Wednesday, July 13, 2011
Congress knowingly put an ineligible candidate on the ballot in 2008. Of course, some members of Congress were “only” complicit by saying nothing; they simply ignored their oath to the Constitution to protect it from enemies, “both foreign and domestic.”
Where is the certification on this document which states that it is a "true and correct" copy of the original on file?
The following letter has been sent to my U.S. congressman and two senators along with a copy of Ron Ewart’s recent article, “Obama, You Leave Me No Choice!” I encourage all Americans concerned about the usurpation of the presidency and the underlying corruption which accomplished and enabled t to do the same.
Dear Senators and Representative,
In my so-far futile attempts to get Congress to admit the obvious, that there is a usurper, who is also an apparent criminal in several other ways, in the White House, I have been told at times that “I am entitled to my opinion.” I agree with that, of course…..,but here is the problem: Congress reacts only to the opinion which they are told is the “correct” opinion. The massive evidence my side has to back up its opinion is ignored and/or treated as if cannot be real.
One example is that the evidence of a long-form birth certificate which many experts in the field of Adobe Illustrator, document reproduction and typesetting have said is a very poor forgery is ignored by Congress, as if it did not exist. The documented forgery is accepted as real by Congress with no questions asked, even though it was presented by a regime which lies endlessly. My opinion is backed up by facts, whereas the “Obama is legitimate” opinion is accepted at face value regardless of what the regime puts out, with no evidence required. This is in spite of the regime’s proven record of lies, deceit and obfuscation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.