A ‘Verification’ is ‘Certification’

10 Jan obamasgarden.wordpress.com

I know many people closely follow the legal cases pertaining to the eligibility issue, so I am looking for someone with information on the vital record ‘verifications’ requested and obtained by the many attorneys handling these type cases..if they exist, that is.

Please contact me if you can direct me to the ‘verifications’ issued to relevant attorneys directly by the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH), that would have and should have been obtained for their use in building their legal arguments and/or client’s defense. Truth be told, I have been wrapped up with my own investigation of the use of the UIPA to obtain records and have never taken the opportunity to follow the cases closely enough to know whether or not any trusted attorney fulfilled their obligation to obtain the evidence and facts offered to them by law. To my knowledge, they have not. If my understanding is correct, I admit that I am both perplexed and outraged. I hope that after reading the following explanation of a ‘verification,’ you will join me insisting that any attorney handling an eligibility case in the future, first obtain a ‘verification’ in preparation of their case. (And that it be physically submitted in a legal proceeding as proof of it’s legal veracity.) However, I hope that people do have the information to prove my understanding is wholly incorrect and that ‘verifications’ have been obtained.
According to the HDOH and vital records law, a ‘verification’ is ‘certification’ of any vital event fact included in an application. An attorney is able to apply for a ‘verification’/'certification’ on the same application used to request a certified copy by writing ‘verification’ on the line provided for ‘OTHER.’ Instructions can be found on the HDOH website. An archived application that specifies a request for ‘verification’ can be downloaded here. If you have the contact information, please see that the relevant attorneys have this information and that they know you want them to use it. Please insist they use it to all its potential.
A ‘verification’/'certification’ would be evidence to the authenticity and validity of the alleged ‘certification’ photographed by Factcheck.org. In fact, an application ideally should include a request that the HDOH verify issuing a certified copy of Obama’s alleged birth certificate on June 6, 2007.
Can anyone tell me if Orly Taitz has ever obtained a ‘verification?’ Can anyone tell me if Leo Donofrio ever obtained a ‘verification’? Did Lt. Col. Lakin’s attorneys request a ‘verification’ from the Hawaii Department of Health? Has any trusted attorney ever applied for or obtained a ‘verification’ for use in their case or building their client’s defense?
Much like Obama’s alleged ‘certification’ photographed by Factcheck.org, any attorney handling one of the eligibility cases is eligible to receive a similar, but authentic, record directly from the HDOH. In their application for a ‘verification,’ an attorney might ask that the HDOH verify every fact listed on Obama’s alleged COLB, or they may ask that the HDOH verify the existence of a ‘late birth certificate’ or an ‘amended birth certificate’ or any fact pertaining to the vital records in question. Any. Fact.
Moreover, an attorney might not be able to ask if Obama has a ‘late birth certificate’ or whether he has one, but an attorney would be able to ask that the HDOH verify that he does have one or the other. If Obama does not, the application for a ‘verification’ would simply be rejected and a new one prepared and submitted by the attorney. However, if Obama does have a late and/or amended birth certificate, those facts would be verified on the ‘certification.’
I make this request to you because I am currently drafting a post which will serve as an overview for a series of articles to come. I intend to publish this overview and series of posts in order to outline the many laws which authorize the disclosure of Obama’s vital records – in part, or in full – to the public, to the Congress, to the attorneys handling related cases. This overview and the series to follow will detail how the Constitutional rights of the public have been utterly violated and disregarded to favor one man: Barrack Obama. I intend to publish proof of these violations and indications of further violations to come which I hope will inspire people to take action. It’s imperative that you recognize your rights and you stand up for them. It’s imperative that we not be intimidated.
Through the dark, I see an opportunity. I hope you will see it, too, because I need your help. These will be the most important posts I write, so please consider them carefully.
In order to complete my overview on how our Constitutional rights to due process and equal protection under the law have been utterly violated, again and again, and how the public has been deceived and our trust broken by government workers in Hawaii, by the Congress and by attorneys; I am hoping to ascertain whether ANY attorney followed through on this very basic legal offer of obtaining a ‘verification’/'certification’ of ANY birth fact pertaining to Barrack Obama directly from the HDOH. In order to serve their legal arguments and their clients to the best of their ability and to build a proper case, it stands to reason that an attorney would not simply ‘hope for’ or ‘bank on’ being granted a ‘court order’ by a judge to obtain a certified copy of Obama’s vital records; but would, at the very least, obtain the legal evidence offered to them directly by the HDOH….for $5.
It stands to reason that a ‘verification’/'certification’ is better evidence and more useful in a legal proceeding than evidence that has been Twittered, posted online by Factcheck.org and Googled. No? All the proof that Obama has to offer is an image of a ‘certification.’
Anyone with knowledge of an existing ‘verification’/'certification’ obtained by an attorney in any of the available court filings online, please contact me using the link above.

For more information, below are relevant excerpts from the Hawaii vital records laws which define a ‘verification’ and outline the relevant qualifications required in order to obtain one [emphasis mine]:
HRS§338-14.3 Verification in lieu of a certified copy.
(a) Subject to the requirements of section 338-18 [below], the department of health, upon request, shall furnish to any applicant, in lieu of the issuance of a certified copy, a verification of the existence of a certificate and any other information that the applicant provides to be verified relating to the vital event that pertains to the certificate.
(b) A verification shall be considered for all purposes certification that the vital event did occur and that the facts of the event are as stated by the applicant.
(c) Verification may be made in written, electronic, or other form approved by the director of health.
HRS§338-18 Disclosure of records.
(g) The department shall not issue a verification in lieu of a certified copy of any such record, or any part thereof, unless it is satisfied that the applicant requesting a verification is:
(4) A private or government attorney who seeks to confirm information about a vital event relating to any such record which was acquired during the course of or for purposes of legal proceedings

**LET ME BE CLEAR, OBTAINING A ‘VERIFICATION’ IS NOT DEPENDENT ON ‘DISCOVERY’ OR WHETHER THE ‘VERIFICATION’ IS ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE OR NOT. A ‘VERIFICATION’ CAN SIMPLY BE REQUESTED IN ORDER FOR AN ATTORNEY TO PROPERLY PREPARE & RESEARCH THEIR CASE.**

__________________

An example of a ‘certification’ for official use can be found on page 6 of this pdf available for download from the Hawaii government website: http://hawaii.gov/dhs/quicklinks/peter_boy/pbkjr_vol5_p32.pdf