Ten reasons why Barack Obama is not eligible to serve in the office of president of the United States
1. There
is no evidence whatsoever that Barack Obama is even a U.S. citizen.
There is an image of his Indonesian school registration as the Asisi
School in Jakarta indicating his Indonesian citizenship. (Line 3 means
“citizenship”). A non-citizen was not allowed to enroll in an Indonesian
school at that time.
Indonesian school registration for “Barry Soetoro” (AP photo)
Obama
acknowledged travel to Pakistan in 1981, but he did not have a U.S.
passport at that time. Attempts to obtain his and/or his mother’s
passport records have been blocked. The U.S. Passport Office was broken
into in 2008 and all of the passport records for Barack Obama and his
mother are missing. There have been reports that Obama traveled to
Pakistan on an Indonesian passport.
2. There
is no record that Obama’s U.S. citizenship was restored by
naturalization, if he ever had such citizenship. The status of his
citizenship upon entry into Punahou School, Occidental College, Columbia
University, and Harvard University could assist in clearing up this
matter, but access to those records has been blocked.
3. The
so-called “long-form birth certificate” released by the White House has
been determined to be fraudulent. This is a direct quote from retired
NY police detective Mike Zullo, Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office Cold
Case Posse Lead Investigator:
“The document presented to the American public by the White House on April 27, 2011 is undoubtedly fraudulent.”
Here
is a link to an exhaustive analysis of the purported birth certificate
by Mara Zebest, the digital document expert who assisted the MCSO Cold
Case Posse investigation:
Adobe book editor positive: Obama certificate is phony
'Altered document is manufactured, or in everyday parlance – a forgery'
Published: 06/28/2011 at 9:41 PM
NEW
YORK – A nationally recognized computer expert who has served as
contributing author and technical editor for more than 100 books on
Adobe and Microsoft software says the Obama long-form
birth-certificate image released by the White House is a fraudulent
document created with Adobe software.
Mara
Zebest is a graphic artist and co-author for a number of Adobe product
books including the Inside Photoshop series which typically exceeded
1000 pages, and published in at least ten different languages around the
world. Ms. Zebest is also tech editor for numerous books for both Adobe
and Microsoft products and has worked closely with the Cold Case Posse
(CCP) for Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) in providing evidence
on Obama’s forged birth certificate.
4. There
are numerous indications that Obama may have been born in Kenya,
including statements in documents authorized by Obama himself, as well
as numerous documented public statements by Michelle Obama, Obama’s
Kenyan grandmother, and members of the Parliament of Kenya. Here are a
few examples:
1991 Booklet distributed by Obama’s literary agent states Obama was “born in Kenya”
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Gathering of Eagles: NY
Fighting the Insurgency at Home
Barack Obama Sighting Hawaii 1980 Revised
December 3, 2009
On
Nov. 17th I posted a recollection from a friend who was a Marine
serving in Hawaii in 1980. It was subjected to considerable ridicule
initially, but more folks are now accepting that while not concrete
proof, it does leave the door open to questions. My friend recently
sent me a revised copy (he is writing it for a literature course) and I
will tell you that it is his recollection as closely as he can remember
it.
No fiction here folks.
Jim "Race Bannon" Bancroft
While
back in Hawaii by late June of 1980, we went back to Honolulu for
liberty. I don’t remember the exact address, or the exact business, but
one August night, early August 1980, I stopped at a small shop that was
either on Kalakaua Blvd, now called Ala Moana, or the street just north
of it, one block north. I struck up a conversation with a young
man, Mulatto, about 18, all teeth, smiling, skinny, short hair that I
remember, at least short for the year we lived in.We struck up a conversation simply because he was at the same place as I was. He appeared to be either an employee there on his off day or was visiting the other older Black American man working there. “Hey, are you a military dependent or do you live here?” I asked. He told me he lived in Hawaii. Not too many black Americans lived in Hawaii at all then, so his being there was an oddity in itself. Heck, my hometown of 16,000 in Connecticut had only three or four Black families until 20 years ago. I asked if he was in the service and he said no. I told him that I was a Marine and had recently gotten back from float. We spoke of world travel at this time and I told him the places we went to.
What strikes me most is what he said as to where he grew up: Indonesia. Having stopped in the Philippines and Thailand that previous deployment made me curious and I asked him if Indonesia was as poor as the Philippines, but he hadn’t been to the Philippines so he didn’t know. We had spoken of how both our travels abroad had given us great perspectives in how we viewed the world…
I asked this Indonesian immigrant of these things but he told me those things were not common where he grew up. Our conversation drifted to our dreams of what we are going to do once we are “all grown up”. I replied that I was not sure and most likely would either re-enlist in the Marines or go home to attend college on the GI Bill.
He told me he wanted to be President of the US some day. I remember lightly smiling and commenting that maybe by the time he gets to be 40 or so, America will be ready for a Black man to be President and I wished him luck. We spoke of the racial tensions I saw at home while growing up, of the outright hostility of Hawaiians toward white Americans and black Americans and I asked him if he ever saw that overseas or since he returned back to Hawaii. I don’t remember his answer, but we spoke more of his time overseas and his thoughts on life and philosophy of government.
He made some strange comments to me; it was obvious he never set foot for any time on continental United States and I told him he better realize that he is making judgments about the United States when he himself never actually lived there. I told him, “Hawaii ain’t the United States!”
He also told me something that I never forgot, for it caused me to do some other things later in an effort to be nice to him. Since we spoke of where I had been and the world as I saw it, I told him I had been to Africa, Mombasa specifically, and he said to me abruptly, “I was born there.”
I told him he is not eligible to be president if that was true, but I remembered he said his mom was an American, so, maybe it was okay. But it was what I did after that makes this a true memory: I went back to the barracks and told others of this guy and suggested we all grab our photo albums and visit him again and show him pictures of Mombasa so he could see where he was from.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Marine: 1980 In Hi. Obama Told Me He Was Born In Kenya And Wanted To Be President.
Published on Jun 2, 2012 by 68Truthseeker
Obama
in 1980 said he was born in Mombasa, Kenya - The stunning admission was
made to a member of the U.S. Marine Corps, in a chance meeting in the
vicinity of Kalakaua Blvd., one evening in early August of 1980.
The now, former Marine is a highly respected member of the Free-Republic online-community, and he has published the account of his personal meeting with the then Barry Soetero online at the Gathering of the Eagles Blog. After the divorce of Barry's mother from his adopted father, Lolo Soetero, he began using the name "Barack Hussein Obama," by which he is knows the world over, today. At the Free Republic, the ex-Marine goes by the name Race Bannon.
The crucial part of his testimony regards what he writes in his essay, "Another crappy day in paradise, or The things you see when you ain't got a gun." Speaking of his encounter with Soetero, Bannon writes:
He also told me something that I never forgot, for it caused me to do some other things in an effort to be nice to him and possibly a favor. We spoke of where I had been and the world as I saw it. I told him I had been to Africa , Mombasa specifically, and he said to me abruptly, "I was born there." I told him he is not eligible to be president if that was true, but I remembered he said his mom was an American, so, maybe it was okay.
The now, former Marine is a highly respected member of the Free-Republic online-community, and he has published the account of his personal meeting with the then Barry Soetero online at the Gathering of the Eagles Blog. After the divorce of Barry's mother from his adopted father, Lolo Soetero, he began using the name "Barack Hussein Obama," by which he is knows the world over, today. At the Free Republic, the ex-Marine goes by the name Race Bannon.
The crucial part of his testimony regards what he writes in his essay, "Another crappy day in paradise, or The things you see when you ain't got a gun." Speaking of his encounter with Soetero, Bannon writes:
He also told me something that I never forgot, for it caused me to do some other things in an effort to be nice to him and possibly a favor. We spoke of where I had been and the world as I saw it. I told him I had been to Africa , Mombasa specifically, and he said to me abruptly, "I was born there." I told him he is not eligible to be president if that was true, but I remembered he said his mom was an American, so, maybe it was okay.
But
it was what I did after that makes this a true memory: I went back to
the barracks and told others of this guy and suggested we all grab our
photo albums and visit him again and show him pictures of Mombasa so he
could see where he was from.
No one wanted to go, and at that time, my camera had failed me weeks before we hit Mombasa and it was late August or early September until I had borrowed someone else's pictures to develop myself so I had copies of where I was. But I never forgot meeting that man for those reasons. I was going to do him a favor and show him his home country of birth. And I never went back for some reason, most likely I forgot to or just felt that a one time chance encounter would be meaningless to both of us and didn't mean we were friends.
Bannon then closes his testimonial with the following observation:
In the light of what is called "The Birther" movement, these memories are still foremost in my mind concerning this. While I cannot swear it was Barak Obama, all the details I do remember of that chance encounter fit the profile of the man who some people claim is born in Kenya and others claim he was born in Hawaii . The man I met was about 18, thin, Mulatto, told me he was born in Mombasa, raised overseas, was living in Hawaii and hadn't yet been to many places in the world outside of those places, mostly, hadn't been to the mainland of America for any long time period if at all. And he openly told me he wanted to be President.
And I remember that face, the face of a young man who sat on a table to my right front, his hands resting on the edge of the table, him leaning forward, his smile, all teeth. It was Barak Obama. I don't know if I'd bet my life on it, but I am willing to tell people openly at the risk of my ridicule. I was there, and saw him, spoke to him, and he openly told me he was born in Mombasa, Kenya, not Hawaii .
Does it matter? Of course it does. It should not have to be explained as to why it matters.
Race Bannon's testimony is corroborative of that of two witnesses to the uncut version of the Obama vs. Keyes Senatorial Debates of 2004. The first and second testimonials of which can be read at The Post & Email. Five African News Agencies also reported that Obama was born in Kenya.
A discussion of Bannon's testimony can be found at Free Republic, replete with comments by the Marine himself and other photos of himself, from his time in the U.S. Marines.
No one wanted to go, and at that time, my camera had failed me weeks before we hit Mombasa and it was late August or early September until I had borrowed someone else's pictures to develop myself so I had copies of where I was. But I never forgot meeting that man for those reasons. I was going to do him a favor and show him his home country of birth. And I never went back for some reason, most likely I forgot to or just felt that a one time chance encounter would be meaningless to both of us and didn't mean we were friends.
Bannon then closes his testimonial with the following observation:
In the light of what is called "The Birther" movement, these memories are still foremost in my mind concerning this. While I cannot swear it was Barak Obama, all the details I do remember of that chance encounter fit the profile of the man who some people claim is born in Kenya and others claim he was born in Hawaii . The man I met was about 18, thin, Mulatto, told me he was born in Mombasa, raised overseas, was living in Hawaii and hadn't yet been to many places in the world outside of those places, mostly, hadn't been to the mainland of America for any long time period if at all. And he openly told me he wanted to be President.
And I remember that face, the face of a young man who sat on a table to my right front, his hands resting on the edge of the table, him leaning forward, his smile, all teeth. It was Barak Obama. I don't know if I'd bet my life on it, but I am willing to tell people openly at the risk of my ridicule. I was there, and saw him, spoke to him, and he openly told me he was born in Mombasa, Kenya, not Hawaii .
Does it matter? Of course it does. It should not have to be explained as to why it matters.
Race Bannon's testimony is corroborative of that of two witnesses to the uncut version of the Obama vs. Keyes Senatorial Debates of 2004. The first and second testimonials of which can be read at The Post & Email. Five African News Agencies also reported that Obama was born in Kenya.
A discussion of Bannon's testimony can be found at Free Republic, replete with comments by the Marine himself and other photos of himself, from his time in the U.S. Marines.
A list of sources over many years reporting Obama was born in Kenya, including of course Obama himself:
What U.S. President in history has multiple sources in a foreign country saying he was born there: http://www.scribd.com/doc/53259902/What-U-S-Pres-in-History-Has-Multiple-Sources-in-Foreign-Country-Saying-He-Was-Born-There
5. Obama
never registered for the draft in 1980, presumably because as a
non-U.S. citizen he was not required to do so. However, if he can
establish that he was a U.S. citizen in 1980, then the image of his
purported Selective Service registration released on his behalf by the
Obama campaign in 2008, proven to be a forgery, represents a felonious
act. In either case, his failure to register for Selective Service or his proffering of a forged official document, disqualifies him from service in any U.S. government position.
The
date stamp on the form below is a crude forgery – it should have four
digits as in “1980”. A date stamp was crudely tampered with by inverting
the digits “80” in “2008” and removing the first two digits to make an
“80” stamp. Furthermore, the form number used in the forgery did not
exist in 1980.
Exhibit A: Barack Obama's Selective Service registration form
Sheriff Joe demands Obama draft registration
Selective Service regulation changed days after probe announced
Published: 05/10/2012 at 8:27 PMIn his March 1 press conference in Phoenix, Arpaio announced the Cold Case Posse had found probable cause that Obama’s long-form birth certificate and his Selective Service registration form are forgeries.
Exhibit A shows Obama’s Selective Service registration form, with the Post Office date stamp, July 29, 1980, in the lower right corner…
Arpaio’s investigators concluded that Obama’s Selective Service registration form fit into what was becoming a common narrative for his life: The document was not only forged, it was poorly forged.
In a March 19 letter addressed to Romo, Arpaio explained that MCSO investigators were able to replicate the alleged forgery.
6. If
Obama was born in Kenya in the summer of 1961, as many reports have
indicated, and Obama’s mother was in Hawaii in August 1961, then she
would have flown into Hawaii by commercial airline around that time.
When the Cold Case Posse went to the National Archive in Washington D.C.
to locate the Immigration and Customs forms filled out by Honolulu
arriving passengers, they found that all records for the first week of
August 1961 are missing. No other records for dates on either side of
that week are missing. In addition, access to birth records at the Coast
Province General Hospital in Mombasa has been blocked.
7. There
are some very disturbing anomalies with the birth records in Hawaii.
Obama’s name appears in a birth index for August 4, 1961 with an index
number which is believed to be associated
with a child, Virginia Sunahara, who was born on August 4, 1961 in
Wahiawa, HI and died the following day. All attempts by members of the
Sunahara family to obtain a copy of Virginia Sunahara’s original birth certificate have been blocked, in violation of Hawaii law.
8. No
Hawaii official has verified the facts of Obama’s birth in Hawaii. They
have made various carefully worded statements that simply do not say
what Obama’s agents and apologists have asserted they say.
Hawaii State Registrar does not verify authenticity of President Obama's birth certificate
Photo: Associated Press
Thursday, May 24, 2012 -
WASHINGTON, May 24, 2012 – The
“Verification of Birth” letter sent by the Hawaii State Registrar Alvin
T. Onaka Ph.D to Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett fails to
respond to the fundamental question asked by Mr. Bennett in a March 30,
2012 letter to Hawaii Department of Health officials: Whether or not
the image of President Obama’s “long form” Certificate of Live Birth,
posted on the White House web site on April 27, 2011 is a “true and
accurate representation of the original record in your files”.
The
official whose signature appears on the “Verification of Birth,” as
well as the copy of President Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth released
by the White House is Onaka who is refusing to talk to Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (Ariz.) Cold Case Posse investigator Mike Zullo who was on the ground in Hawaii.
In response to an outcry from Arizona constituents troubled by the March 1, 2012 Cold Case Posse announcement there is probable cause the image posted on the White House website is a forgery,
Arizona Secretary Bennett enclosed a printout of the White House
website image with his letter, and requested verification that the image
is a “true and accurate representation of the original record in your
files”.
Maricopa County Sheriff's Department Cold Case Posse lead investigator Michael Zullo
At
question is that an “official birth certificate” provided on request is
not the original document created at the time of birth. If you are
from, say Chicago, you can order an official birth certificate from City
Hall, but it is not the original or even an exact facsimile of your
birth certificate. The document you receive carries the Secretary of
State’s seal confirming that the same “information” that would be found
on your original birth certificate records is accurately reflected.
On May 22, 2012, after more than six weeks of wrangling over
the legal authority of Arizona’s request, the Hawaii Department of
Health did produce a “Verification of Birth” which at first glance
appears to answer Mr. Bennett’s original forgery question.
Arizona Secretary of State Bennett March 30, 2012 letter asked Hawaii health officials the following:
“Please
verify that the attached copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr.
Obama is a true and accurate representation of the original record in
your files.”
The May 22, 2012 Hawaii “Verification of Birth”, signed by Hawaii State Registrar Onaka, includes the following statement:
“I
verify that the information in the copy of the Certificate of Live
Birth for Mr. Obama that you attached with your request matches the
original record in our file”.
During
a forgery investigation, certifying, “information matches” does not
address the central and entirely separate issue of a whether a
suspicious document is a true copy of an original document.
The question remains if a forgery can contain information similar or
even identical to that contained in an authentic document, yet still be a
forgery.
Investigators
with the Cold Case Posse announced during a March 1, 2012 press
conference that, based on forensic evidence as outlined in a video
presentation to reporters, there is probable cause the “long form”
Certificate of Live Birth posted on the White House website is a
forgery.
Creating suspicion over the documents authenticity is that Hawaii
Department of Health officials have consistently blocked any attempts
by citizens, the media, and now Arizona law enforcement, to access and
inspect President Obama’s original vital records.
Cold
Case Posse lead investigator Michael Zullo, accompanied by a Maricopa
County Sheriff’s Office deputy, visited the Hawaii Department of Health
in Honolulu last Monday, but was not allowed to see President Obama’s
birth records.
Even
so, Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett said on Wednesday that
Hawaii’s “Verification of Birth” satisfies Arizona requirements, and
that Barack Obama will appear on the November ballot.
Another
example of questionable language being incorporated in documents
surrounding President Obama’s vital records includes the new Selective
Service System privacy rules as uncovered
by Communities @WashingtonTimes.com. Published only four days after an
announcement by World Net Daily that Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse
was opening an investigation of allegations that President Obama’s
Certificate of Live Birth and selective service registration form were
forgeries, those privacy rules contain subtle changes in language.
A May 10, 2012 letter
from the Selective Service System Associate Director for Public and
Intergovernmental Affairs Richard Flahavan to Cold Case Posse lead
investigator Michael Zullo also contains carefully crafted legal
language that navigates around fundamental questions presented to the
agency by investigators while failing to provide direct answers.
The
release of the “Verification of Birth” coincides with a perfect storm
of developments that relate to President Obama’s birth certificate, to
wit:
Four days before Hawaii officials released the “Verification of Birth”, Breitbart.com uncovered a 1991 promotional client list pamphlet
published by the President’s former literary agency Acton & Dystel,
which proclaims that Barack Obama was “born in Kenya and raised in
Indonesia and Hawaii”.
Miriam Goderich, now with Dystel & Goderich Literary Management, issued a press release in response to discovery of the pamphlet:
“This
was nothing more than a fact checking error by me -- an agency
assistant at the time. There was never any information given to us by
Obama in any of his correspondence or other communications suggesting in
any way that he was born in Kenya and not Hawaii. I hope you can
communicate to your readers that this was a simple mistake and nothing
more."
On
Monday May 21, 2012, one day before the “Verification of Birth” was
released, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio dispatched Cold Case Posse
lead investigator Michael Zullo to Hawaii, accompanied by a deputy due
to unspecified security concerns.
Sheriff
Arpaio told ABC15 Phoenix on Tuesday that he doesn’t care how much the
investigation costs. “If I have to send ten deputies down there for
security reasons, I’ll do it” he said.
In
the meantime, major media outlets such as USA Today were reporting on
Secretary Bennett’s statement to a radio interviewer that it “was
possible” President Obama would not make it onto the Arizona ballot for
the November general election.
Following
the release of the Hawaii “Verification of Birth”, some media called
for the official end to all questions concerning President Obama’s
Hawaii birth records while failing to carefully analyze the response
provide by Dr. Onaka to Secretary Bennett’s specific requests.
Also
of interest is that It has been noted that the April 27, 2011 release
of an image the White House maintains is President Obama’s Hawaii
Certificate of Live Birth coincided with the publication of Jerome
Cori’s book “Where’s the Birth Certificate?”
9. In
any case, Barack Obama is not, and can never be, a Natural Born
Citizen, as required by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United
States Constitution:
Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Barack Obama Ballot Challenge Proceeding Forward in the
NJ Supreme Court
By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
August 8, 2012
NJ Supreme Court
By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
August 8, 2012
…
The Founders and Framers had good reason for including the “natural
born Citizen” clause into the Constitution and requiring that future
Presidents have that birth status.
St.
George Tucker tells us why the Founders and Framers used the “natural
born Citizen” clause as a requirement of presidential eligibility:
“That provision in the constitution which requires that the president shall be a native-born citizen (unless he were a citizen of the United States when the constitution was adopted,) is a happy means of security against foreign influence, which, wherever it is capable of being exerted, is to be dreaded more than the plague. The admission of foreigners into our councils, consequently, cannot be too much guarded against; their total exclusion from a station to which foreign nations have been accustomed to, attach ideas of sovereign power, sacredness of character, and hereditary right, is a measure of the most consummate policy and wisdom.”
George Tucker, Blackstone's Commentaries: with Notes of Reference to the Constitution and Laws of the Federal Government of the United States and of The Commonwealth of Virginia (1803) (Philadelphia: published by William Young Birch and Abraham Small; Robert Carter, Printer, 1803), http://constitution.org/tb/tb2.htm . So we can see that the Founders and Framers used the “natural born Citizen” clause as a national security measure designed to make sure that the President worked only in the best interest of the United States and its republican principles and of no other nation. It was also put in place to keep all vestiges of monarchial rule and influence out of the United States.
The Fourteenth Amendment by its clear text gives the status of a “citizen of the United States” to those born or naturalized in the United States and “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” It does not give anyone the status of a “natural born Citizen.”
“That provision in the constitution which requires that the president shall be a native-born citizen (unless he were a citizen of the United States when the constitution was adopted,) is a happy means of security against foreign influence, which, wherever it is capable of being exerted, is to be dreaded more than the plague. The admission of foreigners into our councils, consequently, cannot be too much guarded against; their total exclusion from a station to which foreign nations have been accustomed to, attach ideas of sovereign power, sacredness of character, and hereditary right, is a measure of the most consummate policy and wisdom.”
George Tucker, Blackstone's Commentaries: with Notes of Reference to the Constitution and Laws of the Federal Government of the United States and of The Commonwealth of Virginia (1803) (Philadelphia: published by William Young Birch and Abraham Small; Robert Carter, Printer, 1803), http://constitution.org/tb/tb2.htm . So we can see that the Founders and Framers used the “natural born Citizen” clause as a national security measure designed to make sure that the President worked only in the best interest of the United States and its republican principles and of no other nation. It was also put in place to keep all vestiges of monarchial rule and influence out of the United States.
The Fourteenth Amendment by its clear text gives the status of a “citizen of the United States” to those born or naturalized in the United States and “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” It does not give anyone the status of a “natural born Citizen.”
When
the Founders and Framers inserted the “natural born Citizen” clause in
the Constitution, there was no Fourteenth Amendment. Hence, they surely
did not write the clause into the Constitution having in mind any
citizenship standard that is contained in the Fourteenth Amendment. And
there does not exist any evidence that the Fourteenth Amendment repealed
or amended the Founders’ and Framers’ definition of an Article II
“natural born Citizen.” Hence, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 and the
Fourteenth Amendment stand as two separate and distinct constitutional
provisions which provide two different constitutional citizenship
standards.
Again, Minor v. Happersett confirmed the American “common-law” definition of a “natural-born citizen,” which Minor said the Founders and Framers were familiar with and used when they wrote the “natural born Citizen” clause. That definition is a child “born in a country of parents who were its citizens.” Id. at 167-68.
Again, Minor v. Happersett confirmed the American “common-law” definition of a “natural-born citizen,” which Minor said the Founders and Framers were familiar with and used when they wrote the “natural born Citizen” clause. That definition is a child “born in a country of parents who were its citizens.” Id. at 167-68.
Minor
left open the question of whether a child born “within the
jurisdiction” of the United States to alien parents is a “citizen of the
United States” under the Fourteenth Amendment. As we have seen, this is
a different standard as that which applies to defining a “natural born
Citizen.”
Wong Kim Ark answered the single question left open by Minor. It held that Wong, born in the United States to domiciled and resident alien parents who were neither diplomats nor military invaders was born “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and therefore a “citizen of the United States” from the moment of birth. The Court’s single task was to interpret and apply the Fourteenth Amendment, not Article II, Section 1, Clause 5.
Wong Kim Ark answered the single question left open by Minor. It held that Wong, born in the United States to domiciled and resident alien parents who were neither diplomats nor military invaders was born “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and therefore a “citizen of the United States” from the moment of birth. The Court’s single task was to interpret and apply the Fourteenth Amendment, not Article II, Section 1, Clause 5.
The
Court found that Wong’s parents being domiciled and residents (not
“citizens”) was enough to give jurisdiction to the United States over
them and Wong when Wong was born. Again, since the Fourteenth Amendment
neither repealed nor amended Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 “natural
born Citizen” clause, Wong defined a “citizen of the United States” under the Fourteenth Amendment, not a “natural born Citizen” under Article II.
In
fact, Wong’s specific holding uses the phrase “citizen of the United
States,” not “natural born Citizen.” Hence, using that amendment to find
someone a “citizen of the United States,” regardless of whether that
person is a “citizen” from the moment of birth, has no direct bearing on the definition of an Article II “natural born Citizen.”
After all, Article II says “natural born Citizen,” not “born Citizen,”
and is applied for presidential eligibility. What the Fourteenth
Amendment can do with reference to a “natural born Citizen” is increase
the pool of parents who become “citizens of the United States” and give
birth to “natural born Citizens.”
The clause “natural born Citizen” is a word of art, an idiom, a unitary clause, which has a very special meaning as confirmed by Minor. It is constitutional error to conflate and confound a “citizen of the United States” under the Fourteenth Amendment with a “natural born Citizen” under Article II.
The clause “natural born Citizen” is a word of art, an idiom, a unitary clause, which has a very special meaning as confirmed by Minor. It is constitutional error to conflate and confound a “citizen of the United States” under the Fourteenth Amendment with a “natural born Citizen” under Article II.
A
“natural born Citizen,” being the standard for the President and the
Commander in Chief of the Military, requires allegiance and citizenship
only to the United States from the moment of birth. A Fourteenth
Amendment “citizen of the United States” from birth does not have the
same allegiance requirement and can even be born with dual and
conflicting allegiances, a condition which the Founders and Framers did
not permit future Presidents and Commanders to have when born. They
were very specific as is evident from the plain text of Article II,
Section 1, Clause 5, that after the adoption of the Constitution, one
had to be a “natural born Citizen,” and not just a “Citizen of the
United States.”
There is no other U.S. Supreme Court case that has changed the meaning of a “natural born Citizen” as confirmed by Minor. That definition, which is the definition from the Founding, it therefore the supreme law of the land and stands today until amended by Constitutional amendment. And that definition is a child “born in a country of parents who were its citizens.”
We know that candidate Barack Obama was not born to “citizen” parents. His father was a British/Kenyan citizen who never became a “citizen of the United States.” Obama, even if born in Hawaii, cannot be a “natural born Citizen.” Because his father was not a U.S. citizen when Obama was born, Obama, who wants to be President and Commander in Chief of the Military, while he could have been born a “citizen of the United States” if born in Hawaii, was also born in full allegiance and citizenship of Great Britain, and at age two also of Kenya.
There is no other U.S. Supreme Court case that has changed the meaning of a “natural born Citizen” as confirmed by Minor. That definition, which is the definition from the Founding, it therefore the supreme law of the land and stands today until amended by Constitutional amendment. And that definition is a child “born in a country of parents who were its citizens.”
We know that candidate Barack Obama was not born to “citizen” parents. His father was a British/Kenyan citizen who never became a “citizen of the United States.” Obama, even if born in Hawaii, cannot be a “natural born Citizen.” Because his father was not a U.S. citizen when Obama was born, Obama, who wants to be President and Commander in Chief of the Military, while he could have been born a “citizen of the United States” if born in Hawaii, was also born in full allegiance and citizenship of Great Britain, and at age two also of Kenya.
He
was not born within the full and complete allegiance of the United
States, an indispensable birth condition for one wanting to be President
and Commander of the Military. Hence, Obama is not and cannot be an Article II “natural born Citizen.”
See
David Ramsay, A Dissertation on the Manners of Acquiring the Character
and Privileges of a Citizen (1789) (citizenship “as a natural right,
belongs to none but those who have been born of citizens since the 4th
of July, 1776….” Id. at 6; St. George Tucker, Blackstone's Commentaries:
with Notes of Reference to the Constitution and Laws of the Federal
Government of the United States and of The Commonwealth of Virginia
(1803) (Philadelphia: published by William Young Birch and Abraham
Small; Robert Carter, Printer, 1803), http://constitution.org/tb/tb2.htm
(“These
civil rights [which included the right to be elected President] may be
inherited, or acquired, in the United States: they are acquired by a
foreigner who is naturalized; they are inherited by all whose parents,
at the time of their birth, were citizens”).
What this means is that since Obama is neither an Article II “natural born Citizen” nor a “Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution,” under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 he is not eligible to be President and Commander in Chief of the Military.
I will update this post as soon as I receive new information.
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
August 8, 2012
What this means is that since Obama is neither an Article II “natural born Citizen” nor a “Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution,” under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 he is not eligible to be President and Commander in Chief of the Military.
I will update this post as soon as I receive new information.
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
August 8, 2012
10.
Obama is using a fraudulent Social Security number. It is a number
issued in 1977 and in a block of numbers designated for issuance to
residents of the state of Connecticut. This SSN fails the E-verify test
on the SS web site, coming up as a fraudulent number. Use of a fraudulent Social Security number constitutes a serious crime of identity theft.
FORGERY-GATE
Obama's Social Security Number challenged
Exclusive: Jack Cashill reports on woman's court filing based on myriad anomalies
Published: 07/04/2012 at 6:39 PM
If
Barack Obama has an immediate eligibility problem, it is more likely to
derive from the Social Security Number he has been using for the last
35 years than from his birth certificate.
Ohio
private investigator Susan Daniels has seen to that. On Monday, July 2,
she filed suit in Geauga County (Ohio) Common Pleas Court demanding
that Jon Husted, Ohio secretary of state, remove Obama’s name from the
ballot until Obama can prove the validity of his Social Security Number.
Daniels, who has vetted thousands of Social Security Numbers for numerous other clients, has done her homework. In her filing, she thoroughly documents her contention “that Barack
Obama has repeatedly, consistently, and with intent misrepresented
himself by using a fraudulently obtained Social Security Number.”
Daniels
started her investigation in August 2009. Given her profession, she has
been able to access a variety of proprietary databases. What she
learned without much trouble is that Obama has been using a Social
Security Number with the prefix “042″ since 1986.As she discovered, the “042″ number is reserved for the exclusive use of individuals who register in Connecticut. When she ran 10 sequential numbers before and after Obama’s, all returned with the documentation “issued 1977-1979 in CT.”
When Daniels ran the numbers immediately flanking Obama’s, she came to the firm conviction that Obama’s number was issued in March 1977 in Connecticut.
By all accounts, as Daniels thoroughly documents, Obama was then a 15-year-old living in Hawaii. There is no record of him even visiting Connecticut in or near this time frame.
To have gotten a Social Security card at this time Obama would have had to show up for a “mandatory in-person interview.” This could not have taken place in Connecticut. Obama’s sister, Maya, by contrast, uses a number appropriate for a Hawaiian resident.
Daniels checked other databases as well to validate her findings, including the Massachusetts Department of Motor Vehicles and the IRS. Yes, Obama used the 042 number to get a driver’s license when at Harvard and as recently as on his 2009 income tax return.
In her research, Daniels kept coming across what she calls a “marked anomaly,” one she had never seen before – multiple birthdates listed for the same person. The 08/04/1961 and 04/08/1961 variation made sense, but the frequent appearance of the year “1890″ did not.
The ample evidence Daniels gathered led her to believe that the 042 number Obama has been using “had previously been issued to another person,” one who lived in Connecticut between 1977 and 1979 and who was born in 1890.
This assertion can be verified. By law, the Social Security Administration will have kept on microfilm a copy of the original SS-5 application attached to a particular Social Security Number. Daniels, however, does not have access to that microfilm.
For this reason, Daniels has filed suit. “Defendant Husted, through this filing,” she argues, “has been made aware that the Democratic Candidate has been using a fraudulent Social Security Number, which would render Barack Obama ineligible under both the Ohio and U.S. Constitutions.”
Daniels asks the court, among other things, to issue an injunction against Obama’s name appearing on ballot until it is determined that he is using a proper Social Security Number.
Given the response of courts elsewhere, it is unlikely that Daniels will find satisfaction in Geauga County or from the Republican secretary of state.
What Daniels has done, however, is establish a paper trail so indisputably legitimate that even the most squeamish of conservative media will have a hard time finding fault.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
BREAKING! Detective Probes Obama SSN Mystery - Files Suit in Ohio!
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.