Thursday, January 27, 2011
...from the blogosphere...
“heard repeated rumors/confirmations of attempted “purge” coming down the pike. WH/media going on the offensive bigtime on issue. …Talking very specific, very confrontational, very scary stuff here.”
“purge”? Let me see if I got this right. Robert “Bagdad Bob” Gibbs says that “birthers” are irrational? As Peter Boyles points out, birthers are people who examine this issue, in which a document no one has seen is purported to exist but cannot be found and so are told to “believe” what they are told, but instead argue that to believe in something they have never seen and cannot be confirmed would be irrational. What is rational is now “irrational”. We are dealing with a true CULT FIGURE.
So now there is a threat of a “purge”, which can only mean an attempt to silence the opposition by force. Which means, naturally, that the President intends to attack the few bulldog members of the media who refuse to release the pant leg they’ve bitten.
This is the worst idea they have had yet. It will only inflame the opposition and confirm that there is something serious there.
Analyze this carefully: IF Obama was born in Hawaii, which is likely, then why hide the birth certificate? If he was not born in a hospital, there should still be one available. But it can’t be found. Yet we have been told none of them were destroyed or lost when they switched to electronic records. Gov. Abercrombie says there is a “record” of O’s birth in the archives–but no B.C.
Could it be that Operatives secretly destroyed it? Could there be something there they had to hide?
Then what about the college records? What about his passport records? By the age of 5 or 6 six he was living in Indonesia with Mr. Soetero…
Could it be that at the time of his birth they registered Obama as a Kenyan citizen? Or with dual citizenship? Entirely possible, even likely.
And when he returned to study, he could easily have come as a foreign student, so as an adult he might have mascaraded as an Indonesian or Kenyan to get grants. If so, would he still be a “natural born citizen”?
“purge”? Let me see if I got this right. Robert “Bagdad Bob” Gibbs says that “birthers” are irrational? As Peter Boyles points out, birthers are people who examine this issue, in which a document no one has seen is purported to exist but cannot be found and so are told to “believe” what they are told, but instead argue that to believe in something they have never seen and cannot be confirmed would be irrational. What is rational is now “irrational”. We are dealing with a true CULT FIGURE.
So now there is a threat of a “purge”, which can only mean an attempt to silence the opposition by force. Which means, naturally, that the President intends to attack the few bulldog members of the media who refuse to release the pant leg they’ve bitten.
This is the worst idea they have had yet. It will only inflame the opposition and confirm that there is something serious there.
Analyze this carefully: IF Obama was born in Hawaii, which is likely, then why hide the birth certificate? If he was not born in a hospital, there should still be one available. But it can’t be found. Yet we have been told none of them were destroyed or lost when they switched to electronic records. Gov. Abercrombie says there is a “record” of O’s birth in the archives–but no B.C.
Could it be that Operatives secretly destroyed it? Could there be something there they had to hide?
Then what about the college records? What about his passport records? By the age of 5 or 6 six he was living in Indonesia with Mr. Soetero…
Could it be that at the time of his birth they registered Obama as a Kenyan citizen? Or with dual citizenship? Entirely possible, even likely.
And when he returned to study, he could easily have come as a foreign student, so as an adult he might have mascaraded as an Indonesian or Kenyan to get grants. If so, would he still be a “natural born citizen”?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.