Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Ex Chrysler Dealers to Obama-- Prove Who You Say You Are

Donofrio confirms Chrysler-Dealers’ law suit
Posted on December 8th, 2009 by David-Crockett


WITH ATTORNEY STEVEN PIDGEON, FILES QUO WARRANTO ACTION IN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
by John Charlton

(Dec. 7, 2009) — The Post & Email can confirm this afternoon, that Attorneys Leo Donofrio and Steven Pidgeon are representing a group of Chrysler Automotive dealers in seeking legal redress to their loss of their franchises following the direct and unconstitutional involvement of Barack Hussein Obama in the Chrysler reorganization.

It is speculated that the action will involve a writ of quo warranto, where by Obama will be legally forced to prove that he legitimately holds office as President of the United States in accord with the requirements of Article II, section 1, paragraph 5 of the United States Constitution.


That paragraph reads,

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

The Supreme Court of the United States has on several occasions confirmed that the phrase “natural born citizen” indicates a U.S. citizen, who was born in the U.S.A. of two U.S. citizen parents. Obama, on account of having a father who was a British subject at the time of his own birth, was not, is not, and can never be a natural born citizen. He is thus unqualified to hold the office of president.

Regarding the pending action in the courts of the District of Columbia, Donofrio says that the goal of Steve Pidgeon and himself is to see the owners of the dealerships, whom they represent, “reinstated to their businesses.”

The District of Columbia is unique in the nation, for having a section of its legal code devoted to the writ of quo warranto, when employed against federal office holders who exercise their office within the District.

Attorney Donofrio is famous for his advocacy of the use of the quo warranto provisions of the D.C. Code and holds that the D.C. courts are the only proper venue for such actions against Federal officers.

For more information about the issues raised in this report, click on the tags at the bottom of this article.

1 comment:

  1. WHERE WAS EVERYBODY WHEN OBAMA WAS RUNNING FOR OFFICE??????? WAS EVERYONE LOOKING THE OTHER WAY. WHY WOULD THEY ALL WAIT UNTIL THE MAN IS IN OFFICE,AND THEN QUESTION HIS ELIGIBILITY.THE REASON I VOTED FOR HIM,WAS BECAUSE IF SOMETHING HAPPENED TO THE OTHER CANDIDATE I DID NOT WANT SARA PALIN TO BECOME PRESIDENT !!!!!! WHAT DO WE DO NOW ???????

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.