COLB?
The adoption would have had to have been set aside, as there have been some indications did happen.  I refer to some story about how when “Barry Soetoro” was 18 or so, he went to a Judge on Thanksgiving and then showed up in his sister’s presence announcing, “No more Barry”.  Hence the multiple birth records.  Something like that -it was a long time ago that I heard that story.
So, they can’t have it both ways.  Either the COLB is a screaming forgery because it has Obama Sr. listed, or obama can indeed release his original certificate because clearly there is no “adoptive parent”/sealed original certificate restriction.

Of course, there has never been a copy of adoption records, just that Soetoro made the claim on a Indonesia school registration form that obama was his kid and was also Indonesian.
“The nation of Citizenship: Indonesia”

Some say…..obama released a perfectly legal and certified COLB, which is proof enough that he was born in Hawaii.
On this COLB, this item that is the single, solitary piece of evidence of US birth that obama has released, we find something highly unusual:
The “Father’s race” field indicates Obama Sr.’s race as “African”.  This is one thing that almost every one agrees is most strange.  Have YOU ever in your life seen or heard of a US birth certificate showing a parents race as the Continent of Africa?  I didn’t think so.  Africa is a continent consisting of many countries, it is not a race of people.  If say, Obama Sr. would have DEMANDED in no uncertain terms that he wished to be coded as something other than Negro,  which was the code in use in  1961, wouldn’t he have been more likely to demand “Kenyan”?


In 1961 the “race codes” were:

In 2000 the “race codes” were:

STILL NO AFRICAN.
Yes, a parent can self identify as to race, to an extent.  For instance, if you look Caucasian, but tell the attending Dr. or nurse that you are “British”, I’d be willing to bet that your kids birth certificate won’t have “British” as your race.  There is a reason that it is standardized.  If you tell the Dr. that you are American Indian rather than Mexican, that would indeed be reflected on the birth certificate.  Because there is a CODE for that.  You get to pick from the list.  You don’t get to create a whole new code just for your own special self.
To apply for a social security card, one has to produce more that a COLB.  Shoudn’t the president of the United States have to satisfy at least the same level of best evidence?  I mean, the leader of the free world and all – it doesn’t seem too much to expect.

On to the birth address.  By now even the most ardent obama supporter has come to terms with the fact that Obama Sr. and S. Ann never shared a residence.
So then, doesn’t that make the newspaper birth announcement for baby obama null and void as “evidence” since the address listed for Obama Sr. is fraudulent, and has been proven to be fraudulent?  I should think so.  I requested, and received, copies from the 1960′s POLK directories and phone books housed in the Honolulu State Library.  These copies were collected for me by persons known to me, so I know that they are legit.  They each collected copies for me in 2010, about six months apart.  Nowhere did a entry, or record appear showing Obama Sr. to have ever lived at 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy.  Every record, while he lived in Hawaii, show him to reside at 625 11th Ave.  For convenience sake, I’m just pasting the image from the WND account.  I continue to maintain all of the records and copies from my research.


Next we have the faithful that say it doesn’t matter what address was used for MR. OBAMA, ’cause at least one of them lived at that address.  The newspaper birth announcements are absolute proof anyway.
But what if there are distinct anomalies with those very announcements?  Most of my regular readers are familiar with the research done into the infamous obama newspaper birth announcements. I did that piece and a bunch of follow up “support” posts with additional material, and research.   I’ll link the main post here, in case new readers want to delve into that.  It is a long read, but well worth it as it is the only work of it’s kind.  There are copies of the micro-filmed papers from three of the locations where they are housed.
One of the main things that the research established was that :
The ONE and ONLY time that the two papers published the birth list, beginning at the first announcement, in EXACT descending order, were the editions that obama’s birth announcement appeared in.  This was indeed the only time that these announcements were printed this way, as the closest the papers came to doing this again never had all the same names listed in the exact same order.  I checked a total of a two month span.  At the time I had published the research I had checked a ten day range, with obama’s announcement in the middle of that sample.
http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2010/05/28/extra-extra-announcing-obamas-birth
I was also able to definitively expose the fraud behind the first examples of the obama birth announcements released to the blogger TexasDarlin.  I do not think she was complicit.  These things were sent to her.
I’ll add the link to my post with the info about my take on those first examples:
http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/extra-extra-announcing-obamas-birth/round-pegs-in-square-holes/
Next, lets tackle the passport.
People claim that obama had an Indonesian passport that allowed him to travel to Pakistan when he was a young man.  There are still people claiming that the “proof” he had an Indonesian passport is that Pakistan was on a “no travel” list for the US at that time, and he would not have been able to travel there on a US passport.  Listen carefully to me……..it was not.on.a.no.travel.list!  It was on a travel at your own risk kind of status.  I forget the official term just now, but you know what I mean.  Anyway, so that can not be used as proof that obama only had a Indonesian passport in his youth.  It is quite plausible that he did have one issued to him to travel back to the states from Indonesia when his loving mamma dumped him on his grandparents.  And quite likely he could have maintained it.
From the US State Dept Travel.State.Gov site:
Most U.S. citizens, including dual nationals, must use a U.S. passport to enter and leave the United States. Dual nationals may also be required by the foreign country to use its passport to enter and leave that country. Use of the foreign passport does not endanger U.S. citizenship.
Information on losing foreign citizenship can be obtained from the foreign country’s embassy and consulates in the United States. Americans can renounce U.S. citizenship in the proper form at U.S. embassies and consulates abroad.
How could he get a US passport if he didn’t have a legitimate BC to show?  Well, we know for a fact that diplomatic passports, the type Senators and even the Presidents carry, are automatically issued when you are elected.  You don’t have to go through all the crap that a citizen does.  Go figure.  So, no COLB or long form birth certificate need be produced.
If he would have had to submit his birth cetificate, the passport would show his name as Barack Hussein Obama ll.  The “ll” is absent.

Thems the facts Jack !

~ by ladysforest on January 22, 2011.

MORE INFO FOR DONALD TRUMP...

Red Flags in Hawaii

By butterdezillion Red Flags in Hawaii
People are asking how so many terrorist red flags could be overlooked by so many. The same way these “birther” red flags were not only overlooked but ridiculed:
1. DOH Director Fukino illegally hid until Nov 2009 the DOH Administrative Rules showing that election officials could have received a copy of Obama’s original birth certificate without his permission. The DOH has said they can’t release any records without Obama’s permission. But HRS 338-18(a) allows state laws and DOH rules to govern the disclosure of vital records, and the current rules -Chapter 8b, 2.5(A)(1)(f) -would allow any election officer transacting the placement of Obama’s name on the ballot to receive a certified copy.

2. The DOH has falsely said that HRS 338-18 prohibits disclosure of government processing records. There are 2 kinds of records – records of the vital events themselves, and records of the government’s handling ( http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0001.htm) of those records.
Certificates are the record of the vital events. HRS 338-18(a) says that information about the actual birth, death, marriage, and divorce events may only be released according to the provisions set by law or Department of Health rules, thus referring everyone to the DOH Administrative Rules to see how information on actual certificates may be disclosed and to whom. Far from barring “any disclosure” as claimed by the DOH, current Administrative Rules allow a non-certified abbreviated copy of a birth (Chapter 8b, 2.5B), marriage (Ch 8b, 2.8C), or death (Ch8b, 2.6C) certificate to be released to anyone who asks for it. However, a public statement of where someone was born – such as Fukino’s July 27, 2009 statement about Obama – is not allowed by the rules (Ch 8b, 2.1A).
All other records are public, except that neither direct viewing nor certified copies are allowed unless the requestor has a direct and tangible interest. Non-certified copies, abstracts, and disclosure of information from the documents are not prohibited – which, according to Hawaii’s “Sunshine Law” (UIPA) means they must be disclosed upon request, except for certain exemptions, such as for information having privacy interest that outweighs the public interest in disclosure: date of birth, gender, and address .

Since a damaging disclosure of records processing was made in September (see #3), The DOH has been denying access to these records by claiming that ANY DISCLOSURE is forbidden.

3. Though ridiculing “birthers” publicly, the DOH has PRIVATELY confirmed Obama’s online COLB’s as forgeries – a fact the DOH has known since the beginning. Because processing information is subject to disclosure, the DOH was forced in Sept 2009 to reveal that Obama’s birth certificate has been amended (OIP interpretation) and that Obama or his representative has paid a fee to have his certificate amended at the very time he was considering a run for the presidency. Amendments must be noted on the certificate (Ch 8b, 3.1), so the DOH has known this entire time that both the Factcheck and Fight the Smears COLB’s are forgeries, since they have no amendment noted.
When asked point-blank on Feb 22, 2010 whether the denial of access confirmed the existence of Obama’s amendment documents, the OIP refused to refute that understanding, saying (after 2 e-mails asking clarification) that they were too busy to address the question.

4. The combination of certificate number and filing date on the Factcheck COLB is not possible. The DOH has confirmed that the certificate number is assigned by them when they file the certificate. Observed certificate numbers corroborate this as well, and so does page 232 of the CDC’s 1961 Natality Report. The Factcheck COLB says it was filed at the DOH 3 days before the Nordkye twins’ certificates but has a later number than theirs. The DOH has refused to release the certificate number for Obama even though they are required by UIPA to do so.

5. Every government agency in Hawaii contacted thus far has explicitly denied that they have a responsibility to report known forgery and/or have refused to report suspected forgery to law enforcement. This includes the Department Of Health, Office of Information Practices (OIP), lieutenant governor’s office, and every member of Hawaii’s House and Senate. Janice Okubo of the DOH seems to have stated that law forbids her to disclose ANYTHING about a birth certificate– even that it’s a critical, very public forgery. The Ombudsman’s Office has said they don’t investigate crimes and only report evidence they uncover themselves. See no evil…

6. The amendment made to Obama’s birth certificate renders it insufficient evidence for legal purposes. Minor administrative errors (such as typos) don’t remove the prima facie evidentiary value of a birth certificate, but such no-fault errors don’t result in a fee (Ch 8b 3.5C, 3.11, 3.1, & HRS 338-17) and Obama was charged a fee – as the DOH confirmed again on March 23, 2010. Legal name changes also don’t affect the evidentiary value, but the lieutenant governor’s office has confirmed that there has been no legal name change for anyone named Obama, Dunham, Soetoro, or Sutoro.

7. Kapiolani Hospital received a letter signed by Obama on White House stationery and with raised seal claiming Obama was born there, even though that could only be true if Obama’s amendment contradicted the doctor’s testimony. If he had been born in a Hawaii hospital the hospital itself would have been responsible for the content on the birth certificate and the DOH responsible for any clerical typos. The only way Obama would be charged for an amendment is:
a) if he or his representative claimed to have filled out the certificate themselves and erred, or
b) if Obama claimed the doctor’s testimony was wrong.

8. The DOH has broken Hawaii law to make rule changes (see July 11 addendum at bottom) that would protect Obama. In mid-June of 2009 the DOH stated that they will no longer issue long-form birth certificates. This is in direct violation of the current rules, without following HRS 91-3 mandates for an open process for rule changes – the first of several such violations within the past year.

9. Fukino stated on July 27, 2009 that Obama’s records verify his birth in Hawaii, but Hawaii law forbids her to conclude that, since all the DOH has is legal hearsay. According to PHR Chapter 8b and HRS 338-17, only a judicial or administrative person or group can evaluate the accuracy of the claims when an amended document is presented as evidence. Obama has had many, many opportunities to present his birth certificate as evidence in lawsuits. He has refused – even going so far as rescinding military orders rather than risk a judge seeing his birth certificate. There is no process by which Obama would present his records to Fukino as evidence.

10. Having made the illegal statement, Fukino refused to obey UIPA which required her to release the documents on which her statement was based.

11. The DOH has deleted documents required to be stored for at least 2 years. The DOH says it no longer has the UIPA request or invoices showing Obama’s birth certificate was amended. The DOH’s own “Rules of Practice & Procedure” (11-1-30) say that documents must be stored as long as the case can be contested – August 2011 in this case.
12. Fukino averted discipline against herself by promoting the OIP director, who was replaced by the attorney who has designed the DOH’s deceptive responses. Six days after Leo Donofrio’s blog said he would ask OIP Director Tsukiyama for disciplinary action against Fukino and Okubo for their deception, Tsukiyama resigned from the OIP to take a promotion to a company on whose board of directors Fukino sits. He granted Cathy Takase’s request to have control of all DOH matters and asked her to replace him.
Now OIP is leaving HRS 338-18 rulings up to the DOH and refuses to clarify what kinds of responses qualify as Glomar responses. All DOH responses contain deceptions #1&2, including disobeying their own rules for non-certified abbreviated copies of birth, marriage, and death certificates. They deny that documents exist which are required by law, such as descriptions of their forms, procedures, and instructions which are mandated in HRS 91, etc..
13. Apparently in response to this blog post and a request for a legislative investigation of these matters, Hawaii State Senator Will Espero has introduced a bill that would allow the OIP to label people who ask too many questions as “vexatious requestors” who are then blacklisted from access to government records for 2 years. The net effect of the bill would be to overturn UIPA. They also want to fine “vexatious requestors”…
14. The DOH is falsifying the communication logs in e-mails to frame the requestor as what Cathy Takase calls ”mentally ill” - thus fit to label as a “vexatious requestor” and blacklist for 2 years.
15. The DOH claims that original records required to be retained permanently (original birth index and index of foreign births) don’t exist. Either they are lying or they have illegally destroyed permanent records.
Red flags. This information has been given to every lawmaker in Hawaii, the OIP, DOH, Ombudsman’s office, HI lieutenant governor’ and governor’s offices, Nebraska’s US attorney (who says they won’t take reports from citizens), and Hawaii’s director of the Department of Public Safety, as well as to multiple news organizations. The FBI thrice said they don’t investigate document fraud. All refused to act. Red flags.

It’s A Page Turner

http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/

•April 1, 2011 • 35 Comments
This post is just about comparing some images from the microfilm in the Library of Congress that I made copies of last February.  I had noticed that the Star Bulletin Aug. 1- Aug. 15 1961 microfilm showed significant damage until I got to the page before the page containing obama’s birth announcement.  Since Mr. Trump has been stirring the pot about the newspaper birth announcements, I thought you all might like to see these.  I did screenshots of my pdf’s, the better to make an instant impression.  Comments welcome.
CLICK TO ENLARGE:
.

Star Bulletin 8/03/1961

Star Bulletin 8/07/1961

Star Bulletin 8/10/1961

Star Bulletin 8/13/1961
.


Star Bulletin 8/14/1961 - pg. 23

Star Bulletin 8/14/1961 - pg. 24 - obama announcement
.
Here, this post will give you additional information and insight.  Published Sept. 18, 2010 – good info, easy to read: http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2010/09/18/round-pegs-in-square-holes

Ya Don’t Know What Ya Don’t Know-UPDATE!

•March 28, 2011 • 34 Comments Ok.  My Donald provided a official birth certificate to be published online.
I need to have you all realize one simple thing – although this is not the form he would be given were he to go to the Vital Stats office today and order a fresh certified copy, THIS IS A COPY FROM 1946 – IT IS OLD AND AUTHENTIC.  HAS OBAMA RELEASED ANYTHING AT ALL THAT IS PERIOD AND AUTHENTIC?  Answer: NO

Donald-Trump-Birth-Certificate--resized.jpg
CUE: The Doubters
Do you realize that Mr. Trump was born in 1946?  And that in 1946 the hospital issued a copy signed by the doctor that was suitable for framing?
You all have GOT to quit thinking in today’s terms.
Look, until just around that point in the United States history, birth certificates were not standardized.  Have you ever seen an older marriage certificate?  They were pretty.  So, does the Donald’s BC look like the modern day certified copies?  Nope.  But the one he rolled out is what was issued to the parents back when Trump was born.
I was born in 1962, at home, delivered by a MD, and my original BC had little more info on it than Trump’s does.  It did have my weight though.  And it wasn’t as pretty – the certificate I mean.
OH YE OF LITTLE FAITH !!!  H/T Kittycat77


LINK TO ABC ARTICLE:
http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2011/03/donald-trump-releases-official-birth-certificate.html

Mr. Obama’s Libyan Adventure
 By Daniel Greenfield Full Story
imageIt’s a lot easier to start a war than it is to finish it, as Mr. Obama is learning on his Libyan adventure. That is why wars are generally entered into after some consideration of the situation on the ground. There is only one excuse for a rush to war—and that is either an imminent threat or in response to an act of war. Such was the case after September 11, and yet even then the United States waited longer to begin bombing the Taliban—than we did before bombing Gaddafi.
Obama rushed in when bombing Libya was popular, and now when it hasn’t he’s rushing out again. The US is ending combat operations almost as soon as it began them to avoid being associated with the failure of the Libyan intervention. Or rather to avoid associating Obama with its failure.  Obama was happy to take credit for the fall of Mubarak until the Muslim Brotherhood stepped up to succeed him. He was happy to take credit for toppling Gaddafi until he realized that it wasn’t going to happen without a full bore invasion. The Arab Revolt was cool, but now it isn’t anymore. And Obama doesn’t want to be associated with it anymore.  Suddenly it’s last year’s Keffiyah lying in the trash.

Saturday, April 2, 2011

MORE EVIDENCE AND COMMON SENSE THAT POINTS TO FRAUD BY OBAMA...

Saturday, April 2, 2011

Governor Abercrombie’s Bogus Quest to Prove Obama Was Born in Hawaii

Governor Abercrombie’s Bogus Quest to Prove Obama Was Born in Hawaii

By Mario Apuzzo
April 2, 2011

Hollywood celebrity journalist/radio host, Mike Evans, has known now Governor of Hawaii, Neil Abercrombie, for decades. He first met the Governor when the Governor was driving a cab in Honolulu, Hawaii. They became good friends. They spent a lot of time together in Washington during the time of Obama’s inauguration. Abercrombie told Evans then that he was going to run for Governor of Hawaii. He also told Evans that he remembered Obama as a child and that he used to call him Barry. He told him that once he became Governor, he was going to put an end to the story that Obama was not born in the United States by getting a copy of his birth certificate.

Abercrombie did become Governor and using his powers as Governor, he did look for the document. On January 19, 2011, Abercrombie told Evans during a telephone conversation that he searched everywhere for the birth certificate. He told him that he went to the only two hospitals that existed in Honolulu at the time at which a baby could be born, Kapi’olani Women’s and Children’s Hospital and Queen’s Hospital. Abercrombie told him that there is no Obama birth certificate in Hawaii and that there is absolutely no proof that Obama was born in Hawaii. Abercrombie also told Evans that he remembered Obama playing in a tee-ball league when he was about 5 or 6 but not before that. A confirmation of this information can be heard on a recording of an interview on the radio 92 KQRS Morning Show done on January 20, 2011. During this radio show, Mike Evans, recounts the details of his conversation he had with Governor Abercrombie just the day before.

A story on this new revelation and the radio interview can be heard at http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/01/hawaii-hollywood-reporter-mike-evans.html. A full bio on Mike Evans can be seen at http://www.evansradio.com/mikestory.html.

On January 20, 2011, former Hawaii elections clerk Tim Adams signed an affidavit in which he swears that his supervisors in Hawaii told him that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Obama. He swears that he was also told that neither Queens Medical Center nor Kapi'olani Medical Center in Honolulu had any medical record showing that Obama was born in either facility. Read more: Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=254401#ixzz1C21WDdlc

Governor Abercrombie then announced that he could do not more to prove Obama was born in Hawaii because it is against state law to release private documents such as his birth certificate. See the story here http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/breaking/114401004.html.

The question now is if Abercrombie has not been able to find any Obama Hawaii birth certificate, why did he tell the public that he was abandoning his search for it because privacy laws prohibit him from disclosing the document? Let’s grant to Abercrombie that his efforts were thwarted by privacy laws. But what I do not understand is why he did not simply obtain Obama’s consent for the release of the birth certificate. After all, Abercrombie said that he was a friend of Obama's parents and knew him as a child.

What I also do not understand is why Abercrombie, who was so concerned about honoring Obama’s parents and the 2012 presidential election would give up on his quest so easily just because he cannot get the birth certificate released. Is the birth certificate the only piece of evidence that could prove or disprove an Obama Hawaiian birth? What happened to talking to family and friends from 1961 about an Obama birth in Hawaii? Is there no doctor, nurse, family member, friend, or official who remembered the Obama birth in Hawaii and could give Abercrombie confirming evidence of a Hawaiian birth? Abercrombie said that he was a friend of Obama's parents and knew him as a child. Why could Abercrombie not find any other evidence of an Obama birth in Hawaii? With the resources of the Governor’s Office and the publicity generated by this story, how could the Governor not find one person on the whole island of Hawaii or even from the mainland who could confirm with any real evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii?

There is also another highly suspect part to Abercrombie’s story. And that has to do with medical records. Hawaii Health Department has publicly released incomplete and inconclusive information which Obama supporters claim shows that Obama was born in Honolulu. During the 2008 election, Hawaii's Director of Health, Chiyome Fukino, said:

"There have been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein Obama's official birth certificate. State law (Hawaii Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record. Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai'i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obama's original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures. No state official, including Governor Linda Lingle, has ever instructed that this vital record be handled in a manner different from any other vital record in the possession of the State of Hawaii."

Months later, in July 2009, she added:

"I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago."

As we can see, Dr. Fukino, a medical doctor, did not mention anything about the most compelling and probative evidence of a birth event, to wit, medical evidence. As I have reported in my May 6, 2010 article entitled, A Catalog of Evidence - Concerned Americans Have Good Reason to Doubt that Putative President Obama Was Born in Hawaii , Section 338-5 of the Hawaiian statute provides: "§338-5 Compulsory registration of births. Within the time prescribed by the department of health, a certificate of every birth shall be substantially completed and filed with the local agent of the department in the district in which the birth occurred, by the administrator or designated representative of the birthing facility, or physician, or midwife, or other legally authorized person in attendance at the birth; or if not so attended, by one of the parents. The birth facility shall make available to the department appropriate medical records for the purpose of monitoring compliance with the provisions of this chapter. [L 1949, c 327, §9; RL 1955, §57-8; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; HRS §338-5; am L 1988, c 149, §1]."

Obama alleges he was born in Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital, now called Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children. At no time during the ongoing public debate about whether Obama was born in Hawaii has any official from Hawaii at least informed the pubic that Obama's alleged vital records show that his birth certificate from 1961 was "completed and filed" with the health department in Honolulu by some official of that hospital or a physician or midwife associated with that institution. If Obama was born in a hospital as he claims, we cannot reasonably believe that his birth certificate would have been completed and filed by one of his parents. Additionally, under this statute, Hawaii has the power and authority to obtain medical records from Kapi'olani Medical Center to confirm Obama's alleged Hawaiian birth. At no time did Hawaii inform the American public that it in fact confirmed with that hospital that Obama was in fact born there which it can do under the cited statute. Hawaii has withheld this underlying evidence from the public. This withholding of evidence is a grave matter given that there exists such reasonable doubt as to whether Obama, the putative President and Commander in Chief of our military might, was in fact born in Hawaii.

Under Section 338-5, any birth certificate has to be completed and filed by some institution (hospital) or person (doctor, midwife, or parent). This statute also shows that Hawaii has the authority to confirm any reported birth by examining medical records. While Hawaii pretends to have come clean with the American public, it did not even provide such basic information or conduct such due diligence regarding extant medical evidence which would give the public greater that needed assurance that Obama's birth record is genuine.

With the State of Hawaii having such authority under Section 338-5 to confirm through medical records that a birth in fact occurred in a Hawaiian hospital, why did Abercrombie not confirm for the American people that the Obama birth file in Hawaii in fact shows that his birth event is corroborated with medical evidence from Kapi’olani Medical Center as is required by Section 338-5?  Are we to reasonably believe that there exists no medical evidence confirming Obama's birth in Hawaii that Governor Abercrombie can share with the American people? 

We will know what the underlying evidence is about Obama's alleged birth in Hawaii only if we can examine Obama's contemporaneous birth certificate from 1961, the long-form, hospital generated birth certificate, which should be readily available since Obama claims he was born in Kapi'olani Medical Center in 1961. That root document will tell us the name of the hospital in which he was born and the name of the doctor or midwife who delivered him. Those pieces of information are highly corroborative of the place and time of birth, for they provide a whole other dimension of contemporaneous facts that would support Hawaii's or anybody else's bare statement as to the place and time of Obama's registered birth.

Governor Abercrombie, you really need to do better for the majority of American people who want and are entitled to see credible and convincing proof of where Obama was born. 

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
April 2, 2011
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
####

Copyright © 2011
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
All Rights Reserved

Responsibilty To Protect- In Greater Need For The Ivory Coast Than Libya

About that moral international obligation Mr Pious Liar
 --



Charity Reports More than 1,000 Killed in Ivory Coast

Libyan deaths in the tens over the same period

Published April 02, 2011
| Associated Press


JOHANNESBURG – Unknown attackers wielding machetes and guns killed more than 1,000 civilians in the neighborhood of an Ivory Coast town controlled by forces fighting to install the internationally recognized president, the Catholic charity Caritas told The Associated Press Saturday.

A NICE SUMMATION FROM THE BLOGOSPHERE...

Of course Obama is not a "natural born American." If he were, he would release his birth certificate. He knows the truth and has lied for years to cover it up, making him a malicious, knowing, criminal fraud. Better yet, this phony is not even an American citizen. He grew up a citizen of Indonesia, registered as a Muslim, which he is in all but name, and never took out naturalization papers because he wanted to qualify for scholarship aid as a foreign student at Columbia and Harvard. We know this because both his Social Security Number and his Selective Service Registration Number are bogus. Faking these official ID numbers to hide material facts is a criminal offense. We await a public figure like Donald Trump to demand an investigation. The U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Columbia and Harvard Universities, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi, who certified Obama's electoral eligibility, all know that he is not Constitutionally qualified to be president. Major news organizations know this as well. Their refusal to release the documentary proof in their possession to the American people makes them all criminal co-conspirators in this greatest political crime in American history. Treason is not too strong a word.

AND THE OBOTS WONDER WHY WE WANT TO KNOW WHO THIS BASTARD IS?...



The video starts out with some content from obamasnippets.com, which, of course is contrived. And yet, there seems to be a synthetic truth about what the president says. Is he "natural born" according to the Constitution? No. The requirement is that BOTH parents need to be U. S. Citizens. Two U. S. Citizen parents produce a "natural born" citizen. It's likely that Mr. Obama was REGISTERED in Hawaii, therefore he has a COLB from Hawaii. The truth may well be he was born in Kenya; that is where we believe his "long-form" birth certificate was issued. Nevertheless, "natural born" indicates, and speaks to the fact that BOTH parents have to be U. S. Citizens. His father WAS NEVER a U. S. Citizen, therefore, Barack Hussein Obama is NOT a "natural born" Citizen of the United States, thus he is in violation of Amendment 14, and Article II, Section 1, Paragraph 5 of the United States Constitution.

BRING IT ON BARRY!...

Obama '12 launch likely next week
By: Glenn Thrush and Mike Allen
April 2, 2011 
President Barack Obama plans to announce his reelection campaign early next week in an electronic message to grassroots supporters, Democratic sources tell POLITICO.

Obama launches with a recovering economy and a weak, fractured Republican field, but with chaos in the Middle East that adds unpredictability to an environment that points to likely reelection. Obama’s campaign, which could raise $1 billion or more, will be based in Chicago, just a few blocks from the headquarters of his historic 2008 race.

The most likely day for the campaign to file registration papers with the Federal Election Commission is Monday, but officials are not committing to a specific date in case some transcendent event in the world would overshadow the kickoff. Obama aides want to tell their supporters first, and so are not encouraging preview stories by the press.

The president’s announcement will be transmitted directly to supporters through text messages, email and social media, not with an appearance by Obama, the sources said.

The launch could come any time, according to the sources. The website is ready, the donation button has been tested, and call sheets to key political supporters are set.

David Axelrod, who returned to Chicago after serving as a White House senior adviser for the first two years, will once again be Obama’s strategic guru.

Obama campaign organizers have long planned to launch at the beginning of the second quarter so they can show a fundraising juggernaut in their first report to FEC. But they couldn’t pull the trigger on the first day of the quarter, April Fools’ Day, and then the next two days were weekend days. Obama is scheduled to raise money for the campaign in Chicago on April 14, and the campaign had to formally organize before that date.

Former West Wing staffer Jim Messina, Obama’s likely campaign manager, has been holding donor meetings around the country, and the president is scheduled to hold a series of fundraisers in New York and California over the next few weeks. The campaign expected to raise $750 million to $1 billion.

On Friday, White House press secretary Jay Carney teased reporters about the FEC filing, one of the worst kept secrets in Washington, inserting a breathless, dramatic pause into a typically monotone readout of Obama’s schedule for the next week.

“On Monday, the president will …” Carney said.

“File?” suggested Chip Reid, a CBS reporter.

“Wait for it, Chip,” added Carney, with a chuckle. “On Monday, the president will attend meetings at the White House.”

MUST READ!...


Obama’s ineligibility: conspiracy and cowardice
 By Lawrence Sellin Full Story
Unless I am mistaken, it has always been a Constitutional requirement that a Presidential candidate be a natural born citizen. That is, the candidate must be born in the US of parents who are US citizens at the time of birth.