Hillary's Pathetic Road Back to the White HouseJonathan F. KeilerHillary just doesn’t fit the stereotype of the Hollywood villainess, and for too many people, Hollywood is reality.  More

Meanwhile, that little Noah and Amanda you sent off to school will be coming back home as another Al Gore
Education System now Graduating Al Gores from public schools
 By Judi McLeod Full Story

The next generation of global warming-spouting Al Gore type-activists are already in training in America’s classrooms.

The big lie called man-made global warming, birthed by the United Nations and lib-left world leaders out to make a fast buck in the impossible-to-fail money maker advanced on society by global warming/climate change, is here to stay.

The New Nationwide 

Crime Wave

Wall Street Journal-May 29, 2015

The nation's two-decades-long crime decline may be over. Gun violence in particular is spiraling upward in cities across America. In Ba

When a society abandons these virtues, the people become corrupt, and unwilling to abide by the rule of law. A viciousness blankets the people, which leads to violence and lawlessness
A Virtuous Society
 By Douglas V. Gibbs Full Story

Benjamin Franklin emphasized that without virtue, free societies could not properly function. He said, "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."

America's first digital dictator
‘The News’ now planted progressive propaganda
 By Judi McLeod Full Story
In October of 2008 Obama and the Dems threw the Fundamental Transformation of America up in garish, jaw-dropping neon lights and the world thereafter was never to be the same.

The communications world now digital gave an about-to-be-jettisoned America its first digital dictator.

White House: Hey, it's not our job to defeat ISIS
 By Dan Calabrese Full Story

You tell me: Is it really that big a deal when the Obama Administration comes right out and admits what we all know anyway? That they really have no heart for the fight against ISIS and they're not going to make a serious commitment to winning it?

SHE SHOULD NOT ONLY BE DISQUALIFIED...SHE SHOULD BE INDICTED AND PROSECUTED FOR CRIMES AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE...

Of Foreign Influence and Eligibility

Posted By Sharon Rondeau On Thursday, May 28, 2015 

SHOULD HILLARY CLINTON BE DISQUALIFIED FROM SEEKING THE PRESIDENCY?

by Joseph DeMaio, ©2015

(May 28, 2015) — By now – unless you have been living under a rock or watching nothing but NBC and MSNBC… roughly equivalent activities – you are aware that William (“it-depends-on-what-’is’-is”) Clinton and his spouse, Hillary (“what-difference-now-does-it-make?”) Clinton have funneled millions of dollars from foreign governments to the “Clinton Foundation,” an entity they call, with a straight face no less, their “charity.” You also know, subject to that same “rock” caveat above, that much of that money flowed into the foundation’s coffers in the dead of night, without disclosure, while Hillary Rodham Clinton posed as U.S. Secretary of State.

Since her main “accomplishment” while in her position at the State Department was apparently feathering her own nest along with whatever other nest her husband was parking his boots beneath with this money, instead of responding to the cries for help from Christopher Stevens in Benghazi, the term “posed” seems fitting. These people – both of them – give new meaning to the term “corrupt.”

And listening to the Clintons and their sycophants in the media, you are admonished to believe that there was nothing – repeat, nothing – even faintly resembling a “link” or “quid pro quo” between those “donations” to the foundation from foreign governments and actions taken by the State Department with respect to contracts, reviews and approvals or various “activities” being pursued by those governments and their nationals. How could you possibly believe otherwise?

That uranium deal with the Russians?  Pay no attention… it is a “distraction.” The hiring of Sidney Blumenthal by the foundation – at $10,000 per month – to “fact-find” and “advise” the Secretary of State on the situation in Libya?  Peanuts. The use of a private computer and e-mail system, the deletion of thousands of e-mails otherwise constituting what the law and judges call “evidence” and the degaussing of the server’s hard drive in an attempt to make sure none of them – including any that might have involved foreign governments – could be retrieved?  None of your business. Move on… nothing to see here.

Really?

As the details continue to see the light of day, and despite her desperate attempts to keep the curtains drawn, we now know that tens of millions of dollars’ worth of arms sales – sales far exceeding those authorized by the prior Bush administrations – were authorized and approved on HRC’s watch to myriad foreign nations which, in turn, had made millions of dollars in “donations” to the Clinton Foundation.

Many (but not all) of those countries have less than exemplary track records in the area of human rights and democratic practices. But hey, as one oleaginous barterer said to the other, “You grease my palm, and I will grease yours.” As noted in the linked article above, “under federal law, foreign governments seeking State Department clearance to buy American-made arms are barred from making campaign contributions — a prohibition aimed at preventing foreign interests from using cash to influence national security policy. But nothing prevents them from contributing to a philanthropic foundation controlled by policymakers.” (Emphasis added).

As P&E readers are well aware, lying at the core of the Founders’ concerns regarding inclusion of the “natural born Citizen” restriction in the Constitution was the desire to preclude and prevent, as far as possible, the potential for the insinuation and infiltration of “foreign influence” into the office of the president.

Alexander Hamilton authored a majority of the Federalist Papers, written to convince the colonists to support ratification of the U.S. Constitution

As noted in Federalist 68, Alexander Hamilton cautioned that “[n]othing was more to be desired than that every practicable obstacle should be opposed to cabal, intrigue, and corruption. These most deadly adversaries of republican government might naturally have been expected to make their approaches from more than one quarter, but chiefly from the desire in foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils. How could they better gratify this, than by raising a creature of their own to the chief magistracy of the Union?” (Emphasis added). John Jay’s July 25, 1787 letter to George Washington articulates the same concern regarding the potential for the admission of foreign influence into the office of the “Command in Chief of the [A]merican army,” i.e., the president.

So, against this backdrop, is it just me… or does anyone else detect a similarity between the Founders’ eligibility concerns regarding “foreign influence” in the office of the president and present-day questions surrounding Hillary Rodham Clinton’s and the Clinton Foundation’s “you-grease-my-palm” approach to foreign governments and foreigners seeking approvals, favor and influence?

Even if HRC qualified as a “natural born Citizen” – unlike the present occupant of the Oval Office – her actions with regard to foreign donations to her “charity” would have raised in the Founders’ minds precisely the same species of concerns as to “foreign influence” in the office of the chief executive. And for the same reasons, she should be disqualified and deemed ineligible, not as a matter of constitutional law, but as a matter of plain common sense. Again, rocket science, this is not.

On the other hand, as her husband might argue, it would depend on what the meaning of “ineligible”….. is.

© 2015, The Post & Email. All rights reserved.

From Communists to Progressives, the Left's Takedown of Family and MarriagePaul KengorToday’s advocates of same-sex marriage need to be aware of the quite insidious deeper historical-ideological forces they are unwittingly serving.  More

Destroy Capitalism, Save the Climate?Robert EllisonIt's what the climate modelers would have us think.  But there's a little more to it than that.   More

Hillary Clinton lied when she swore she would faithfully discharge the duties of Secretary of State
 By Al Kaltman Full Story

On February 2, 2009, Vice President Biden administered the oath of office for Secretary of State to Hillary Rodham Clinton. As part of that oath, Mrs. Clinton swore that she would faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which she was about to enter and that she took the obligation to do so without any purpose of evasion.

Jorge Ramos spars with Ann Coulter over her comparison of immigrants to ISIS...

President Obama to Use the UN to Stab Israel in the Back
By Joseph A. Klein Full Story
President Barack Obama visited an influential conservative Washington D.C. synagogue on May 22nd with the avowed purpose of assuring his audience of about 1000 people that his “commitment to Israel’s security is and always will be unshakeable.” Donning a yarmulke and speaking from the synagogue sanctuary’s bimah where the Torah is recited, Obama claimed that “no U.S. President, no administration has done more to ensure that Israel can protect itself than this one.” Carried away by his own self-proclaimed support for Israel, he declared himself an “honorary member of the tribe.”

WELCOME TO OBAMALAND...

Baltimore Bloodshed Continues; 28 Shot, 9 Dead Over Holiday Weekend

May 25, 2015 

 

View Comments

BALTIMORE(WJZ)–It’s the deadliest month Baltimore has seen in more than 15 years. More than two dozen shootings over the holiday weekend alone have city police working around the clock.
READ MORE...

THE ORGANIZERS AND THE PROTESTERS SHOULD BE PROSECUTED TO THE FULL EXTENT OF THE LAW...

Angry Ferguson Protesters Were Paid to Cause Havoc

(Getty Images)

Protesters who looted, rioted, burned buildings, and overturned police cars in Ferguson, Missouri, last year were promised payment of up to $5,000 per month to join the protests. But organizers stiffed them, resulting in new protests to demand payment. [Full Story]

Obama Ineligibility Attorney: News Media Needs 

To keep With Their Bylaws On Article II Eligibility 

Attorney Mario Apuzzo via CDR Kerchner:

Senator Cruz, Senator Rubio, and Governor Jindal Should Not Be Allowed to Participate in the Presidential Debates Because They, Like Defacto President Obama, Are All Not Natural Born Citizens and Therefore Not Eligible to Be President

by Atty Mario Apuzzo

“Soon, we will see various presidential candidates debate each other for the right to win their party’s nomination for President and ultimately to win the people’s and Electoral College’s vote for that Office.  The organizations that will be sponsoring these presidential debates, Commission on Presidential Debates, Fox News, Fox Business Network, Reagan Library Foundation, Salem Media Group, CNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, Telemundo, and National Review, in keeping with their bylaws, should not allow any person who is not constitutionally eligible for that office to debate.  Allowing constitutionally ineligible candidates to debate will only give the false impression to the American people that such persons are constitutionally eligible to be elected President.  This result is the more damaging to the Constitution and the rule of law, given that the federal courts refused to get involved in the question of whether de facto President Barack Obama is an Article II natural born citizen.  There has been mentioned in the news of some individuals who will be vying for the Office of President.  These are Senator Ted Cruz, Senator Marco Rubio, and Governor Bobby Jindal.  But these individuals, like Obama, are not natural born citizens and hence not eligible to be elected President.  They should therefore not be allowed to debate.  Allow me to explain.
READ MORE...

MUST READ ARTICLE...

Are We Running Out of Time?
Eileen F. ToplanskyThe passage of time continues to work to Obama's advantage More

Prominent Lt. General Tells Dave Hodges of the Coming Civil War...

[2]
Yesterday, I was fortunate enough to speak to the Chino Valley, AZ. chapter of the Oathkeepers. I came away convinced that I shared a room, for 90 minutes, with people who grasp the importance of the times that we are living in and these former law enforcement and military personnel are dedicated to convincing today’s LEO’s and military to not take up arms against the American people when ordered to do so. I am further convinced that we are beginning to enter a period of time where some in the military are questioning their military mission regarding Jade Helm which means that after months of keeping our collective journalistic eye on the ball, the work is beginning to pay off.
I have been telling many colleagues, in the Independent Media, that I fully expected to start hearing from people in more of an official capacity when it comes to Jade Helm, because Jade Helm is anti-American, illegal in its execution and absolutely evil in its intent. I know that there will be a time when most American soldiers will collectively say “enough is enough”.
I have heard from many members of the Michigan Reservists and National Guard that are questioning their mission in relation to Jade Helm. I get the occasional email from the family members of military personnel from around the country who are concerned about the direction that our military is being taken.
My military sources have confirmed that key members of the Jade Helm leadership are growing concerned because they are not entirely certain of their mission goals because their participation is so heavily compartmentalized. But until yesterday, I have not heard from a person in a command position, or a recent command position, who is expressing concern over Jade Helm and what will follow these drills. This is the story of one leader and his up close and personal view of what lies ahead and this message should scare the life out of every American.

The Lt. General Speaks Out

On the morning of May 23rd, I was sent an email communication from a man claiming to be a recently retired Lt. General who was forced to retire in an Obama purge of military leadership in which the President has fired 270 command military leaders. He provided me with identifying clues so that I could verify his identity which I subsequently did. As a quality control check, I ran the same information by my two primary military sources. Both sources independently told me that they do indeed know both the identity of this individual and his former role and function in the military.

Lessons Learned

Back in November of 2012, when I broke the news about the attempted soft military coup in regard to the Benghazi story, I hesitated to publish my information for 10 days because I did not have outside collaboration for what I was being told. I almost lost my source as a result of my hesitation. As it turned out in this November 3, 2012 article, I was three months ahead of many outlets because the source was so controversial that many backed away from this topic. However, my information about the soft coup connected with the attempted rescue of Ambassador Stevens has proven to be accurate. I will not make the same mistake did with the Ambassador Stevens story. The Lt. General’s information is important and time sensitive. With his identity validated and confirmed, this is his message about the present national crisis connected to Jade Helm.

Revelations From the Lt. General

In 2012 this Lt. General  was part of a Pentagon study which studied how many military personnel would side with the government and how many could be counted upon to fire upon American citizens when ordered to do so. The 2012 Pentagon study reached the following conclusions:

1. Approximately 60% of active duty Army personal will side with the American people.
2. Eighty percent of the National Guard will not fire upon American citizens when, as the Lt. General said, “(not if Sir) but when the order is given to openly enslave the American people under Martial Law”.
3. Somewhere around 90% the Marines will side with the American people.
4. The Navy as a whole will stay out of the fight choosing to be the last line of defense against foreign intervention should the country fall into civil war. (Editor’s Note: Please refer to my previous reference to the fact that the Navy has engaged in five years of war games in order to keep most of its ships out to sea).
5. It is widely believed that in excess of 75% of the Air Force will side with the establishment.

The Lt. General also identified three emerging sides to this conflict: (1) Those that will support the establishment; (2) Those that will oppose the establishment; and, (3) Those who will not take sides but instead will choose to protect civilians, presumably friends and family.

The Establishment’s Need for Foreign Troops

In his email to me, the Lt. General stated the following with regard to Russian troops on American soil:

“There are many within the active military both officers and senior NCO’s who see what is happening and what is coming. Many more than you can possibly imagine will not follow an unconstitutional order to move against the American people, nor will they allow foreign troops to openly attack American citizens.
This would be the start of a fight these foreign forces could not possibly win as we will be fighting for our families, home, country and freedom. The Russian forces currently on American soil have no stomach for a fight with the American people, I know because I speak fluent Russian and I have met them and many of their officers, when push comes to shove they will stand down and go home. I have met President Putin and I found him to be a Nationalist, the man believes in Russia and while he is interested in expanding Russian influence and power it is because of the threat he sees from America, England and NATO not because he has designs on taking over America”.

The Lt. General’s notion that the Russians will stand down, is interesting and foreign to my previous thoughts on the subject and of all the content expressed to me in his email, this will undoubtedly prove to be the most controversial.

The Nature and Course of the Coming Civil War

During the course of the email, the Lt. General briefly summarized what he anticipated would be coming as a result of major portions of the U.S. military refusing to participate in the subjugation of the American people by force. In the email he offered the following:
“With modern antiaircraft systems (mobile and man portable) air power will be all but useless. What we will see is a ground war, city by city, street by street. Additionally what is coming will be unlike any civil war in history, it will be very personal, the government will call the Patriots forces terrorists and traitors, they will arrest, intern, torture and murder suspected terrorists families, this will result in bloody reprisals which will start a vicious cycle lasting for years”.

Conclusion

This certainly is not the future that we hope and pray that our children will build for themselves. However, I wrote something similar regarding the nature of the coming civil war almost two years ago which I am going to republish with some updated information. This is a future which I fear, and as a person who espouses nonviolence as a means to solve our differences, I am not supportive of a civil war. However, my permission will not be required when the shooting starts and when ARSOF begins citizen extractions, if they forsake their oath, the conflict will commence. In the meantime, we all need to be Oathkeepers.

Ladies and gentlemen, the worst Memorial Day photo ever
 By Dan Calabrese Full Story

I don't even know what to say about this. It's almost as if whoever runs the Democrats' Twitter account decided to take on a personal challenge of coming up with the most inappropriate photo imaginable for the day when the nation honors its war dead. It's about fallen soldiers? Ha!

What says “Memorial Day weekend” more than this?

 Follow

The Democrats 

✔@TheDemocrats

Happy Memorial Day weekend, everyone!

Michael Savage Warns Civil War is Coming to the United States

End this Tyranny
 By Guest Column----Kathleen M. Dynan   --American Freedom

Tyranny is defined in the Merriam Webster Dictionary as:  cruel and unfair treatment by people with power over others; a government in which all power belongs to one person.  Escaping the tyranny of a monarch was the reason America was founded.  Our Declaration of Independence from another country, England, states: “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”  Our forefathers fought a war to earn America’s freedom from tyranny.

Thanks to Dave Hollenbeck for this.

The Clinton Scam
The article linked below is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax free international money laundering scheme. It will probably eventually prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in US history.​

This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and repackage it to be used for your own purposes.  All tax free.  Here's how it works:

1. You create a separate foreign "charity".  In this case one in Canada.

2. Foreign oligarchs and governments, many sworn enemies of the United States, then donate to this Canadian charity.  In this case, over 1,000 did, contributing mega millions.  I'm sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian charity).

3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations and makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.

4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors.  (As the article indicates. this is not true.)

5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of this money for legitimate good works programs.  Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 10%.  Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clinton's, pay salaries to untold numbers of hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc.  Again, virtually all tax free, which means you and I are subsidizing it.

6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best accountants, somehow fails to report much of this on their tax filings.  They discover these "clerical errors" and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.

7. Net result - foreign money, much of it from enemies of the US, goes into the Clinton's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor.
This is the textbook definition of money laundering.

The linkage between these foreign donations, and favors done by the Clintons (including Hillary as Secretary of State) will be the subject of a future note from your humble correspondent.  This will extend money laundering into bribery and treason.

Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes as a principal one Frank Giustra.  Google him.  He is the guy who was central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive US uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia and Putin.  This transaction required US State Department approval, and guess who was Secretary of State when the approval was granted.  Nothing to see here.  And much of this uranium will eventually be sold to Iran, undoubtedly for peaceful purposes as Obama will of course never let Iran build a bomb.

As an aside, imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels.  That poor schlub is in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin company.  Not legal but not exactly putting US security at risk.
Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a cleverly structured way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clintons, ask yourself this:

Why did these foreign interests funnel money through a Canadian charity?
Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation?  Better yet, why not donate money directly to the people, organizations and countries in need?

This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling.  Now you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she was willing to take.  One "smoking gun" e-mail would land her in jail.
Anyway, please read. These grifters could someday be back in the White House.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/04/the_clinton_foundation_as_a_moneylaundering_scheme.html

End game between Obama and the Islamic State was always easy to discern
Obama's Policies to Empower ISIS Exposed
 By Raymond Ibrahim Full Story


For months, many Western observers have been closely following the minute-by-minute developments concerning the battle between Islamic State and coalition forces in the hopes that such data will help them discern what the future may hold.

Devvy Kidd unloads on the the battle ax known as Hillary Clinton...

TAKING DOWN HILLARY CLINTON ONCE AND FOR ALL

By: Devvy
Originally published April 11, 2015
NewsWithViews.com

I have been saying for more than a year Hillary the Hun would not run for president. Allegedly, she will make the announcement today. Bill & Hillary Clinton are committed Marxists and anyone who doesn't believe that hasn't done their homework nor do they understand the issue. For this column I will refer to Comrade Hillary as Mrs. Clinton because I know how much she hates it; sexist, empowerment and the other nonsense spewed by feminists.

Why did I believe she wouldn't run? Why on earth would anyone with her amount of political baggage, scandals and outright criminal activities subject herself to having it all dragged out in public again?

Why would Mrs. Clinton, married to a rapist and serial adulterer worth in the neighborhood of $10 - $50 million dollars (no one knows for sure because the famous duo are masters at hiding the truth) put herself through such a stressful, expensive and rigorous schedule? It's not as if she needs another paycheck.

Poor Hillary: "Clintons raked in more than $100 million in personal income since leaving the White House in 2001. The idea that they would have any trouble paying back their campaign debts or compensating themselves (regardless of what the campaign laws say) for their own money spent on the campaign is laughable. Mr. Clinton's lucrative new career is almost indistinguishable from political fund-raising -- he gives speeches and shows up in rooms where wealthy people have paid big money to spend time with him. Meanwhile, Mrs. Clinton intends to remain in the Senate and will continue to be besieged by corporations, labor unions and wealthy individuals who want to give her money."

Yes, Bill Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick. All the details and more are in my May 26, 2013, column, Hillary Rodham Clinton: Liar, Globalist Traitor; a must read.

READ MORE...

Obama’s Betrayal of America: Obama is on the side of the enemy

An Endless number of Investigations – Why? – The American Report
Declassified documents again show what everyone knows deep-down – Obama is on the side of the enemy
The crooked, deceitful, and traitorous Obama regime was again revealed on Monday to be lying about what happened in Benghazi, Libya. Documents obtained by Judicial Watch and examined by Fox News prove for all time that the administration was shipping Libyan weapons to Syrian rebels.

Note: Those are the same groups of rebels (al Qaeda, ISIS, “moderate rebels,” etc.) who are committing genocide against Christians and destroying humanity’s cultural heritage in ancient Mesopotamia.

This is also the reason why Ambassador Christopher Stevens was in Benghazi to begin with.
He was working out of a CIA annex in Benghazi, overseeing a sophisticated weapons distribution supply chain to a variety of revolutionary terrorist groups in North Africa and the Middle East.
An Endless number of Investigations – Why?
For those counting, the current Benghazi investigation is the eighth investigation on the topic.
At the core of the myriad (and stymied) investigations of Benghazi is a simple fact: the Obama administration switched sides in the war on terror, and allied the United States with the Muslim Brotherhood.
Congress, showing remarkably bad judgment, rubberstamped what Obama and Hillary demanded: arm Islamic terrorists in order to overthrow secular governments in the Middle East and North Africa.
READ MORE...

America is for the Free. The rest of the world already caters to the captives of tyrants
Why compassion for illegal immigration is wrong
 By A. Dru Kristenev Full Story

Unchecked immigration is destroying our nation by undermining and overrunning the very institution that was built to harbor immigrants through the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution...

Don't call it compassion when the president, elected officials or a candidate takes a stand that illegal immigrants deserve a pass to stay in this country and receive citizenship, let alone resident status. It is approval of America's demise; an uncontrolled decimation of what the Founders established in the new world expressly to provide free exercise of faith, industry and speech.

FROM THE INTERNET...

Dear Baltimore:

How does it feel, all that hope and change? All that blatant race baiting, all the broken promises. It's not a matter of money. That's been poured out in endless floods. It isn't Republicans. There aren't any in your city or state with positions of responsibilities. Haven't been for years if not decades.

No, this is the result of bad policy by your elected leaders. Democrats, Socialists and Communists all. No results and/or failure and you keep electing them back into office.

And now, charging the police for doing their job. Sweet. Stupid. The crime rate, sorry, the reported crime rate is sky rocketing. Law Enforcement is so afraid of being hung out to dry, they don't want to risk doing their jobs.

Worse, you've raised a generation of animals, expecting everything to be given to them. No consequence for their actions. And your leaders have promised.

Guess what. Check's due.

 A Message From Her Majesty, The Queen

As you know, my dear people, the last year for me has been an annus horribilus. The Royal House of Clinton has been tormented by questions about our handling of finances and subjected to tiresome questions about the tragic events in Benghazi–in the furthest regions of our empire. And, sadly, also questions about my Royal e-mails.

Nevertheless, I will not be daunted in my desire and commitment to serve you the people. For the next seventeen months I will be traveling among you as one of you, to listen to your deepest longings and needs. I will be with you in your Wal-Mart and beside you in your Burger Kings. I will drive with you down the busy interstate highways of our land sharing your poverty and needs with you.

How well I remember the days when the Duke of Arkansas and I were impoverished. After we were expelled from our Washington Palace we hardly had two mansions to rub together. We were so poor we had to remove thousands of dollars of china, flatware, carpets and gifts from the Washington Palace just to survive. Now, happily, benefactors from around our empire have given just enough for us to scrape by.

During those difficult times we had to cut back when our daughter was married. We only had three million dollars to spend on her wedding and I remember our hopes as she moved into her $10 million Manhattan apartment that one day she would be able to move on from that humble abode to something more fitting. So as I travel across our land to meet you all, I will be listening and sharing with you. Then when the time for the royal election comes I know you will crown me as your rightful monarch so that we can all live happily ever after.

How does a British-Kenyan citizen
with no ties to the United States
overthrow the American Republic?
What appears on the surface to be one, simple unanswered question is, in realty, several unanswered questions packaged as one. The United States Constitution outlines precisely who, and under what specific circumstances, can run for the office of President of the United States. Keep in mind, the drafting of the US Constitution began on May 25, 1787 with a quorum of members present at the Pennsylvania State House (renamed Independence Hall), and finalized on Sept. 17, 1787. Why is that germane? Because the laws enacted and enforced under the Articles of Confederation dealing with citizenship as well as the laws concerning what constituted being a natural citizen in 1787 are different than the verbiage in Article II of the Constitution that qualifies a candidate seeking office for the office he seeks. Had the Articles of Confederation remained the law of the land, Barack Obama would have been qualified to run for the office of President of the United States.

Specifically, Article II says: "No person except a natural born citizen or a citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained the age of 35 years, and been 14 years resident within the United States."

READ MORE...

Obama’s is a fairytale world of golfing, partying and holidaying while guaranteeing that the life of the masses will be an every day nightmare
Global Warming Now Responsible for Islamic Terrorism
 By Judi McLeod Full Story

President Barack Obama’s attempts to provide cover for Islamic terrorists by first declaring global warming/climate change “a national security threat” and then excusing their ongoing carnage with the absurd claim that it was global warming that set them off, must be the biggest political scam in all of human history.

THE BS NEVER STOPS...

Obama tells Coast Guard grads climate change threatens U.S

By By Roberta Rampton |

Reuters/Reuters - U.S. President Barack Obama walks through an honor cordon as the arrives for the 134th Commencement Exercises of the United States Coast Guard Academy in New London, Connecticut May 20, 2015. …more

Psychopaths in Command 

James G. Long  

Marxism is psychopathic, necessarily meaning that it is dishonest, manipulative, and controlling, and these are among Marxism's more attractive characteristics.  More

How arms got into ISIS jihadists' hands--with Clinton and Obama's full knowledge
The Benghazi-Syria Weapons Connection
 By Arnold Ahlert Full Story

The shameless lying that has formed the heart of the Obama administration's Benghazi narrative took another turn yesterday. Documents obtained by Fox News reveal that U.S. intelligence agencies were "fully aware" weapons were being moved from Benghazi to Syria before the attack on Sept. 11, 2012, that claimed the lives of ambassador Christopher Stevens,Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, and diplomat Sean Smith. The documents also put the lie to President Obama's assertion that the rise of ISIS caught the administration "by surprise."

Democrat Rep. worried about morale - because Congressmen haven't had enough pay raises
 By Robert Laurie Full Story

Out in the real world, pay increases are usually tied to performance. Do a better job, grab a better position, and make more money. It makes a lot of sense.

Liberal Academic Says America’s Founding Document Outmoded
 By Cliff Kincaid Full Story

Top Vatican adviser Jeffrey Sachs says that when Pope Francis visits the United States in September, he will directly challenge the “American idea” of God-given rights embodied in the Declaration of Independence.

Obama Green-lights Anti-Semitism 

Jonathan Keiler  

Obama is only a part of the problem. But he is an important part of the rising anti-Semitic tide.  More

Obama the Magnificent 

James Lewis 

He may get no credit at home for the vast transformation he is accomplishing, but sooner or later the Islamic world will bestow the title on him.   More

RACE IN AMERICA

BOOKER T.'S HEAVEN VS. MICHELLE O'S HELL

Exclusive: Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson asks, 'Which do you prefer, Americans?'

 JESSE LEE PETERSON 

The Obamas are “free at last” from having to face the voters again – and free to tell us what they really think.

For Barack, there’s no longer any need to hide his inner racist. And he’s no longer bashful about advocating to “spread the wealth” – Karl Marx style.

For Michelle, there’s no longer a need to run from her early statements like, “For the first time in my adult life, I’m really proud of my country (now that my husband is president).”

Michelle held nothing back at her recent commencement speech at Tuskegee University, the world-renowned institution founded by Booker T. Washington.

I was born and raised near Tuskegee, and our high-school teacher took us to visit the campus every summer. We slept in the dorms, ate in the cafeteria, and the experience made a lasting impression on me – so much so that I patterned my private school, The BOND Leadership Academy, after Tuskegee.

READ MORE...

Barack and Michelle Obama's race to the bottom
 By Jeff Crouere Full Story

As the Obama administration mercifully begins to wind toward the end of its second term, both the President and the First Lady will continue to distract from their horrible record. Their favorite distraction is to claim racial discrimination exists in this nation and it needs to be corrected through government action.