Monday, February 23, 2015

A storm erupted in America - especially on the left of the political spectrum - following the assertion by former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani that President Barack Hussein Obama does not love America.

The leftist-dominated media that helped bring and sustain Obama in power was unsurprisingly enraged by this strong charge brought by a man who is widely known and loved for his powerfully patriotic conduct during the 9-11 disaster in New York.

But is there a truth in what Giuliani says?

For twenty years, the young Barack Obama sat under the virulent and revolutionary anti-American teachings of his preferred pastor, Jeremy Wright, who even dared use his pulpit to shout: "God damn America." Obama never walked out to demonstrate his revulsion of such hatred, and his wife Michelle later remarked, upon his election as the first black man to the presidency: "This is the first day that I can say I love this nation."

We know from United States history that it is not a new thing that people who attained to high positions in government were later found to have used their influence to serve the very nations that were at war, or loggerheads, with America.

Alger Hiss, who acquired senior status in the State Department, is just one of many that could be mentioned here. Back then the leftist-infected media's first response to the suspicions about Hiss was to heap scorn and ridicule on the man who suggested them, Whittaker Chambers. In the end what Chambers claimed was proven true, and Hiss was found to be an agent of the Soviet Union. Before that verdict was reached, however, as Chambers tells in his book, "Witness," the press had virtually destroyed his credibility.

It is precisely this media weapon that has been turned on all who, out of true love for their American nation, have dared question Obama's loyalty to the foundational and direction-giving Judeo-Christian principles that have placed the United States in its distinctive and powerful position in our world.

Ridicule is the name of this weapon, and it is encased in this kind of outrage: "How can you be so stupid and mistaken as to insinuate that our black president is anything but a true lover and servant of those things that brought unique blessings to our land? You must be mad! How dare you?"

Derision is indeed an effective bludgeon, and it has been used ad infinitum by many of those who have helped bring Obama to his position, and who have assisted and defended him at all costs - a cost that may one day well become totally unbearable for most Americans.

For revolutionaries who have been at war with many of the very principles underpinning our exceptionally blessed America - revolutionaries who, as Obama boasted in his election speeches, want to help him "to basically transform America" - ridicule is the "most powerful weapon." So writes Saul Alinsky, one of Obama's favorite mentors, in "Rules for Radicals" - a book dedicated to Lucifer, whom the Bible describes "as the destroyer of nations.")

And let's be honest, it has worked - this ridicule by so many of the left-leaning pundits who control most our media outlets.

Whether the Fast and Furious gun-running, the debacle in Benghazi, the Internal Revenue Service's unlawful harassment of mainly conservative pro-American, pro-Israel groups and organizations, the birth certificate issue questioning where Obama was truly born - those raising these issues were treated with the same scorn as that leveled at all critical claims against the Obama presidency.

Was he indeed a Muslim, who loved ISLAM more than he loved the Americans who chose him as their president?  This suggestion, naturally, was ridiculed in exactly the same way: "How could anyone even suggest such stupidity?"  This despite the occasions when Obama - usually in the presence of other Muslims - called himself a Muslim!!!

Now, some of these reported allegations - though always denied and ridiculed by the men and women around Obama and often by doggedly faithful media outlets - are serious indeed.  Let us name some of them, and mention the possible outcomes if they were proven true.

Richard Nixon was impeached for lying and covering up his men's Watergate break-in. Unlike with Benghazi, there were no American deaths involved, yet Nixon was removed from power. His crime was far less serious than those that have been allegedly committed during Obama's presidency.

If, as has been researched and stated by many, it is eventually found to have been true that Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya and not in Hawaii, his whole presidency will have to be rendered illegal, his oath at his Supreme Court inauguration as president a fallacy - for as both men must have known, while swearing to faithfully uphold the US constitution, he trespassed it by belying his place of birth on the very day of his oath!!

When Donald Trump, one of the few courageous men who challenged Obama and dared him to prove his place of birth, offering him five million dollars if he could, the American president ridiculed Trump and it worked!! That the "original" birth certificate later released by Obama's White House was definitely a forgery was brilliantly by (among others) the eminent lawyer Richard R. Silverlieb. Here is his account:

For all you "anti-Fox News" folks, none of this information came from Fox. All of it can be verified from legitimate sources (Wikipedia, the Kapiolani hospital website itself, and a good history book, as noted herein). It is very easy for someone to check out.
 Four Simple Questions: 
1.  Back in 1961, people of color were called 'Negroes.' So how can the Obama 'birth certificate' state he is "African-American" when the term wasn't even used at that time?

2.  The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961 and lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right?  At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in "Kenya , East Africa," This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate". Check it out > &

3.  On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital". This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home", respectively. The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978? CHECK IT OUT: http://http/http/ (

Why hasn't this been discussed in the major media ?

4.  Perhaps a clue comes from Obama's book on his father. He states how proud he is of his father fighting in WW II. I'm not a math genius, so I may need some help from you. Barack Obama's "birth certificate" says his father was 25 years old in 1961 when Obama was born. That should have put his father's date of birth approximately 1936-if my math holds (Honest! I did that without a calculator!!!) Now we need a non-revised history book-one that hasn't been altered to satisfy the author's goals-to verify that WW II was basically between 1939 and 1945. Just how many 3 year olds fight in Wars? Even in the latest stages of WW II his father wouldn't have been more than 9 years old.

Does that mean that Mr. Obama is a liar, or simply chooses to alter the facts to satisfy his imagination or political purposes?

Very truly yours,
Livingston , NJ 07039

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.